Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Transplant ; 38(7): e15408, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39044662

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pretransplant infection screening (IS) of potential organ recipients is essential to optimal outcome of solid organ transplantation (SOT). METHODS: A pre-post study was performed during 2020-2023 to investigate the impact of the STREAM (Solid organ TRansplant stEwArdship and Multidisciplinary approach) intervention to improve IS in SOT. The intervention, performed in 2022, included the implementation of IS through educational meetings, local guidelines, and the availability of a digital screening tool. The objective of the study was the assessment of IS completion, including a list of 17 laboratory tests and the investigation of vaccination status. The reduction of unnecessary tests was also analyzed. The test of proportions and a multilevel multivariate Poisson regression model were used to compare IS completion before and after STREAM. infectious diseases (ID) consultation and urgent evaluation were investigated as predictors of IS completion. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients were enrolled, including liver (44%), heart (32%), and kidney (24%) transplant candidates. Mean age was 56 ± 11 years, and most patients (77%) were males. Ninety-five (56%) patients were included before the intervention and 76 (44%) after STREAM. IS completion increased after STREAM (IRR 1.41, p < 0.001) with significant improvement recorded for seven (39%) IS items. Unnecessary tests decreased by 43% after the intervention. ID consultation (IRR 1.13, p = 0.02) and urgent evaluation (p = 0.68, p < 0.001) were predictors of IS improvement. CONCLUSIONS: STREAM was successful in improving IS completion. Further research is needed to investigate the impact of this intervention on posttransplant infections.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Órganos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pronóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Infecciones/diagnóstico , Infecciones/etiología , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano , Enfermedades Transmisibles/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Transmisibles/etiología , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Adulto
2.
G Ital Cardiol (Rome) ; 25(7): 491-498, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38916464

RESUMEN

Every year, approximately 5 out of 1000 patients receive a diagnosis of advanced heart failure, with a prevalence of 1-2% in the adult population. This figure is likely underestimated, considering undiagnosed cases. Despite significant progress in medical therapy for heart failure, mortality rates persist around 20% within the first year, reaching 50-60% at 5 years from the initial diagnosis. For patients with severe end-stage heart failure, the 1-year mortality rate can reach up to 70%. Heart transplantation remains the preferred treatment for terminal stages of the disease; however, the significant challenge lies in the mismatch between available donors and recipients. Given this dilemma, both short-term solutions including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and long-term options such as left ventricular assist devices have gained prominence. These mechanical circulatory support systems become crucial for patients in critical conditions, temporarily ineligible for heart transplantation, such as those with severe irreversible pulmonary hypertension or acute organ failure. Despite these advancements, a growing number of patients on the waiting list develops severe biventricular dysfunction, precluding the use of a left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant. In such cases, a total artificial heart emerges as a viable therapeutic option.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Trasplante de Corazón , Corazón Artificial , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar , Predicción , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea
3.
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 40(Suppl 1): 100-109, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38827546

RESUMEN

Infective endocarditis represents a challenging and life-threatening clinical condition affecting native and prosthetic heart valves, endocardium, and implanted cardiac devices. Right-sided infective endocarditis account for approximately 5-10% of all infective endocarditis and are often associated with intravenous drug use, intracardiac devices, central venous catheters, and congenital heart disease. The tricuspid valve is involved in 90% of right-side infective endocarditis. The primary treatment of tricuspid valve infective endocarditis is based on long-term intravenous antibiotics. When surgery is required, different interventions have been proposed, ranging from valvectomy to various types of valve repair to complete replacement of the valve. Percutaneous removal of vegetations using the AngioVac system has also been proposed in these patients. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the current surgical options and to discuss the results of the different surgical strategies in patients with tricuspid valve infective endocarditis. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-023-01650-0.

4.
Trials ; 25(1): 191, 2024 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38491507

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: One of the main goals of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is targeting an adequate mean arterial pressure (MAP) during heart surgery, in order to maintain appropriate perfusion pressures in all end-organs. As inheritance of early studies, a value of 50-60 mmHg has been historically accepted as the "gold standard" MAP. However, in the last decades, the CPB management has remarkably changed, thanks to the evolution of technology and the availability of new biomaterials. Therefore, as highlighted by the latest European Guidelines, the current management of CPB can no longer refer to those pioneering studies. To date, only few single-centre studies have compared different strategies of MAP management during CPB, but with contradictory findings and without achieving a real consensus. Therefore, what should be the ideal strategy of MAP management during CPB is still on debate. This trial is the first multicentre, randomized, controlled study which compares three different strategies of MAP management during the CPB. METHODS: We described herein the methodology of a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial comparing three different approaches to MAP management during CPB in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery: the historically accepted "standard MAP" (50-60 mmHg), the "high MAP" (70-80 mmHg) and the "patient-tailored MAP" (comparable to the patient's preoperative MAP). It is the aim of the study to find the most suitable management in order to obtain the most adequate perfusion of end-organs during cardiac surgery. For this purpose, the primary endpoint will be the peak of serum lactate (Lmax) released during CPB, as index of tissue hypoxia. The secondary outcomes will include all the intraoperative parameters of tissue oxygenation and major postoperative complications related to organ malperfusion. DISCUSSION: This trial will assess the best strategy to target the MAP during CPB, thus further improving the outcomes of cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05740397 (retrospectively registered; 22/02/2023).


Asunto(s)
Presión Arterial , Puente Cardiopulmonar , Humanos , Puente Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Puente Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Proyectos de Investigación , Hipoxia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...