RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a serious complication that usually occurs at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D). However, the prevalence of DKA at diagnosis of T1D is heterogeneous in different regions of the world. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of DKA at diagnosis of T1D in Asturias. METHODS: This study included all patients under nineteen years of age diagnosed with T1D in Asturias between 2011 and 2020. Retrospective review of medical records was performed to analyse DKA and other characteristics at diagnosis. A log binary regression model was constructed to obtain an estimate of the prevalence ratio of DKA to diagnosis in the years studied. RESULTS: A total of 267 people were diagnosed with a mean age of 9.85±4.46 years. The prevalence of DKA at diagnosis during this period was 38.63%. There was an increasing trend, with a prevalence ratio over the years studied of 1.015 (95%CI: 0.96-1.07; p=0.61). Duration of symptoms before diagnosis was 4.57±7.64 weeks. Weight loss was 7.56±7.26%, being more than 10% of previous weight in almost half of the patients who loosed weight. There was a positive relationship between symptoms duration and prevalence of DKA and between time to diagnosis and weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: Asturias has a high prevalence of DKA at diagnosis of T1D, slightly higher than observed in other studies at national level and higher than in other similar countries, with a tendency to increase. Delayed diagnosis is a key factor in the prevalence of DKA and weight loss. Thus, health actions are needed for the early detection of T1D to avoid DKA at diagnosis.
OBJETIVO: La cetoacidosis diabética (CAD) es una complicación grave que puede producirse al diagnóstico de la diabetes mellitus tipo 1 (DM1). La prevalencia de CAD al diagnóstico de DM1 es desigual en las distintas regiones del mundo. El objetivo de este estudio fue conocer la prevalencia de CAD al diagnóstico de DM1 en Asturias. METODOS: Se incluyeron los pacientes menores de diecinueve años diagnosticados de DM1 en Asturias entre 2011 y 2020. Mediante revisión de historia clínica se analizó la prevalencia de CAD así como otras características al diagnóstico. Se construyó un modelo de regresión log binaria para obtener una estimación de la razón de prevalencia de CAD al diagnóstico en los años estudiados. RESULTADOS: Se diagnosticaron 267 personas con edad media de 9,85±4,46 años. La prevalencia de CAD al diagnóstico fue del 38,63%. Se apreció una tendencia al aumento, con una razón de prevalencia en los años estudiados de 1,015 (IC95%:0,96-1,07; p=0,61). La duración de los síntomas hasta el diagnóstico fue de 4,57±7,64 semanas. La pérdida de peso fue de 7,56±7,26%, siendo superior al 10% en casi la mitad de los pacientes que perdieron peso. Se apreció relación entre la duración de los síntomas y la prevalencia de CAD, y entre el tiempo de evolución y la pérdida de peso. CONCLUSIONES: Asturias presenta una alta prevalencia de CAD al diagnóstico de DM1, levemente superior a otros estudios a nivel nacional y superior a otros países de nuestro entorno, con tendencia al aumento. El retraso diagnóstico es clave en la prevalencia de CAD y en la pérdida de peso. Son necesarias actuaciones sanitarias para la detección precoz de la DM1.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Humanos , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , España , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prevalencia , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is one of the most common chronic diseases in childhood. An increased incidence of T1DM has recently been noted in children under 15 years of age, and especially in the younger group. The purpose of this study was to know the incidence of T1DM in Asturias and its characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Children and young adults under 40 years of age living in Asturias and diagnosed with T1DM in public and private centers from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2011, were included in the study. Information collected included age, sex, date of diagnosis, initial symptoms, and biochemical parameters of the disease. RESULTS: A total of 436 patients were diagnosed, of whom 59.63% were males; 169 were younger than 15 years, 56.8% of them males. The age-adjusted overall incidence rate (IR) in Asturias of people diagnosed with diabetes before 40 years of age during this period was 9.45/100.000 population/year (95% CI: 8.58-10.38), 11.07 in males (95% CI: 9.77-12.50) and 7.77 in females (95% CI: 6,66-9,00). In subjects under 30 years of age, IR rate was 10.82 (95% CI: 9.67-12.07), 11.91 in males (95% CI: 10.23-13.78) and 7.61 in females (95% CI: 6,25-9.17). The IR in subjects younger than 15 years of age was 15.60 (95% CI: 13.33-18.13), 17.24/100,000 population/year (95% CI: 13.97-21.06) in males and 13, 86 (95% CI: 10.86-17.42) in females. Estimated IR adjusted by age group in children under 15 years of age was 9.58 (95% CI: 6.64-13.39) in those aged 0-4 years, 18.25 in those aged 5-9 years (95% CI: 14.06-23.31), and 18.78 (95% CI: 14.67-23.69) between 10 and 14 years of age. IR remained stable in virtually all age groups and in both sexes, except in girls under 4 years of age, who showed a significant upward trend. There were significant differences in incidence between the central area of Asturias, predominantly urban, and the peripheral areas, mainly devoted to farming and livestock breeding. Thus, while IR in Mieres was 8/100,000/year, in Jarrio reached 25.6/100,000/year. CONCLUSION: In Asturias, incidence of T1DM in children and young adults is similar to that of the surrounding communities, but lower than the average in Spain. It has remained stable in recent years, except in the younger girls (in whom it has increased), and shows a great geographical variability between the center of the region and the periphery.
