Baseline levels of soluble CD14 and CD16+56- natural killer cells are negatively associated with response to interferon/ribavirin therapy during HCV-HIV-1 coinfection.

Disease progression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is associated with immune activation. Activation indices are higher during coinfection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV. The effect of immune activation on interferon α (IFN-α) therapy response is unknown. We evaluated soluble CD14 (sCD14) and natural killer (NK)-cell subsets at baseline, and during pegIFN-α2a/ribavirin therapy in HCV-HIV coinfection. The sCD14 level increased during therapy. Baseline sCD14 positively correlated with baseline HCV level and CD16(+)56(-) NK-cell frequency, and both sCD14 and CD16(+)56(-) NK cells correlated negatively with magnitude of HCV decline. IL28B genotype was associated with therapy response but not sCD14 or CD16(+)56(-) NK frequency. Markers of innate immune activation predict poor host response to IFN-α-based HCV therapy during HCV-HIV coinfection.

Immunologic failure despite suppressive antiretroviral therapy is related to activation and turnover of memory CD4 cells.

BACKGROUND: Failure to normalize CD4(+) T-cell numbers despite effective antiretroviral therapy is an important problem in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. METHODS: To evaluate potential determinants of immune failure in this setting, we performed a comprehensive immunophenotypic characterization of patients with immune failure despite HIV suppression, persons who experienced CD4(+) T-cell restoration with therapy, and healthy controls. RESULTS: Profound depletion of all CD4(+) T-cell maturation subsets and depletion of naive CD8(+) T cells was found in immune failure, implying failure of T-cell production/expansion. In immune failure, both CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells were activated but only memory CD4(+) cells were cycling at increased frequency. This may be the consequence of inflammation induced by in vivo exposure to microbial products, as soluble levels of the endotoxin receptor CD14(+) and interleukin 6 were elevated in immune failure. In multivariate analyses, naive T-cell depletion, phenotypic activation (CD38(+) and HLA-DR expression), cycling of memory CD4(+) T cells, and levels of soluble CD14 (sCD14) distinguished immune failure from immune success, even when adjusted for CD4(+) T-cell nadir, age at treatment initiation, and other clinical indices. CONCLUSIONS: Immune activation that appears related to exposure to microbial elements distinguishes immune failure from immune success in treated HIV infection.

Circulating human CD4 and CD8 T cells do not have large intracellular pools of CCR5.

CC Chemokine Receptor 5 (CCR5) is an important mediator of chemotaxis and the primary coreceptor for HIV-1. A recent report by other researchers suggested that primary T cells harbor pools of intracellular CCR5. With the use of a series of complementary techniques to measure CCR5 expression (antibody labeling, Western blot, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction), we established that intracellular pools of CCR5 do not exist and that the results obtained by the other researchers were false-positives that arose because of the generation of irrelevant binding sites for anti-CCR5 antibodies during fixation and permeabilization of cells.

Uridine supplementation in the treatment of HIV lipoatrophy: results of ACTG 5229.

BACKGROUND: Lipoatrophy is prevalent on thymidine nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (tNRTIs). A pilot trial showed that uridine (NucleomaxX) increased limb fat. METHODS: A5229 was a multicenter trial in which HIV-infected individuals with lipoatrophy on tNRTI regimens were randomized to NucleomaxX or placebo. Primary endpoint was change in limb fat from baseline to week 48. The study was powered to detect 400-g difference between arms at week 48. A stratified Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to assess between-arm differences. RESULTS: The 165 participants were 91% men, 62% white; median age 49 years, CD4 cell count 506 cells/µl, and limb fat 3037 g; 81% had HIV-1 RNA 50 copies/ml or less; 76% were on zidovudine (ZDV). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Only 59% completed 48 weeks of treatment; however, only three participants (one on uridine) discontinued due to toxicity (diarrhea). In intent to treat, there was no difference for changes in limb fat between treatments at week 24 or week 48. On as-treated analysis, uridine resulted in an increase in %limb fat vs. placebo (3.4 vs. -0.8%, P = 0.01) at week 24 but not at week 48 (1.8 vs. 3.8%, P = 0.93). Similar results were seen when limiting the analysis to patients with at least 80% adherence. The results were not related to severity of lipoatrophy or type of tNRTI. No changes were found in facial anthropometrics, fasting lipids, trunk fat, CD4 cell count, or HIV RNA. CONCLUSIONS: We found a modest transient improvement in limb fat after 24 weeks of uridine. The lack of sustained efficacy at week 48 was not due to changes in adherence or reduction in sample size. Uridine was well tolerated and did not impair virologic control.

The effect of raltegravir intensification on low-level residual viremia in HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Most HIV-1-infected patients on effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels below the detection limits of commercial assays have residual viremia measurable by more sensitive methods. We assessed whether adding raltegravir lowered the level of residual viremia in such patients. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Patients receiving ART who had plasma HIV-1 RNA levels below 50 copies/mL but detectable viremia by single copy assay (SCA) were randomized to add either raltegravir or placebo to their ART regimen for 12 weeks; patients then crossed-over to the other therapy for an additional 12 weeks while continuing pre-study ART. The primary endpoint was the plasma HIV-1 RNA by SCA averaged between weeks 10 and 12 (10/12) compared between treatment groups. Fifty-three patients were enrolled. The median screening HIV-1 RNA was 1.7 copies/mL. The HIV-1 RNA level at weeks 10/12 did not differ significantly between the raltegravir-intensified (n = 25) and the placebo (n = 24) groups (median 1.2 versus 1.7 copies/mL, p = 0.55, Wilcoxon rank sum test), nor did the change in HIV-1 RNA level from baseline to week 10/12 (median -0.2 and -0.1 copies/mL, p = 0.71, Wilcoxon rank sum test). There was also no significant change in HIV-1 RNA level from weeks 10/12 to weeks 22/24 after patients crossed-over. There was a greater CD4 cell count increase from baseline to week 12 in the raltegravir-intensified group compared with the placebo group (+42 versus -44 cells/mm(3), p = 0.082, Wilcoxon rank sum test), which reversed after the cross-over. This CD4 cell count change was not associated with an effect of raltegravir intensification on markers of CD4 or CD8 cell activation in blood. CONCLUSION: In this randomized, double-blind cross-over study, 12 weeks of raltegravir intensification did not demonstrably reduce low-level plasma viremia in patients on currently recommended ART. This finding suggests that residual viremia does not arise from ongoing cycles of HIV-1 replication and infection of new cells. New therapeutic strategies to eliminate reservoirs that produce residual viremia will be required to eradicate HIV-1 infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00515827

In vitro naïve T cell proliferation failure predicts poor post-immunization responses to neoantigen, but not recall antigens, in HIV-infection.

Immune reconstitution after HAART is incomplete, but no widely accepted method to quantify subclinical immune deficiency is available. We immunized 9 HIV-negative subjects and 29 HIV-infected patients with CD4>/=450 cells/microL and undetectable HIV RNA levels with 2 doses of diphtheria/tetanus toxoid (TT) and KLH, a presumed neoantigen. We quantified the response by lymphoproliferative assay, delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH), and antibody titers up to 59days after enrollment. We assessed T cell proliferative capacity using anti-Vbeta3 and anti-Vbeta5 antibody stimulation, which we herein show induced predominant proliferation of naïve T cells. Subjects with detectable responses to KLH tended to exhibit greater proliferative responses to anti-Vbeta3/Vbeta5 stimulation; no such pattern was seen with response to TT. Several measures of in vitro T cell proliferative capacity correlated significantly with DTH and antibody responses to KLH, but not with TT responses; this association was independent of naïve T cell numbers. Our results indicate that naïve T cell proliferation predicts response to neo-, but not recall antigens, and suggest that it may be a meaningful reflection of in vivo immune competence in HIV-infected persons.

IL-7 administration drives T cell-cycle entry and expansion in HIV-1 infection.

Interleukin 7 (IL-7) is a common gamma chain receptor cytokine implicated in thymopoiesis and in peripheral expansion and survival of T lymphocytes. The safety and activity of recombinant human IL-7 (rhIL-7) administration were therefore examined in HIV-infected persons. In this prospective randomized placebo-controlled study, a single subcutaneous dose of rhIL-7 was well tolerated with biologic activity demonstrable at 3 microg/kg and a maximum tolerated dose of 30 microg/kg. Injection site reactions and transient elevations of liver function tests were the most notable side effects. Transient increases in plasma HIV-RNA levels were observed in 6 of 11 IL-7-treated patients. Recombinant hIL-7 induced CD4 and CD8 T cells to enter cell cycle; cell-cycle entry was also confirmed in antigen-specific CD8 T cells. Administration of rhIL-7 led to transient down-regulation of the IL-7 receptor alpha chain (CD127) in both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. Single-dose rhIL-7 increased the numbers of circulating CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells, predominantly of central memory phenotype. The frequency of CD4(+) T cells with a regulatory T-cell phenotype (CD25(high) CD127(low)) did not change after rhIL-7 administration. Thus, rhIL-7 has a biologic and toxicity profile suggesting a potential for therapeutic trials in HIV infection and other settings of lymphopenia. This clinical trial has been registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov under NCT0099671.

Cyclosporin A provides no sustained immunologic benefit to persons with chronic HIV-1 infection starting suppressive antiretroviral therapy: results of a randomized, controlled trial of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5138.

BACKGROUND: Although the determinants of immune deficiency and immune restoration in chronic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 infection are not well understood, immune activation has been proposed as being central to the pathogenesis of HIV. METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial of cyclosporin A treatment for 2 weeks was performed in persons with chronic HIV-1 infection who were beginning a standardized antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen. RESULTS: Treatment with cyclosporin A provided only a marginal and transient enhancement in circulating T cell restoration that was largely restricted to cells expressing the CCR7 chemokine receptor and that did not persist beyond 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporin A coadministered for 2 weeks with ART provided no sustained immunologic benefit to persons with chronic HIV-1 infection. If immune activation drives progressive immune deficiency in chronic HIV-1 infection, these activation pathways may not be sensitive to cyclosporin.

Proliferation responses to HIVp24 during antiretroviral therapy do not reflect improved immune phenotype or function.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether lymphoproliferation (LP) responses to HIVp24 in chronically infected patients treated with antiretroviral therapy (ART) predict an improved cytolytic T-cell phenotype or better in vivo immune function as measured by immunization responses. METHODS: HIV-infected patients who started ART during chronic infection and who achieved viral suppression (HIV-RNA < 400 copies/ml for > 12 months) were grouped by the presence of strong [stimulation index (SI) > 10; n = 21] or absent (SI < 3; n = 18) LP to HIV-core antigen. The two groups were compared for functional immune responses to vaccination with diphtheria-toxoid, tetanus-toxoid and keyhole-limpet-hemocyanin, frequency of circulating naive and memory CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, maturation phenotype and expression of cytolytic molecules on total and HIV-specific CD8+ T cells, and frequency of memory CD4+ T cells with intracellular HIV-mRNA. Group comparisons were analyzed by non-parametric Mann-Whitney tests. Proportions were estimated by Pearson's chi analysis. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in immune responses to vaccination or in the numbers or phenotype of circulating T cells. In a subgroup of HLA-A2+ or B8+ patients, HIV-reactive CD8+ T cells in both groups had similar expression of perforin, granzyme A and T-cell maturation markers (CD27, CD28, CCR7, CD62L). However, patients with SI > 10 in response to HIVp24 tended to more often have high levels of circulating CD4+ T cells with intracellular HIV-1 mRNA than did patients with SI < 3. CONCLUSION: Following long-standing suppression of viral replication on ART, the presence of HIV-1 specific T-helper proliferation responses does not correlate with improved indices of immune phenotype or function but may reflect relatively higher levels of HIV-expression.

Human epithelial beta-defensins 2 and 3 inhibit HIV-1 replication.

OBJECTIVE: Mechanisms underlying mucosal transmission of HIV-1 are incompletely understood. We describe the anti-HIV-1 activity of human beta-defensins (hBD), small cationic molecules that provide protection at mucosal surfaces. METHODS AND RESULTS: HIV-1 induced expression of hBD-2 and -3 mRNA (but not that of hBD-1) 4- to 78-fold, respectively, above baseline in normal human oral epithelial cells. HIV-1 failed to infect these cells, even after 5 days of exposure. Recombinant hBD-1 had no antiviral activity, while rhBD-2 and rhBD-3 showed concentration-dependent inhibition of HIV-1 replication without cellular toxicity. Inhibition was greater against CXCR4-tropic than against the CCR5-tropic HIV-1 isolates. hBD-2 and hBD-3 induced an irreversible effect on virion infectivity, with electron microscopy confirming binding of hBDs to viral particles. Finally, hBD-2 and -3 induced downmodulation of the HIV-1 coreceptor CXCR4 (but not CCR5) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and T lymphocytic cells as shown by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows for the first time that HIV-1 induces beta-defensin expression in human oral epithelial cells and that beta-defensins block HIV-1 replication via a direct interaction with virions and through modulation of the CXCR4 coreceptor. These properties may be exploited as strategies for mucosal protection against HIV-1 transmission.

Nadir CD4+ T-cell count and numbers of CD28+ CD4+ T-cells predict functional responses to immunizations in chronic HIV-1 infection.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether delaying the initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) compromises functional immune reconstitution in HIV-1 infection in persons who regain 'normal' CD4 T-cell counts after suppressive antiretroviral therapies. DESIGN: Prospective open-label study carried out at two University-affiliated HIV-outpatient clinics in the USA. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Response to immunization was used as a model for in vivo functional immune competence in 29 HIV-1 infected patients with CD4 T-cell counts > 450 x 106 cells/l and HIV-RNA < 400 copies/ml for > 12 months after HAART and nine HIV-1 seronegative controls. After immunization with tetanus toxoid, diphtheria-toxoid, and keyhole limpet hemocyanin, immune response scores (IRS) were calculated using postimmunization antibody concentrations, lymphocyte proliferation, and delayed-type hypersensitivity responses to vaccine antigens. RESULTS: Despite normal numbers of circulating CD4 T-cells, the CD4 T-cell nadir before HAART initiation predicted the immune response to immunization (rho = 0.5; P < 0.005) while current CD4 T-cell count did not. Likewise, CD4 T-lymphocyte expression of the co-stimulatory molecule CD28 was also an independent predictor of response to immunization (rho = 0.5; P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Even among persons who controlled HIV replication and normalized CD4 T-cell counts with HAART, pretreatment CD4 T-cell count and numbers of circulating CD4+CD28+ T-cells at immunization, but not current CD4 T-cell count, predict the ability to respond to vaccination. Delaying the initiation of HAART in chronic HIV-1 infection results in impaired functional immune restoration despite normalization of circulating CD4 T-cell numbers.

Impact of suppression of viral replication by highly active antiretroviral therapy on immune function and phenotype in chronic HIV-1 infection.

We compared immune phenotypes, lymphocyte proliferation (LP), and delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses in 28 male antiretroviral treatment-naive and experienced HIV-1-infected patients, matched pair-wise according to age and CD4+ T-lymphocyte count. Median CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts were 441 cells/microL and 483 cells/microL and median CD4+ T-lymphocyte nadirs were 435 cells/microL and 150 cells/microL in both groups, respectively. Absolute numbers of circulating T-lymphocyte subpopulations and proportions of naive and memory T-lymphocytes were comparable in the two groups. Untreated patients had greater proportions of activated CD4+ (p <.05) and CD8+ (p <.01) T-cells expressing human leukocyte antigen (HLA)DR and CD38 and fewer CD8+ cells expressing CD28 (p <.05). DTH and LP responses were comparable in both groups except for HIVp24, LP responses, and mumps DTH responses, which were of greater magnitude in the group treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) (p <.05). Thus, HIV-1-infected patients who experienced substantial increases in CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts after suppression of viral replication on HAART had fewer activated lymphocytes and similar immune function when compared with findings in untreated patients with similar CD4+ T-cell counts. HIV replication has minimal real-time effect on CD4+ T-cell function in response to non-HIV antigens but helper T-cell responses to HIV-gag antigen are impaired during ongoing viral replication and may be restored by antiretroviral therapy.

CD4+ T-lymphocyte nadir and the effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on phenotypic and functional immune restoration in HIV-1 infection.

To evaluate the effects of the timing of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on immune reconstitution, we compared lymphocyte subpopulations and lymphocyte proliferation (LP) in response to Candida albicans, cytomegalovirus, HIV p24, Mycobacterium avium complex, pokeweed mitogen, streptokinase, and tetanus toxoid in 43 patients with pretherapy advanced, moderately advanced, and early chronic HIV-1 infection. All patients had recent CD4+ T-cell counts >450/microl and HIV RNA <400 copies/ml for >12 months. CD4+ nadirs were positively correlated with recent numbers of CD4+ T-cells (P < 0.001), memory cells (P < 0.001), and naïve CD4+ T-cells (P < 0.05) and CD4+ CD28+ T-lymphocytes (P < 0.05) and were negatively correlated with recent CD8+ T-lymphocyte counts (P < 0.05). Only CD4+ naïve T-cells normalized when HAART was initiated at lower CD4+ T-cell levels. Fifty-three percent of patients had LP responses to HIV p24 antigen. While LP responses to prevalent antigens were usually present, responses to tetanus toxoid were more common with higher CD4+ T-lymphocyte nadirs (P < 0.05). Delaying HAART may limit phenotypic and functional immune restoration in HIV-1 infection.