RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Wilms tumour (WT) is one of the common and curable cancer types targeted by the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer. Tumour excision is essential for cure. This analysis focuses on surgical outcomes of patients with WT in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: We implemented a risk-stratified WT treatment guideline as a multicentre, prospective study across eight hospitals and six countries. Eligibility criteria were age 6 months to 16 years, unilateral WT, surgery performed after preoperative chemotherapy and diagnosed between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2022. Data collection included a specific surgical case report form (CRF). RESULTS: The study registered 230 patients, among whom 164 (71.3%) had a nephrectomy. Ninety-eight percent of patients had a completed surgical CRF. Out 164 patients, 50 (30.5%) had distant metastases. Median tumour diameter at surgery was 11.0 cm. Lymph node sampling was done in 122 (74.3%) patients, 34 (20.7%) had intraoperative tumour rupture, and for 18 (10.9%), tumour resection involved en bloc resection of another organ. Tumour size at surgery was significantly correlated with tumour rupture (p < .01). With a median follow-up of 17 months (range: 2-33), 23 (14.0%) patients have relapsed. Twenty-two (13.4%) patients abandoned treatment post nephrectomy. Two-year event-free survival was 60.4% ± 4.7% with treatment abandonment as an event. CONCLUSION: Survival post nephrectomy is challenged by treatment abandonment, treatment-related mortality and relapse. Large tumours after preoperative chemotherapy were associated with a higher risk of tumour rupture. Earlier diagnosis and access to radiotherapy are expected to improve survival.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Wilms Africa studies implemented an adapted Wilm's tumor (WT) treatment protocol in sub-Saharan Africa in two phases. Phase I began with four sites and provided out-of-pocket costs. Phase II expanded the number of sites, but lost funding provision. Objective is to describe the outcomes of Phase II and compare with Phase I. METHODS: Wilms Africa Phase I (n = 4 sites; 2014-2018) and Phase II (n = 8 sites; 2021-2022) used adapted treatment protocols. Funding for families' out-of-pocket costs was provided during Phase I but not Phase II. Eligibility criteria were age less than 16 years and newly diagnosed unilateral WT. We documented patients' outcome at the end of planned first-line treatment categorized as treatment abandonment, death during treatment, and disease-related events (death before treatment, persistent disease, relapse, or progressive disease). Sensitivity analysis compared outcomes in the same four sites. RESULTS: We included 431 patients in Phase I (n = 201) and Phase II (n = 230). The proportion alive without evidence of disease decreased from 69% in Phase I to 54% in Phase II at all sites (p = .002) and 58% at the original four sites (p = .04). Treatment abandonment increased overall from 12% to 26% (p < .001), and was 20% (p = .04) at the original four sites. Disease-related events (5% vs. 6% vs. 6%) and deaths during treatment (14% vs. 14% vs. 17%) were similar. CONCLUSION: Provision of out-of-pocket costs was important to improve patient outcomes at the end of planned first-line treatment in WT. Prevention of treatment abandonment remains an important challenge.
