RESUMEN
Brain and heart interact through multiple ways. Heart rate variability, a non-invasive measurement is studied extensively as a predicting model for various health conditions including subarachnoid hemorrhage, cancer, and diabetes. There is limited evidence to predict delirium, an acute fluctuating disorder of brain dysfunction, as it poses a significant challenge in the intensive care unit (ICU) and post-operative setting. In this systematic review of 9 articles, heart rate variability indices were used to investigate the occurrence of post-operative and ICU delirium. This systematic review and meta-analysis reveal evidence of a strong predilection between postoperative and intensive care unit delirium and alterations in the heart rate variability, measured by mean differences for standard deviation of NN-intervals. Other heart rate variability indices [root mean squares of successive differences, low-frequency (LF), high-frequency (HF), and LF:HF ratio] showed lack of or very weak association. A non-invasive tool of brain and heart interaction may refine diagnostic predictions for acute brain dysfunctions like delirium in such population and would be an important step in delirium research.
Asunto(s)
Delirio , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Delirio/diagnóstico , Delirio/fisiopatología , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Medical and health sciences librarians who are involved in evidence synthesis projects will know that systematic reviews are intensely rigorous, requiring research teams to devote significant resources to the methodological process. As expert searchers, librarians are often identified as personnel to conduct the database searching portion and/or are approached as experts in the methodology to guide research teams through the lifecycle of the project. This research method has surged in popularity at our campus and demand for librarian participation is unsustainable. As a response to this, the library created self-directed learning objects in the form of roadmap to assist researchers in learning about the knowledge synthesis methodology in an expedient, self-directed manner. This paper will discuss the creation, implementation and feedback around our educational offering: Systematic & Scoping Reviews: Your Roadmap to Conducting an Evidence Synthesis.
Asunto(s)
Bibliotecólogos , Humanos , Investigadores/educación , Bibliotecas Médicas/tendencias , Bibliotecología/educación , Bibliotecología/métodos , Bibliotecología/tendenciasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolism is associated with significant patient morbidity, mortality, and can lead to delays in treatment for patients with cancer. The objectives of this study were to identify the incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with advanced ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and identify risk factors for venous thromboembolism. METHODS: A systematic literature search of biomedical databases, including Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Embase was performed on December 6, 2022 and updated on December 21, 2023 for peer reviewed articles. Studies were included if they were cohort studies or randomized controlled trials that evaluated the incidence of venous thromboembolism for patients with ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for cohort studies and the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool results across studies. RESULTS: A total of 2636 studies were screened, and 11 were included in the review. Ten were retrospective cohort studies, and one was a randomized controlled trial. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in the included studies ranged from 0% to 18.9%. The pooled incidence rate of venous thromboembolism was 10% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7% to 13%). This remained significant when restricted to only studies with a low risk of bias (pooled incidence of 11%, 95% CI 9% to 14%). Body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2 was a significant risk factor for venous thromboembolism with a pooled odds ratio of 1.76 (95% CI 1.13 to 2.76) CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study demonstrated a 10% incidence of venous thromboembolism for patients with advanced ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This suggests that there may be a role for universal thromboprophylaxis in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022339602.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Ováricas , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Femenino , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder in females. Modest weight loss improves reproductive and metabolic PCOS features. While lifestyle modifications and pharmacotherapies remain first-line weight loss strategies, bariatric surgery is emerging as a potentially effective treatment. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature to examine the impact of bariatric surgery in PCOS to inform the 2023 International PCOS Evidence-based Guidelines. Electronic databases were searched for observational studies and trials comparing pharmacologic or lifestyle treatments to bariatric surgery in women with PCOS or bariatric surgery in women with or without PCOS. Anthropometric, reproductive, hormonal, and metabolic outcomes were included and, where possible, meta-analyzed using random-effects models. Risk of bias and evidence quality were assessed. Ten studies were included involving 432 women with and 590 women without PCOS. Comparisons between bariatric surgery and pharmacologic or lifestyle treatments were only reported in one study each, and most reproductive outcomes were limited to a single study; therefore, meta-analyses could not be performed. Meta-analysis found that women with PCOS experience similar improvements in anthropometric, hormonal, and metabolic outcomes after bariatric surgery compared to those without PCOS. Existing research is limited and of low quality with high risk of bias, especially in comparison to existing PCOS treatments and with respect to reproductive outcomes including pregnancy, highlighting the need for additional studies to inform clinical recommendations.