Evaluation of stapes mobilization in the 21st century for conductive hearing loss in the otosclerotic ear.

PURPOSE: Compare outcomes of stapes mobilization and stapedectomy performed by a single surgeon for the otosclerosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of adult patients who underwent stapes mobilization or stapedectomy for otosclerosis was performed. Operative notes reviewed; patients included if diagnosed with otosclerosis without another otologic disease that could contribute to their hearing loss and all required data were available. Pre-and post-operative audiograms at 1, 6, and 12-months were evaluated to compare the air-bone gaps between the mobilization and stapedectomy procedures. The rates of sensorineural hearing loss also were compared. Student t-tests and multiple regression models were used to ascertain the association between improvement in post-operative air-bone gaps, sensorineural hearing loss, and the procedure undertaken. RESULTS: Sixty-seven (n = 67) patients with 108 procedures were included for analysis. No substantial difference between the surgical subgroups was found when comparing stapes mobilization to stapedectomy, and there was no evidence to suggest that either surgical procedure was superior to the other based on the data obtained and analyzed. Improvements in air-bone gap averaged 15.79 dB for stapes mobilization and 19.23 dB for stapedectomy. The results of the study showed no evidence of post-operative sensorineural hearing loss or change in air-bone gaps when comparing virgin to "revision" stapedectomy largely in patients who had failed previous mobilization. CONCLUSION: Stapes mobilization provides a conservative approach to otosclerosis patients suffering from conductive hearing loss. Stapedectomy can be used to correct failed mobilization.

Intubation-Related Laryngeal Pathology Precluding Tracheostomy Decannulation: Incidence and Associated Risk Factors.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the incidence and risk factors for intubation-related laryngeal lesions that preclude tracheostomy decannulation in a large population. METHODS: A 3-year retrospective case-control study was performed of tracheotomized adults in acute rehabilitation facilities who underwent routine endoscopic evaluation of the airway as part of the facilities' decannulation protocol. Patients with known upper airway pathology, external laryngeal trauma, cricothyrotomy or emergent tracheostomy, prior head and neck radiation, isolated tracheal lesions, and patients with incomplete reports were excluded. The laryngeal pathologies were classified, and demographics and clinical features were compared between those whose lesions precluded decannulation and all other patients. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-one patients met inclusion criteria. One hundred six (28.6%) had laryngotracheal lesions. Forty-nine patients (13.2%) had intubation-related lesions of the larynx that precluded decannulation. These lesions included posterior glottic stenosis (30.6%), granulation tissue (24.5%), vocal fold immobility (16.3%), subglottic stenosis (16.3%), a combination of granulation tissue and stenosis (10.2%), and glottic edema (2.0%). A BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 was associated with laryngeal lesions precluding decannulation. There was no difference in age, sex, race, diabetes mellitus, endotracheal tube size, number of days intubated, and number of intubations between groups. Seventy-eight percent of patients with lesions precluding decannulation were decannulated after medical or surgical therapy. The decannulation rate of patients without lesions precluding decannulation was 79.9%. CONCLUSIONS: BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 may increase the risk of development of laryngeal lesions preventing decannulation. Given that 13.2% of tracheotomized patients have laryngeal lesions precluding decannulation, an endoscopic evaluation of the airway is important to prevent decannulation failure and future airway symptoms.

The Utility of Pulmonary Function Testing in Patients Presenting With Dysphonia.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the utility of pulmonary function testing (PFT), particularly forced expiratory flow (FEF) 25-75%, in patients presenting with dysphonia. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was carried out. METHODS: Records of 199 patients who presented with dysphonia were reviewed to determine whether in-office PFTs, which we perform routinely, lead to new pulmonary diagnoses or the need for additional pulmonary medications, after assessment by a pulmonologist. Of particular interest was evaluating if FEF25-75% of predicted values less than 80% can be used as a marker for occult pulmonary disease in patients presenting with dysphonia. RESULTS: Of the 199 patient charts reviewed, 129 were female and 70 were male. The age of patients ranged from 18 to 88 years, with a mean of 46.8 years. The body mass index ranged from 17.5 to 53.4 kg/m2. One hundred five (52.8%) patients had FEF25-75% values less than 80% of predicted (poor midflow values). Of these patients, 76 (72.4%) were referred to a pulmonologist, 22 of 76 (28.9%) completed the referral, and 17 of 22 (77.3%) received a new pulmonary diagnosis or change in medications. Of the 155 patients without a history of pulmonary disease, 76 had poor midflow values, 57 (75%) of these patients were referred, and 12 of 57 (21%) completed the referral. Eight (67%) of these 12 patients were diagnosed with a previously unrecognized pulmonary disorder. Of the 44 patients with a prior history of pulmonary disease, 29 (65.9%) had poor midflow values. Nineteen (65.5%) of these patients were referred, and 9 (47%) received a new pulmonary diagnosis or a change in their medications. There were 51 classically trained singers and 148 nonclassically trained singers or nonsingers. There was no significant difference in average midflow values between the two groups (80.96 ± 24.7 and 80.73 ± 28.4, respectively) or in the percentage of classically trained singers with poor midflow values compared with nonsingers (53.5% vs. 49%, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that patients with dysphonia may have unrecognized underlying pulmonary disease, and PFT should be considered as part of the routine initial voice evaluation for patients presenting with dysphonia.

Laboratory Evaluation of Vocal Fold Paralysis and Paresis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the value of comprehensive laboratory evaluation in patients with vocal fold paralysis or paresis. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective chart review. METHODS: Records of 231 patients with vocal fold paralysis or paresis were reviewed to determine whether there is a significant increase in the number of abnormal test results compared with rates of abnormal results for these tests in the general population and whether testing resulted in clinically important diagnosis. Laboratory data were collected from charts from initial visits from 2010 to 2014 and compared with national data. RESULTS: When controlled for age and sex, white blood cell count was found to have a significantly higher rate of abnormal test results (P < 0.001) in patients with vocal fold paralysis or paresis than the general population. Although hemoglobin, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and thyroid antibody tests were more likely to be abnormal in our patient population, the trend was not statistically significant. Further, the prevalence of syphilis and myasthenia gravis was found to be higher in these subjects than their respective national prevalences, and the incidence of Lyme disease was found to be higher than the national prevalence of Lyme disease. Several patients were diagnosed with medically important conditions such as diabetes, thyroid dysfunction, syphilis, myasthenia gravis, and Lyme disease based on these tests. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that comprehensive testing of patients with vocal fold movement disorders results in diagnoses that would be missed without a comprehensive evaluation, some of which are important medically, although their causal relationship to vocal fold paralysis or paresis was not investigated or established.