Patient reported outcomes for quality of life (QOL) by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) on average 15 years post treatment.

Objective/purpose: Previously patient reported quality of life (QOL) was reported in men with prostate cancer a mean 2 and 6 years post treatment with open radical prostatectomy (RP), 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT), or 125I low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy (BT). Herein we update the results 15 years post-treatment QOL. Materials/methods: The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) domains were scored with differences evaluated at a median 15.8 years follow up based upon mean EPIC summary domains by ANOVA with pairwise post-hoc comparisons adjusted for age. Patient differences of current survey from first cross-section are reported as median change in summary score for each treatment group at median of 2.2 and 6.0, and 15.8 years. Results: Among men still alive response rate was 52% in BT, 60% in 3D CRT, and 62% in RP resulting in 30, 41, and 330 QOL questionnaires to evaluate for each corresponding modality at median follow up of 15.8 years. Men were a mean 75.3, 83.6, and 79.3 years of age after RP, 3DCRT, and BT, respectively.At a median of 15.8 years, there were largely persistent differences in EPIC domains without substantial evolution in QoL from middle time points. Persistent worsening in urinary irritative and bowel domain with 3DRT or BT compared to RP. Trend towards worse urinary incontinence with RP were noted without statistical differences within radiotherapy options. Conclusion: As the EPIC patient reported outcomes with the longest follow-up, these data uniquely reveal temporal trends from 2 to 15 years post treatment. However, the treatment modalities of open RP, 3D CRT without image guidance or intensity modulation, and BT without peripheral loading or MRI guidance may not reflect modern techniques.

Prostate magnetic resonance imaging for brachytherapists: Anatomy and technique.

PURPOSE: To present an overview of mp MRI techniques necessary for high-resolution imaging of prostate. METHODS: We summarize examples from our clinical experience and concepts from the current literature that illustrate normal prostate anatomy on multiparametric MRI (mp MRI). RESULTS: Our experience regarding optimal mp MRI image acquisition is provided, as well as a summary of prostate and periprostatic anatomy and anatomical variants that pose challenges for BT. CONCLUSIONS: mp MRI provides unparalleled assessment of the prostate and periprostatic anatomy, making it the most appropriate imaging modality to facilitate prostate BT treatment planning, implantation, and followup. This work provides an introduction to prostate mp MR imaging, anatomy, and anatomical variants essential for successful integration mp MRI into prostate brachytherapy practice.

Prostate magnetic resonance imaging for brachytherapists: Diagnosis, imaging pitfalls, and post-therapy assessment.

Optimal integration of multiparametric MRI (mp MRI) into prostate brachytherapy practice necessitates an understanding of imaging findings pertinent to prostate cancer detection and staging. This review will summarize prostate cancer imaging findings and tumor staging on mp MRI, including an overview of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS)-structured reporting schema, mp MRI findings observed in the post-therapy setting including cases of post-treatment recurrence, and MRI concepts integral to successful salvage brachytherapy.

A randomized trial of a single-dose rasburicase versus five-daily doses in patients at risk for tumor lysis syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is a life-threatening disorder characterized by hyperuricemia and metabolic derangements. The efficacy of rasburicase, administered daily for 5 days, has been well established. However, the optimal duration of therapy is unknown in adults. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy of rasburicase (0.15 mg/kg) administered as single dose followed by as needed dosing (maximum five doses) versus daily dosing for 5 days in adult patients at risk for TLS. RESULTS: Eighty of the 82 patients enrolled received rasburicase; 40 high risk [median uric acid (UA) 8.5 mg/dl; range, 1.5-19.7] and 40 potential risk (UA = 5.6 mg/dl; range, 2.4-7.4). Seventy-nine patients (99%) experienced normalization in their UA within 4 h after the first dose; 84% to an undetectable level (<0.7 mg/dl). Thirty-nine of 40 (98%) patients in the daily-dose arm and 34 of 40 (85%) patients in single-dose arm showed sustained UA response. Six high-risk patients within the single-dose arm required second dose for UA >7.5 mg/dl. Rasburicase was well tolerated; one patient with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency developed methemoglobinemia and hemolysis. CONCLUSIONS: Rasburicase is highly effective for prevention and management of hyperuricemia in adults at risk for TLS. Single-dose rasburicase was effective in most patients; only a subset of high-risk patients required a second dose.

Defining high risk prostate cancer with risk groups and nomograms: implications for designing clinical trials.

PURPOSE: Death from prostate cancer is usually preceded by metastases and it usually occurs in men with high risk disease who experienced biochemical failure with a short prostate specific antigen doubling time. We developed a model for determining disease specific survival in prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the model for defining high risk prostate cancer that was developed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and combined it with the Kattan nomogram for predicting the risk of metastases. We selected 414 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group intermediate and high risk patients who were treated with external beam radiotherapy alone. Excluded were patients with low risk disease. The Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to estimate the probability of freedom from biochemical failure, overall survival and disease specific survival. RESULTS: A significant difference was observed in freedom from biochemical failure, disease specific survival and overall survival among the 3 tertiles created by the nomogram using the cutoff points less than 8.5%, 8.5% to 15% and greater than 15% (p <0.001, 0.0002 and 0.0003, respectively). Only the risk of metastases using the categorized nomogram score (less than 8.5% and 8.5% to 15% vs greater than 15%), not preradiotherapy prostate specific antigen or Radiation Therapy Oncology Group risk (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 2 vs 3), was a significant predictor of disease specific and overall survival for intermediate/high risk patients and intermediate/high risk with 15% or less risk for metastases. CONCLUSIONS: We combined a risk group stratification scheme for disease specific survival with a nomogram predicting the risk of metastases and created a model that may be useful for designing phase III trials with metastases and disease specific survival as study end points.

What does postradiotherapy PSA nadir tell us about freedom from PSA failure and progression-free survival in patients with low and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer?

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the post-external beam radiotherapy (RT) prostate-specific antigen nadir (nPSA) improves our ability to predict freedom from PSA failure, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival. Controversy regarding the importance of nPSA after external beam RT as a prognostic indicator for patients with localized prostate cancer has continued. METHODS: This analysis was based on the data from 748 patients with low and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer treated with external beam RT alone. Patients were categorized by nPSA quartile groups with cutpoints of less than 0.3, 0.3 to less than 0.6, 0.6 to less than 1.2, and 1.2 ng/mL or greater. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the significance of nPSA on PSA failure (American Society for Therapeutic Radiology Oncology consensus definition), PFS (death after PSA failure), and overall survival (death from any cause). RESULTS: Freedom from PSA failure was strongly associated with nadir quartile groups (P <0.0001). PFS was also significantly different statistically among nadir quartile groups (P = 0.02). No statistically significant difference was found in overall survival associated with nPSA at this point. CONCLUSIONS: nPSA is a strong independent predictor of freedom from PSA failure and PFS in patients with low and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer treated with RT alone. Longer follow-up and larger patient numbers are required to confirm these observations.

Comparison of MRI pulse sequences in defining prostate volume after permanent implantation.

PURPOSE: To determine the relative value of three MRI pulse sequences in defining the prostate volume after permanent implantation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 45 patients who received a permanent 125I implant were studied. Two weeks after implantation, an axial CT scan (2 mm thickness) and T1-weighted, T1-weighted fat saturation, and T2-weighted axial MRI (3-mm) studies were obtained. The prostate volumes were compared with the initial ultrasound planning volumes, and subsequently the CT, T1-weighted, and T1-weighted fat saturation MRI volumes were compared with the T2-weighted volumes. Discrepancies in volume were evaluated by visual inspection of the registered axial images and the registration of axial volumes on the sagittal T2-weighted volumes. In a limited set of patients, pre- and postimplant CT and T2-weighted MRI studies were available for comparison to determine whether prostate volume changes after implant were dependent on the imaging modality. RESULTS: T1-weighted and T1-weighted fat saturation MRI and CT prostate volumes were consistently larger than the T2-weighted MRI prostate volumes, with a volume on average 1.33 (SD 0.24) times the T2-weighted volume. This discrepancy was due to the superiority of T2-weighted MRI for prostate definition at the following critical interfaces: membranous urethra, apex, and anterior base-bladder and posterior base-seminal vesicle interfaces. The differences in prostate definition in the anterior base region suggest that the commonly reported underdose may be due to overestimation of the prostate in this region by CT. The consistent difference in volumes suggests that the degree of swelling observed after implantation is in part a function of the imaging modality. In patients with pre- and postimplant CT and T2-weighted MRI images, swelling on the T2-weighted images was 1.1 times baseline and on CT was 1.3 times baseline, confirming the imaging modality dependence of prostate swelling. CONCLUSION: Postimplant T2-weighted MRI images provided superior prostate definition in all critical regions of the prostate compared with CT and the other MRI sequences tested. In addition to defining an optimal technique, these findings call two prior observations into question. Under dosing at the anterior base region may be overestimated because of poor definition of the prostate-bladder muscle interface. The swelling observed after implantation was lower on T2-weighted images as well, suggesting that a fraction of postimplant swelling is a function of the imaging modality. These findings have implications for preimplant planning and postimplant evaluation. As implant planning techniques become more conformal, and registration methods become more efficient, T2-weighted MRI after implantation will improve the accuracy of postimplant dosimetry.

Influence of 3D-CRT pelvic irradiation on outcome in prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The role of pelvic irradiation (PRT) in the treatment of prostate cancer remains unclear. We reviewed our institution's experience with three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy (3D-CRT) during the prostate-specific antigen era to determine the influence of PRT on the risk of biochemical recurrence in patients who have a predicted risk of lymph node involvement. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between March 1985 and January 2001, 1832 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with definitive 3D-CRT. All treatments involved CT planning to ensure coverage of the intended targets. Treatment consisted of prostate-only treatment, prostate and seminal vesicle treatment, or PRT of lymph nodes at risk followed by a boost. To create relatively homogenous analysis groups, each patient's percentage of risk of lymph node (%rLN) involvement was assigned by matching the patient's T stage, Gleason score, and initial prostate-specific antigen level to the appropriate value as described in the updated Partin tables. Three categories of %rLN involvement were defined: low, 0-5%; intermediate, >5-15%; and high, >15%. Biochemical recurrence was defined as the first occurrence of either the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition of prostate-specific antigen failure or the initiation of salvage hormonal therapy for any reason. RESULTS: The risk status (%rLN) could be determined for 709 low-risk, 263 intermediate-risk, and 309 high-risk patients. The actuarial freedom from biochemical recurrence (bNED) and the log-rank test for the similarity of the control and treatment survival functions are reported for each risk group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a statistically significant benefit for the entire population treated with PRT, with a relative risk reduction of 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.54-0.97). Although the multivariate analysis could not determine the patient population that would most benefit from PRT, the beneficial effect appeared to be most pronounced within the intermediate-risk group. Univariate analysis revealed that the intermediate-risk patients treated with PRT had an improved 2-year bNED rate, 90.1% vs. 80.6% (p = 0.02), and both low-risk and high-risk patients treated with PRT had statistically similar 2-year bNED rates compared with those who did not receive it. CONCLUSION: Pelvic 3D-CRT appears to improve bNED in prostate cancer patients. Additional studies are needed to elucidate the %rLN population for which this treatment should be recommended.

Overall survival after prostate-specific-antigen-detected recurrence following conformal radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To study the significance, in terms of overall and cause-specific survival, of biochemical failure after conformal external-beam radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Of the 1844 patients in the Radiation Oncology prostate cancer database, 718 were deemed eligible. Patients excluded were those with N1 or M1 disease, those treated after radical prostatectomy, those who received hormone therapy before radiation therapy, and those who died, failed clinically, or had no PSA response in the first 6 months after RT. Patients included were required to have a minimum of 2 post-RT PSAs separated by at least 1 week. Biochemical relapse was defined as 3 consecutive PSA rises. This resulted in 154 patients with biochemical failure. Survival was calculated from the third PSA elevation. The rate of rise of PSA was calculated by fitting a regression line to the four rising PSAs on a ln PSA vs. time plot. RESULTS: There were 41 deaths among the 154 patients with failure in 23 of the 41 due to prostate cancer. The overall survival after failure was 58% at 5 years, while the cause-specific failure was 73% at 5 years. Among the 154 failures, several factors were evaluated for an association with overall survival: age at failure, pre-RT PSA, PSA at second rise, PSA nadir, time from RT to failure, time to nadir, Gleason score, T-stage, and rate of rise, both from the nadir and from the beginning of the rise. None of these factors were significantly associated with an increased risk of death. As expected, the group of patients with biochemical failure have significantly worse prognostic factors than those without biochemical failure: median pre-RT PSA 15.9 vs. 9.0 (p < 0.001), and Gleason score of 7 or greater for 48% of subjects vs. 40% (p = 0.1). Relative PSA rise and slope of ln PSA vs. time were associated with cause-specific mortality (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively). CONCLUSION: Overall survival after conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer remains high 5 years after biochemical failure. This high survival rate occurs even though the group of patients with biochemical failure has worse than average adverse preradiation prognostic factors. Thus, although biochemical failure can identify patients who have recurrent disease after RT, the ultimate relationship between this endpoint and death remains to be better defined.

Prostate position late in the course of external beam therapy: patterns and predictors.

PURPOSE: To examine prostate and seminal vesicles position late in the course of radiation therapy and to determine the effect and predictive value of the bladder and rectum on prostate and seminal vesicles positioning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-four patients with localized prostate cancer underwent a computerized tomography scan (CT1) before the start of radiation therapy. After 4-5 weeks of radiation therapy, a second CT scan (CT2) was obtained. All patients were scanned in the supine treatment position with instructions to maintain a full bladder. The prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum were contoured. CT2 was aligned via fixed bony anatomy to CT1. The geometrical center and volume of each structure were obtained and directly compared. RESULTS: The prostate shifted along a diagonal axis extending from an anterior-superior position to a posterior-inferior position. The dominant shift was to a more posterior-inferior position. On average, bladder and rectal volumes decreased to 51% (+/-29%) and 82% (+/-45%) of their pretreatment values, respectively. Multiple regression analysis (MRA) revealed that bladder movement and volume change and upper rectum movement were independently associated with prostate motion (p = 0.016, p = 0. 003, and p = 0.052 respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients are often instructed to maintain a full bladder during a course of external beam radiation therapy, in the hopes of decreasing bladder and small bowel toxicity. However, our study shows that large bladder volumes late in therapy are strongly associated with posterior prostate displacement. This prostate displacement may result in marginal miss.

3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) for high grade prostate cancer: a multi-institutional review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of 3DCRT and the effect of higher than traditional doses in patients with high grade prostate cancer, we compiled data from three institutions and analyzed the outcome of this relatively uncommon subset of prostate cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The 180 patients with Gleason score 8- 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostrate were treated with 3DCRT at the Univer sity of Michigan Health System, University of California-San Francisco, or Fox Chase Cancer. Eligible patients had T1-T4 NO or NX MO adenocarci noma with a pretreatment PSA. Pretreatment characteristics included: me dian age 72 years, 60.6% Gleason score 8 tumors, 57.6% T1-T2, and median pretreatment PSA 17.1 ng/ml (range 0.3-257.1). The total dose received was <70 Gy in 30%, 70-75 Gy in 37%, and >75 Gy in 33%, 27% received adju vant or neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. The median follow-up was 3.0 years for all patients and 16% of patients were followed up for at least 5 years. RESULTS: The 5-year freedom from PSA failure was 62.5% for all patients and 79.3% in T1-T2 patients. Univariate analysis revealed that T-stage (T1-T2 vs. T3-T4), pretreatment PSA, and RT dose predicted for freedom from PSA failure. A 5-year overall survival for all patients was 67.3%. Only RT dose was predictive of 5-year overall survival on univariate analysis. Because a significant association was seen between T-stage and RT dose, the Cox proportional hazards model was performed separately for T1-T2 and T3-T4 tumors. None of the prognostic factors reached statistical significance for overall survival or freedom from PSA failure in T3-T4 patients or for overall survival in T1-T2 patients. Lower RT dose and higher pretreatment PSA predicted for PSA failure on multivariate analysis in T1-T2 patients. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study from three institutions with experience in dose escalation suggests a dose effect for PSA control above 70 Gy in patients with T1-T2 high grade prostate cancer. These results are superior to surgery and emphasize the need for dose escalation in treating Gleason 8-10 prostate cancer.

Permanent implantation of 125I sources in the prostate: radical limits of simplicity.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of reducing the number of sources per implantation on the dose coverage of the prostate volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Idealized source distributions were planned for four, eight, 16, 24, 32, and 48 sources. The peripheral loading technique was used to plan a uniform, conformal dose distribution to the target volume, which was the prostate volume as visualized at ultrasonography. Source-placement error was estimated by using measured error magnitudes and was expressed with systematic and random components. The relative sensitivities of the plans to the source-placement error were studied. RESULTS: Idealized planned target coverage can be adequately achieved with comparable dose distributions with eight or more sources. The sensitivity to source-placement error is comparable for plans with 16 or more sources. CONCLUSION: It is theoretically possible to radically simplify implantation without compromising target coverage or error tolerance.

The effect of patient position and treatment technique in conformal treatment of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The relative value of prone versus supine positioning and axial versus nonaxial beam arrangements in the treatment of prostate cancer remains controversial. Two critical issues in comparing techniques are: 1) dose to critical normal tissues, and 2) prostate stabilization. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients underwent pretreatment CT scans in one supine and two prone positions (flat and angled). To evaluate normal tissue exposure, prostate/seminal vesicle volumes or prostate volumes were expanded 8 mm and covered by the 95% isodose surface by both 6-field axial and 4-field nonaxial techniques. A total of 280 dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were analyzed to evaluate dose to rectal wall and bladder relative to patient position and beam arrangement. A CT scan was repeated in each patient after 5 weeks of treatment. Prostate motion was assessed by comparing early to late scans by three methods: 1) center of mass shift, 2) superior pubic symphysis to anterior prostate distance, and 3) deviation of the posterior surface of the prostate. RESULTS: For prostate (P) or prostate/seminal vesicle (P/SV) treatments, prone flat was advantageous or equivalent to other positions with regard to rectal sparing. The mechanism of rectal sparing in the prone position may be related to a paradoxical retraction of the rectum against the sacrum, away from the P/SV. Although there was no clear overall preference for beam arrangement, substantial improvements in rectal sparing could be realized for individual patients. In this limited number of patients, there was no convincing evidence prostate position was stabilized by prone relative to supine position. CONCLUSIONS: Prone flat positioning was advantageous over other positions and beam arrangements in rectal sparing. This study suggests that patient position is a more critical a factor in conformal therapy than beam arrangement, and may improve the safety of dose escalation.

Antibiotic treatment of gastric lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. An uncontrolled trial.

BACKGROUND: Gastric lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) is related to Helicobacter pylori infection and may depend on this infection for growth. OBJECTIVE: To determine the response of gastric MALT lymphoma to antibiotic treatment. DESIGN: Prospective, uncontrolled treatment trial. SETTING: University hospital referral center and three collaborating university and community hospitals. PATIENTS: 34 patients with stage I or stage II N1 gastric MALT lymphoma. INTERVENTION: Two of three oral antibiotic regimens--1) amoxicillin, 750 mg three times daily, and clarithromycin, 500 mg three times daily; 2)tetracycline, 500 mg four times daily, and clarithromycin, 500 mg three times daily; or 3) tetracycline, 500 mg four times daily, and metronidazole, 500 mg three times daily--were administered sequentially (usually in the order written) for 21 days at baseline and at 8 weeks, along with a proton-pump inhibitor (lansoprazole or omeprazole) and bismuth subsalicylate. MEASUREMENTS: Complete remission was defined as the absence of histopathologic evidence of lymphoma on endoscopic biopsy. Partial remission was defined as a reduction in endoscopic tumor stage or 50% reduction in the size of large tumors. RESULTS: 34 patients were followed for a mean (+/-SD) of 41 +/- 16 months (range, 18 to 70 months) after antibiotic treatment. Of 28 H. pylori-positive patients, 14 (50% [95% CI, 31% to 69%]) achieved complete remission, 8 (29%) achieved partial remission (treatment eventually failed in 4 of the 8), and 10 (36% [CI, 19% to 56%]) did not respond to treatment. Treatment failed in all 6 (100% [CI, 54% to 100%]) H. pylori-negative patients. Patients with endoscopic appearance of gastritis (stage I T1 disease) were most likely to achieve complete remission within 18 months. Tumors in the distal stomach were associated with more favorable response than tumors in the proximal stomach. CONCLUSIONS: A subset of H. pylori-positive gastric MALT lymphomas, including infiltrative tumors, may respond to antibiotics. The likelihood of early complete remission seems to be greatest for superficial and distal tumors.

Hodgkin's disease with lymphocyte predominance: long-term results based on current histopathologic criteria.

PURPOSE: To define the disease course, therapeutic strategies, patterns and rates of relapse and causes of death for patients with Hodgkin's disease with lymphocyte predominance (LPHD) and to assess prognostic factors including nodular and diffuse histologic patterns. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of all previously untreated patients with LPHD who received initial treatment at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDACC) from 1960 through 1992 were reviewed. Clinical and histopathologic characteristics, specifically nodular and diffuse LPHD, and treatment groups were assessed by overall and relapse-free survival, patterns of relapse, and causes of death. RESULTS: Of 70 patients, 58 (83%) had nodular LPHD and 12 (17%) had a diffuse pattern: clinical characteristics were similar between the two subtypes. The median age of all patients was 25 years, 79% were male, 96% presented with stage I or II disease and 93% were free of B symptoms. Laparotomy (23 patients) failed to upstage any patient with a negative lymphogram. With a median follow-up of 12.3 years for alive patients, 19 (27%) patients have relapsed. All 3 relapses among the patients with diffuse subtype occurred within 3 years while 9 of 16 relapses occurred after 5 years with nodular subtype. However, we did not detect any statistically significant difference in relapse free survival or survival between the subtypes in our patient population. There was some suggestion that patients aged 40 and older experienced shorter survival; no other pretreatment characteristics were noted to be associated with relapse free survival or survival. Though there were no relapses within the radiation fields, no effect of extent of radiation therapy on relapse rate was observed. Thirteen (19%) patients have died, 6 (8.6%) of whom succumbed to LPHD. Two patients developed diffuse large cell lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LPHD usually present with localized and asymptomatic disease. Laparotomy is unnecessary if the lymphogram is negative. Nodular histology occurred in the majority of patients. Though all relapses from diffuse subtype occurred within 3 years in contrast to some late relapses observed for nodular subtype, there was no statistically significant difference in relapse free survival or survival between the subtypes. The extent of irradiation had no effect on relapse free survival or survival. We could not find any evidence that LPHD should be treated any different from the classical Hodgkin's disease at this point despite suggestions that it be classified as a non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma.

Impact of ultrasound and computed tomography prostate volume registration on evaluation of permanent prostate implants.

PURPOSE: Ultrasound (US)-guided permanent prostate implants typically use US prostate volumes to plan the implant procedure and CT prostate volumes for 3D dosimetric evaluation of the implant. Such a protocol requires that CT and US prostate volumes be registered. We have studied the impact of prostate volume registration on postimplant dosimetry for patients with low-grade prostate cancer treated with combined US and fluoroscopic-guided permanent implants. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A US image set was obtained with the patient in the lithotomy position to delineate the prostate volume that was subsequently used for treatment planning. Each plan was customized and optimized to ensure complete coverage of the US prostate volume. After implant, a CT scan was obtained for postimplant dosimetry with the patient lying supine. Sources were localized on CT by interactively creating orthogonal images of small cubes, whose dimensions were slightly larger than the source, to assure unique identification of each seed. Ultrasound and CT 3D surfaces were registered using either (a) the rectal surface and base of the prostate, or (b) the Foley balloon and urethra as the alignment reference. A dose distribution was assigned to the US prostate volume based on the CT source distribution, and the dose-volume histogram (DVH) was calculated. RESULT: Prostate volumes drawn from US images differ from those drawn from CT images with the CT volumes being typically larger than the US volumes. Urethral registration of the prostate volume based on aligning the prostatic urethra generates a dose distribution that best follows the preimplant plan and is geometrically the preferable choice for dosimetry. CONCLUSION: The dose distribution and the DVH for the US prostate is sensitive to the mode of registration limiting the ability to determine if acceptable dose coverage has been achieved.

Rate of PSA rise predicts metastatic versus local recurrence after definitive radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: A rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) following treatment for adenocarcinoma of the prostate indicates eventual clinical failure, but the rate of rise can be quite different from patient to patient, as can the pattern of clinical failure. We sought to determine whether the rate of PSA rise could differentiate future local versus metastatic failure. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two thousand six hundred sixty-seven PSA values from 400 patients treated with radiotherapy for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate were analyzed with respect to PSA patterns and clinical outcome. Patients had received no hormonal therapy or prostate surgery and had > 4 PSA values post-treatment. PSA rate of rise, determined by the slope of the natural log, was classified as gradual [< 0.69 log(ng/ml)/year, or doubling time (DT) > 1 year], moderate [0.69-1.4 log(ng/ml)/year, or DT 6 months-1 year], or rapid [> 1.4 log(ng/ml)/year, or DT < 6 months]. RESULTS: Sixty-one percent of patients had non-rising PSA following treatment; 25% of patients with rising PSA developed clinical failure, and 93% of patients with clinical failure had rising PSA. The rate of rise discerned different clinical failure patterns. Local failure occurred in 23% of patients with moderate rate of rise versus 7% with gradual rise (p = 0.0001). Metastatic disease developed in 46% of those with rapid rise versus 8% with moderate rise (p < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, in addition to rate of rise, PSA nadir and rate of decline predicted local failure; those with post-treatment nadir of 1-4 ng/ml were five times more likely to experience local failure than nadir < 1 ng/ml (p = 0.0002). Rapid rate of rise was the most significant independent predictor of metastatic failure. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of PSA rise following definitive radiotherapy can predict clinical failure patterns, with a rapidly rising PSA indicating metastatic recurrence and moderately rising PSA local recurrence. This information could potentially direct therapy; if the rise predicts metastatic failure hormonal therapy could be considered, while aggressive salvage therapy may benefit subclinical local recurrence identified by a moderate rate of PSA rise.

Results of 3D conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT) has been shown to decrease acute morbidity in the treatment of prostate cancer. Therapeutic outcome and late morbidity data have been accumulating. To evaluate the results of 3D CRT for the treatment of prostate cancer, we analyzed the outcome of a large series of patients treated with conformal techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 1987 through June 1994, 707 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with 3D CRT. Patients with pathologically-confirmed pelvic lymph node metastasis, treated with pre-irradiation (preRT) androgen ablation, or treated post-prostatectomy were excluded. All had CT obtained specifically for treatment planning, multiple structures contoured on the axial images, and beam's-eye view conformal beams edited to provide 3D dose coverage. Median follow-up is 36 mos; 70 patients have been followed longer than 5.5 years. Six hundred three had T1-T2 tumors. PreRT prostate specific antigen (PSA) was available for 649 patients: median preRT PSA was 12.9 ng/ml, 209 patients had preRT PSA > 20 ng/ml. The median dose of radiation was 69 Gy; 102 patients received > or = 69 Gy. Biochemical failure was defined as: 1) two consecutive PSA rises over 2.0 ng/ml if nadir PSA < or = 2.0 ng/ml, 2) two consecutive PSA rises over nadir if nadir PSA > 2.0 ng/ml, or 3) initiation of hormonal therapy after RT. Complications were graded using the RTOG system. RESULTS: PreRT PSA and Gleason score emerged as independent indicators of biochemical control (bNED). Patients with preRT PSA > 10 had a significantly worse bNED at 5 years than patients with preRT PSA < or = 10. Five-year bNED was determined according to preRT PSA: PSA < or = 4, 88%; PSA > 4 < or = 10, 72%; PSA > 10 < or = 20, 43%; and PSA > 20, 30%. Patients with Gleason score > or = 7 also had a significantly worse bNED than patients with Gleason score < 7. Patients were divided into two prognostic groups: a favorable group with PSA < or = 10, Gleason score < 7, and T1-T2 tumors, and an unfavorable group with PSA > 10, Gleason score > or = 7 or T3-T4 tumors and studied for the effect of dose on bNED status. The bNED at 5 years was 75% for the favorable group and 37% for the unfavorable group. In addition, a group that might be considered a surgical subset was reviewed: patients with PSA < or = 10, Gleason score < or = 7, and T1-T2 tumors who were < 70 years old. This subset had an 84% 5-year bNED rate and 98% 5-year overall survival. Complications with the techniques used here are very low: 3% risk at 7 years of Grade 3-4 complications and 1% risk at 7 years of Grade 3 bladder complications (no Grade 4). CONCLUSION: 3D CRT allows for treatment of prostate cancers with a very low risk of complications. Patients with relatively early disease as defined by preRT PSA, Gleason score < 7, and T1-2 tumors and patients who are candidates for radical prostatectomy have excellent 5-year bNED rates. Patients with adverse prognostic factors have a high risk of biochemical recurrence and are candidates for innovative therapy.

Impact of differences in ultrasound and computed tomography volumes on treatment planning of permanent prostate implants.

PURPOSE: Both ultrasound (US) and computerized tomography (CT) images have been used in the planning of prostate interstitial therapy. Ultrasound images more clearly define the apex and capsule of the prostate, while CT images define seed positions for postimplant dosimetry. Proper registration of the US volume with the CT volume is critical to the assessment of dosimetry. We therefore compared US and CT prostate volumes to determine if differences were significant. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten consecutive patients entered in an interstitial implant program were studied by pretreatment US. In addition, pretreatment CT scans were obtained and three physicians independently outlined the dimensions of the prostate on these images. The patients subsequently underwent placement of radioactive 125I or 103Pd. Postimplant CT images were obtained the next day and the postimplant prostate volumes were outlined by the same three physicians. Seven of 10 patients underwent late CT scans 9-14 months postimplant for comparison of preimplant and immediate postimplant CT studies. RESULTS: There were differences between US and CT volumes. Although the physician-to-physician variation was significant, the trends were consistent, with US prostate volume typically smaller (47%) than the preimplant CT volume and markedly smaller (120%) than the postimplant CT volume. Prostate volumes derived from late CT images did not consistently return to preimplant levels. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in volume of the prostate structure were found between US and CT images. The data suggests that: (a) Implants planned on CT tend to overestimate the size of the prostate and may lead to unnecessary implantation of the urogenital diaphragm and penile urethra. (b) Registration of initial US and postimplant CT prostate volumes required for accurate dosimetry is difficult due to the increased volume of prostate secondary to trauma. (c) Further study to determine the optimal time for the postimplant CT is necessary.

Source placement error for permanent implant of the prostate.

The performance of ultrasound (US) and fluoroscopic-guided permanent 125I source implant of the prostate using CT identification of the source positions has been evaluated. Marker seeds were implanted during the planning study to assist in the alignment of the US and CT prostate volumes for treatment planning and to guide the placement of needles. The relative positions of the needles and marker seeds were checked by fluoroscopy. A postimplant CT study was used to input the radioactive source positions and to register the sources relative to the preimplant CT and US prostate volumes and the planned source distribution. Source placement errors observed were categorized as: (1) source-to-source spacing differences; (2) needle placement error, both depth and position; and (3) seed splaying, particularly near the prostate periphery. Errors due to source splaying and spacing were in part attributed to prostate motion. Later refinements included fixed-spaced string sources, for which placement errors were smaller than for unattached sources. However, source placement errors due to needle placement error and prostate motion remained unchanged.