Chemotherapy-free treatment targeting fusions and driver mutations in KRAS wild-type pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, a case series.

Background: KRAS wild-type (WT) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents a distinct entity with unique biology. The therapeutic impact of matched targeted therapy in these patients in a real-world setting, to date, is less established. Objectives: The aim of our study was to review our institutional database to identify the prevalence of actionable genomic alterations in patients with KRAS-WT tumors and to evaluate the therapeutic impact of matched targeted therapy in these patients. Design: We reviewed electronic medical records of patients with KRAS-WT PDAC and advanced disease (n = 14) who underwent clinical-grade tissue ± liquid next-generation sequencing (315-648 genes for tissue) between years 2015 and 2021. Methods: Demographic and disease characteristics were summarized using descriptive parameters. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 236 PDAC patients, 14 had advanced/metastatic disease with KRAS-WT tumors. Median age at diagnosis was 66 years. There was a high frequency of potentially actionable genomic alterations, including three (21%) with BRAF alterations, two (14%) with fusions [RET-PCM1 and FGFR2-POC1B (N = 1 each)]; and one with a druggable EGFR (EGFR E746_A755delISERD) variant; two other patients had an STK11 and a MUTYH alteration. Five patients were treated with matched targeted therapy, with three having durable benefit: (i) erlotinib for EGFR-altered tumor, followed by osimertinib/capmatinib when MET amplification emerged (first-line therapy); (ii) pralsetinib for RET fusion (fifth line); and (iii) dabrafenib/trametinib for BRAF N486_P490del (third line). Duration of time on chemotherapy-free matched targeted therapy for these patients was 17+, 11, and 18+ months, respectively. Conclusion: Sustained therapeutic benefit can be achieved in a real-world setting in a subset of patients with advanced/metastatic KRAS-WT PDAC treated with chemotherapy-free matched targeted agents. Prospective studies are warranted.

Comprehensive genomic profiling: Does timing matter?

Purpose: There is variability in utilization of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) in most of the metastatic solid tumors (MST). We evaluated the CGP utilization patterns and its impact on outcomes at an academic tertiary center. Patients and Methods: Institutional database was reviewed for CGP data in adult patients with MST between 01/2012 - 04/2020. Patients were categorized based on interval between CGP and metastatic diagnosis; 3 tertiles of distribution (T1-earliest to the diagnosis, T3-furthest), and pre-mets (CGP performed prior to diagnosis of metastasis). Overall survival (OS) was estimated from the time of metastatic diagnosis with left truncation at the time of CGP. Cox regression model was used to estimate the impact of timing of CGP on survival. Results: Among 1,358 patients, 710 were female, 1,109 Caucasian, 186 Afro-Americans, and 36 Hispanic. The common histologies were lung cancer (254; 19%), colorectal cancer (203; 15%), gynecologic cancers (121; 8.9%), and pancreatic cancer (106; 7.8%). Time interval between diagnosis of metastatic disease and CGP was not statistically significantly different based on sex, race and ethnicity after adjusting for histologic diagnoses with 2 exceptions - Hispanics with lung cancer had delayed CGP compared to non-Hispanics (p =0.019) and females with pancreas cancer had delayed CGP compared to males (p =0.025). Lung cancer, gastro-esophageal cancer and gynecologic malignancies had better survival if they had CGP performed during the first tertile after metastatic diagnosis. Conclusion: CGP utilization across cancer types was equitable irrespective of sex, race and ethnicity. Early CGP after metastatic diagnosis might have effect on treatment delivery and clinical outcomes in cancer type with more actionable targets.

Outcome comparison between muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps after secondary orthopedic procedures.

Lower extremity wounds associated with fractures and bony defects often require secondary orthopedic procedures after flap coverage has been performed. In this study, we compare complications between muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps after secondary orthopedic procedures. A retrospective chart review study of all lower extremity soft tissue reconstructions by a single surgeon over seven years yielded a subgroup of patients who underwent secondary orthopedic procedures, including hardware removal, hardware revision, and bone grafting after flap reconstruction. Of 355 lower extremity, soft tissue reconstructions for orthopedic coverage performed in the time period studied, 102 patients underwent secondary orthopedic procedures after flap reconstruction. Of these, 54 received muscle flaps (52.94%), and 48 received fasciocutaneous flaps (47.06%). Using this subgroup of 102 patients, we compared muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps using three categories of wound complications following these secondary procedures: There were no superficial wounds requiring local wound care only in the muscle flap group (0%, n = 0) versus 4.17% (n = 2; p = 0.130) in the fasciocutaneous flap group. There were 2 lost flaps requiring surgical debridement and additional skin grafting in the muscle flaps group (3.70%) versus 2 (4.17%; p = 0.904) in the fasciocutaneous flap group. In the third category, flap loss requiring additional soft tissue reconstruction was 18.52% (n = 10) in the muscle group versus 2.08% (n = 1; p = 0.008) in the fasciocutaneous flap group. Our data support the existing literature indicating that fasciocutaneous flaps can tolerate secondary procedures better than muscle flaps and should initially be considered in patients with higher probability of needing additional orthopedic procedures after reconstruction.

Postoperative Interventions in Pediatric Digital Replantation: A Tertiary Referral Center Case Review.

PURPOSE: Although a few case series have been published describing the excellent outcomes of replantation and revascularization operations in children, there has been limited study of the hospital course that these patients experience and the number of potentially harmful interventions and treatments that occur. The purpose of this study was to detail the results of various postoperative interventions, including anticoagulation, transfusion, leeching, sedation, and additional anesthetic exposures. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients aged less than 18 years had 34 digital revascularizations or replantations performed between January 2000 and May 2020. The details of each patient's presentation, surgery, and postoperative care were analyzed. RESULTS: Nine of 29 children underwent repeat anesthetics, including 6 revision amputations. No demographic, surgical, or postoperative variables consistently preceded revision amputation or additional anesthetic procedures. Only 5 patients had >1 hemoglobin (Hb) measurement. Two patients received blood transfusions; the average drop in Hb was 3.5 g/dL from before surgery to the lowest after surgery. Four patients underwent leech therapy. Only patients receiving leech therapy required postoperative transfusions. Anticoagulation regimens were prescribed on the basis of demographic and surgical factors, although no medication or regimen seemed to affect outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although the experience of digital replantation is essentially the same in pediatric patients as adults, there may be different ramifications for children. Specifically, postoperative management of pediatric digital replantation or revascularization can involve multiple interventions that carry their risks. Parents should be counseled about the risks of anticoagulants, transfusions, and repeat anesthetics, and clinicians should monitor Hb closely when using leech therapy. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, Therapeutic IV.

Prognostic Outcomes of Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Breast.

BACKGROUND: Signet ring cell breast carcinoma (SRCBC) is a rare variant of invasive lobular carcinoma and there are no large series characterizing its long-term prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The NCDB was queried from 2004-2016 to identify SRCBC patients. Patients were excluded if they had non-invasive tumors, multiple malignancies, or incomplete surgical data. Univariate analysis was performed utilizing chi-squared and Fischer's Exact tests. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: 324 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were mostly White (75.3%), ≥50 years of age (88.2%), female (98.5%), and had a low Charlson-Deyo score (82.7%). 34.5% had Stage IV disease and 78.1% had ER+ tumors. In patients with non-Stage IV disease, 91.5% received surgery: 49.5% had lumpectomy and 50.5% underwent mastectomy. Radiation therapy was used in 40.7% (71.4% with lumpectomy and 35.8% with mastectomy) and 50% received chemotherapy. Significant differences in unadjusted overall survival were seen at 5 and 10 years based on stage (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, ER+ patients showed an improved survival (HR 0.5, P < 0.01) but there was no difference in survival if ER+ patients received endocrine therapy (ET) (HR 0.9, P = 0.57). Non-metastatic patients who underwent surgery had improved overall survival compared to those that did not (HR 0.5, P = 0.02), but there was no survival difference based upon type of breast operation (P = 0.8). CONCLUSION: SRCBC frequently presents at an advanced stage. While ER+ patients appear to have improved survival, there was no clear survival benefit to receiving ET in ER+ patients.