The orthopaedic and traumatology scenario during Covid-19 outbreak in Italy: chronicles of a silent war.

BACKGROUND: From February 21, the day of hospitalisation in ICU of the first diagnosed case of Covid-19, the social situation and the hospitals' organisation throughout Italy dramatically changed. METHODS: The CIO (Club Italiano dell'Osteosintesi) is an Italian society devoted to the study of traumatology that counts members spread in public and private hospitals throughout the country. Fifteen members of the CIO, Chairmen of 15 Orthopaedic and Trauma Units of level 1 or 2 trauma centres in Italy, have been involved in the study. They were asked to record data about surgical, outpatients clinics and ER activity from the 23rd of February to the 4th of April 2020. The data collected were compared with the data of the same timeframe of the previous year (2019). RESULTS: Comparing with last year, overall outpatient activity reduced up to 75%, overall Emergency Room (ER) trauma consultations up to 71%, elective surgical activity reduced up to 100% within two weeks and trauma surgery excluding femoral neck fractures up to 50%. The surgical treatment of femoral neck fractures showed a stable reduction from 15 to 20% without a significant variation during the timeframe. CONCLUSIONS: Covid-19 outbreak showed a tremendous impact on all orthopaedic trauma activities throughout the country except for the surgical treatment of femoral neck fractures, which, although reduced, did not change in percentage within the analysed timeframe.

Non-unions.

Non-union of long bones is a significant consequence of fracture treatment. Bone regeneration is a complex physiological process of bone formation which can be seen during normal fracture healing. An improved understanding of the molecular and cellular events that occur during bone repair and remodelling has led to the development of biologic agents that can augment the biological microenvironment and enhance bone repair. Currently, there are different strategies to augment the impaired or "insufficient" bone-regeneration process, including the "gold standard" autologous bone graft, free fibula vascularised graft, allograft implantation, and use of growth factors, osteoconductive scaffolds, osteoprogenitor cells and distraction osteogenesis. A lack of standardized outcome measures for comparison of biologic agents in clinical fracture repair trials, frequent off-label use and a limited understanding of the biological activity of these agents at the bone repair site have limited their efficacy in clinical applications.

Proximal femoral fractures in elderly people: time to surgery. The experience of Milan's "ASST Pini/CTO".

Proximal femoral fractures in elderly patients represent a rapidly increasing socio-economic problem. The functional recovery and the mortality rate are influenced by a substantial quantity of variables, including the waiting time for surgical treatment ("time to surgery"). This study aims at investigating the average waiting time, and ascertaining the causes and effects, together with other non-modifiable variables, on the outcome for patients admitted to Milan's Istituto Ortopedico Gaetano Pini (Gaetano Pini Orthopaedic Institute) with a proximal femoral fracture. Data have been collected from 234 patients, between May and November 2015. Parameters recorded and analysed included fracture type, presence of comorbidities (Charlson Index (CCI)), the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) score, day of the week presenting to hospital, the type of treatment received, the functional recovery, and the patient's condition on discharge. In 46.4% of cases, the duration of preoperative stay prior to surgery was found to be in line with what is recommended in the literature (<48 h). In 20% of cases, the time to surgery was found to exceed 96 hours. The data collected that pertain to the distribution of the sample and the comorbidities were shown to be in line with the literature. A statistical significant difference was found between day of the week that the patient was admitted to hospital and the waiting time for surgery.

Treatment of an atrophic clavicle non-union with the chamber induction technique: a case report.

The gold standard technique for treating non-union of the clavicle is based on corticocancellous bone graft harvested from the iliac crest and fixation with a plate. In cases of large clavicular defects, this surgical procedure becomes ineffective and only a complex bone reconstruction can be considered. In the herein study we report on a clavicular non-union which was associated with a 4cm bone defect that was managed successfully with optimum fixation and the Chamber Induction Technique (C.I.T)-formation of the masquelet membrane- and subsequent biological augmentation with a composite bone graft.

Reconstruction of patellar tendon following implantation of proximal tibia megaprosthesis for the treatment of post-traumatic septic bone defects.

INTRODUCTION: Latest advances made in joint replacement implants allows reconstruction of entire limbs. These special prostheses or megaprostheses were originally designed for the treatment of severe oncological bone loss. Nowadays, however, the indications and applications of these devices are expanding to other orthopaedic and trauma clinical conditions. Since 2008 we have implanted 152 megaprostheses in non-oncological conditions: 87 were implanted for post-traumatic failures aseptic/septic (represented by complex non-unions and critical size bone defects); 26 total femur, 52 distal femur and 9 proximal tibia. In this group of patients bone and soft tissues conditions are completely different compared to patients with oncological back ground. The presence of infection and previous surgeries can lead to adhesion, scar interference, muscular and tendon impairment and skin problems that lead to reduced function and severe joint stiffness. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of treatment of reconstruction of patellar tendon during implantation of proximal tibia megaprosthesis for the treatment of septic post traumatic critical bone defects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 9 patients treated with proximal tibia megaprosthesis who underwent patellar tendon reconstruction. All patients presented a complete patellar tendon disruption at the time of prosthesis implantation. Procedures of reconstruction included a tendon-plasty of quadriceps and/or patellar tendons, a pie crusting of quadriceps fascia, a reinforcement of the apparatus with synthetic tendon graft substitutes (LARS) and a medial gastrocnemius muscular flap to reconstruct the extensor mechanism and obtain skin coverage when needed. The average follow up was 18 months (9-36). For each of the cases, we analysed the complications occurred regarding septic recurrence, patellar fracture, quadriceps and patellar tendon rupture and number of reinterventions. The clinical outcome was assessed by the WOMAC Score. RESULTS: In all cases there was no infection recurrence or skin related problems. None of the patients require prosthesis revision due to loosening or device failure. No patellar fracture or quadriceps tendon failure was recorded. One patient presented a rupture of the reconstructed patellar tendon due to a trauma incident 18 months after the implantation and he required revision surgery. From a clinical point of view the average WOMAC score was 62.4 at 1 month rising to 72.6 at 3 months, 78.2 at 6 months, 76.4 at 1 year and 74.8 at 18 months. CONCLUSION: When proximal tibia megaprosthesis is implanted and there are soft tissue and patellar tendon deficiency, soft tissue reconstruction can be achieved by appropriate lengthening of the tendon and a gastrocnemius flap reinforced by LARS. Such an approach allows restoration of the extensor mechanism and coverage of the prosthesis in an area where skin problems are frequently very common.

Clinical effectiveness of Osigraft in long-bones non-unions.

Current evidence, based primarily on case series, suggest that the eptotermin alfa (recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-7 (rhBM-7)), which is commercialized as Osigraft with an indication for tibial non-union, used in monotherapy or polytherapy, is a safe and effective therapy for long bones non-unions of lower and upper limbs. No previous study has compared the safety and the efficacy of Osigraft and the "gold standard" treatment for recalcitrant long-bones non-union, autologous bone graft (ABG). This study aims to compare the effectiveness of Osigraft and ABG in the treatment of post-traumatic, persistent long bone non-unions. In particular, the present study will focus exclusively on complex persistent non-unions, excluding simpler cases, in which it is likely that a simple revision of the osteosynthesis will be sufficient to promote union, and extremely severe cases in which there is an indication for amputation and prosthesis. The study addresses the following research question: 1. Is the effectiveness of eptotermin alfa comparable to that of ABG in the treatment of complex long bone non-unions? 2. Are there significant differences in the prevalence of adverse events between patients treated with eptotermin alfa and those treated with ABG? The study is an observational, retrospective study, located in one Experimental Recruiting Center (Ospedale Universitario G. PINI - Milano). The study was conducted with ethics approval and according with the existing Italian law. Demographic and clinical data were collected from patients Clinical Medical Records and other existing documentation, through a web based eCRF. The treatment (surgery with Osigraft or ABG) effectiveness was evaluated comparing the number of success cases (primary endpoint) and the length for clinical and radiological healing (secondary end-points). The treatment safety was evaluating comparing the prevalence of Adverse Events. Osigraft was demonstrated to be statistically equivalent to ABG with respect to the primary and secondary end point of surgical success. The treatment success was statistically comparable across all the anatomical regions considered, both in patients treated with Osigraft and in patients treated with ABG. The use of Osigraft when compared to autograft was associated with statistically lower intraoperative blood loss and shorter operative times. In addition patients treated with Osigraft developed statistically less peri-operative and late onset adverse events, compared to ABG. The difference was substantially due to the occurrence of pain at donor site in patients treated with ABG.