Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
J Nurs Manag ; 6(4): 193-200, 1998 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9832723

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of this study was to understand how people evaluate and make sense of their experience of hospital care. METHOD: Narrative interviews were conducted with 18 patients between 4-6 weeks after an episode of inpatient care or day surgery. Participants were deliberately sampled from a population who participated in a hospital-wide audit which took place during 1 week in June 1995. Sampling criteria ensured a mix of age, gender, type of, and reason for, admission. The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed using grounded theory. FINDINGS: Three categories: 'feeling informed', 'valued as an individual', and 'at home' contributed to a core category: 'building confidence, faith and trust'. Notably, confidence and trust were determined as much by observations of the care given to other people, as the care the participants themselves had received. CONCLUSIONS: More attention needs to be given to understanding the complex social and reflective process which underpin patient judgements about quality of care.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Relaciones Enfermero-Paciente , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación Metodológica en Enfermería , Educación del Paciente como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...