Biomarkers for Optimization and Personalization of Anti-TNFs in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

The use of biological drugs has improved outcomes in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Prediction of the response to biological drugs would be extremely useful in IBD, and even more so in children, who are still growing physically and psychologically. Specific clinical, biochemical, and genetic parameters are considered predictive of response to biological drugs, although few studies have been carried out in children with IBD. In this review, we present current evidence on biological treatments used in pediatric IBD and the available biomarkers of response. We examine demographics, clinical characteristics, biomarkers (genetic, genomic, and cellular), and microbiota.

Persistence and adherence to biologic therapies in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that often requires biological therapy to control its activity. Medication persistence and adherence are important aspects on which we have scarce information. We performed a longitudinal, retrospective, and observational study based on data from the daily clinical management of JIA patients. We recorded clinical remission at 6 and 12 months. Persistence of biological therapy was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and adherence was assessed using the medication possession ratio (MPR). We included 68 patients who received biological therapy. Of these, 11 (16.2%) and 5 (7.4%) required a second and third drug, respectively. The persistence rate for biological therapy at 5 years was 64%, with no differences between the first and second lines. Adherence was high during the first year of treatment (MPR80: 96.3%) and also in the second and third years (MPR80: 85.2% and 91.8%, respectively). Persistence and adherence to biological therapy were remarkably high in our JIA cohort. Adherence to biological treatments could be related to a higher probability of fulfilling the Wallace remission criteria at 6 months, although this was not confirmed at 12 months.

COVID-19 in hospitalised patients in Spain: a cohort study in Madrid.

Few large series describe the clinical characteristics, outcomes and costs of COVID-19 in Western countries. This cohort reports the first 1255 adult cases receiving anti-COVID-19 treatment at a Spanish hospital (1-24 March 2020). Treatment costs were calculated. A logistic regression model was used to explore risk factors on admission associated with ARDS. A bivariate Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) model was employed to determine the HR between individual factors and death. We included 1255 patients (median age 65 years; 57.8% male), of which 92.3% required hospitalisation. The prevalence of hypertension, cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus (DM) was 45.1%, 31.4% and 19.9%, respectively. Lymphocytopenia (54.8%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (33.0%) and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (58.5%) were frequent. Overall, 36.7% of patients developed ARDS, 10.0% were admitted to an ICU and 21.3% died. The most frequent antiviral combinations were lopinavir/ritonavir plus hydroxychloroquine (44.2%), followed by triple therapy with interferon beta-1b (32.7%). Corticosteroids and tocilizumab were used in 25.3% and 12.9% of patients, respectively. Total cost of anti-COVID-19 agents was €511 825 (€408/patient). By multivariate analysis, risk factors associated with ARDS included older age, obesity, DM, severe hypoxaemia, lymphocytopenia, increased creatine kinase and increased C-reactive protein. In multivariate Cox model, older age (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.06-1.09), cardiovascular disease (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.01-1.79), DM (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.09-1.92), severe hypoxaemia (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.49-2.72), lymphocytopenia (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.20-2.20) and increased C-reactive protein (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06) were risk factors for mortality.

Tocilizumab as salvage treatment of refractory pulmonary acute graft-versus-host disease.

INTRODUCTION: Acute graft-versus-host disease GVHD (aGVHD) is the main complication during the first months after bone transplantation. Steroid therapy is clearly the upfront established treatment for aGVHD. However, there are patients with partial response to steroid treatment and steroid-refractory cases. For those patients, a vast number of therapeutic options have emerged, although the evidence is scarce. CASE REPORT: We report the use of tocilizumab as salvage treatment in a patient with corticosteroid refractory pulmonary aGVHD that was admitted to the critical care unit for respiratory support measures. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: We decided to use tocilizumab as rescue treatment, after failure of corticosteroid treatment, standard treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics and etanercept. The patient showed a remarkable clinical improvement two days after first infusion and a total resolution of the symptomatology with normalization of the spirometry tests after 4 weeks of the administration of tocilizumab. DISCUSSION: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case that describes the effective and safe use of tocilizumab as a rescue treatment in a patient with steroid-refractory pulmonary aGVHD. It showed a rapid onset of action and a favorable safety profile, which could make it an interesting option for the treatment of this potentially fatal complication.

[Quality control of parenteral nutrition compounding: gravimetric and component verification control]. / Control de calidad de la elaboración de nutriciones parenterales: control gravimétrico y de productos utilizados.

INTRODUCTION: Introduction: parenteral nutrition (PN) compounding is a process with a high probability of errors. Objective: to analyze PN compounding errors detected using a gravimetric control (GC) and a component verification control (CVC). Methods: a prospective analysis was carried out during a three-year period (January 2016 to December 2018). The MedicalOne Parenteral® software program was used to calculate the theoretical weight of each PN based on density and volume. Each elaborated PN was weighed to obtain the real weight. Gravimetric error (%) ((real weight - theoretical weight) x 100 / theoretical weight) was considered correct if within the ± 5 % interval. The CVC consisted of checking that the correct ingredients and volumes were added according to the PN order. Results: during the study period a total number of 28,761 PNs were checked out; 20,612 adult PNs (APN) were weighed and 124 were considered incorrect (0.60 %). Of the 1,203 non-neonatal pediatric PNs (NPPN), 15 (1.25 %) were incorrect, and of the 6,946 neonatal PNs (NPN), 164 (2.96 %) were incorrect. Regarding the CVC, 71 errors were detected in the APN (0.70 %), 6 (1.34 %) in the NPPN, and 5 (0.21 %) in the NPN group. The total number of errors included: adding more volume of one component [38 (46.34 %)], adding a wrong component [27 (32.93 %)], and absent volume of one component [17 (20.73 %)]. Conclusions: the quality control carried out allowed to detect errors during the preparation of PNs and prevented them from reaching the patient. More incorrect NPNs were detected through GC. The main error detected with CVC was adding more volume of a component.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Introducción: la elaboración de nutriciones parenterales (NP) es un proceso complejo y con alta probabilidad de aparición de errores. Objetivo: analizar los errores detectados en el control gravimétrico (CG) y de productos (CP) utilizados realizado en las NP elaboradas. Métodos: se realizó un análisis prospectivo en el que durante tres años (enero de 2016 a diciembre de 2018) se pesaron las NP elaboradas. Se utilizó el programa informático MedicalOne Parenteral®, que calcula el peso teórico teniendo en cuenta la densidad y el volumen. Cada NP elaborada se pesaba para obtener el peso real. El error gravimétrico (%) (EG = (peso real - peso teórico) x 100 / peso teórico) se consideró correcto dentro del intervalo de ± 5 %. El CP consistía en la comprobación de los productos y los volúmenes utilizados con la hoja de elaboración. Resultados: se realizó el control de 28.761 NP. Se pesaron 20.612 NP de adultos (NPA), siendo incorrectas 124 (0,6 %). De las 1203 NP de pacientes pediátricos no neonatos (NPP), 15 (1,25 %) fueron incorrectas, y de las 6946 de neonatos (NPN), 164 (2,96 %). Respecto al CP se detectaron 71 errores en las NPA (0,70 %), 6 (1,34 %) en las NPP y 5 (0,21 %) en las NPN. Los errores fueron: añadir más volumen de un componente [38 (46,34 %)], añadir menos volumen [17(20,73 %)] y producto erróneo [27 (32,93 %)]. Conclusiones: el control de calidad realizado permitió detectar errores producidos durante la elaboración y evitó que llegaran al paciente. Se detectaron en el CG más NP incorrectas entre las NPN. Con el CP, el error mayoritario fue añadir más volumen de un componente.

Assessing Apps for Patients with Genitourinary Tumors Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS): Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The large number of available cancer apps and their impact on the population necessitates a transparent, objective, and comprehensive evaluation by app experts, health care professionals, and users. To date, there have been no analyses or classifications of apps for patients with genitourinary cancers, which are among the most prevalent types of cancer. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to analyze the quality of apps for patients diagnosed with genitourinary cancers using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) and identify high-quality apps. METHODS: We performed an observational cross-sectional descriptive study of all smartphone apps for patients diagnosed with genitourinary cancers available on iOS and Android platforms. In July 2019, we searched for all available apps for patients with genitourinary cancers (bladder, prostate, cervical, uterine, endometrial, kidney, testicular, and vulvar) or their caregivers. Apps were downloaded and evaluated, and the general characteristics were entered into a database. The evaluation was performed by 2 independent researchers using the MARS questionnaire, which rates 23 evaluation criteria clustered in 5 domains (Engagement, Functionality, Esthetics, Information, and Subjective Quality) on a scale from 1 to 5. RESULTS: In total, 46 apps were analyzed. Of these, 31 (67%) were available on Android, 6 (13%) on iOS, and 9 (20%) on both platforms. The apps were free in 89% of cases (41/46), and 61% (28/46) had been updated in the previous year. The apps were intended for prostate cancer in 30% of cases (14/46) and cervical cancer in 17% (8/46). The apps were mainly informative (63%, 29/46), preventive (24%, 11/46), and diagnostic (13%, 6/46). Only 7/46 apps (15%) were developed by health care organizations. The mean MARS score for the overall quality of the 46 apps was 2.98 (SD 0.77), with a maximum of 4.63 and a minimum of 1.95. Functionality scores were quite similar for most of the apps, with the greatest differences in Engagement and Esthetics, which showed acceptable scores in one-third of the apps. The 5 apps with the highest MARS score were the following: "Bladder cancer manager," "Kidney cancer manager," "My prostate cancer manager," "Target Ovarian Cancer Symptoms Diary," and "My Cancer Coach." We observed statistically significant differences in the MARS score between the operating systems and the developer types (P<.001 and P=.01, respectively), but not for cost (P=.62). CONCLUSIONS: MARS is a helpful methodology to decide which apps can be prescribed to patients and to identify which features should be addressed to improve these tools. Most of the apps designed for patients with genitourinary cancers only try to provide data about the disease, without coherent interactivity. The participation of health professionals in the development of these apps is low; nevertheless, we observed that both the participation of health professionals and regular updates were correlated with quality.