Photo Visualization of Skintone Compatibility of an SPF 35 Sunscreen.

BACKGROUND: Visual casts and discoloration are common barriers to sunscreen use in melanin-rich populations. However, photoprotective measures are essential for individuals with all skin types, including darker skin. METHODS: Single-center, 7-day, open-label study of healthy adult females with Fitzpatrick Skin Types (FST) IV to VI and sensitive skin treated with once-daily daily facial moisturizer sun protection factor 35 (DFM SPF35). Subjects completed a cosmetic acceptability questionnaire at days 1 and 7. Photography using VISIA CR was performed at day 7. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: Thirty-two (32) subjects participated; 31.3% had FST IV, 53.1% V, and 15.6% VI skin. DFM SPF35 was viewed as cosmetically elegant. At day 1, 96.7% of subjects agreed product was easy to apply; 90.0% reported soft skin after product use; 86.7% said it had a lightweight, non-greasy feel and hydrated the skin. At day 7, 93.7% reported no visible white residue on their skin and said the product applied easily/absorbed well. The majority (90.6%) would continue using and would recommend the product; and 87.5% reported the product blended seamlessly into their skin, which agreed with clinical photography. Responses were consistent among subjects with normal, oily, or combination skin. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: DFM SPF35 blended well into the skin and was perceived favorably among subjects with SOC after 1 and 7 days of use. Subjects felt it had good cosmetic acceptability without unacceptable white residues or a greasy feeling. Dermatologists need to be versed in products that can be used on a variety of skin types.J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(7):515-518.  doi:10.36849/JDD.8223.

Heatmap Evaluation of Facial Hydration Using a Novel Python Program.

BACKGROUND: Evaluating cleansers and moisturizers provides important information to guide clinicians in the recommendation of these products. This project was performed to visualize skin hydration via heatmap after the use of a gentle skin cleanser (GSC) and moisturizing lotion (ML). METHODS: Half-face, intra-individual open-label study in healthy volunteers. Cleanser was administered in a single application that was then wiped off the face. Moisturizing lotion was applied at least once-daily for one week. Hydration measurements were made at 30 pre-defined points on half of the face, at baseline, and 30 minutes post-application; an additional assessment at week 1 was made for the moisturizing lotion. Heatmaps were generated using Python programming software to interpolate hydration values to colors that were then superimposed onto the volunteer's facial image.  Results: Five subjects completed the cleanser assessments, and 5 subjects completed the 30-minute evaluation for the lotion, with 4 completing the week 1 assessment. There was a visible shift in skin hydration post-GSC application from values approximately in the 12-42 AU (arbitrary unit) range to 30-60 AU at 30 minutes. Similarly, there was a shift in hydration from baseline to 30 minutes that continued to increase through week 1 of ML use. CONCLUSIONS: This innovative heatmap data generation showed a clear, visual change in hydration over time. There was a visible shift in hydration values from baseline to 30 minutes after application of cleanser; hydration also improved after use of moisturizing lotion at 30 minutes and increased after week 1 application.  J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):463-465.     doi:10.36849/JDD.8221.

An Over-the-Counter Healing Ointment: Benefits in Dry Skin and Wound Healing.

BACKGROUND: The use of ointments can be beneficial for dry, chapped, or cracked skin and also for supporting wound healing. We describe the results of 2 studies with an over-the-counter healing ointment (HO) to evaluate the effects on skin hydration and in the setting of wound healing after dermatologic procedures.  Methods: Study 1 was a single-center, in-use study using HO on qualified areas at least once daily for 4 weeks in subjects with dry, cracked body skin and self-perceived sensitive skin. Study 2 was a multi-center study of wound healing in subjects using HO on a daily basis after having dermatologic surgical procedures.  Results: In Study 1, there was a significant reduction in skin dryness after 1 and 4 weeks of HO use (P<0.05). Image analysis of the skin revealed a significant increase in skin smoothness after the first application of HO in 100% of subjects (P<0.05). Tolerability and safety were excellent, and HO was well-perceived by subjects throughout the study. In Study 2, HO improved clinical assessments at all time points compared with baseline with a decrease in erythema, edema, scabbing/crusting, and an improvement in overall wound appearance (P<0.05). There was no worsening or significant increase in measures for tolerability parameters at any study visits. Additionally, HO achieved a favorable perception by study subjects.  Conclusions: HO has a well-established safety profile and has been shown to improve both skin hydration and the overall wound healing process after dermatologic surgical procedures. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(5):360-365. doi:10.36849/JDD.8224.

Evaluation of a Moisturizing Cream with 20% Urea for Keratosis Pilaris.

BACKGROUND: Keratosis pilaris (KP) is a benign dermatosis consisting of folliculocentric keratotic papules or pustules with surrounding erythema, often on proximal extensor surfaces of extremities. Management strategies for KP largely center on moisturization and exfoliation. Urea, a well-established ingredient in topical skincare, is a component of the natural moisturizing factors with concentration-dependent humectant, emollient, and exfoliative properties.  Given the overlap of urea’s properties and management goals of KP, a 4-week, open-label, noncomparative clinical study was conducted to evaluate a moisturizing cream formulated with 20% urea for use in KP.  Thirty participants aged 18 to 65 years with KP completed this study. After a 5-day washout period, study participants applied a 20% urea cream once daily to areas of KP for 4 weeks. At baseline, 1-week, and 4-week visits, clinical grading of skin texture, adverse event monitoring, and participant satisfaction questionnaires were conducted. After 1 week and 4 weeks of product use, the percent change in skin smoothness/texture from baseline was significant (P≤0.001). Furthermore, after 4 weeks of use, the majority of participants indicated satisfaction with the feel of their skin, as well as improved confidence and decreased embarrassment related to their skin. No significant adverse events were reported. Overall, the results of this study support that 20% urea cream is generally well tolerated and suitable for use in treating KP. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(1):1274-1277.     doi:10.36849/JDD.7806.

Individual Article: A Novel 3-Step Over-the-Counter Eczema Regimen Improves Eczema Severity, Itch, and Life Quality: Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: Eczema, or atopic dermatitis (AD), is a chronic relapsing skin disease associated with unpredictable flares of erythema, rash, and pruritus. AD arises from a combination of immune system dysregulation and abnormal skin barrier function. Skin barrier support with proper skincare regimens have a central role in management. METHODS: This was a multi-center, 12-week in-use study of a skincare regimen in children and adults with mild-to-moderate eczema (6-16) on the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), and ≥2 flares within 3 months prior to screening. The regimen included Itch Relief Gel, Eczema Soothing Lotion, and Flare Relief Cream. Efficacy assessments included POEM, ItchyQuant, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Quality of Life and digital photography, along with gathering of adverse events and cutaneous tolerability. RESULTS: 34 subjects completed the study. In 12 weeks, mean POEM scores improved from 9.7 to 5.3, and EASI scores improved by 17.9% (P<0.05 vs baseline). Additionally, mean ItchyQuant scores showed that pruritus was significantly improved from 5.4 at baseline to 2.7 at week 12 (P<0.05). The number of flares decreased from 4.2 to 3.2 after 12 weeks of regimen application (P<0.05 vs 12 weeks before baseline). Quality-of-life measures also showed improvement in both children and adults from baseline (P<0.05). There were no related adverse events, the regimen was well tolerated, and participants had positive perceptions of the regimen. CONCLUSIONS: 12-week use of this OTC skincare regimen resulted in significant improvements in EASI, POEM, and ItchyQuant scores, a reduced number of flares, and improved quality of life. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22:10(Suppl 2):s21-26.

Individual Article: Evaluation of Efficacy and Tolerability of Two Over-the-Counter Eczema Itch Relief Products.

BACKGROUND: Study to compare efficacy, tolerability, and patient perception between an over-the-counter itch relief gel (IRG) and itch relief moisturizing cream (IRMC) after a single application.  Methods: Single-center, randomized, blinded, split-body study comparing IRG vs IRMC in adults with eczema-prone skin and mild-to-moderate itch. Assessments included itch relief duration upon application, itch severity (0=none to 9=severe at baseline [BL], 8, 12, and 24 hours), tolerability (0=none to 3=severe), and self-assessment questionnaire about product attributes and preference.  Results: Thirty-three females and males with a mean age of 49.7 completed the study. Average time to itch relief was 28.5 seconds for IRG vs 41.8 for IRMC (P<0.05), with first onset at 5 seconds. In the IRG group, itch severity was reduced from 4.4 at BL to 1.4 at 8 hours; in comparison, itch was reduced from 4.4 at BL to 2.6 at 8 hours in the IRMC group (P<0.05). Both products significantly relieved itch vs baseline at all time points. IRG had better tolerability, with burning/stinging going from 1.5 at BL to 0.8 at 24 hours vs 1.5 at BL to 1.2 at 24 hours for IRMC (P<0.05). There was a trend in favor of IRG vs IRMC on the patient satisfaction self-assessment questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: IRG provided rapid itch relief and significantly outperformed IRMC. Both products significantly improved itch severity for up to 24 hours after application, with IRG outperforming IRMC at 8 hours. Additionally, IRG moderated stinging/burning sensations better than IRMC. Further, IRG was preferred by participants over IRMC.J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22:10(Suppl 2):s10-15.  .

Individual Article: Over-the-Counter Moisturizers Significantly Improve Skin Hydration in Adults With Eczema/Atopy-Prone Skin.

BACKGROUND: Many adults suffer from dry, itchy skin, particularly those with eczema-prone skin. This study evaluated the effects of two over-the-counter (OTC) moisturizing products on skin hydration, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), ceramide levels, and patient experience. METHODS: Single-center, randomized, double-blind, split-body study evaluating the effectiveness of an Eczema Soothing Moisturizer (ESM) versus an Itch Relief Moisturizing Lotion (IRML) applied twice daily for 4 weeks in healthy adults with self-perceived persistent mild-to-moderate eczema-prone skin. Assessments included corneometer for skin hydration, evaporimeter for TEWL, tape stripping to measure ceramide NS and AS levels on the skin of the arm and leg, and a self-assessed participant-reported outcome questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 30 adults completed the study. Both products significantly increased hydration, but the effect of ESM was greater than IRML (P=0.001), and both significantly decreased TEWL. At week 4, there were increases in NS and AS ceramides at both the legs and arms for both products (P<0.05 vs BL). Individually, ceramide content was significantly improved for ESM in the leg and for IRML in the arm at week 4 (P<0.05 vs BL). Participant photos show ESM was beneficial across a range of skin phototypes. Both products resulted in favorable perceptions from study participants. CONCLUSIONS: These moisturizers improved skin hydration, skin barrier, ceramide levels in the skin, and were well-perceived by the participants. This suggests that both products are beneficial for patients with eczema and eczema-prone skin. However, the hydrating effect of ESM was significantly greater than IRML. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22:10(Suppl 2):s16-20.

Assessing Implicit Bias in Dermatology.

BACKGROUND: Patients with skin of color (SOC), defined as Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI, and of varying ethnicities are under-represented in dermatology. This includes practitioners, trainees, dermatologic teaching materials, and clinical studies.  Methods: Online survey study to assess dermatologists’ perceptions that could impact patient care. Participants were screened for providers that spent ≥80% of their time in direct patient care; managed ≥100 unique patients per month; and had ≥20% aesthetic patients. RESULTS: A total of 220 dermatologists participated; 50 with SOC, 152 non-SOC, and 18 other. SOC dermatologists had a more diverse patient population by racial/ethnic background, but there was no difference in proportion of patients by Fitzpatrick skin phototype categories. While race/ethnicity is not considered a primary factor in clinical decision making, Fitzpatrick skin type is for many dermatologists. Most dermatologists agree that more diversity in medical training for dermatologic conditions would be beneficial. Dermatologists report that adding before and after photos of different skin types in educational materials and increasing training on cultural competency are likely to be the most effective strategies for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Although racial/ethnic diversity shows differences based on location of practice and the race of dermatologists, diversity of skin type based on Fitzpatrick scale is virtually identical across practices, illustrating the challenge of categorizing patients by this scale alone. Beer J, Downie J, Noguiera A, et al. Assessing implicit bias in dermatology. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(7):635-640. doi:10.36849/JDD.7435.

Safe Use of Adapalene 0.1 % Gel in a non-Prescription Environment.

BACKGROUND: Topical retinoids are the mainstay of acne therapy and, until 2016, were only available by prescription. The margin of safety (MOS) of adapalene for potential teratogenic effects, and its use in pregnancy were investigated as part of the OTC switch. OBJECTIVE: To determine MOS using a maximal usage trial (MUsT) and animal embryo-fetal development studies. To conduct a thorough review of safety data with respect to use of Adapalene 0.1% Gel during pregnancy. METHODS: The MUsT was multicenter, open-label pharmacokinetic study which enrolled adolescents and adult subjects with mainly severe acne vulgaris. The no observable adverse event level (NOAEL) for adapalene teratogenicity was established in rat and rabbit embryo-fetal development studies. An exhaustive review of pregnancy data from multiple safety databases was conducted. RESULTS: The calculated MOS for teratogenicity was 70 for Adapalene 0.1% Gel. For the pregnancy safety review, no pregnancy malformations were attributable to topical adapalene use. LIMITATIONS: Animal studies do not always predict effects in human development. Additionally, safety data is voluntarily reported and intrinsically incomplete. CONCLUSION: Adapalene has a large and reassuring MOS making it suitable for OTC use. No teratogenic risk was identified in a MUsT and Pregnancy Safety Review. Adapalene 0.1% Gel is a safe and effective medication for the treatment of acne in a non-prescription environment. Based on available evidence, use of adapalene during pregnancy does not pose harm to the fetus. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(12):1330-1335. doi:10.36849/JDD.6527.

A Multicenter Study to Evaluate Subject Satisfaction With Two Treatments of AbobotulinumtoxinA a Year in the Glabellar Lines.

BACKGROUND: Real-world re-treatment intervals for botulinum toxins vary, but most subjects receive treatment less frequently than the manufacturer-recommended minimum intervals. In subjects receiving treatment with AbobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) less frequently, high levels of satisfaction and psychosocial improvements in well-being, self-confidence, and quality of life are observed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate subject satisfaction with a twice yearly re-treatment schedule. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This open-label, multicenter, interventional study evaluated subject satisfaction following injections of ABO 50 U in the glabellar lines at baseline and 6 months. The primary end point was subject satisfaction at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included subject satisfaction, FACE-Q scales, and glabellar line severity scale (GLSS). RESULTS: Ninety-five percent of the 120 subjects were "highly satisfied" or "satisfied" with their treatment outcomes at 12 months. FACE-Q total scores suggested that subjects were less bothered by glabellar lines and felt better about their facial appearance with each treatment versus baseline. Approximately half of subjects had ≥1-grade improvement from baseline in GLSS at 12 months. Median onset of effect was 2 days. CONCLUSION: The majority of subjects (95%) were satisfied with ABO treatment every 6 months; results were supported by high subject satisfaction, long duration, rapid onset, natural-looking results, and overall psychological wellness and safety.

A daily skincare regimen with a unique ceramide and filaggrin formulation rapidly improves chronic xerosis, pruritus, and quality of life in older adults.

A skin care regimen which significantly improved atopic dermatitis and pruritus was evaluated for its efficacy and acceptability in senior subjects diagnosed with xerosis who also suffer from pruritus. This was an open-label, single-center study, designed to evaluate the daily use of a skin care regimen for 15 days. Assessments were made at baseline, day 8 and day 15 for visual skin dryness, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), hydration, desquamation, subject-perceived itch and quality of life (QoL). Twenty-five subjects, ages 60-73 years, had significantly improved skin visual dryness, hydration, desquamation, itch and QoL at days 8 and 15, relative to baseline (P < .05). TEWL was improved, though not significantly. Subjects expressed a high degree of satisfaction with the results. This regimen provides geriatric patients with an easily incorporated skin routine to help improve a common symptom of aging skin which negatively affects QoL.

Urea: A Clinically Oriented Overview from Bench to Bedside.

Urea is an important hygroscopic component of the epidermis, where it participates in the maintenance of skin hydration as part of the skin's source of natural moisturizing factor (NMF) in the outer most layers. Xerotic skin, which is frequently characterized as NMF-deficient, is a unifying trait of dermatoses such as atopic dermatitis (AD), psoriasis, and ichthyosis vulgaris. The reduced hygroscopic potential of pathologically dry skin leads to unregulated transepidermal water loss (TEWL), epidermal hyperproliferation, and inhibited desquamation; all which clinically translate to hyperkeratotic and possibly pruritic skin. Common underlying etiologies link these dermatoses to aberrant expression of genes encoding epidermal structural and catalytic proteins. Intervention of dry skin pathologies with topical moisturizer formulations is a foundational management strategy. For over a century urea-containing formulations have been used in a concentration-dependent manner to restore skin hydration, thin hyperkeratosis, debride dystrophic nails, and enhance topical drug penetration. Recently, urea's role in skin hydration and repair has expanded to include regulation of epidermal genes necessary for proper barrier function. Taken together, urea's versatility in topical formulations and broad range of therapeutic mechanism highlights its utility to clinicians and benefit to patients.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2016;15(5):633-639.

Efficacy and Safety of Minoxidil 2% Solution in Combination With a Botanical Hair Solution in Women With Female Pattern Hair Loss/Androgenic Alopecia.

Female pattern hair loss (FPHL), also known as female androgenic alopecia, affects over 21 million women in the United States with devastating effects on self-esteem and psychosocial functioning. Topical minoxidil 2% and 5% formulations are the only US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for FPHL. The length of time it typically takes to observe the benefits is a challenge for many patients, and may affect adherence to treatment. Herbal extracts, which are also believed to promote healthier-looking hair, have a long history of use in hair care formulations. The safety and efficacy of a twice-daily regimen of 2% minoxidil solution used in combination with the botanical hair solution for 12 weeks in 54 subjects was evaluated in a multicenter, single-arm, open-label study. Assessments included investigator and subject ratings of improvement and subject satisfaction. Investigator ratings indicated significant improvement in hair growth and overall treatment benefits in as early as 6 weeks (P<.001). Subject self-ratings indicated significant satisfaction with hair volume and quality improvement at week 6 (P<.001). Subjects also indicated an increase in self-confidence and attractiveness at week 12 (P<.001). The investigator and subject-assessed efficacy and subject satisfaction with this regimen provides clinicians with an effective treatment option for FPHL that also provides a high level of patient acceptance, which ultimately may help promote minoxidil treatment adherence.

Efficacy and Safety of Minoxidil 5% Foam in Combination With a Botanical Hair Solution in Men With Androgenic Alopecia.

Androgenic alopecia (AGA) is the most common type of hair loss in men, characterized by hair miniaturization, hairline recession, and vertex balding. It affects approximately 50% of men, negatively affecting self-esteem and sociability. Topical minoxidil formulations are approved up to a 5% concentration for men, but patient adherence to treatment is challenged by gradual results that may be perceived as a lack of initial benefit. Herbal extracts, which are also believed to promote healthier-looking hair, have a long history of use in hair care formulations. The safety and efficacy of a twice-daily regimen of 5% minoxidil foam used in combination with a novel botanical hair solution was evaluated in a 12-week, multicenter, single-arm, open label study in 56 subjects with mild to moderate AGA. Assessments included investigator ratings of improvement and subject self-ratings of satisfaction. Investigator ratings indicated significant improvement in scalp hair coverage and perception of overall treatment benefit in as early as 4 weeks (P<.001). Subject self-ratings were significant for improved hair growth and hair appearance in as few as 4 weeks (P<.05). The regimen was well tolerated, and subjects indicated a high degree of satisfaction. Investigator and subject-assessed efficacy and subject satisfaction with this novel regimen provide clinicians with an effective treatment option for AGA that also provides a high level of patient satisfaction, which may help promote patient adherence to long-term treatment.

Accelerated Onset of Action and Increased Tolerability in Treating Acne With a Fixed-Dose Combination Gel.

Nonadherence to topical acne therapies is a major contributing factor to poor treatment outcomes. Multiple contributing factors have been identified, including a lack of perceived efficacy and fear of side effects. A fixed-dose combination gel of adapalene/benzoyl peroxide gel, 0.1%/2.5% (A-BPO) is an efficacious and safe treatment for a range of acne severities in patients as young as 9 years old. A meta-analysis of 14 clinical studies involving A-BPO was conducted to assess the 4 week efficacy and overall tolerability of this treatment. Over 2,300 subjects were included in the analysis. Mean total, inflammatory, and non-inflammatory lesion counts decreased at 4 weeks by 40.8%, 46.2%, and 37.5%, respectively. Worst post-baseline tolerability scores for stinging/burning, dryness, scaling, and erythema were none or mild for a majority of subjects. The result of this meta-analysis add to the body of literature supporting the use of A-BPO in a variety of acne patients and shows that A-BPO provides meaningful clinical results within 4 weeks and will be well-tolerated for a majority of patients. With a demonstrable quick onset of action and high tolerability, A-BPO may improve adherence, and ultimately treatment outcomes, by addressing factors that contribute to nonadherence.

Managing Occupational Irritant Contact Dermatitis Using a Two-Step Skincare Regimen Designed to Prevent Skin Damage and Support Skin Recovery.

Occupational irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) affecting the hands is a common and difficult-to-manage condition. Occupations that necessitate contact with harsh chemicals, use of alcohol-based disinfectants, and frequent hand washing elevate the risk of ICD. Management strategies that do not adequately prevent accumulated damage and repair skin, can develop into chronic dermatoses which negatively impact work productivity and quality of life. A 2-step skin-care regimen (Excipial Daily Protection Hand Cream (EP) and Excipial Rapid Repair Hand Cream (ER), Galderma Laboratories, L.P.) has been developed as a daily-use management strategy to protect and repair vulnerable hands. The protective barrier cream is formulated with aluminum chlorohydrate and designed for pre-exposure application to enhance the skin's natural protective barrier and minimize excessive moisture while wearing protective gloves. The repair cream, a lipid-rich formulation, is intended for post-exposure application to rehydrate and facilitate the skin's natural healing process. The results of 3 clinical studies highlighted in this review demonstrate how the use of a 2-step skin-care regimen offers a greater protective effect against ICD than the use of barrier cream alone, and also how the formulation of the barrier cream used in these studies helps minimize the occlusion effect caused by gloves and does not interfere with the antibacterial efficacy of an alcohol-based hand sanitizer. This 2-step skin-care regimen is effectively designed to manage and minimize the risk of ICD development in a variety of patients and provides clinicians an additional tool for helping patients manage ICD. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016;15(12):1504-1510.

Tolerability of a Skin Care Regimen Formulated for Acne-Prone Skin in Children.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology and demographic profile of acne vulgaris has evolved over the past several decades, with a noted earlier onset occurring in patients as young as 7 years of age. The combination of a foaming facial wash and a facial moisturizer with a sun protection factor (SPF) of 30 is an over-the-counter cleansing and moisturizing regimen for acne-prone skin that has been shown to be safe and tolerable in subjects 12 years of age and older. OBJECTIVES: To assess the tolerability of this skin care regimen in children ages 7 to 11 years with acne-prone skin. METHODS: This was an open-label, single-center study that investigated the safety and tolerability of these products in subjects 7 to 11 years of age (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01909713). Subjects used the foaming wash twice daily and the SPF 30 moisturizer once daily. Subjects were assessed for cutaneous tolerability, and satisfaction at baseline and weeks 1 and 3. RESULTS: Thirty-five subjects enrolled and completed the study. The cutaneous tolerability score of most subjects was none when assessed by the investigator and subject or legally authorized representative at weeks 1 and 3. The products were well tolerated and a positive impression for cosmetic acceptability was reported for both products by the study population on the questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the use of a skin care regimen comprising a wash and a moisturizer in acne-prone patients as young as 7 years old since these products were safe, well tolerated, and liked by subjects.

The use of a reliable, ubiquitous, inexpensive, and user-friendly tablet-based system to track target lesion improvements in subjects with plaque psoriasis treated with clobetasol propionate 0.05% spray.

Ubiquitous electronic devices, such as smartphones and tablets, have the potential to enable a fundamental shift in the paradigm of healthcare as these devices may allow patients and health care providers (HCPs) to rapidly and remotely communicate with each other. Once fully realized, these devices may facilitate interactions between patients and HCPs. While these devices hold much promise, much work remains in assessing their viability in various diseases. A pilot study was conducted to investigate the use of a tablet-based numeric rating scale to assess improvements in a plaque psoriasis target lesion treated with clobetasol propionate 0.05% spray (CPS). Twenty-eight subjects with plaque psoriasis enrolled and were treated with CPS twice daily for 15 days. Target lesion severity (scale of 0 [no psoriasis] to 10 [very severe psoriasis]) and effectiveness scores (scale of 0 [none] to 3 [severe]) were recorded using a tablet-based system by the investigator and subjects. The tablet was also used to take photos of the target lesion to capture photographic evidence of improvement. Investigator and subject assessed target lesion severity and effectiveness scores improved during the study from baseline to day 15; in addition subjects indicated a high level of satisfaction with CPS treatment. Very few technological failures were reported and captured photographs were consistent visit to visit and of high quality. Taken together, this study supports the use of a tablet-based system to measure and track plaque psoriasis disease progression and also confirmed that CPS is an effective and safe treatment for plaque psoriasis.

Tolerability and cosmetic acceptability of a body wash in atopic dermatitis-prone subjects.

Atopic dermatitis is a common skin disease characterized by eczematous eruptions and impaired skin barrier function. Patients, as well as their families, frequently report reductions in quality of life. Pruritus, lack of sleep, and impaired social functioning all contribute to this reduction. A skincare regimen of gentle cleansing and daily moisturization is integral to managing atopic dermatitis. While there are a multitude of reports supporting the use of moisturizers, there is a paucity regarding the use of cleansers, especially cleansers formulated with ingredients known to improve skin hydration. A clinical study was conducted to assess the tolerability and cosmetic acceptability of a body wash formulated with the filaggrin break-down products arginine and pyrrolidone carboxylic acid in subjects with atopic dermatitis-prone skin (Cetaphil® RestoraDerm® Body Wash). The results of this study indicate that Cetaphil RestoraDerm Body Wash was well tolerated, reduced itch, improved quality of life, and was well-liked by subjects with atopic dermatitis-prone skin.

Fixed-Dose Combination Gel of Adapalene and Benzoyl Peroxide plus Doxycycline 100 mg versus Oral Isotretinoin for the Treatment of Severe Acne: Efficacy and Cost Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is a chronic skin disease with a high prevalence. Left untreated or inadequately treated, acne vulgaris can lead to psychological and physical scarring, as well as to unnecessary medical expenses. Oral isotretinoin is an effective treatment for severe resistant nodular and conglobate acne vulgaris. A regimen consisting of a fixed-dose combination of adapalene and benzoyl peroxide gel, 0.1%/2.5% (A-BPO) with oral doxycycline 100 mg (A-BPO/D) has been demonstrated to be efficacious and well tolerated in patients with severe acne and may be an alternative to oral isotretinoin for some patients with severe acne. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to compare the relative efficacy and associated costs of A-BPO/D versus oral isotretinoin. METHODS: In this analysis, comparisons of relative efficacy were made using previously published studies involving similar patient populations with severe acne that warrant the use of oral isotretinoin. The pricing for oral doxycycline and oral isotretinoin was estimated based on the maximum allowable cost from 9 states, and the pricing for A-BPO was calculated as the range between the average wholesale price and the wholesale acquisition cost. For this analysis, 2 treatment models were generated to compare costs: (1) a basic treatment model that examined the costs of an initial regimen of either A-BPO/D or oral isotretinoin without considering probable outcomes, and (2) a long-term model that factored in likely treatment outcomes and subsequent treatments into associated costs. The basic treatment model assumed that patients would be prescribed a single regimen of A-BPO/D for 12 weeks or oral isotretinoin for 20 weeks. The long-term model considered the probability of each treatment successfully managing patients' acne, as well as likely additional regimens of A-BPO monotherapy or an additional regimen of oral isotretinoin. As a result of different treatment durations, the costs for each treatment were normalized to weekly cost of treatment. RESULTS: Based on evidence from the published literature, patients treated with A-BPO/D would be expected to have an initial 72% reduction in inflammatory lesions, and patients treated with oral isotretinoin would have an 80% to 90% reduction of these lesions. The median weekly cost for the basic treatment model was $44 for A-BPO/D and $62 for oral isotretinoin. The weekly median costs for the long-term model were $44 for patients initially receiving a regimen of A-BPO/D followed by a maintenance regimen of A-BPO monotherapy and $50 for patients receiving an initial regimen of A-BPO/D who required a subsequent regimen of oral isotretinoin. The weekly cost for oral isotretinoin in the long-term model was $62. CONCLUSIONS: The comparison of these 2 treatments demonstrated that they are both effective in treating severe acne, and that A-BPO/D was less expensive weekly than oral isotretinoin. These models show that A-BPO/D is safer than and is a more cost-effective alternative to oral isotretinoin for treating patients with severe acne vulgaris.