Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Laryngol Otol ; 134(1): 68-73, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31918788

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients would have equivalent or improved outcomes when receiving non-surgical management versus surgical removal for vocal process granulomas. METHODS: A chart review was performed for 53 adults with vocal process granulomas. All patients received baseline anti-reflux treatment consisting of twice-daily proton pump inhibitors and vocal hygiene education. Further treatment approaches were divided into non-surgical (i.e. inhaled corticosteroids, voice therapy, botulinum toxin injections) and surgical groups. Subjective parameters (Voice Handicap Index 10 and Reflux Symptom Index) and outcomes were tabulated and statistically compared. Cause of granuloma was also analysed to determine if this influenced outcomes. RESULTS: Of 53 patients, 47 (89 per cent) experienced reduction in granuloma size, while 37 (70 per cent) experienced complete resolution. The rate of complete granuloma resolution after initial treatment strategy alone was significantly higher in non-surgical compared to surgical patients (67 and 30 per cent, respectively; p = 0.039). No difference in outcome was seen between iatrogenic and idiopathic granulomas. CONCLUSION: Non-surgical patients were more likely to experience initial treatment success than those who underwent surgical removal. Continued emphasis should be placed on conservative treatment options prior to surgery for patients with this condition.


Asunto(s)
Granuloma/terapia , Laringitis/terapia , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Pliegues Vocales/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/farmacología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pliegues Vocales/efectos de los fármacos , Calidad de la Voz/efectos de los fármacos , Entrenamiento de la Voz
2.
Case Rep Surg ; 2018: 1947807, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30057846

RESUMEN

Gender affirmation surgeries in male-to-female patient transitioning include breast augmentation, genital construction, and facial feminization surgery (FFS). FFS improves mental health and quality of life in transgender patients. The nose and forehead are critical in facial attractiveness and gender identity; thus, frontal brow reduction and rhinoplasty are a mainstay of FFS. The open approach to reduction of the frontal brow is very successful in the feminization of the face; however, risks include alopecia and scarring. Endoscopic brow reduction, in properly selected patients, is minimally invasive with excellent outcomes avoiding these risks. Since both reduction rhinoplasty and frontal brow reduction are routinely performed in FFS, a combined approach provides superior control over the nasal radix and profile when performing surgery on the frontal bone region first followed by nose reduction. We present a case series of four transwomen undergoing frontal bone reduction in combination with a reduction rhinoplasty. All had excellent results with one DVT that resolved with treatment. Transgender patients frequently require multiple operations during their transition increasing their hospital stay and costs. This combined approach offers superior control over the nasofrontal angle and is not only safe but reduces hospitalizations and costs and is a novel indication to reduce gender dysphoria.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...