Optimizing Perioperative Blood and Coagulation Management During Cardiac Surgery.

Bleeding and transfusion are common in cardiac surgery and associated with poorer outcome. Bleeding is frequently due to coagulopathy caused by the complex interaction between cardiopulmonary bypass, major surgical trauma, anticoagulation management, and perioperative factors. Patient blood management has emerged to improve outcome by the prediction, prevention, monitoring, and treatment of bleeding and transfusion. Each part of this chain has several individual modalities and when combined leads to result in a better outcome. This article reviews the hemostasis disturbances in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and gives an overview of the most important patient blood management strategies.

The value of the thromboelastometry heparinase assay (HEPTEM) in cardiac surgery.

The thromboelastometry INTEM clotting time (CT) with heparinase (HEPTEM) is frequently used to detect residual heparin after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in cardiac surgery. This study investigated whether the HEPTEM CT reflects the presence of residual heparin and the association of the protamine-to-heparin ratio to the INTEM and HEPTEM CT. We retrospectively evaluated thromboelastometry data that were obtained before CPB and after protamine infusion following CPB in two tertiary hospitals. The number of patients with an INTEM: HEPTEM ratio (IH-ratio) > 1, suggesting residual heparin, were quantified. Moreover, the influence of different protamine-to-heparin-dosing-ratios (P:H) on the INTEM and HEPTEM CT was evaluated in the clinical setting and in blood drawn from healthy volunteers. An INTEM: HEPTEM CT ratio > 1.1 was observed in 16 % of the patients prior to CPB, and in 15 % after protamine administration. Interestingly, 23 % and 36 % of the patients had an HEPTEM CT exceeding the INTEM CT before CPB and following protamine administration. The HEPTEM CT was longer than the INTEM CT in patients with a P:H-ratio of 1:1 (265 ± 132 vs 260 ± 246 s; p=0.002) or P:H-ratio of 1.3:1 (357 ± 174 vs 292 ± 95 s; p=0.001). Increasing P:H-ratios induced a prolonged HEPTEM CT in fresh blood. In conclusion, limited agreement was observed between INTEM and HEPTEM clotting time in the absence of heparin. INTEM comparison to HEPTEM may not always reliably reflect the presence of residual heparin, while protamine may additionally affect the latter test. These observations complicate HEPTEM results interpretation in clinical situations with suspected residual heparin effect after protamine.

Instability of the non-activated rotational thromboelastometry assay (NATEM) in citrate stored blood.

INTRODUCTION: The non-activated rotational thromboelastometric assay (NATEM) is increasingly used as sensitive test for the evaluation of the endogenous activation of haemostasis. The reproducibility of the test results in citrate stored blood has never been investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The NATEM assay was performed in citrated blood samples stored for 0, 45 and 90minutes using ROTEM® (TEM International, Munich, Germany). Blood samples were drawn from healthy volunteers and a population of patients admitted to the intensive care (ICU). In 10 ICU patients, citrate concentrations were measured at baseline and after 90minutes of storage. RESULTS: The NATEM clotting time shortened in stored citrated blood from healthy volunteers (t=0 1226±160; t=45 986±171; t=90 903±177; p<0.001) and ICU patients (t=0 986±318; t=90 750±187; p<0.001). A similar decrease in clot formation time (CFT) was seen whereas the MCF remained unaffected. Citrate concentration did not change over time, baseline 13.3±0.5mmol/l; after 90minutes 13.2±0.7mmol/l; n.s.. CONCLUSIONS: The non-activated rotational thromboelastometric assay test results change over time in citrate stored blood. The NATEM test should be initiated at a standardised time point, in order to prevent bias by different test initiation times, preferably directly after blood withdrawal.

Systemic endotoxin activity correlates with clot formation: an observational study in patients with early systemic inflammation and sepsis.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammation and coagulation are closely linked, and both can be triggered by endotoxin. Thrombelastometry and impedance aggregometry are of diagnostic and predictive value in critically ill patients. In this observational study we investigated the correlation of endotoxin activity with thrombelasometric and aggregometric variables in patients with systemic inflammation. METHODS: Based on a daily screening on a tertiary academic surgical ICU, patients, as soon as they fulfilled two or more criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), were included. In whole blood we performed endotoxin activity (EA) assay, thrombelastometry (ROTEM®) and impendance aggregometry (Multiplate®). RESULTS: In total, 49 patients were included with a broad spread of EA levels of (median (minimum to maximum)) 0.27 (0.01 to 0.72), allowing expedient correlative analysis. Clot formation time (CFT) (263 s (60 to 1,438 s)) and clotting time (CT) (1,008 s (53 to 1,481 s)) showed a significant negative correlation with EA level (r = -0.38 (P < 0.005) and r = -0.29 (P < 0.05)). Positive correlations were found for alpha-angle (50° (17 to 78°), r = 0.40 (P < 0.005)) and maximum clot firmness (MCF) (55 mm (5/76), r = 0.27 (P < 0.05)). No significant correlations were found between Lysis Index at 60 minutes (LI60) and EA levels. There was no correlation between EA level and aggregometric values, or classical coagulation parameters. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with systemic inflammation, increasing endotoxin concentrations correlate with increased clot formation.