The Impact of Indocyanine Green Angiography on Fat Necrosis in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) is a widely known reliable option for autologous breast reconstruction. One common complication of DIEP procedures is fat necrosis. Consequences of fat necrosis include wound healing complications, pain, infection, and the psychological distress of possible cancerous recurrence. Clinical judgment alone is an imperfect method to detect at-risk segments of adipose tissue. Objective methods to assess perfusion may improve fat necrosis complication rates, reducing additional surgeries to exclude cancer and improve cosmesis for patients. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent analysis of DIEP flap vascularity with or without intraoperative indocyanine green angiography (ICGA). Flap perfusion was assessed using intravenous ICGA and was quantified with both relative and absolute value units of fluorescence. Tissue with observed values less than 25% to 30% relative value units was resected. Postoperative outcomes and fat necrosis incidence were collected. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-five DIEP flaps were included in the study, 187 (52.7%) of which were assessed intraoperatively with ICGA. Thirty-nine patients (10.9%) experienced operable fat necrosis. No statistically significant difference in incidence of postoperative fat necrosis was found between the 2 groups (P = 0.732). However, a statistically significant relationship was found between fat necrosis incidence and body mass index as both a continuum (P = 0.001) and when categorized as greater than 35 (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Although ICGA is useful for a variety of plastic surgery procedures, our retrospective review did not show a reduction in operable fat necrosis when using this technology.

Decreasing Opioid Prescriptions in Women Undergoing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Florida enacted legislation limiting opioid prescriptions and affecting the management of acute pain in the postoperative patient. Patients in a reconstructive surgery practice were receiving prescriptions for opioids as their primary method of pain management. Clinic providers identified a need to limit opioid prescriptions. AIM: The aim of this quality improvement initiative was to decrease the number of opioids prescribed while effectively managing pain in women undergoing mastectomy and breast tissue expander placement. DESIGN: This is a quality improvement project. METHODS: The Model for Improvement was used as a framework for this project. An evidence-based pain management plan was developed after a review of the breast reconstruction surgery literature. The plan incorporated preoperative patient and family education and the standard use of preemptive analgesia, intraoperative nerve blocks, and postoperative multimodal analgesia in all patients undergoing mastectomy with breast tissue expander placement. Patient and family education and perioperative pain management were provided to patients, and the number of opioid tablets prescribed was tracked. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and August 2019, the average number of opioid tablets prescribed per patient decreased from 84.7 to 8.4. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid prescriptions can be decreased in women undergoing breast reconstruction with the use of patient education and multimodal analgesia.

Vertical Profunda Artery Perforator Flap for Plantar Foot Wound Closure: A New Application.

BACKGROUND: Plantar foot reconstruction requires special consideration of both form and function. There are several fasciocutaneous flap options, each with indications and reservations. CASE STUDY: This case presents a new application of the vertical profunda artery perforator flap for definitive closure of a neuropathic foot ulcer in a young woman with spina bifida. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the flap survived completely. The surgical and donor sites were without wound recurrence at 5-month follow-up. DISCUSSION: Understanding the variability of foot flap options is important because of unique cases such as the one presented where the wound was caused by specific and less commonly observed foot anatomy. The specific choice to use the vertical profunda artery perforator flap for this patient and her neuropathic wound type was made based on its excellent flexibility, durability, and donor site appeal. CONCLUSIONS: The vertical profunda artery perforator flap has adequate surface area and bulk and a favorable pedicle length and caliber, can be thinned, and leaves a donor scar in a less conspicuous area than other popular free flaps for lower-extremity reconstruction. For these reasons, it should be considered a first-line therapy for free flap coverage of selected foot wounds.

Avoiding Facial Incisions with Midface Free Tissue Transfer.

BACKGROUND: We have adopted an intraoral microsurgical anastomosis to the facial vessels to eliminate the need for any visible facial incisions. METHODS: Cadaveric dissection was used to demonstrate accessibility of the facial artery and vein through an intraoral approach. Additionally, 5 patients underwent free tissue transfer for reconstruction of major defects of the midface through an intraoral, transmucosal approach, obviating the need for visible skin incisions. RESULTS: The pathology included palatal defects due to mucoepidermoid carcinoma and ischemic necrosis from cocaine abuse, maxillary defects secondary to fibrous dysplasia and avascular necrosis from traumatic blast injury, and a residual posttraumatic bony deformity of the zygoma. Reconstructions were performed with a free ulnar forearm flap, a free vastus lateralis muscle flap, a deep circumflex iliac artery myoosseous flap, a free fibula flap, and a deep circumflex iliac artery osseous flap, respectively. The facial artery and vein were used as recipient vessels for microvascular anastomosis for all cases. Mean follow-up was 12.2 months. All free tissue transfers were successful, and each patient had a satisfactory aesthetic outcome with no associated facial scars. CONCLUSION: This technique can be employed during reconstruction of an array of bony or soft-tissue midface deficits with minimal morbidity. This small series effectively demonstrates the varied pathologies and tissue deficiencies that can be successfully reconstructed with free tissue transfer using an entirely intraoral approach to the recipient facial vessels, resulting in no visible scars on the face and an improvement in the overall aesthetic outcome.

The Profunda Artery Perforator Flap Experience for Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The profunda artery perforator flap was first introduced for breast reconstruction in 2010. In this article, the authors analyze the results of all profunda artery perforator flaps performed by their group to date. METHODS: A retrospective review was completed of consecutive profunda artery perforator flaps performed by the senior author (R.J.A.) from 2010 to 2014. Patient demographics, indications, operative techniques, flap specifics, complications, and number of operations were recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients have undergone 164 profunda artery perforator flap operations for breast reconstruction since 2010. Reconstructions were performed following breast cancer management (59.5 percent), following prophylactic mastectomy for cancer risk reduction (35.7 percent), and for congenital breast deformity (4.8 percent). The average age of the patients was 48 years (range, 24 to 64 years) and their average body mass index was 22.5 kg/m. Average flap weight was 367.4 g and average pedicle length was found to be 10.2 cm. The success rate of the profunda artery perforator flap was greater than 99 percent, with a 3 percent take-back rate and only one flap loss recorded. Complications included hematoma (1.9 percent), seroma (6 percent), fat necrosis (7 percent), and donor-site infection (1.9 percent). CONCLUSIONS: The profunda artery perforator flap is an excellent option for breast reconstruction. Advantages include a reliable blood supply, long pedicle, thick donor tissue, and a favorable donor site. Currently, the profunda artery perforator flap is second only to the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator among flaps used by the authors for breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Expanding the Applications of the Profunda Artery Perforator Flap.

BACKGROUND: The profunda artery perforator free flap has not gained traction for nonbreast reconstruction, likely because of the presence of a proven workhorse in the anterolateral thigh flap. The authors believe that the profunda artery perforator flap offers similar coverage characteristics with the benefits of a medial donor site, a more consistent anatomy, and relatively easy dissection. The authors review their indications, technique, and outcomes in seven patients requiring eight free flap reconstructions. METHODS: The authors applied the use of the vertically oriented profunda artery perforator flap to both lower extremity and head and neck reconstructions in which an anterolateral thigh flap would normally have been used. Details reviewed include soft-tissue defect, perforator location, flap size, recipient vessel, and complications. RESULTS: Eight soft-tissue defects were covered with a vertically oriented profunda artery perforator flap in seven patients. Six reconstructions were for distal lower extremity and two were for head and neck reconstruction, both trauma and oncologic reconstructions. Flap sizes ranged from 40 to 92 cm. The pedicle length ranged from 7 to 10 cm. There were no partial or complete flap losses. One complication of seroma at the donor site requiring washout and closure was encountered. CONCLUSIONS: The profunda artery perforator flap is a safe and effective option for perforator-based free flap reconstruction with relative ease of harvest and an inconspicuous donor site. This flap offers an excellent alternative to the anterolateral thigh flap. In certain patient demographics, the profunda artery perforator flap should be considered as a primary option. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Four-flap Breast Reconstruction: Bilateral Stacked DIEP and PAP Flaps.

BACKGROUND: In cases of bilateral breast reconstruction when the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap alone does not provide sufficient volume for body-specific reconstruction, stacking each DIEP flap with a second free flap will deliver added volume and maintain a purely autologous reconstruction. Stacking the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap with the DIEP flap offers favorable aesthetics and ideal operative efficiency. We present the indications, technique, and outcomes of our experience with 4-flap breast reconstruction using stacked DIEP/PAP flaps. METHODS: The authors performed 4-flap DIEP/PAP breast reconstruction in 20 patients who required bilateral reconstruction without adequate single donor flap volume. The timing of reconstruction, average mastectomy/flap weights, and operative time are reported. Complications reviewed include fat necrosis, dehiscence, hematoma, seroma, mastectomy flap necrosis, and flap loss. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent 4-flap DIEP/PAP breast reconstruction. Surgical time averaged 7 hours and 20 minutes. The primary recipient vessels were the antegrade and retrograde internal mammary vessels. No flap losses occurred. Complications included 1 hematoma, 1 incidence of arterial and venous thrombosis successfully treated with anastomotic revision, 1 incidence of thigh donor site dehiscence, and 3 episodes of minor mastectomy skin flap necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Four-flap breast reconstruction is a favorable autologous reconstructive option for patients requiring bilateral reconstruction without adequate single donor flap volume. Stacking DIEP/PAP flaps as described is both safe and efficient. Furthermore, this combination provides superior aesthetics mirroring the natural geometry of the breast. Bilateral stacked DIEP/PAP flaps represent our first choice for breast reconstruction in this patient population.