RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the absence of direct evidence supporting how to use nasal endoscopy findings to judge chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) disease control, experts' practice patterns could provide guidance. METHODOLOGY: Participants consisted of a diverse group of twenty-nine rhinologists. Participants were presented with every possible combination of bilateral nasal endoscopy findings represented by the modified Lund-Kennedy (MLK; range: 0-12) endoscopic scoring system and Nasal Polyp Score (NPS; range: 0-8). Reflecting the practical consequence of CRS disease control assessment, participants were asked whether they would consider CRS treatment escalation based on each scenario in the absence of any CRS symptoms, and how strongly they considered escalating therapy. The same scenarios were then presented in the context of 1 burdensome CRS symptom and participants again were asked whether they would consider treatment escalation. RESULTS: The median threshold total MLK score for considering treatment escalation was ≥4 and 75.9% of participants' MLK thresholds were within 1 point of 4. The median threshold total NPS for considering treatment escalation was ≥3 and 62.5% of participants' NPS thresholds were within 1 point of 3. Endoscopy score thresholds decreased in the presence of 1 burdensome symptom and generally increased when requiring stronger affirmation for considering CRS treatment escalation. CONCLUSION: Reflecting the practice patterns of a diverse group of rhinologists, MLK score ≥4 or NPS ≥3 may serve as thresholds for considering CRS treatment escalation. Alternatively, MLK score.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The extent to which gender affects outcomes in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is unclear. The objective of this study was to examine differential outcomes between genders following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) among CRS patients. METHODS: PubMed/Ovid, Embase and Cochrane databases were queried. Outcomes included disease burden on imaging and endoscopy, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), revision rates, and olfactory outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method with random effects model. RESULTS: Of 4,656 articles screened, 32 (n=103,499) were included for qualitative analysis and four (n=2,602) for meta-analysis. On qualitative analysis, 19 of the 32 studies noted a significant gender difference in post-operative outcomes, with five studies favoring women and 14 favoring men. Nine of 18 studies with PROMs noted a difference between genders, all favoring men. Olfactory outcomes were mixed with studies divided on favoring men vs women. No studies noted significant gender differences of disease burden on imaging or endoscopy. Across four studies included in the meta-analysis, women had higher preoperative and post-operative SNOT-22 scores. CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis shows that women patients have worse pre and postoperative SNOT-22 scores. Postoperative gender differences are most apparent in studies that examined PROMs. Further research is needed to investigate the underlying causes and to mitigate disparities between genders.
