Comparative effectiveness and safety of ozanimod versus other oral DMTs in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a synthesis of matching-adjusted indirect comparisons.

Background: Several oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). In the absence of head-to-head randomized data, matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) can evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of ozanimod versus other oral DMTs in RRMS. Objectives: To synthesize results from the published MAICs of ozanimod and other oral DMTs for 2-year outcomes in RRMS. Methods: Published MAICs involving ozanimod for the treatment of RRMS were identified. Extracted data elements included efficacy [annualized relapse rate (ARR), confirmed disability progression (CDP), and brain volume loss] and safety [adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), AEs leading to discontinuation, and infection] outcomes. Results: The four MAIC studies identified compared ozanimod with fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and ponesimod. All comparisons were adjusted for differences in age, sex, relapses within the previous year, Expanded Disability Status Scale score, and percentage of patients with prior DMTs. Outcomes at 2 years were analyzed based on comparisons that lacked a common comparator arm. Ozanimod was associated with significantly lower ARR versus teriflunomide [ARR ratio (95% CI) 0.73 (0.62, 0.84) and DMF 0.80 (0.67, 0.97)], with no significant difference versus fingolimod or ponesimod. The proportions of patients treated with ozanimod or fingolimod had similar 3- and 6-month CDP. Compared with teriflunomide and DMF, ozanimod was associated with a significantly lower risk of 3-month CDP; 6-month CDP was comparable. Ozanimod was associated with significantly lower rates of any AE and AEs leading to discontinuation compared with the other oral DMTs evaluated. Ozanimod also had significantly lower rates of SAEs versus teriflunomide and DMF and lower rates of reported infection outcomes versus fingolimod and ponesimod. Conclusion: Compared with the other oral DMTs evaluated in MAICs, ozanimod was associated with a favorable safety profile and improved or comparable efficacy outcomes.

An indirect comparison of ozanimod vs other oral treatments in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis The many treatment options available for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) make treatment decisions difficult. While direct head-to-head treatment comparisons provide useful information, these studies are not available for every pair of treatments. Indirect comparisons of published study results can help fill that evidence gap. A technique called matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) offers a statistically robust way to compare safety/efficacy outcomes from different studies by accounting for important differences across the studies. We collected data from four MAIC studies that compared 2-year treatment outcomes in patients treated with ozanimod versus those treated with fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate (DMF), or ponesimod. Each study accounted for differences in age, sex, relapses within the previous year, disability status, and previous therapy use. We found ozanimod was either better than or similar to other treatments based on the outcomes measured. The annual rate of RRMS relapse was lower for patients treated with ozanimod than for patients treated with teriflunomide or DMF and similar for patients treated with ponesimod or fingolimod. Ozanimod-treated patients saw their RRMS progress at rates similar to those treated with fingolimod at 3 and 6 months and teriflunomide and DMF at 6 months; RRMS was more likely to progress at 3 months in patients treated with teriflunomide and DMF versus those treated with ozanimod. Our analyses also found that patients treated with ozanimod had lower rates of side effects, including those serious enough to cause treatment discontinuation, compared with patients receiving other treatments. By comparing findings from existing MAIC studies, we found that patients with RRMS treated with ozanimod had fewer side effects and better or similar efficacy outcomes compared with patients who received other treatments for RRMS. These findings can potentially inform treatment decisions for patients with RRMS.

Comparison of time to clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life in neurological disorders in patients treated with natalizumab versus ocrelizumab.

Aim: To assess time to improvement in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) domains for patients treated with natalizumab versus ocrelizumab. Methods: Patients enrolled in the MS PATHS network who initiated treatment with either natalizumab or ocrelizumab rated the Neuro-QoL domains of physical function, symptoms, emotional health, cognitive function and social ability. Results: Time to clinically meaningful improvement was significantly shorter with natalizumab versus ocrelizumab for cognitive function (event time ratio [95% CI]: 0.37 [0.24-0.57]; p < 0.001), sleep disturbance (0.45 [0.28-0.72]; p = 0.001), social role participation (0.37 [0.21-0.66]; p = 0.001) and social role satisfaction (0.5 [0.31-0.8]; p = 0.004). Conclusion: Natalizumab had shorter time to clinically meaningful improvement in cognitive, sleep, and social role Neuro-QoL domains versus ocrelizumab.

Knowledge of treatment-related benefits associated with medication choices, including improvement of quality of life (QoL), are strong influential factors for patients to start and continue their therapies. Little is known about patient-reported time to onset of functional improvement upon the initiation of medications for multiple sclerosis (MS). The Multiple Sclerosis Partners Advancing Technology and Health Solutions (MS PATHS) network, a repository of collaborative international data on routine MS management, includes patient-reported information on the health-related QoL using the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) measure. This study included data from 883 eligible patients enrolled in MS PATHS, with the aim of assessing and comparing the time to improvement in physical, mental and social health for patients treated with natalizumab versus ocrelizumab using Neuro-QoL. Natalizumab and ocrelizumab are both high-efficacy treatment options for relapsing forms of MS. The results demonstrated that, compared with ocrelizumab, natalizumab treatment led to faster effect on mental and social health, as well as quicker improvements in physical functioning in the arms and hands. Overall, it took shorter time for natalizumab-treated patients to achieve better QoL compared with ocrelizumab. These findings highlight the importance of QoL in disease management and provide a patient perspective for healthcare providers when making decisions about high-efficacy treatments for their patients with MS.

Virtual versus usual in-office care for multiple sclerosis: The VIRTUAL-MS multi-site randomized clinical trial study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects nearly 1 million people and is estimated to cost $85.4 billion in the United States annually. People with MS have significant barriers to receiving care and telemedicine could substantially improve access to specialized, comprehensive care. In cross-sectional analyses, telemedicine has been shown to be feasible, have high patient and clinician satisfaction, reduce patient costs and burden, and enable a reasonable assessment of disability. However, no studies exist evaluating the longitudinal impact of telemedicine care for MS. Here we describe the study protocol for VIRtual versus UsuAL In-office care for Multiple Sclerosis (VIRTUAL-MS). The main objective of the study is to evaluate the impact of telemedicine for MS care on: patient clinical outcomes, economic costs, patient, and clinician experience. METHODS: This two-site randomized clinical trial will enroll 120 adults with a recent diagnosis of MS and randomize 1:1 to receive in-clinic vs. telemedicine care for 24 months. The primary outcome of the study is worsening in any one of the four Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite 4 (MSFC4) measures at 24 months. Other study outcomes include patient and clinician satisfaction, major healthcare costs, Expanded Disability Status Scale, treatment adherence, and digital outcomes. CONCLUSION: The results of this study will directly address the key gaps in knowledge about longitudinal telemedicine-enabled care in an MS population. It will inform clinical care implementation as well as design of trials in MS and other chronic conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05660187.

Geographic Disparities in Access to Neurologists and Multiple Sclerosis Care in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A shortage of neurology clinicians and healthcare disparities may hinder access to neurologic care. This study examined disparities in geographic access to neurologists and subspecialty multiple sclerosis (MS) care among various demographic segments of the United States. METHODS: Neurologist practice locations from 2022 CMS Care Compare physician data and MS Center locations as defined by the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers were used to compute spatial access for all U.S. census tracts. Census tract-level community characteristics (sex, age, race, ethnicity, education, income, insurance, % with computer, % without a vehicle, % with limited English, and % with hearing, vision, cognitive, and ambulatory difficulty) were obtained from 2020 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. Rural-urban status was obtained from 2010 rural-urban commuting area codes. Logistic and linear regression models were used to examine access to a neurologist or MS Center within 60 miles and 60-mile spatial access ratios. RESULTS: Of 70,858 census tracts, 388 had no neurologists within 60 miles and 17,837 had no MS centers within 60 miles. Geographic access to neurologists (spatial access ratio [99% CI]) was lower for rural (-80.49%; CI [-81.65 to -79.30]) and micropolitan (-60.50%; CI [-62.40 to -58.51]) areas compared with metropolitan areas. Tracts with 10% greater percentage of Hispanic individuals (-4.53%; CI [-5.23 to -3.83]), men (-6.76%; CI [-8.96 to -4.5]), uninsured (-7.99%; CI [-9.72 to -6.21]), individuals with hearing difficulty (-40.72%; CI [-44.62 to -36.54]), vision difficulty (-13.0%; [-18.72 to -6.89]), and ambulatory difficulty (-15.68%; CI [-19.25 to -11.95]) had lower access to neurologists. Census tracts with 10% greater Black individuals (3.50%; CI [2.93-10.71]), college degree holders (-7.49%; CI [6.67-8.32]), individuals with computers (16.57%, CI [13.82-19.40]), individuals without a vehicle (9.57%; CI [8.69-10.47]), individuals with cognitive difficulty (25.63%; CI [19.77-31.78]), and individuals with limited English (18.5%; CI [16.30-20.73]), and 10-year older individuals (8.85%; CI [7.03-10.71]) had higher spatial access to neurologists. Covariates for access followed similar patterns for MS centers. DISCUSSION: Geographic access to neurologists is decreased in rural areas, in areas with higher proportions of Hispanics, populations with disabilities, and those uninsured. Access is further limited for MS subspecialty care. This study highlights disparities in geographic access to neurologic care.

Predictors for the development of neurological immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors and impact on mortality.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Little is known about risk factors for developing neurological immunological adverse events (neuro-irAEs) from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We report the incidence, predictors for development, impact on mortality of neuro-irAEs, and impact of ICIs on pre-existing neurological conditions in a large clinical cohort. METHODS: Patients who received ICIs between January 2011 and December 2018 were identified from a tertiary cancer center registry. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient, cancer, and treatment data. Odds ratios from univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were calculated to identify potential predictors for developing a neuro-irAE. Impact of neuro-irAEs on overall survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Overall frequency of neurological irAEs was 2.3%. Peripheral nervous system complications were most frequent (53.6%). Melanoma, younger age, prior chemotherapy, prior resection, CTLA-4 ICIs exposure, and combination PD-1 and CTLA-4 ICIs exposure had significantly higher odds for developing a neuro-irAE (p < 0.05) in univariate but not multivariate models. Those with a neuro-irAE were less likely to die at 3 years compared to those without a neuro-irAE (69% vs. 55%, p = 0.004) in univariate but not multivariate model. Flare of pre-existing neurological condition after exposure to ICIs was present (15.4%, 2 of 13 patients) but manageable. One patient was rechallenged with ICIs without recurrent flare. CONCLUSIONS: Neuro-irAEs are not associated with increase in overall mortality. Potential predictors for the development of neuro-irAEs are younger age, melanoma, prior chemotherapy and resection, CTLA-4, or combination ICIs exposure.

Disparities in spatial access to neurological care in Appalachia: a cross-sectional health services analysis.

Background: Appalachia is rural and socioeconomically deprived with a heavy burden of neurological disorders and poor access to healthcare providers. Rates of neurological disorders are increasing over time without equal increases in providers, indicating that Appalachian disparities are likely to worsen. Spatial access to neurological care has not been robustly explored for U.S. areas, so we aimed to examine disparities in the vulnerable Appalachian region. Methods: Using 2022 CMS Care Compare physician data, we conducted a cross-sectional health services analysis, where we computed spatial accessibility of neurologists for all census tracts in the 13 states with Appalachian counties. We stratified access ratios by state, area deprivation, and rural-urban commuting area (RUCA) codes then utilized Welch two-sample t-tests to compare Appalachian tracts with non-Appalachian tracts. Using stratified results, we identified Appalachian areas where interventions would have the largest impact. Findings: Appalachian tracts (n = 6169) had neurologist spatial access ratios between 25% and 35% lower than non-Appalachian tracts (n = 18,441; p < 0.001). When stratified by rurality and deprivation, three-step floating catchment area spatial access ratios for Appalachian tracts remained significantly lower in the most urban (RUCA = 1 [p < 0.0001) and most rural tracts (RUCA = 9 [p = 0.0093]; RUCA = 10 [p = 0.0227]). We identified 937 Appalachian census tracts where interventions can be targeted. Interpretation: After stratifying by rural status and deprivation, significant disparities in spatial access to neurologists remained for Appalachian areas, indicating both poorer access in Appalachia and that neurologist accessibility cannot be determined solely by remoteness and socioeconomic status. These findings and our identified disparity areas have broad implications for policymaking and intervention targeting in Appalachia. Funding: R.B.B. was supported by NIH Award Number T32CA094186. M.P.M. was supported by NIH-NCATS Award Number KL2TR002547.

Gadolinium-based contrast agent exposures and physical and cognitive disability in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The clinical correlation of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) has not been well studied in multiple sclerosis (MS). We investigated the extent to which the number of GBCA administrations relates to self-reported disability and performance measures. METHODS: A cohort of MS patients was analyzed in this retrospective observational study. The main outcome was the association between the cumulative number of GBCA exposures (linear or macrocyclic GBCA), Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS), and measures of physical and cognitive performance (walking speed test, manual dexterity test [MDT], and processing speed test [PST]). The analysis was performed first cross-sectionally and then longitudinally. RESULTS: The cross-sectional data included 1059 MS patients with a mean age of 44.0 years (standard deviation = 11.2). While the contrast ratio in globus pallidus weakly correlated with PDDS, MDT, and PST in a univariate correlational analysis (coefficients, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11 [0.04, 0.18], 0.15 [0.08, 0.21], and -0.16 [-0.10, -0.23], respectively), the associations disappeared after covariate adjustment. A significant association was found between number of linear GBCA administrations and PDDS (coefficient [CI] = -0.131 [-0.196, -0.067]), and MDT associated with macrocyclic GBCA administrations (-0.385 [-0.616, -0.154]), but their signs indicated better outcomes in patients with greater GBCA exposures. The longitudinal data showed no significant detrimental effect of macrocyclic GBCA exposures. CONCLUSION: No detrimental effects were observed between GBCA exposure and self-reported disability and standardized objective measures of physical and cognitive performance. While several weak associations were found, they indicated benefit on these measures.

Clinical and Research Applications of the Electronic Medical Record in Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review of Current Uses and Future Applications.

BACKGROUND: The electronic medical record (EMR) has revolutionized health care workflow and delivery. It has evolved from a clinical adjunct to a multifaceted tool, with uses relevant to patient care and research. METHODS: A MEDLINE literature review was conducted to identify data regarding the use of EMR for multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical care and research. RESULTS: Of 282 relevant articles identified, 29 were included. A variety of EMR integrated platforms with features specific to MS have been designed, with options for documenting disease course, disability status, and treatment. Research efforts have focused on early diagnosis identification, relapse prediction, and surrogates for disability status. CONCLUSIONS: The available platforms and associated research support the utility of harnessing EMR for MS care. The adoption of a core set of discrete EMR elements should be considered to support future research efforts and the ability to harmonize data across institutions.

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG associated disorders (MOGAD) following SARS-CoV-2 infection: A case series.

This case series describes 9 patients diagnosed with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG associated disorder (MOGAD) following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Patients developed neurological symptoms between 4 days and 5 weeks following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Myelitis was observed in 4 patients; 4 presented with optic neuritis; and encephalopathy was observed in 3. Serum MOG-IgG cell-based assay was medium or high positive in each case. The majority of patients had near-complete recovery following acute immunosuppression. This series adds to the growing number of cases of central nervous system demyelination following SARS-CoV-2 infection and highlights a potential role of infection in the immunopathogenesis of MOGAD.

Association of socioeconomic disadvantage and neighborhood disparities with clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis patients.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic disadvantage may be an important contributor to clinical outcomes in MS but is not well understood. Our objective was to examine the associations between Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a validated measure of neighborhood-level disadvantage, with clinical outcomes. METHODS: We assessed the longitudinal association between MS Performance Test (MSPT) and quality of life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) measures with ADI quartiles (Q1: lowest deprivation - Q4 highest deprivation) in relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) and progressive MS cohorts. RESULTS: Our study included 2,921 patients (65.8% RRMS and 34.1% progressive MS) with 13,715 visits. Patients living in the most disadvantaged areas had almost universal worsening on baseline MSPT and Neuro-QoL scores (p < 0.05) when compared to patients living in areas of lowest deprivation. Manual Dexterity Test (MDT) illustrated particular disparity as RRMS patients living in the greatest area of deprivation had MDT score which averaged 2.9 seconds longer than someone living in areas of least deprivation. Longitudinal analysis illustrated less favorable MSPT and Neuro-QoL outcomes across visits between Q1 versus Q4 ADI quartiles within in the RRMS cohort but not within the progressive MS cohort. After adjustment, linearly increasing area deprivation scores reflected less favorable Processing Speed Test (PST) and six Neuro-QoL outcomes among the RRMS cohort. Within the progressive cohort, higher deprivation was associated less favorable MDT, PST and 11 of 12 Neuro-QoL outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for socioeconomic disadvantage as a risk factor for disability accrual in MS and may be targeted to improve care while informing resource allocation.

Providing Person-Centered Care via Telemedicine in the Era of COVID-19 in Multiple Sclerosis.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has catalyzed the rapid adoption of telemedicine which encompasses synchronous and asynchronous interactions between patients and providers. In order to facilitate this rapid deployment, there has been numerous regulatory changes to ensure caregivers can effectively communicate with patients during this time. We illustrate a model where people, processes, and technology work together to address the comprehensive needs of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. We provide a template for how multidisciplinary, academic practices can implement a rapid shift to virtual management during the pandemic using existing infrastructure that can be widely adopted to care for patients with chronic diseases. Telemedicine was incorporated into our entire practice, which encompasses neurology, rehabilitation, advanced practice providers, fellows, social work, and behavioral medicine. Our patient satisfaction results remained stable across almost all domains when compared to survey results from our typical, in-office visits. Our experience demonstrates telemedicine's transformative potential in successfully managing a multidisciplinary MS clinic during the time of a pandemic and outlines a potential path for other practices to follow.

Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators in multiple sclerosis and other conditions.

The sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) signalling pathways have important and diverse functions. S1P receptors (S1PRs) have been proposed as a therapeutic target for various diseases due to their involvement in regulation of lymphocyte trafficking, brain and cardiac function, vascular permeability, and vascular and bronchial tone. S1PR modulators were first developed to prevent rejection by the immune system following renal transplantation, but the only currently approved indication is multiple sclerosis. The primary mechanism of action of S1PR modulators in multiple sclerosis is through binding S1PR subtype 1 on lymphocytes resulting in internalisation of the receptor and loss of responsiveness to the S1P gradient that drives lymphocyte egress from lymph nodes. The reduction in circulating lymphocytes presumably limits inflammatory cell migration into the CNS. Four S1PR modulators (fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, and ponesimod) have regulatory approval for multiple sclerosis. Preclinical evidence and ongoing and completed clinical trials support development of S1PR modulators for other therapeutic indications.

Impact of natalizumab on quality of life in a real-world cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis: Results from MS PATHS.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing multiple sclerosis treatment warrants understanding of changes in physical, mental, and social health. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of natalizumab on Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) scores. METHODS: Annualized change in T-scores and likelihood of ≥5-point improvement over baseline were calculated for each Neuro-QoL domain after natalizumab initiation. Comparisons with ocrelizumab-treated patients were conducted after propensity score weighting and adjustment for relevant co-medications, year, and drug-year interaction. RESULTS: Among 164 natalizumab patients analyzed, 8 of 12 Neuro-QoL domains improved significantly, with greater improvement in patients with abnormal baseline Neuro-QoL. In the subgroup comparison of natalizumab-treated (n = 145) and ocrelizumab-treated (n = 520) patients, significant improvement occurred in 9 of 12 and 4 of 12 domains, respectively. The difference between groups was statistically significant for positive affect and well-being (p = 0.02), sleep (p = 0.003), and satisfaction with social roles and activities (SRA) (p = 0.03) in the overall population and for emotional and behavioral dyscontrol (p = 0.01), participation in SRA (p = 0.0001), and satisfaction with SRA (p = 0.02) in patients with abnormal baseline Neuro-QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Natalizumab can produce clinically meaningful improvements in mental and social health. Such improvements are unlikely to be primarily driven by expectation bias, as their magnitude exceeded improvements with another high-efficacy therapy, ocrelizumab.

Use of a Smartphone to Gather Parkinson's Disease Neurological Vital Signs during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: To overcome travel restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic, consumer-based technology was rapidly deployed to the smartphones of individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) participating in a 12-month exercise trial. The aim of the project was to determine the feasibility of utilizing a combined synchronous and asynchronous self-administered smartphone application to characterize PD symptoms. METHODS: A synchronous video virtual visit was completed for the administration of virtual Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III (vMDS-UPDRS III). Participants asynchronously completed a mobile application consisting of a measure of upper extremity bradykinesia (Finger Tapping Test) and information processing. RESULTS: Twenty-three individuals completed the assessments. The mean vMDS-UPDRS III was 23.65 ± 8.56 points. On average, the number of taps was significantly greater for the less affected limb, 97.96 ± 17.77 taps, compared to the more affected, 89.33 ± 18.66 taps (p = 0.025) with a significantly greater number of freezing episodes for the more affected limb (p < 0.05). Correlation analyses indicated the number of errors and the number of freezing episodes were significantly related to clinical ratings of vMDS-UPDRS III bradykinesia (Rho = 0.44, p < 0.01; R = 0.43, p < 0.01, resp.) and finger tapping performance (Rho = 0.31, p = 0.03; Rho = 0.32, p = 0.03, resp.). Discussion. The objective characterization of bradykinesia, akinesia, and nonmotor function and their relationship with clinical disease metrics indicate smartphone technology provides a remote method of characterizing important aspects of PD performance. While theoretical and position papers have been published on the potential of telemedicine to aid in the management of PD, this report translates the theory into a viable reality.

Expanded access to multiple sclerosis teleneurology care following the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Teleneurology for multiple sclerosis (MS) care was considered feasible, but utilization was limited. OBJECTIVE: To describe how the existing teleneurology populations at two academic MS Centers changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we captured all in-person and teleneurology visits at two academic MS Centers between January 2019 and April 2020. We compared group differences between the Centers, and COVID-related changes using T-, chi-squared Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: 2268 patients completed 2579 teleneurology visits (mean age 48.3 ± 13.3 years, 72.9% female). Pre-COVID, the Centers' teleneurology populations were similar for age, sex, MS type, and disability level (all p > 0.1), but differed for race (96.5% vs 80.7% white, p ≤ 0.001), MS treatment (49.1% vs 32.1% infusible, p ≤ 0.001), and median distance from Center (72 vs 186 miles, p ≤ 0.001). Post-COVID, both Centers' teleneurology populations had more black (12.7% vs 4.37%, p ≤ 0.001) and local (median 34.5 vs 102 miles, p ≤ 0.001) patients. CONCLUSION: Teleneurology visits in 2019 reflected the organizational and local teleneurology reimbursement patterns of our Centers. Our post-COVID-19 changes illustrate the potential for payors and policy to change disparities in access to, or utilization of, remote care. Patients' perception of care quality and value following this shift warrants study.