Using models to shape measles control and elimination strategies in low- and middle-income countries: A review of recent applications.

After many decades of vaccination, measles epidemiology varies greatly between and within countries. National immunization programs are therefore encouraged to conduct regular situation analyses and to leverage models to adapt interventions to local needs. Here, we review applications of models to develop locally tailored interventions to support control and elimination efforts. In general, statistical and semi-mechanistic transmission models can be used to synthesize information from vaccination coverage, measles incidence, demographic, and/or serological data, offering a means to estimate the spatial and age-specific distribution of measles susceptibility. These estimates complete the picture provided by vaccination coverage alone, by accounting for natural immunity. Dynamic transmission models can then be used to evaluate the relative impact of candidate interventions for measles control and elimination and the expected future epidemiology. In most countries, models predict substantial numbers of susceptible individuals outside the age range of routine vaccination, which affects outbreak risk and necessitates additional intervention to achieve elimination. More effective use of models to inform both vaccination program planning and evaluation requires the development of training to enhance broader understanding of models and where feasible, building capacity for modelling in-country, pipelines for rapid evaluation of model predictions using surveillance data, and clear protocols for incorporating model results into decision-making.

First direct limits on lightly ionizing particles with electric charge less than e/6.

While the standard model of particle physics does not include free particles with fractional charge, experimental searches have not ruled out their existence. We report results from the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search (CDMS II) experiment that give the first direct-detection limits for cosmogenically produced relativistic particles with electric charge lower than e/6. A search for tracks in the six stacked detectors of each of two of the CDMS II towers finds no candidates, thereby excluding new parameter space for particles with electric charges between e/6 and e/200.

Search for low-mass weakly interacting massive particles using voltage-assisted calorimetric ionization detection in the SuperCDMS experiment.

SuperCDMS is an experiment designed to directly detect weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), a favored candidate for dark matter ubiquitous in the Universe. In this Letter, we present WIMP-search results using a calorimetric technique we call CDMSlite, which relies on voltage-assisted Luke-Neganov amplification of the ionization energy deposited by particle interactions. The data were collected with a single 0.6 kg germanium detector running for ten live days at the Soudan Underground Laboratory. A low energy threshold of 170 eVee (electron equivalent) was obtained, which allows us to constrain new WIMP-nucleon spin-independent parameter space for WIMP masses below 6 GeV/c2.

Results from a low-energy analysis of the CDMS II germanium data.

We report results from a reanalysis of data from the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search (CDMS II) experiment at the Soudan Underground Laboratory. Data taken between October 2006 and September 2008 using eight germanium detectors are reanalyzed with a lowered, 2 keV recoil-energy threshold, to give increased sensitivity to interactions from weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) with masses below ∼10 GeV/c(2). This analysis provides stronger constraints than previous CDMS II results for WIMP masses below 9 GeV/c(2) and excludes parameter space associated with possible low-mass WIMP signals from the DAMA/LIBRA and CoGeNT experiments.

Dark matter search results from the CDMS II experiment.

Astrophysical observations indicate that dark matter constitutes most of the mass in our universe, but its nature remains unknown. Over the past decade, the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search (CDMS II) experiment has provided world-leading sensitivity for the direct detection of weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) dark matter. The final exposure of our low-temperature germanium particle detectors at the Soudan Underground Laboratory yielded two candidate events, with an expected background of 0.9 +/- 0.2 events. This is not statistically significant evidence for a WIMP signal. The combined CDMS II data place the strongest constraints on the WIMP-nucleon spin-independent scattering cross section for a wide range of WIMP masses and exclude new parameter space in inelastic dark matter models.

Search for axions with the CDMS experiment.

We report on the first axion search results from the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search (CDMS) experiment at the Soudan Underground Laboratory. An energy threshold of 2 keV for electron-recoil events allows a search for possible solar axion conversion into photons or local galactic axion conversion into electrons in the germanium crystal detectors. The solar axion search sets an upper limit on the Primakov coupling g(agammagamma) of 2.4x10(-9) GeV-1 at the 95% confidence level for an axion mass less than 0.1 keV/c2. This limit benefits from the first precise measurement of the absolute crystal plane orientations in this type of experiment. The galactic axion search analysis sets a world-leading experimental upper limit on the axioelectric coupling g(aee) of 1.4x10(-12) at the 90% confidence level for an axion mass of 2.5 keV/c2.

Search for weakly interacting massive particles with the first five-tower data from the cryogenic dark matter search at the soudan underground laboratory.

We report results from the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search at the Soudan Underground Laboratory (CDMS II) featuring the full complement of 30 detectors. A blind analysis of data taken between October 2006 and July 2007 sets an upper limit on the weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) nucleon spin-independent cross section of 6.6x10;{-44} cm;{2} (4.6x10;{-44} cm;{2} when combined with previous CDMS II data) at the 90% confidence level for a WIMP mass of 60 GeV/c;{2}. This achieves the best sensitivity for dark matter WIMPs with masses above 44 GeV/c;{2}, and significantly restricts the parameter space for some favored supersymmetric models.

Previous breast biopsy for benign disease rarely complicates or alters interpretation on screening mammography.

OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that breast screening leads to too many biopsies for benign disease that permanently scar the breast and confuse the interpretation of subsequent mammograms. We undertook retrospective and prospective studies to determine how often an excisional biopsy for benign breast disease complicates or alters interpretation of screening mammograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of our screening center database yielded 31,025 asymptomatic patients who had routine mammographic screening studies between 1993 and 1996. Of the 58,538 examinations of these patients, 53,510 were of patients who had no history of breast biopsy and 5028 were of patients who had a history of breast biopsy for benign disease. Recall rates were compared between the two groups. In the prospective study, radiologists reviewed the mammograms of 1997 consecutive patients presenting to the screening center, 173 of whom reported a prior breast biopsy for benign disease. The radiologist interpreting the images determined how often evidence of the biopsy site was apparent on the mammogram and how often such changes necessitated additional imaging. RESULTS: In the retrospective study, 3296 (6%) of the 53,510 studies done in patients who did not have a biopsy for benign disease and 360 (7%) of the 5028 studies done in women who had a biopsy for benign disease led to additional imaging. Eight recalls for further imaging (0.16%) among the 5028 studies in women with a prior biopsy for benign disease were related to the biopsy site. In the prospective study, 24 (14%) of the 173 women who had a biopsy for benign disease had mammographic evidence of the biopsy site. Nine (5%) of the 173 women who had previously had a biopsy for benign disease and 86 (5%) of the 1824 patients without a prior biopsy were recalled for additional imaging. No women were recalled because a previous breast biopsy for benign disease led to confusion or diagnostic concern. CONCLUSION: Changes in patients' breasts due to previous excisional biopsies for benign breast disease rarely pose a diagnostic dilemma in the interpretation of routine screening mammograms.

Imaging of fallopian tube tumors.

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to investigate the imaging findings in patients with primary fallopian tube neoplasms and to determine whether specific imaging features favor the preoperative diagnosis of fallopian tube tumors (FTT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computerized search of medical records from 1984 to 1994 identified 20 patients with a discharge diagnosis of primary fallopian tube carcinoma. Medical records, imaging studies, and pathology findings were reviewed. Eleven patients had available preoperative imaging. RESULTS: Seventeen of 20 patients with primary FTT had unilateral disease. Of these 17, preoperative imaging was available in nine, showing four solid adnexal masses, four complex cystic adnexal masses, and one normal adnexa. The preoperative imaging of these nine patients included six sonographic and five CT studies. Three patients with primary FTT had bilateral tumors, and preoperative imaging was available for two patients: Two sonographic studies and one CT study showed one complex cystic adnexal mass and three normal adnexa. CONCLUSION: Primary FTT commonly presents as an adnexal mass on preoperative imaging and mimics other pelvic malignancies, especially ovarian carcinoma. Making a specific preoperative diagnosis is difficult; however, because primary FTT is unlikely to be confused with a benign process, delay in diagnosis is rare.

Screening mammography: effect of national guidelines on current physician practice.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of national breast cancer screening guidelines on current physician attitudes toward and practice of screening mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaire responses from 278 physicians were analyzed. The questionnaire had four sections: general information on physician practice and experience, current use of breast cancer screening, perceptions of screening mammography, and physician awareness of and response to the controversy in breast cancer screening. RESULTS: In women aged 40-49 years, 144 (52%) of 278 physicians performed annual clinical breast examination and screening mammography every 2 years; 57 (21%) favored annual mammography and clinical breast examination. In women aged 50 years and older, 232 (83%) physicians screened patients annually with clinical breast examination and mammography. Two hundred seventeen (78%) physicians were aware of the recommended changes in screening guidelines; 54 (19%) were not aware of the changes. Of those aware of the changes, 56 (26%) changed to the new guidelines, 150 (69%) did not change, and six (3%) modified their practice somewhat. CONCLUSION: Physician practice as regards screening mammography is influenced by national guidelines.

Patients' opinion of mammography screening services: immediate results versus delayed results due to interpretation by two observers.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate by random questionnaire mailings the preferences of women who have undergone mammography in our region regarding communication of mammography screening results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to 400 randomly selected women who were more than 35 years old and who had been treated at our institution for medical or surgical reasons. Questions regarding use of mammography screening at our institution versus services at other locations were included. The questionnaire described two possible mammography services; either a double reading service that would provide delayed reports (DRDR) with the benefit of extra cancers detected, and a service that provides immediate reports given directly to the patient by an on-site radiologist. The presentation of the services was reversed in half the questionnaires to avoid bias. Patients' choices were collected, as were demographic data. The choice of one system over the other was evaluated using the one-sample lest for binomial probability. The chi-square test was used to determine if the order of questions on the survey or the site of patients' screening mammography affected responses. RESULTS: The response rate was 42% (n = 168). Of these, one response informed us of the death of a patient. Of the remaining 167 respondents, 75% (n = 126) preferred the DRDR system, 13% (n = 22) preferred the system providing immediate results (p < .0001), and the other 19 respondents did not select a preference. Of the 167 respondents, 156 answered the question regarding previous screening mammography experience. Of the 105 patients who had undergone screening mammography at our institution, 78% (n = 82) preferred the DRDR system. Of the 51 patients who had undergone mammography elsewhere or who had never undergone mammography, 75% (n = 38) preferred the DRDR system. We found that ordering of presentation of the systems in the questionnaire had no effect on responses. Likewise, whether a respondent had undergone mammography at our institution had no effect on responses (p = 1.0). CONCLUSION: A statistically significant number of women who responded to our questionnaire preferred the DRDR system of reporting screening mammographic results. Educational material about double reading that we included with each patient's questionnaire could account for these results. If the use of a second interpreter is feasible and is done for batch interpretation of screening mammograms, then education of patients about this process may increase acceptance of a delayed mammographic report.

Should women with implants or a history of treatment for breast cancer be excluded from mammography screening programs?

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine whether it is scientifically justified to require that women with implants or a history of treatment for breast cancer be screened in a diagnostic mammography setting and that they be excluded from mammography screening programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The recall rates for women with breast implants or a history of treatment for breast cancer who were screened in a dedicated mammography screening program were compared with those of other women in the screening program. The computerized records for the breast screening program of the Department of Radiology at our institution for January 1, 1990, through December 31, 1995, were reviewed. The recall rates for women who had breast implants and those for women with a history of treatment for breast cancer were compared with the recall rates for the other women who underwent screening. Each recall rate included women who were called back for additional evaluation in addition to those for whom a biopsy was recommended on the basis of the screening study. RESULTS: Of 45,134 screening examinations done during the review period, 43,454 (96%) were for women who had no history of breast cancer or of breast implants; 590 (1%) were for women who had undergone mastectomy; 991 (2%) were for women who had been treated with lumpectomy and irradiation for breast cancer; and 99 (0.2%) were for women with breast implants. Among the 43,454 examinations of women with no history of breast cancer or implants, 3081 examinations (7%) led to interpretations that produced requests for the patient to return for additional evaluation. Thirty-six women who had been treated for breast cancer by mastectomy were recalled (6%). Seventy-five women who had undergone lumpectomy and irradiation for breast cancer were recalled (8%). Five women with breast implants were recalled (5%). Statistically, these rates were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: We find no scientific reason to exclude women who have been treated for breast cancer or who have breast implants from dedicated screening programs.

Positive predictive value of breast biopsy performed as a result of mammography: there is no abrupt change at age 50 years.

PURPOSE: To determine if the positive predictive value (PPV) of a biopsy initiated because of an abnormal mammogram changes abruptly at age 50 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PPV and its variation with age was analyzed for 4,778 women who underwent biopsy for a clinically occult abnormality detected at mammography. The relationship of the results to the patient's age was analyzed with age represented as a continuous and two-categorized (< 50, > 50) measure. The latter measure represented an abrupt change, which distinguished those aged 49 years and younger from those aged 50 years and over. With this measure, the patients in each of the two age groups were statistically indistinguishable. RESULTS: The results were consistent with a steady increase in PPV and the yield of cancers with age, and there was no abrupt change at age 50 years. The modeled PPV for all cancers for these 4,778 patients was approximately 12% for women aged 40 years and increased to 46% by age 79 years. CONCLUSION: The PPV did not change abruptly at any age for women aged 40-79 years but increased steadily, which reflects the prior probability of breast cancer at each age. Inappropriate grouping of data can lead to misinterpretation of results. Screening guidelines should not be predicated on the false assumption that this variable changes at age 50 years.

Physicians' opinions on the delivery of mammographic screening services: immediate interpretation versus double reading.

OBJECTIVE: Mammographic services are delivered in many ways. Emphasis has been placed on providing women with immediate reports of their screening mammograms. We believe that double reading of mammograms is more important than an immediate report. We sought to determine physicians' attitudes toward this issue and if education affects their opinions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to 1000 physicians in Massachusetts who were randomly selected from 16,000 members of the state medical society. The questionnaire had four sections, of which two were pertinent to this subject. The first section collected general information on the physician's practice and experience. The second section described two common delivery systems for mammographic screening services and asked physicians to choose the delivery system that would most benefit their patients. RESULTS: Of the 1000 physicians, 294 returned the questionnaire, giving a response rate of 29%. Of these, 16 physicians returned blank surveys, leaving 278 for analysis. Two hundred forty-nine (90%) valued off-site, delayed interpretation of mammographic screening for their patients over on-site reading by a single radiologist if an off-site, delayed reading made double reading possible. CONCLUSION: An off-site, double-reading delivery system for mammographic screening services is preferred by many physicians for their patients once they are educated as to the benefits of double reading.

Computed tomography-guided needle localization of nonpalpable breast lesions: review of 24 cases.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We examined the role of computed tomography (CT) in breast imaging, especially in guiding needle localization procedures. METHODS: We reviewed our institution's breast imaging database, from 1978 to 1994, for procedures in which CT scanning was used. Twenty-four CT-guided needle localizations were identified. Medical records, mammograms, CT scans, and pathology reports were reviewed for all patients. RESULTS: Twenty-four needle localizations were performed on 22 female patients. The average size of the lesions localized was 12 mm. The most common reason for CT scanning was the inability to image a suspicious density by conventional mammography on two orthogonal views. Nine malignant and 15 benign lesions were localized under CT guidance. One patient developed a postoperative hematoma. No other complications occurred. CONCLUSION: CT-guided breast localization is a reliable technique that may be used to define selected breast lesions that are difficult to triangulate or localize by conventional two-view mammography.

The sternalis muscle: an unusual normal finding seen on mammography.

OBJECTIVE: We studied the appearance of the sternalis muscle on mammography and on CT and MR imaging. To our knowledge, this is the first description of this normal anatomic variant. An approach is provided that permits differentiation of the sternalis from significant pathology. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between January 1992 and December 1994, four women of an estimated 32,000 who had mammograms at the Massachusetts General Hospital had an unusual, irregular structure visible medially on the craniocaudal projection that posed a diagnostic dilemma. The records and imaging studies of these women and two others from the Deaconess Hospital breast imaging program were reviewed to determine the etiology of the findings seen by mammography and to establish a diagnostic approach. RESULTS: Surgery in one patient and cross-sectional imaging in the other five established that the structure was the sternalis muscle. Although it may be bilateral, the sternalis muscle was visible only unilaterally on the mammograms of these six women. The appearance of the muscle ranged from an irregularly rounded density at the sternal edge of the film to flame-shaped and almost completely surrounded by fat. CT and MR imaging are diagnostic when they show the longitudinal extent of the muscle, which lies anterior to the medial margin of the pectoralis major muscle. CONCLUSION: The sternalis muscle is an unusual variant of the chest wall musculature. It may be visible as a rounded or irregular density on the craniocaudal mammogram along the sternal edge of the film. With improved mammographic positioning it will be seen more frequently. The muscle has a variety of appearances that should be familiar to the radiologist to avoid confusion with a malignant lesion. The etiology can be confirmed and cancer excluded by CT or MR imaging.

Uniaxial stress apparatus for measurements of optical activity.

A device is described with which the optical activity of crystalline materials under stress can be measured. The sample is not moved, but a three-axis rotation is possible.