Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 27
Filtrar
1.
CNS Oncol ; 12(3): CNS102, 2023 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37462385

RESUMEN

Aim: The EMulate Therapeutics Voyager™ is a simple, wearable, home-use device that uses an alternating electromagnetic field to alter biologic signaling within cells. Objective: To assess the safety/feasibility of the Voyager in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). Methods: In this study, patients with rGBM were treated with Voyager as monotherapy or in combination with standard chemotherapy at the Investigator's discretion. Safety was assessed by incidence of adverse events associated with the Voyager. Patients were followed until death. Results: A total of 75 patients were enrolled and treated for at least one day with the Voyager (safety population). Device-related adverse events were uncommon and generally did not result in interruption or withdrawal from treatment. There were no serious adverse events associated with Voyager. A total of 60 patients were treated for at least one month (clinical utility population). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17 weeks (4.3 months) in the Voyager only group (n = 24) and 21 weeks (5.3 months) in the Voyager + concurrent therapy group (n = 36). The median overall survival (OS) was 7 months in the Voyager only group and 9 months in the Voyager + concurrent therapy group. In patients treated with Voyager + concurrent therapy, the median OS for patients enrolled with their 1st or 2nd recurrence (n = 26) was 10 months, while in patients enrolled with their 3rd or 4th recurrence (n = 10) OS was 7 months. Conclusion: The data support the safety and feasibility of the Voyager for the treatment of rGBM. Further prospective study of the device is warranted. Trial Registration Number: NCT02296580 (ClinicalTrials.gov).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioblastoma , Humanos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Factibilidad , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
J Immunother Cancer ; 8(2)2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33323462

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bintrafusp alfa is a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of transforming growth factor (TGF)-ßRII (a TGF-ß 'trap') fused to a human IgG1 mAb blocking programmed cell death ligand 1. This is the largest analysis of patients with advanced, pretreated human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated malignancies treated with bintrafusp alfa. METHODS: In these phase 1 (NCT02517398) and phase 2 trials (NCT03427411), 59 patients with advanced, pretreated, checkpoint inhibitor-naive HPV-associated cancers received bintrafusp alfa intravenously every 2 weeks until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Primary endpoint was best overall response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) V.1.1; other endpoints included safety. RESULTS: As of April 17, 2019 (phase 1), and October 4, 2019 (phase 2), the confirmed objective response rate per RECIST V.1.1 in the checkpoint inhibitor-naive, full-analysis population was 30.5% (95% CI, 19.2% to 43.9%; five complete responses); eight patients had stable disease (disease control rate, 44.1% (95% CI, 31.2% to 57.6%)). In addition, three patients experienced a delayed partial response after initial disease progression, for a total clinical response rate of 35.6% (95% CI, 23.6% to 49.1%). An additional patient with vulvar cancer had an unconfirmed response. Forty-nine patients (83.1%) experienced treatment-related adverse events, which were grade 3/4 in 16 patients (27.1%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Bintrafusp alfa showed clinical activity and manageable safety and is a promising treatment in HPV-associated cancers. These findings support further investigation of bintrafusp alfa in patients with advanced, pretreated HPV-associated cancers.


Asunto(s)
Antígeno B7-H1/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Papillomaviridae/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/virología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/patología
3.
J Immunother Cancer ; 8(2)2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32907924

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Avelumab, an antiprogrammed death ligand-1 antibody, is approved as a monotherapy for treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma and advanced urothelial carcinoma, and in combination with axitinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma. We report the efficacy and safety of first-line avelumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In a phase I expansion cohort of the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial, patients with treatment-naive, metastatic, or recurrent NSCLC received 10 mg/kg avelumab intravenously every 2 weeks. Endpoints included best overall response, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 156 patients were enrolled and treated. Median duration of follow-up was 18.6 months (range, 15 to 23 months). The objective response rate was 19.9% (95% CI, 13.9 to 27.0), including complete response in 3 (1.9%) and partial response in 28 (17.9%). Median DOR was 12.0 months (95% CI, 6.9 to not estimable). Median PFS was 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.7 to 5.4) and the 6-month PFS rate was 38.5% (95% CI, 30.7 to 46.3). Median OS was 14.1 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 16.9) and the 12-month OS rate was 56.6% (95% CI, 48.2 to 64.1). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 107 patients (68.6%), including grade ≥3 TRAEs in 19 (12.2%). Immune-related adverse events and infusion-related reactions occurred in 31 (19.9%) and 40 patients (25.6%), respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Avelumab showed antitumor activity with a tolerable safety profile as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC. These data support further investigation of avelumab in the phase III JAVELIN Lung 100 study. TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01772004; registered January 21, 2013.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacología , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/farmacología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
J Immunother Cancer ; 8(2)2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32641320

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We report the clinical activity and safety of bintrafusp alfa, a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of the transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß)RII receptor (a TGF-ß 'trap') fused to a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody blocking programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), in patients with heavily pretreated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). METHODS: In this phase I dose-expansion cohort, patients with advanced SCCHN not amenable to curative therapy that progressed/recurred after platinum therapy in the recurrent/metastatic setting, or <6 months after platinum therapy in the locally advanced setting, received bintrafusp alfa 1200 mg intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was confirmed best overall response (BOR; Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1) per independent review committee (IRC); other endpoints included BOR per investigator and safety. RESULTS: As of August 24, 2018, 32 patients had received bintrafusp alfa (median follow-up 86.4 weeks; range 2-97). Per IRC, the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 13% (95% CI 4% to 29%; 4 partial responses (PR)); 4 patients had stable disease (SD) (disease control rate 34%; 95% CI 12% to 43%). Per investigator, there were 5 PRs (ORR, 16%), including 2 patients who developed delayed PRs after initial disease increase (total clinical response rate 22%). Responses (ORRs) were observed in patients with PD-L1-positive (12%), PD-L1-negative (17%; 73-10 antibody for immunohistochemistry), human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive (33%) and HPV-negative tumors (5%). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 11 patients (34%), with no grade 4 TRAEs or treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Bintrafusp alfa showed clinical activity across subgroups of PD-L1 expression and in HPV-positive tumors and had a manageable safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated advanced SCCHN. Activity in HPV-positive tumors is favorable compared with historical data from PD-L1 inhibitors and is being further investigated in an ongoing study of HPV-associated tumors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02517398.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Antígeno B7-H1/efectos de los fármacos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/farmacología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
5.
Prostate ; 80(1): 99-108, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31742767

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a well-established therapeutic and diagnostic target overexpressed in both primary and metastatic prostate cancers. PSMA antibody-drug conjugate (PSMA ADC) is a fully human immunoglobulin G1 anti-PSMA monoclonal antibody conjugated to monomethylauristatin E, which binds to PSMA-positive cells and induces cytotoxicity. In a phase 1 study, PSMA ADC was well tolerated and demonstrated activity as measured by reductions in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). To further assess PSMA ADC, we conducted a phase 2 trial in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) subjects who progressed following abiraterone/enzalutamide (abi/enz) therapy. METHODS: A total of 119 (84 chemotherapy-experienced and 35 chemotherapy-naïve) subjects were administered PSMA ADC 2.5 or 2.3 mg/kg IV q3w for up to eight cycles. Antitumor activity (best percentage declines in PSA and CTCs from baseline and tumor responses through radiological imaging), exploratory biomarkers, and safety (monitoring of adverse events [AEs], clinical laboratory tests, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status) were assessed. RESULTS: PSA declines ≥50% occurred in 14% of all treated (n = 113) and 21% of chemotherapy-naïve subjects (n = 34). CTC declines ≥50% were seen in 78% of all treated (n = 77; number of subjects with ≥5 CTCs at baseline and a posttreatment result) and 89% of chemotherapy-naïve subjects (n = 19); 47% of all treated and 53% of chemotherapy-naïve subjects had a transition from ≥5 to less than 5 CTCs/7.5 mL blood at some point during the study. PSA and CTC reductions were associated with high PSMA expression (CTCs or tumor tissue) and low neuroendocrine serum markers. In the chemotherapy-experienced group, the best overall radiologic response to PSMA ADC treatment was stable disease in 51 (60.7%) subjects; 5.7% of subjects in the chemotherapy-naïve group had partial responses. The most common treatment-related AEs ≥Common Terminology Criteria for AE (CTCAE) grade 3 were neutropenia, fatigue, electrolyte imbalance, anemia, and neuropathy. The most common serious AEs were dehydration, hyponatremia, febrile neutropenia, and constipation. Two subjects who received 2.5 mg/kg died of sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: PSMA ADC demonstrated some activity with respect to PSA declines, CTC conversions/reductions, and radiologic assessments in abi/enz treated mCRPC subjects. Clinically significant treatment-related AEs included neutropenia and neuropathy.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Androstenos/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Benzamidas , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Humanos , Inmunotoxinas/efectos adversos , Inmunotoxinas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nitrilos , Feniltiohidantoína/administración & dosificación , Feniltiohidantoína/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/diagnóstico por imagen , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Melanoma Manag ; 6(2): MMT20, 2019 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31406564

RESUMEN

AIM: Metastatic melanoma patients were treated with patient-specific vaccines consisting of autologous dendritic cells loaded with antigens from irradiated cells from short-term autologous tumor cell lines. PATIENTS & METHODS: A total of 72 patients were enrolled in a single-arm Phase I/II (NCT00948480) trial or a randomized Phase II (NCT00436930). RESULTS: Toxicity was minimal. Median overall survival (OS) was 49.4 months; 5-year OS 46%. A 5-year OS was 72% for 18 recurrent stage 3 without measurable disease when treated and 53% for 30 stage 4 without measurable disease when treated. A total of 24 patients with measurable stage 4 when treated (median of four prior therapies) had an 18.5 months median OS and 46% 2-year OS. CONCLUSION: This dendritic cell vaccine was associated with encouraging survival in all three clinical subsets. Clinicaltrial.gov NCT00436930 and NCT00948480.

7.
J Transl Med ; 17(1): 271, 2019 08 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31426803

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: ACAM2000, a thymidine kinase (TK)-positive strain of vaccinia virus, is the current smallpox vaccine in the US. Preclinical testing demonstrated potent oncolytic activity of ACAM2000 against several tumor types. This Phase I clinical trial of ACAM2000 delivered by autologous adipose stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells was conducted to determine the safety and feasibility of such a treatment in patients with advanced solid tumors or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). METHODS: Twenty-four patients with solid tumors and two patients with AML participated in this open-label, non-randomized dose-escalation trial. All patients were treated with SVF derived from autologous fat and incubated for 15 min to 1 h with ACAM2000 before application. Six patients received systemic intravenous application only, one patient received intra-tumoral application only, 15 patients received combination intravenous with intra-tumoral deployment, 3 patients received intravenous and intra-peritoneal injection and 1 patient received intravenous, intra-tumoral and intra-peritoneal injections. Safety at each dose level of ACAM2000 (1.4 × 106 plaque-forming units (PFU) to 1.8 × 107 PFU) was evaluated. Blood samples for PK assessments, flow cytometry and cytokine analysis were collected at baseline and 1 min, 1 h, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months following treatment. RESULTS: No serious toxicities (> grade 2) were reported. Seven patients reported an adverse event (AE) in this study: self-limiting skin rashes, lasting 7 to 18 days-an expected adverse reaction to ACAM2000. No AEs leading to study discontinuation were reported. Viral DNA was detected in all patients' blood samples immediately following treatment. Interestingly, in 8 patients viral DNA disappeared 1 day and re-appeared 1 week post treatment, suggesting active viral replication at tumor sites, and correlating with longer survival of these patients. No major increase in cytokine levels or correlation between cytokine levels and skin rashes was noted. We were able to assess some initial efficacy signals, especially when the ACAM2000/SVF treatment was combined with checkpoint inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ACAM2000/SVF in patients with advanced solid tumors or AML is safe and well tolerated, and several patients had signals of an anticancer effect. These promising initial clinical results merit further investigation of therapeutic utility. Trial registration Retrospectively registered (ISRCTN#10201650) on October 22, 2018.


Asunto(s)
Tejido Adiposo/irrigación sanguínea , Tejido Adiposo/citología , Virus Oncolíticos/fisiología , Timidina Quinasa/metabolismo , Virus Vaccinia/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Línea Celular Tumoral , ADN Viral/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Viroterapia Oncolítica/efectos adversos , Células del Estroma/metabolismo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
8.
Prostate ; 79(6): 604-613, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30663074

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a well-characterized target that is overexpressed selectively on prostate cancer cells. PSMA antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the microtubule disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), which is designed to specifically bind PSMA-positive cells, internalize, and then release its cytotoxic payload into the cells. PSMA ADC has demonstrated potent and selective antitumor activity in preclinical models of advanced prostate cancer. A Phase 1 study was conducted to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor effects of PSMA ADC in subjects with treatment-refractory prostate cancer. METHODS: In this first-in-man dose-escalation study, PSMA ADC was administered by intravenous infusion every three weeks to subjects with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who were previously treated with docetaxel chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was to establish a maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The study also examined the pharmacokinetics of the study drug, total antibody, and free MMAE. Antitumor effects were assessed by measuring changes in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and radiologic imaging. RESULTS: Fifty-two subjects were administered doses ranging from 0.4 to 2.8 mg/kg. Subjects had a median of two prior chemotherapy regimens and prior treatment with abiraterone and/or enzalutamide. Neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy were identified as important first-cycle and late dose-limiting toxicities, respectively. The dose of 2.5 mg/kg was determined to be the MTD. Pharmacokinetics were approximately dose-proportional with minimal drug accumulation. Reductions in PSA and CTCs in subjects treated with doses of ≥1.8 mg/kg were durable and often concurrent. CONCLUSIONS: In an extensively pretreated mCRPC population, PSMA ADC demonstrated acceptable toxicity. Antitumor activity was observed over dose ranges up to and including 2.5 mg/kg. The observed anti-tumor activity supported further evaluation of this novel agent for the treatment of advanced metastatic prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacocinética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/administración & dosificación , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/farmacocinética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/patología , Oligopéptidos/metabolismo , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/inmunología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto
9.
CNS Oncol ; 8(1): CNS30, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30547676

RESUMEN

AIM: Evaluation of the Nativis Voyager® device in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). MATERIALS & METHODS: Voyager is a noninvasive, nonthermal, nonionizing and portable investigational device which delivers ultra-low radio frequency energy (ulRFE®) that uses a magnetic field to penetrate tissues to alter specific biologic functions within cells. Patients with rGBM were treated with Voyager alone (V) or Voyager in combination with standard of care (V + SoC). Safety and clinical utility were assessed every 2-4 months. RESULTS: Data from the first 11 patients treated are reported here. Median progression-free survival was 10 weeks in the V arm and 16 weeks in the V + SoC arm. Median overall survival was 16 months in V arm and 11 months in the V + SoC arm. No serious adverse events associated with the device were reported. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the Voyager is safe and feasible for the treatment of rGBM.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Glioblastoma/terapia , Magnetoterapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Adulto , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Glioblastoma/mortalidad , Humanos , Magnetoterapia/instrumentación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
10.
J Immunother Cancer ; 6(1): 19, 2018 03 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29510745

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite improved survival following checkpoint inhibitors, there is still a potential role for anti-cancer therapeutic vaccines. Because of biological heterogeneity and neoantigens resulting from each patient's mutanome, autologous tumor may be the best source of tumor-associated antigens (TAA) for vaccines. Ex vivo loading of autologous dendritic cells with TAA may be associated with superior clinical outcome compared to injecting irradiated autologous tumor cells. We conducted a randomized phase II trial to compare autologous tumor cell vaccines (TCV) and autologous dendritic cell vaccines (DCV) loaded with autologous TAA. METHODS: Short-term autologous tumor cell lines were established from metastatic tumor. Vaccines were admixed with 500 micrograms of GM-CSF and injected weekly for 3 weeks, then at weeks 8, 12,16, 20, and 24. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary objectives were identification of adverse events, and results of delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions to intradermal tumor cell injections. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were randomized. All were followed from randomization until death or for five years; none were lost to follow-up. DCV was associated with longer survival: median 43.4 versus 20.5 months (95% CI, 18.6 to > 60 versus 9.3 to 32.3 months) and a 70% reduction in the risk of death (hazard ratio = 0.304, p = 0.0053, 95% CI, 0.131 to 0.702). Tumor DTH reactions were neither prognostic nor predictive. The most common treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate local injection site reactions and flu-like symptoms; but grade 2 treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with TCV. Serum marker analyses at week-0 and week-4 showed that serum markers were similar at baseline in each arm, but differed after vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: This is the only human clinical trial comparing DCV and TCV as platforms for autologous TAA presentation. DCV was associated with minimal toxicity and long-term survival in patients with metastatic melanoma. DTH to autologous tumor cells was neither prognostic for survival nor predictive of benefit for either vaccine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials.gov NCT00948480 retrospectively registered 28 July 2009.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Células Dendríticas/trasplante , Melanoma/terapia , Citocinas/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Tardía , Masculino , Melanoma/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Trasplante Autólogo/efectos adversos
11.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 79(4): 681-688, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28289865

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A phase I two-period two sequence cross-over study compared the bioavailability of two pimasertib (MSC1936369B/AS703026) formulations (capsule versus tablet) in advanced cancer patients. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors were randomized to one of two treatment sequences utilizing pimasertib tablet (test; 3 × 20 mg, PO QD) and capsule (standard; 2 × 30 mg, PO QD). The trial comprised a screening and baseline period, two time periods or parts A and B, and a trial extension phase. RESULTS: N = 38 patients were randomized to two treatment sequences S1 and S2. PK parameters t 1/2, CL/f, and V z/f were within the same range for the two formulations. Tablet had bioavailability comparable to capsule based on the analysis of AUC0-t, however, tablet administration resulted in an increase of ~25% in C max versus capsule. Common predicted adverse events of pimasertib included ocular events, diarrhea and creatine phosphokinase elevation. Disease control rate was ~29% with 1 partial response and 4 of 10 patients with stable disease >4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Pimasertib tablet was overall well tolerated, had a similar safety and efficacy profile to standard capsule formulation and had bioavailability comparable to capsule.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacocinética , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Área Bajo la Curva , Disponibilidad Biológica , Cápsulas , Estudios Cruzados , Composición de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Sistema de Señalización de MAP Quinasas/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Niacinamida/administración & dosificación , Niacinamida/farmacocinética , Niacinamida/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Comprimidos , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Cancer Biother Radiopharm ; 30(5): 187-94, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26083950

RESUMEN

In patients with metastatic melanoma, sequential single-arm and randomized phase II trials with a therapeutic vaccine consisting of autologous dendritic cells (DCs) loaded with antigens from self-renewing, proliferating, irradiated autologous tumor cells (DC-TC) showed superior survival compared with similar patients immunized with irradiated tumor cells (TC). We wished to determine whether this difference was evident in cohorts who at the time of treatment had (1) no evidence of disease (NED) or (2) had detectable disease. Eligibility criteria and treatment schedules were the same for all three trials. Pooled data confirmed that overall survival (OS) was longer in 72 patients treated with DC-TC compared with 71 patients treated with TC (median OS 60 versus 22 months; 5-year OS 51% versus 32%, p=0.004). Treatment with DC-TC was associated with longer OS in both cohorts. Among 70 patients who were NED at the time that treatment was started, OS was better for DC-TC: 5-year OS 73% versus 43% (p=0.015). Among 73 patients who had detectable metastases, OS was better for DC-TC: median 38.8 months versus 14.7 months, 5-year OS 33% versus 20% (p=0.025). This approach is promising as an adjunct to other therapies in patients who have had metastatic melanoma.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Células Dendríticas/trasplante , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Melanoma/terapia , Células Madre Neoplásicas/trasplante , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Carga Tumoral , Presentación de Antígeno , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Femenino , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Interferón gamma/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Melanoma/inmunología , Melanoma/secundario , Antígenos Específicos del Melanoma/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Células Madre Neoplásicas/inmunología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/inmunología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Células Tumorales Cultivadas/inmunología
13.
Phys Biol ; 12(1): 016008, 2015 Jan 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25574741

RESUMEN

Purpose. Circulating melanoma cells (CMCs) constitute a potentially important representation of time-resolved tumor biology in patients. To date, genomic characterization of CMCs has been limited due to the lack of a robust methodology capable of identifying them in a format suitable for downstream characterization. Here, we have developed a methodology to detect intact CMCs that enables phenotypic, morphometric and genomic analysis at the single cell level. Experimental design. Blood samples from 40 metastatic melanoma patients and 10 normal blood donors were prospectively collected. A panel of 7 chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4)-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) was used to immunocytochemically label CMCs. Detection was performed by automated digital fluorescence microscopy and multi-parametric computational analysis. Individual CMCs were captured by micromanipulation for whole genome amplification and copy number variation (CNV) analysis. Results. Based on CSPG4 expression and nuclear size, 1-250 CMCs were detected in 22 (55%) of 40 metastatic melanoma patients (0.5-371.5 CMCs ml(-1)). Morphometric analysis revealed that CMCs have a broad spectrum of morphologies and sizes but exhibit a relatively homogeneous nuclear size that was on average 1.5-fold larger than that of surrounding PBMCs. CNV analysis of single CMCs identified deletions of CDKN2A and PTEN, and amplification(s) of TERT, BRAF, KRAS and MDM2. Furthermore, novel chromosomal amplifications in chr12, 17 and 19 were also found. Conclusions. Our findings show that CSPG4 expressing CMCs can be found in the majority of advanced melanoma patients. High content analysis of this cell population may contribute to the design of effective personalized therapies in patients with melanoma.


Asunto(s)
Genoma Humano/genética , Melanoma/genética , Melanoma/patología , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Línea Celular Tumoral , Femenino , Genómica , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias
14.
J Immunother ; 35(8): 641-9, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22996370

RESUMEN

Only 10% of metastatic melanoma patients survive 5 years, even though many can achieve substantial tumor reduction by surgical resection and/or radiation therapy and/or systemic therapy. An effective, nontoxic, consolidation immunotherapy could benefit such patients. We initiated a randomized trial to compare 2 promising patient-specific immunotherapy cell products. Patients had to have a diagnosis of metastatic melanoma and availability of an autologous melanoma cell line. Patients were stratified by whether their most advanced stage had been regional or distant metastases, and by whether they had measurable disease at the time of treatment, then they were randomized to receive irradiated autologous proliferating tumor cells or autologous dendritic cells (DC) loaded with antigens from such cells. Both products were injected subcutaneously in 500 µg of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, weekly for 3 weeks and then monthly for 5 months. Patients in the 2 arms did not differ in baseline characteristics. All patients received prescribed therapy. Treatment was well tolerated. At the time of initial analysis, with no patients lost to follow-up, 50% of patients deceased, and all surviving patients followed for at least 6 months after randomization, survival is superior in the DC arm (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.098-0.729) with median survival not reached versus 15.9 months, and 2-year survival rates of 72% versus 31% (P=0.007). This trial provides evidence that a DC vaccine is associated with longer survival compared with a tumor cell vaccine, and is consistent with previous data suggesting a survival benefit from this patient-specific immunotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Células Dendríticas/trasplante , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Melanoma/terapia , Células Madre Neoplásicas/trasplante , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Antígenos de Neoplasias/inmunología , Antígenos de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Células Dendríticas/metabolismo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/inmunología , Melanoma/secundario , Persona de Mediana Edad , Células Madre Neoplásicas/inmunología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/inmunología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Análisis de Supervivencia
17.
J Clin Oncol ; 28(2): 215-21, 2010 Jan 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19933919

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: During the last 25 years, National Cancer Institute (NCI) cooperative trial groups have extended trial networks from academic centers to include certain community and Veterans Health Administration (VHA) centers. We compared trial patients' attributes and outcomes by these enrollment settings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Studying 2,708 patients on one of 10 cooperative group, randomized lung trials at 272 institutions, we compared patient attributes by enrollment setting (ie, academic, community, and VHA affiliates). We used adjusted Cox regression to evaluate for survival differences by setting. RESULTS: Main member institutions enrolled 44% of patients; community affiliates enrolled 44%; and VHAs enrolled 12%. Patient attributes (ie, case-mix) of age, ethnicity, sex, and performance status varied by enrollment setting. After analysis was adjusted for patient case-mix, no mortality differences by enrollment setting were noted. CONCLUSION: Although trial patients with primarily advanced-stage lung cancer from nonacademic centers were older and had worse performance statuses than those from academic centers, survival did not differ by enrollment setting after analysis accounted for patient heterogeneity. An answer for whether long-term outcomes for patients at community and VHA centers affiliated with cooperative trial groups are equivalent to those at academic centers when care is delivered through NCI trials requires additional research among patients with longer survival horizons.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Instituciones de Salud , Neoplasias/terapia , Atención al Paciente/normas , Selección de Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Centros Médicos Académicos , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Hospitales de Veteranos , Humanos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud
19.
Cancer Biother Radiopharm ; 24(3): 311-9, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19538053

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Between January 2001 and September 2007, we treated 54 metastatic melanoma patients with patient-specific tumor cell vaccines consisting of dendritic cells (DCS), derived from their peripheral blood cells that were cultured in interleukin (IL)-4 and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), which had phagocytosed irradiated autologous tumor cells from a continuously proliferating, self-renewing, autologus tumor cell (TC) culture. The loaded DCs were injected subcutaneously in 500 microg of GM-CSF weekly x three, and then monthly for 5 months, for a total of up to 8 injections. The 34 men and 20 women had a median age of 50.5 years; 32 had M1c (visceral metastases and/or elevated lactate dehydrogenase) as their most advanced disease stage. Overall, 83% had received other systemic therapies, including interferon-alpha (n = 20), biochemotherapy (n = 19), GM-CSF (n = 19), chemotherapy (n = 16), IL-2 (n = 13), and other investigational vaccines (n = 7). Patients received an average of 7.4 vaccinations. Treatment was well-tolerated, with most patients experiencing only mild local pruritus and/or erythema. A positive delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to purified autologous tumor cells was observed at baseline in only 1 of 54 patients, compared to 12 of 54 following vaccination (p = 0.001). The projected 5-year survival rate is an impressive 54% at a median follow-up of 4.5 years (range, 2.4-7.4) for the 30 surviving patients. This survival was superior to that observed following vaccination with irradiated TC in 48 melanoma patients in a previous trial (64 versus 31 months, p = 0.016). This patient-specific vaccine warrants further investigation, based on its safety and encouraging survival rates. ( CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCI-V01-1646).


Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Neoplasias/uso terapéutico , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Células Dendríticas/trasplante , Melanoma/inmunología , Melanoma/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticuerpos/sangre , Antígenos CD/metabolismo , Antígenos de Neoplasias/inmunología , Autoantígenos/inmunología , Autoantígenos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/inmunología , Técnicas de Cultivo de Célula , Línea Celular Tumoral , Citocinas/sangre , Células Dendríticas/metabolismo , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Gangliósidos/sangre , Gangliósidos/inmunología , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/inmunología , Interferón gamma/sangre , Masculino , Melanoma/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/inmunología , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/patología , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/terapia , Fagocitosis/inmunología , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
20.
Lung Cancer ; 62(1): 92-8, 2008 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18367288

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Retrospective data suggests prolonging the time to complete thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) may negatively impact tumor control and survival in limited stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC). We examined the association between TRT duration and outcomes on a prospective phase III study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This review included 267 patients who received protocol TRT on a phase III CALGB LSCLC study assessing the addition of tamoxifen to standard chemo-radiotherapy. TRT, to a planned dose of 50Gy in 2Gy daily fractions, was initiated with the fourth chemotherapy cycle. TRT interruptions were mandated for hematologic toxicity (granulocytes<1000/mm3 or platelets<75,000/mm3) and esophageal toxicity (dysphagia necessitating intravenous hydration). RESULTS: TRT interruptions > or =3 days occurred in 115 patients (43%), most frequently during the 4th week of TRT, and did not differ between treatment arms. Hematologic toxicity and esophageal toxicity were the most frequent indications for interrupting TRT. Variables including advanced age (>70 years), gender, race, or radiotherapy treatment volume did not predict for TRT interruptions. Overall survival (OS) and local tumor control did not correlate with the administration of TRT interruptions or with TRT duration. CONCLUSION: Toxicity mandated interruptions of conventional dose, once-daily, TRT may not adversely affect outcomes for patients receiving TRT concurrent with chemotherapy (cycle 4) for LSCLC. The implications for accelerated or high dose TRT regimens are not clear.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Radioterapia/métodos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/radioterapia , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/mortalidad , Tamoxifeno/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...