Reproducing the Native Posterior Tibial Slope in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: Technique and Clinical Implications.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) profoundly influences knee biomechanics. Using an arbitrary (often 3° to 5°) posterior tibial slope (PTS) in all cases seldom will restore native slope. This study examined whether the native PTS could be reproduced in cruciate-retaining TKA and how this would influence clinical outcome. Radiographic and clinical outcomes of 215 consecutive TKAs using the PFC sigma cruciate-retaining implant were evaluated. The tibial bone cut was planned to be made parallel to the native anatomical slope in the sagittal plane. The PTS was measured with reference to the proximal tibial medullary canal (PTS-M) and the proximal tibial anterior cortex (PTS-C) on true lateral radiographs using a picture achieving and communication system. Knee range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) were evaluated. Mean preoperative PTS-M was 6.9°±3.3°, and mean postoperative PTS-M was 7.0°±2.4°. Mean preoperative PTS-C was 12.2°±4.2°, and mean postoperative PTS-C was 12.6°±3.4°. Preoperative and postoperative PTS were not significantly different for both techniques (P>.05). An arbitrary 3° as an acceptable range for PTS-M was achieved in 144 knees (67%) (group 1), and 71 knees (33%) had a difference of more than 3° (group 2). Group 1 had a significantly larger gain in ROM (P=.04) as well as improved Knee Society, WOMAC, and SF-12 physical scores compared with group 2 (P<.01). The modified surgical technique reproduced the native tibial slope in cruciate-retaining TKA. Reproduction of the native PTS within 3° resulted in better clinical outcomes manifested by gain in ROM and knee functional outcome scores. [Orthopedics. 2020; 43(1):e21-e26.].

Does Recession of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament Influence Outcome in Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: For a PCL-retaining (posterior cruciate ligament) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to function suitably, proper soft tissue balancing, including PCL recession, is required. Yet, when the recession of the PCL is needed, there is still a debate as to whether a cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA should be converted to a posterior-stabilized TKA due to the concern of instability and poorer clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to determine whether recession of the PCL adversely affects clinical outcomes in patients who undergo CR TKA. METHODS: CR TKAs of the same design performed by the senior author (J.M.) were identified between December 2006 and July 2015. Clinical outcome measurements were collected and included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, the Knee Society Clinical Rating System, Short Form-12 Physical Composite Score/Mental Health Composite Score, and revision rates. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinical outcome when the PCL was retained, partially recessed, or completely released during PCL-retaining TKA (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index: P = .54, Knee Society Clinical Rating System: P = .42, Short Form-12 Mental Health Composite Score: P = .89, Short Form-12 Physical Composite Score: P = .527). CONCLUSION: This study presents evidence of similar clinical outcomes when the PCL is retained or released during PCL-retaining TKA, provided attention is paid to appropriate soft tissue balancing. CR TKA undergoing partial or complete release of the PCL should not routinely be converted to a posterior-stabilized knee design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Prognostic study.

Midterm Results of Delta Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty.

This study reports mid-term results of Delta ceramic on ceramic (COC) in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Subjects received Delta COC THA in a prospective multi-center study with either 28 mm (n=177) or 36 mm (n=168) articulations. Annual clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed, and patients were asked about hip noises. At mean 5.3-year follow-up there were 3 (0.9%) post-operative liner fractures. Nine revisions were performed (2 liner fracture, 4 stem loosening, 3 deep infection). Kaplan-Meier survivorship at 6 years was 96.9% (94.0-98.4). Twenty-six (7.5%) subjects reported squeaking, of whom none were revised. One (0.3%) subject could reproduce a sound in clinic. More patients reported squeaking with a 36 mm bearing (28 mm: 7/177, 36 mm: 19/168, P=0.013).

Comparing the long-term results of two uncemented femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty.

327 proximal and 185 extensively coated femoral stems with mean 10-year follow-up were reviewed. Implant survivorship, clinical outcomes, and radiographic analyses were compared. Kaplan-Meier implant survivorship was 97.5% for the proximal, and 98.8% for the extensively coated stem for stem-only revisions at 10-years. The proximally coated stem outperformed on the PCS arm of the SF-12 (P = 0.04) and stiffness arm of the WOMAC (P = 0.03). Otherwise, all clinical outcomes were comparable. Thigh pain incidence was 12.5% and 5.3% for the extensive versus proximally coated groups, respectively (P = 0.007). Radiographic review identified more severe stress shielding (P < 0.001) in the extensively coated stems. This study supports the long-term clinical track record of total hip arthroplasty using two different cementless stem designs.

Feasibility, effectiveness and costs associated with a web-based follow-up assessment following total joint arthroplasty.

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, effectiveness and costs of a web-based follow-up compared to in-person assessment following primary total hip or total knee arthroplasty. Patients who were at least 12 months postoperative were randomized to follow-up method. We excluded patients who had revision surgery, osteolysis, complications or identified radiographic issues. 229 patients (118 Web, 111 in-person) completed the study. There were no patients who had an issue missed by the web-based follow-up. Patients in the web-based group travelled less (28.2km vs 103.7km, (P<0.01)), had lower associated costs ($10.45 vs $21.36, (P<0.01)) and took less time to complete (121.7min web vs 228.7min usual). Web-based follow-up is a feasible, clinically effective alternative with lower associated costs than in-person clinic assessment.

Fracture of Two Moderately Cross-Linked Polyethylene Tibial Inserts in a TKR Patient.

Highly cross-linked polyethylene has become the gold standard in total hip replacement for its wear resistance. Moderately crosslinked polyethylene is now available for total knee replacement (TKR), although concerns about reduced mechanical strength have prevented widespread adoption. The purpose of this report is to describe an unusual case where a patient underwent cruciate retaining TKR using a moderately crosslinked polyethylene tibial insert that went on to fracture twice in the same location across the primary and first revision surgery. The first tibial insert was 10 mm thick and was implanted for 16 months. The second tibial insert was 15 mm thick and was implanted for 11 months. Both fractured along the posterior aspect of the medial articular surface. The lack of a specific event leading to these fractures and the fact that they occurred twice in the same location in the same patient suggest that caution is still necessary regarding the introduction of crosslinked polyethylene for TKR surgery.

Comparison of outcomes and survivorship between patients of different age groups following TKA.

A total of 6275 consecutive TKA patients were divided into three groups based on their age: <55, 55-70 and >70 years. There was a statistically significant difference in the change in WOMAC score (32 vs 31 vs 26, P<0.001) and Knee Society Score (78.9 vs 76.0 vs 69.0, P<0.001) favoring the younger populations. However, the revision rate was higher in the younger patients with a Kaplan-Meier survivorship at 5 years of 95.5%, 97.2% and 98.1% and at 10 years of 92.2%, 95.9% and 97.6%. Infection was the most frequent cause for failure in all groups although aseptic loosening and instability accounted for the increased revision rate in the younger patients. Younger patients may experience slightly better clinical outcomes following TKA but lower survivorship, when compared to older patient populations.

Does patellectomy jeopardize function after TKA?

BACKGROUND: The patella provides important mechanical leverage to the knee extensor mechanism. Patellectomy does not exclude the development of tibiofemoral arthrosis. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether (1) TKA provides improvements in clinical outcome scores in patellectomized knees and (2) the scores of TKA in patellectomized knees are comparable to those in knees with intact patellae. METHODS: We evaluated 50 patients (52 primary TKAs) with patellectomized knees and a control group of 52 patients (52 primary TKAs) with intact patellae matched for age, sex, implant, and surgical year between 1984 and 2009. We compared the preoperative and latest postoperative SF-12, WOMAC, and Knee Society score (KSS). Minimum followup was 24 months (mean, 69 months; range, 24-204 months). RESULTS: The mean WOMAC score in the control group improved from 41.8 (range, 7.5-72.4) preoperatively to 69.1 (range, 17.0-100.0) postoperatively, while that in the patellectomized group improved from 35.8 (range, 5.2-62.2) to 61.3 (range, 17.5-96.2). The mean KSS improved from 80.4 (range, 4.0-143.0) preoperatively to 161.4 (range, 69.0-200.0) postoperatively in the control group and from 76.9 (range, 5-134) to 136.8 (range, 7-199) in the patellectomized group. Mean postoperative WOMAC scores were comparable between the two groups, while the mean KSS was lower in the patellectomized group. The mean SF-12 scores were not different after TKA or between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the mechanical disadvantage to the knee extensor mechanism rendered by a previous patellectomy, TKA for tibiofemoral arthrosis in these patients relieved pain and restored function, but function was on average lower than that in patients with intact patellae. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Factors affecting modular acetabular ceramic liner insertion: a biomechanical analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ceramic liner fracture is a concern in THA. However, it is unclear what factors influence the risk of facture. To study these factors under controlled conditions, we created a laboratory model to avoid fractures in vitro. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined (1) whether misaligned liner insertion, acetabular shell deformation, entrapment of soft tissue within the locking taper area, and damage to the taper during engagement of the ceramic liner on the locking taper influenced fracture at light and medium impaction forces; and (2) whether the number and force of impactions affect the locking taper force between the ceramic liner and acetabular shell and fracture of the ceramic liner. METHODS: Impaction and pushout tests were performed with each of five ceramic inserts in titanium shells per test to simulate clinical intraoperative situations of misaligned inserts (Test 1), deformed shells (Test 2), soft tissue within the locking taper area (Test 3), simulated cup taper damage (Test 4), and a combination of misaligned insert, deformed shells, and simulated taper damage to create an overall worst-case condition (Test 5). RESULTS: Higher pushout forces occurred with increased impact force and an increased number of strikes. Insert fractures only occurred where inserts were misaligned in the shell. No fractures occurred with deformed shells, soft tissue in the taper, or with simulated taper damage in the absence of misaligned inserts. CONCLUSION: The data suggest a misaligned ceramic insert in an acetabular increases the potential for insert fracture. Shell deformation, soft tissue in the taper, or simulated taper damage seemed well tolerated even with very forceful impaction. Forceful and repetitive impaction is favorable for engagement of the taper and improving pullout strength.

THA with Delta ceramic on ceramic: results of a multicenter investigational device exemption trial.

UNLABELLED: Although the published studies on the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed with currently available ceramic components show high survivorship and low bearing wear at midterm followup, concern over ceramic fracture and squeaking persist. For these reasons, the use of ceramic is limited. Recently, a new alumina matrix composite material (Delta ceramic) with improved material properties was developed to address these concerns. We report the early outcomes and complications of a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of 263 patients (264 hips) at eight centers, comparing a Delta ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) articulation with a Delta ceramic head-crosslinked polyethylene bearing combination (COP). There were 177 COC hips and 87 COP hips. Complications were reported for all patients, whereas clinical and radiographic results were provided for the 233 patients with minimum 2-year followup (average, 31.2 months; range, 21-49 months). The Harris hip scores and clinical, radiographic, and survivorship outcomes were similar in both groups. There were four (2%) revisions in the COC group and two (2%) in the COP group. We encountered three intraoperative ceramic liner-related events. In addition, one patient receiving the COC underwent revision for chipping of the ceramic liner, and a second had ceramic fragmentation on followup radiographs but has not undergone revision. These liner related complications remain a concern. No patient reported squeaking in either group; this leaves us hopeful the new material will lessen the frequency of squeaking. In the short term, the Delta COC articulation provided similar functional scores and survivorship and complication rates with the ceramic head mated with crosslinked polyethylene. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Does bearing design influence midterm survivorship of unicompartmental arthroplasty?

UNLABELLED: Medial unicompartmental arthroplasties (UKA) are available with mobile- and fixed-bearing designs, with the advantages of one bearing over another unproven. We questioned whether the bearing design influenced clinical outcome, survivorship, the reason for revision, or the timing of failures. We retrospectively reviewed 179 patients (229 knees) who had medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties between 1990 and 2007; of these 79 knees had a mobile-bearing design and 150 knees a fixed-bearing design. Patients with mobile-bearing UKA had a minimum followup of 1 year (mean, 3.6 years; range, 1-11.3 years); those with fixed-bearing UKA a minimum followup of 1 year (mean, 8.1 years; range, 1-17.8 years). Patients were evaluated with clinical outcome scores and radiographically using the Knee Society rating system. Seven of 79 (9%) mobile-bearing knees underwent revision at a mean of 2.6 years, and 22 of 150 (15%) fixed-bearing knees underwent revision at a mean of 6.9 years. The 5-year cumulative survival rates were 88% (SE +/- 0.47, 95% CI 0.7229-1) and 96% (SE +/- 0.16, 95% CI 0.93-0.9979) for the mobile- and fixed-bearing designs respectively using the endpoint of revision surgery. We observed no differences in the indications or complexity of revision surgery between the groups and none in midterm survivorship. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty for valgus osteoarthritis.

UNLABELLED: The valgus, osteoarthritic knee is challenging technically and it is unknown whether and how technical and implant variables influence outcomes. We therefore determined the influence of surgical technique of soft tissue balancing and patient and implant factors from 100 unselected cruciate-retaining TKAs for valgus osteoarthritis in patients younger than 75 years of age. From 1987 to 1990, lateral soft tissue balancing was done with an outside-in progression in which the lateral collateral ligament and popliteus were typically released from the femur. From 1991 to 1994, an inside-out technique was use in which the lateral collateral ligament and/or popliteus were typically preserved. The minimum followup was 0.1 year (mean, 8.2 years; range, 0.1-18.2 years). Fourteen of 16 revisions were for wear and/or instability. Popliteus release, lateral collateral ligament release, or greater polyethylene shelf age increased the risk of revision. At 10 postoperative years, survival (end point, revision) was 89% (100 knees), 94% when the shelf age was less than 1 year (n = 73 knees), 97% when the popliteus or lateral collateral ligament was not released (n = 57 knees), and 100% when both conditions were met (n = 39 knees). Cruciate-retaining implants can be successfully used in knees with any degree of valgus osteoarthritis and survival is improved when the surgeon preserves at least one of the structures providing lateral stability in flexion and uses polyethylene with a short shelf life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Revision total knee arthroplasty: planning, management, and controversies.

The number of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed annually in the United States is increasing exponentially. Even with modest annual revision rates, the number of patients requiring revision knee surgery will increase in a similar fashion. It is therefore important to have a systematic approach dealing with a patient presenting with a painful TKA. The treating physician must be able to recognize a variety of failure patterns and treat them accordingly. Surgical exploration in the absence of a definable cause is rarely successful and should be avoided. The ability to plan and execute a complex revision TKA is a challenging and rewarding aspect of adult reconstructive surgery. Commonly encountered mechanisms of failure are identified and a stepwise approach to the surgical management of these conditions is presented.

The outcome of rerevision of an extensively porous-coated stem with another extensively porous-coated stem.

Despite excellent results, failure of osseointegration does occur in femoral revisions performed with extensively porous-coated stems. This study examined the outcome of rerevision of a failed extensively porous-coated femoral stem with yet another extensively porous-coated stem. Between 1980 and 2000, we performed 711 femoral revisions using an extensively porous-coated device. Fifteen patients (16 hips) were known to have undergone a rerevision of this femoral component using another porous-coated stem. At latest follow-up, 2 patients (3 hips) were deceased, leaving 13 patients. At a mean follow-up of 9.8 years, none of the cementless stems had required another revision (100% survivorship), and 12 (92%) of the 13 stems were bone ingrown based on radiographic examination.

Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Wear of the polyethylene tibial bearing is a leading cause of failure of knee replacements done prior to the current decade. The objective of this study was to determine how patient-related factors, implant-related factors, and limb or tibial component alignment influenced the amount of thickness loss in polyethylene tibial bearings that were retrieved at the time of revision surgery or after the death of the patient. METHODS: We retrieved polyethylene tibial bearings from eighty-one unicondylar and eighty-nine total knee replacements that had been performed because of osteoarthritis with varus deformity from 1984 to 1998. All of the polyethylene bearings had been sterilized with gamma radiation in air. Polyethylene loss was quantified as the change in the minimum bearing thickness per years in vivo (the mean time in vivo [and standard deviation] was 8 +/- 4 years). Multiple linear regression was used to assess whether polyethylene loss was associated with age, weight, gender, varus angle of the tibial component, postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle, initial thickness of the polyethylene, shelf age of the polyethylene, and either the type of polyethylene (for total knee replacements, which were of one posterior cruciate ligament-retaining design) or the manufacturer (for unicondylar knee replacements), and to determine the magnitude by which polyethylene loss would change if any of the significant risk factors were changed. RESULTS: The mean loss (and standard deviation) of polyethylene thickness in the medial compartment of total knee replacements (0.33 +/- 0.28 mm/yr) and that in medial unicompartmental knee replacements (0.49 +/- 0.40 mm/yr) were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with the same three variables: patient age, postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle, and shelf age of the polyethylene. A total knee bearing with a one-year increase in shelf age, a unicondylar knee bearing with a six-month increase in shelf age, a patient who was ten years younger at the time of operation, or a limb that was aligned in 5 degrees more varus (less valgus) had similar effects on the loss of polyethylene thickness in the medial compartment; the coefficients of the linear regression equations indicated that any one of these changes would increase polyethylene loss by 0.11 to 0.14 mm/yr. CONCLUSIONS: The wear-related loss of thickness in gamma-irradiated-in-air polyethylene bearings from unicondylar and total knee replacements implanted in osteoarthritic knees with varus deformity is influenced mainly by the shelf age of the polyethylene, the age of the patient, and the postoperative angulation of the knee in the coronal plane. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although polyethylene bearings have not been sterilized with gamma radiation in air since the end of the last decade, many arthroplasty patients have polyethylene bearings that were sterilized with use of this method. An understanding of the findings of this study may be of value as these patients return for follow-up care. Whether the study findings have relevance to bearings sterilized with other methods is unclear and will remain so for many years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II.

Midterm radiographic comparison of cementless acetabular shells containing lateralized and nonlateralized liners.

This retrospective study assessed the effect of lateralized acetabular inserts on polyethylene wear rates, radiographic loosening, and hip stability. Fifty-six 4-mm lateralized liners and 39 neutral liners were compared at a mean follow-up of 7.1 years. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated a significant increase of 0.04 mm/y in polyethylene wear rate with use of lateralized liners. However, predictable cementless fixation was obtained without screws in both liner groups with no migration or radiographic signs of loosening observed for any cup. The dislocation rate for hips with lateralized liners (3.6%) was less than that for hip with neutral liners (10.3%), although the difference was not significant with the numbers available. Despite the increase in wear rate, hips with lateralized liners performed as well as those with neutral liners with regard to loosening and stability.

Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

The goal of this report is to review reoperations undertaken on the initial 221 unicompartmental arthroplasties performed using a minimally invasive technique. A comparison was then performed between these cases and the previous 514 open medial unicompartmental arthroplasties performed at our institution. In the minimally invasive group, 9 (4.1%) of 221 knees were revised (8 for component loosening, 1 for deep infection). Of 212 unrevised knees, 16 have required a total of 18 nonrevision reoperations. Overall, 25 of 221 knees required at least 1 reoperation (total reoperation rate, 11.3%). Despite an accelerated recovery and decreased hospital stay in our minimally invasive unicompartmental arthroplasties, the rate of revision due to aseptic loosening (3.7% vs 1.0%) and the overall reoperation rate (11.3% vs 8.6%) compare unfavorably with those performed with an open technique.

Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty.

The investigators reviewed 245 fixed-bearing unicondylar arthroplasties that one surgeon performed as treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis between 1988 and 1997 using a variety of cemented metal-backed tibial components and gamma-irradiated-in-air polyethylene bearings. Multivariate statistical analysis was used to evaluate how the event of revision was influenced by 3 patient factors, 3 implant factors, and 7 factors assessed from preoperative and early postoperative radiographs. Five factors were statistically associated with revision: (younger) patient age, (thinner) tibial component initial thickness, (longer) polyethylene shelf age, (lesser) angular reduction of medial tibial plateau varus, and (more varus) postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle. Besides illustrating deleterious consequences of using gamma-irradiated-in-air polyethylene in medial unicompartmental arthroplasty, our results support reducing varus angulation of the medial tibial plateau and knee at surgery.

Survival of medial unicondylar arthroplasties placed by one surgeon 1984-1998.

Unicondylar arthroplasty survival rates have varied widely. Implant- and patient-specific factors may be contributory. One surgeon placed 411 medial compartment arthroplasties of 12 designs from 1984 to 1998. In most cases, the fixed bearing tibial component was placed with cement and featured gamma-sterilized-in-air polyethylene and a metal backing. Tibial component initial thickness averaged 8.5 +/- 1.4 mm. Polyethylene shelf age averaged 1.3 +/- 1.2 years. Age and weight at arthroplasty averaged 67 +/- 8 years and 83 +/- 15 kg, respectively. Survival (no revision) at 9 years was 80%. Revision was more common in younger patients, in those with a thinner tibial component or longer polyethylene shelf age, and when some designs were used rather than others; weight and gender were not associated with revision. Nine-year survival improved to 94% when tibial component thickness was > 7 mm and polyethylene shelf age was < 1 year (154 knees). Per our experience, placement of a thin or shelf-aged gamma-irradiated-in-air polyethylene bearing into a young or active subject could explain most failures of unicondylar arthroplasties done in the 1980s and 1990s. Unicondylar patients of that era who were fortunate enough to avoid a thin or aged oxidation-prone polyethylene bearing probably have enjoyed superior outcomes.