[Lung cancer diagnosed by transesophageal ecoendoscopy and fine needle aspiration biopsy]. / Cáncer de pulmón diagnosticado mediante ecoendoscopía transesofágica y biopsia por punción con aguja fina.

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Pulmonary nodules located in the vicinity of the mediastinum, retrocardiac, near the aorta or pulmonary vessels, and in front of the spine, may be difficult to access through a percutaneous or bronchoscopic approach. Fine needle aspiration/biopsy guided by transesophageal echoendoscopy (EUS-FNA/FNB) is a minimally invasive method with low morbidity that could allow access to lesions in these places. We present the case of a patient with a solitary pulmonary nodule, in which the diagnosis of lung cancer was obtained by EUS-FNA/FNB.

El cáncer de pulmón es la principal causa de muerte por cáncer en todo el mundo. Los nódulos pulmonares ubicados en proximidad al mediastino, retrocardíacos, cercanos a grandes vasos o por delante de la columna vertebral pueden resultar de difícil acceso por vía percutánea o broncoscópica. La punción aspiración/biopsia con aguja fina guiada por ecoendoscopía transesofágica (EUS-FNA/FNB) es un método mini invasivo con baja morbilidad que permitiría acceder a estas localizaciones. Presentamos el caso de un paciente con nódulo pulmonar solitario, en el que se obtuvo el diagnóstico de cáncer de pulmón mediante EUS-FNA/FNB.

Cáncer de pulmón diagnosticado mediante ecoendoscopia transesofágica y biopsia por punción con aguja fina / Lung cancer diagnosed by transesophageal ecoendoscopy and fine needle aspiration biopsy

El cáncer de pulmón es la principal causa de muerte por cáncer en todo el mundo. Los nódulos pulmonares ubicados en proximidad al mediastino, retrocardíacos, cercanos a grandes vasos o por delante de la columna vertebral pueden resultar de difícil acceso por vía percutánea o broncoscópica. La punción aspiración/biopsia con aguja fina guiada por ecoendoscopía transesofágica (EUS-FNA/FNB) es un método mini invasivo con baja morbilidad que permitiría acceder a estas localizaciones. Presentamos el caso de un paciente con nódulo pulmonar solitario, en el que se obtuvo el diagnóstico de cáncer de pulmón mediante EUS-FNA/FNB.

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Pulmonary nodules located in the vicinity of the mediastinum, retrocardiac, near the aorta or pulmonary vessels, and in front of the spine, may be difficult to access through a percutaneous or bronchoscopic approach. Fine needle aspiration/biopsy guided by transesophageal echoendoscopy (EUS-FNA/FNB) is a minimally invasive method with low morbidity that could allow access to lesions in these places. We present the case of a patient with a solitary pulmonary nodule, in which the diagnosis of lung cancer was obtained by EUS-FNA/FNB.

Gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis for critically ill patients: a clinical practice guideline.

CLINICAL QUESTION: What is the role of gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis (stress ulcer prophylaxis) in critically ill patients? This guideline was prompted by the publication of a new large randomised controlled trial. CURRENT PRACTICE: Gastric acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) is commonly done to prevent gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. Existing guidelines vary in their recommendations of which population to treat and which agent to use. RECOMMENDATIONS: This guideline panel makes a weak recommendation for using gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill patients at high risk (>4%) of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding, and a weak recommendation for not using prophylaxis in patients at lower risk of clinically important bleeding (≤4%). The panel identified risk categories based on evidence, with variable certainty regarding risk factors. The panel suggests using a PPI rather than a H2RA (weak recommendation) and recommends against using sucralfate (strong recommendation). HOW THIS GUIDELINE WAS CREATED: A guideline panel including patients, clinicians, and methodologists produced these recommendations using standards for trustworthy guidelines and the GRADE approach. The recommendations are based on a linked systematic review and network meta-analysis. A weak recommendation means that both options are reasonable. THE EVIDENCE: The linked systematic review and network meta-analysis estimated the benefit and harm of these medications in 12 660 critically ill patients in 72 trials. Both PPIs and H2RAs reduce the risk of clinically important bleeding. The effect is larger in patients at higher bleeding risk (those with a coagulopathy, chronic liver disease, or receiving mechanical ventilation but not enteral nutrition or two or more of mechanical ventilation with enteral nutrition, acute kidney injury, sepsis, and shock) (moderate certainty). PPIs and H2RAs might increase the risk of pneumonia (low certainty). They probably do not have an effect on mortality (moderate certainty), length of hospital stay, or any other important outcomes. PPIs probably reduce the risk of bleeding more than H2RAs (moderate certainty). UNDERSTANDING THE RECOMMENDATION: In most critically ill patients, the reduction in clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding from gastric acid suppressants is closely balanced with the possibility of pneumonia. Clinicians should consider individual patient values, risk of bleeding, and other factors such as medication availability when deciding whether to use gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis. Visual overviews provide the relative and absolute benefits and harms of the options in multilayered evidence summaries and decision aids available on MAGICapp.

The Use of Standard Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Ultrasound to Assess Cardiac Anatomy.

In this prospective observational study, conducted at an academic medical center, we evaluated the feasibility of performing a basic transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examination using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) technology to determine what cardiac structures could be assessed. This may be potentially beneficial during hemodynamic emergencies in the endoscopy suite resulting from hypovolemia, depressed ventricular function, aortic dissection, pericardial effusions, or aortic stenosis. Of the 20 patients enrolled, 18 underwent EUS with a linear echoendoscope for standard clinical indications followed by a cardiac assessment performed under the guidance of a TEE-certified cardiac anesthesiologist. Eight of the 20 standard views of cardiovascular structures per the 1999 American Society of Echocardiography/Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists guidelines for TEE could be obtained using the linear echoendoscope. The following cardiac valvular structures were visualized: aortic valve (100%), mitral valve (100%), tricuspid valve (33%), and pulmonic valve (11%). Left ventricular and right ventricular systolic function could be assessed in 89% and 67% of patients, respectively. Other structures such as the ascending and descending aorta, pericardium, left atrial appendage, and interatrial septum were identified in 100% of patients. Doppler-dependent functions could not be assessed. Given that the EUS images were not directly compared with TEE in these patients, we cannot comment definitively on the quality of these assessments and further studies would need to be performed to make a formal comparison. Based on this study, EUS technology can consistently assess the mitral valve, aortic valve, aorta, pericardium, and left ventricular function. Given its limitations, EUS technology, although not a substitute for formal echocardiography, could be a helpful early diagnostic tool in an emergency setting.

La colonoscopia en la pesquisa de cáncer colorrectal / Colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer

El cáncer colorrectal representa una de las primeras causas de muerte por cáncer en todo el mundo y también en la Argentina. En los últimos años la pesquisa de cáncer de colon ha cobrado gran importancia y se ha postulado a la colonoscopia como el patrón de oro. En esta revisión resumimos las evidencias de este método poniendolo en contexto con las complicaciones y desventajas.

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer deathworldwide and also in Argentina. In the past few years colorectalcancer screening has become more popular and colonoscopyhas been postulated as the gold standard. In thisreview we analyzed the evidence supporting this methodin contrast with its complications and disadvantages.

Use of a cap in single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Cannulation of the native papilla in surgically altered anatomy is difficult in endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). There are limited data regarding the success of single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERC (SBE-ERC) in patients with a native papilla and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Use of a plastic cap may assist cannulation in these cases. The aim of the current study was to investigate the use of SBE-ERC with a cap (Cap-SBE-ERC) in patients with surgically altered anatomy referred for ERC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with surgically altered anatomy (hepaticojejunostomy, gastric bypass surgery, and Whipple's surgery) who underwent Cap-SBE-ERC were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes were diagnostic and procedural success. Patients with a native papilla were compared with those with a biliary-enteric anastomosis. RESULTS: Among 56 patients with surgically altered anatomy, high rates of diagnostic and procedural success were observed (78.6 % and 71.4 %, respectively). High diagnostic and procedural success rates of 72.7 % and 65.9 %, respectively, were also observed for patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy with a native papilla (n = 44). CONCLUSION: High rates of diagnostic and procedural success were reported for SBE-ERC with the use of a cap, including a large subgroup of patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and a native papilla.

Finding sessile serrated adenomas: is it possible to identify them during conventional colonoscopy?

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Proximal colorectal cancer may arise from sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs). Recognition of these lesions during colonoscopy can optimize the endoscopic approach. We aimed to identify specific endoscopic features of SSA with conventional colonoscopy. METHODS: Patients undergoing screening colonoscopies from January 2011 to September 2012, in whom colonic polyps were found, were prospectively included in our study. Polyp morphology, location, polyp pit pattern (Kudo classification), and other previously reported features of SSA were evaluated. Histological examination was conducted independently by two pathologists. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of SSA. RESULTS: A total of 272 patients were included, and 440 polyps were evaluated (1.6 polyps per patient). Thirty-four polyps (8%) were SSA, 135 (31%) hyperplastic, and 249 (56%) adenomas. The most prevalent endoscopic features of SSA were right-side location (94%), type II Kudo pit pattern (91%), mucus cap (41%), flat morphology (29%) and red-colored surface (26%). Multivariate analysis revealed that flat morphology (p = 0.002, OR = 3.81 CI 1.53-9.09), red-colored surface (p < 0.001, OR = 12.97 CI 4.43-37.69), right-side location (p < 0.001, OR = 22.21 CI 5.09-135.94) and mucus cap (p < 0.001, OR 8.77 CI 3.76-20.44) were independent predictors of SSA. CONCLUSION: We were able to identify specific features of SSA during conventional colonoscopy, which may help to identify, and therefore to optimize the endoscopic approach of these lesions.

[Colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy]. / La colonoscopia en la pesquisa de cáncer colorrectal.

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide and also in Argentina. In the past few years colorectal cancer screening has become more popular and colonoscopy has been postulated as the gold standard. In this review we analyzed the evidence supporting this method in contrast with its complications and disadvantages.

La colonoscopia en la pesquisa de cáncer colorrectal / Colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy

El cáncer colorrectal representa una de las primeras causas de muerte por cáncer en todo el mundo y también en la Argentina. En los últimos años la pesquisa de cáncer de colon ha cobrado gran importancia y se ha postulado a la colonoscopia como el patrón de oro. En esta revisión resumimos las evidencias de este método poniendolo en contexto con las complicaciones y desventajas.

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide and also in Argentina. In the past few years colorectal cancer screening has become more popular and colonoscopy has been postulated as the gold standard. In this review we analyzed the evidence supporting this method in contrast with its complications and disadvantages.

[Celiac disease and risk of colorectal neoplasia]. / Riesgo de cáncer colorrectal en pacientes con enfermedad celíaca.

BACKGROUND: Although small bowel and esophagus neoplasia are recognized to occur more frequently in patients with celiac disease, the association with colorectal cancer is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of colorectal neoplasia among patients with celiac disease. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted using the gastroenterology and endoscopy unit electronic data base. Patients with celiac disease and colonoscopy were regarded as cases and those without celiac disease and colonoscopy as controls. Patients were matched for age, sex, colonoscopy purpose and family history of colorectal cancer. The main outcome was the risk of colorectal polyps, adenomas, advanced lesions and cancer. The risk was expressed as odds ratio (OR) with the respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Out of 178 celiac disease patients, 44 were included as cases. Eighty-eight non-celiac patients were included as controls. In cases, the presence of polyps, adenomas and advanced colonic lesions was 20%, 16% and 4.5%, respectively. In controls, it was 15%, 9% and3.4%, respectively. The risk of polyps, adenomas and advanced colonic lesions was similar in both groups: OR 1.48 (95% CI 0.59-3.73), OR 1.89 (95% CI 0.66-5.42) and OR 1.34 (95% CI 0.26-7.05). No colorectal cancer was identified. CONCLUSION: The risk of colorectal neoplasia within this cohort of patients with celiac disease was similar to the control population.

[Prevalence of serrated adenomas of the colon and association with synchronic and metachronic neoplastic lesions]. / Prevalencia de adenomas serratos de colon y asociación con lesiones neoplásicas sincrónicas y metacrónicas.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of serrated adenomas (SA), the frequency of high grade dysplasia (HGD) and adenocarcinoma in these polyps, and the association with synchronic (SNL) and metachronic neoplastic lesions (MNL). METHODS: Reports from patients undergoing colonoscopy and polypectomy from January 2003 to April 2010, were obtained from our electronic database. SA were reanalyzed by two pathologists and classified on the basis of Snover's diagnostic criteria. The prevalence of these polyps and the clinical and endoscopic features were determined. SNL were defined by adenomas, cancer or advanced neoplastic lesions (ANL) (> 1 cm, HGD and/or >75% of villous component) in the same colonoscopy. MNL were identified in patients who underwent surveillance colonoscopies. An univariate and multivariate analysis was performed, looking for independent predictors of HGD/ cancer, SNL and MNL in patients with SA. RESULTS: The prevalence of SA was 0.87%. The mean age was 60 years old and 50.5% of patients were women. Most of the polyps were sessile (67%), small (63%) and located in ceco-ascending colon (47%). We found HGD in 4.4% ofSA and no adenocarcinoma. SNL was found in 31% ofpatients: 46% adenomas, 40.5% ANL and 13.5% adenocarcinoma. MNL was found in 29% of patients: 25% SA, 31% adenomas, 44% ANL and 0% adenocarcinoma. Age over 60 years old was significantly associated with MNL [Odds ratio 3.7 (95% confidence interval 1.16-11.8)] and polyp's size higher than 1 cm with sessile SA histology [Odds ratio 8 (95% confidence interval 1.28-49.4)]. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of SA was low. We found an association with neoplastic lesions. Therefore, it is important to establish specific guidelines for the management of these polyps.

[Diffuse gastric cancer associated with Ménétrier's disease]. / Adenocarcinoma gástrico difuso asociado a enfermedad de Ménétrier.

BACKGROUND: Ménétrier's disease is a rare disease of the stomach generally described as hypertrophic gastropathy. Its etiology is unknown and its malignant potential is controversial. Only a few reports supporting its association with gastric cancer have been found. We present a case of gastric cancer associated with Ménétrier's disease. CASE REPORT: We present a 72 year-old-male with epigastric pain and early satiety during the last 5 months. He had been treated with proton pump inhibitors with unfavorable response and began with loss of weight and asthenia. An upper digestive endoscopy showed an erythematous nodular gastric mucosa, with enlarged folds. An abdominal CT scan demonstrated a circumferential parietal thickening of the gastric wall and adenopathies. A gastric macrobiopsy done by endoscopic mucosal resection evidenced a mucin infiltrating adenocarcinoma with invasion of the lamina propria. Subtotal gastrectomy was done. The histology showed a stomach with changes compatible with Ménétrier's disease and diffuse infiltration by a highly undifferentiated adenocarcinoma (plastic linitis). CONCLUSION: A patient with diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma and Ménétrier's disease is reported.

[Surveillance colonoscopy before scheduled: is it worthwhile?]. / Vigilancia colonoscópica antes de Lo estipulado: tiene alguna utilidad?

OBJECTIVE: To determine de incidence of colonic polyps in colonoscopies performed before scheduled and to identifY the clinical and endoscopic features that predicted this finding. METHODS: All patients who underwent at least two complete colonoscopies less than three years apart were retrospectively identified in our computerized database. We excluded patients with high risk of colonic neoplasm requiring a new colonoscopy in less than three years. We analyzed the incidence of polyps before the first and third year after the first study, and the clinical and endoscopic features related to this finding by means of multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: 378 paired colonoscopies fulfilled criteria, 129 were performed less than one year apart (group 1), and 249 less than three years apart (group 2). Regarding surveillance colonoscopies, 19% of patients presented adenomas and 1.5% high grade dysplasia (HGD) in group 1, and 21% presented adenomas and 2% HGD in group 2. In group 1 fair preparation (P = 0.03), and prolonged colonoscopy (P = 0.02) on the first study were independent predictors to find any polyp on the second study before scheduled. In group 2 fair cleansing (P = 0.04), history of sessile polyps (P = 0.01) and 3 or more polyps in the first study (P = 0.01) were independent predictors to find any polyp, while more than 5 polyps in the first study predicate adenomas. CONCLUSION: During the first year incident polyps related to difficult procedures (missed polyps?) while at 3 years the history of previous polyps was also important.

[Role of antibodies in celiac disease after one year of treatment to predict the adherence to gluten-free diet]. / Rol de los anticuerpos en la enfermedad celíaca luego de un año de tratamiento para predecir la adherencia a la dieta libre de gluten.

INTRODUCTION: The celiac disease (CD) is characterized by a permanent sensitivity to gluten. The treatment for this disease is the life-long strict compliance with a gluten-free diet (GFD). The average of compliance with GFD ranges between 15% and 80%. Antibodies' role in the follow up of these patients regarding the adherence to the GFD is not well established. Objective. To determine the relationship between the antibodies for CD and the adherence to the GFD in patients with over a year of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with CD with a minimum of one year of GFD were prospectively included They were asked to complete a self-survey regarding to the compliance to GFD and the level of adherence was determined: low (no compliance or more than 2 gluten intakes per week), medium (1 or 2 gluten intakes per week or 2 or 3 gluten intakes per month), or high (1 gluten intake per month or less than 3 intakes per year). The follow up was performed by their general practitioners. From one year of GFD onwards, the results of the available antibodies at the time of the last follow up were assessed: antigliadine IgA (AGA) and IgG (AGG), anti-endomysium IgA (EMA) and IgG (EMG), anti-transglutaminase (ATG), and deaminated peptides of gliadine IgA and IgG, considering them as positive or negative. Through an univariate analysis, the above-mentioned antibodies were correlated (independent variables) in order to identify predicting factors of high and low adherence to the GFD (dependent variables). RESULTS: Ninety patients were analyzed, age 43.6 +/- 15.3 years old, 89% women, 58% classic celiacs. The average time of GFD was 7.9 years and 63% had been on a GFD for over 3 years. A 71% of patients (95% CI 69%-80%) showed high adherence to the GFD, and a 67% (95% CI 2%-13%) showed low adherence. GFD of less than 3 years was a determining factor for low adherence [relative risk (RR) 2.41 (95% CI 1.2-2.89)]. The predictive antibodies for GFD high adherence were: (1) negative EMA [RR 1.27 (95% CI 1.03-1.54)], (2) negative ATG [RR 1.62 (95% CI 1.12-2.47)], and (3) all negative requested ones [RR 1.60 (95% CI 1.17-2.18)]. The predictive antibodies for GFD low adherence were: (1) positive AGA [RR 15.5 (95% CI 2.29-105)], (2) positive EMA [RR 10.2 (95% CI 2.19-47.7)], (3) positive ATG [RR 9.63 (95% CI 1.53-63.4)], and 4) all negative requested ones [RR 0.11 (95% CI 0.018-0.71)]. CONCLUSION: After one year of treatment, the negativity of EMA or ATG antibodies had a significant correlation with the high adherence to GFD and the positivity of AGA, EMA or ATG antibodies had a significant correlation with a low adherence.

A colorectal mosaic pattern might be an endoscopic feature of collagenous colitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The endoscopic aspect of the colorectal mucosa in those patients with collagenous colitis is usually normal, or with non-specific changes. Until now it had never been related to a mucosal pattern of mosaic type. Our aim was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the presence of mosaic pattern in the colorectal mucosa for collagenous colitis. METHODS: Patients who had undergone a colonoscopy with random biopsies performed in the diagnostic evaluation of chronic diarrhea between 2004 and 2008 were studied. We defined patients with chronic diarrhea and mosaic mucosal pattern as "cases", and patients with chronic diarrhea without mosaic pattern as "controls". The odds ratio (OR) of finding a collagenous colitis in view of a mosaic pattern in colon was determined; as well as sensitivity and specificity; positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+, LR-), considering this finding as a diagnostic instrument for collagenous colitis. RESULTS: 252 patients who had undergone colonoscopy with biopsy due to chronic diarrhea were analyzed. In 6 patients, a mosaic pattern was identified in the colorectal mucosa. The histological diagnose of 36 of the 252 patients (14%) was microscopic colitis, 27 of which (11%) had collagenous colitis. The colonoscopy was found normal in 21 of these 27 patients; in 2 patients, congestion or petechiae was found in the rectum; and in 4 patients (15%), all women, a mosaic pattern was found in the rectosigmoid mucosa. The OR of this finding was 19.4 (CI 95% 3.9-95.4) for collagenous colitis. It had a sensitivity of 14.8% (CI 95% 6.8-20), a specificity of 99.1% (CI 95% 98.2-99.7), LR+ of 16.6 (CI 95% 3.7-76.4), and LR- of 0.86 (CI 95% 0.80-0.95) for a collagenous colitis. CONCLUSION: The mosaic pattern in the colorectal mucosa of patients studied due to chronic diarrhea could be a distinguishing feature of collagenous colitis.

[Treatment recommendations based on best evidences]. / Recomendaciones de tratamientos basadas en las mejores pruebas.

The fact of making recommendations about treatments demands for a systematic analysis of the different variables involved. The direction of these variables will become a recommendation into a strong one, when the benefits outweigh the harms, or into a weak one, when profits and losses are balanced. In this way, evidence based medicine analyzes this variables: 1) the quality of the literature; 2) the importance of clinical effect; 3) the magnitude of the effect; 4) the risks of the disease to treat; 5) the risks of treatment; 6) the costs; 7) the preferences of the patients; 8) the inconvenience to patients; 9) the minimum and maximum effect and 10 ) if the recommendation is strong or weak. This ten steps strategy will lead us to the construction of a scientifically based recommendation.

Guías de práctica clínica: ejemplos en la anestesiología / Clinical practice guidelines: examples in anesthesiology

La medicina basada en las pruebas es una metodología interesante para optimizar lo que leemos, lo que aprendemos y lo que hacemos. Hoy en día, las guías de práctica clínica (GPC) son una de las herramientas más completas para recopilar la mejor evidencia científica disponible. Hay distintos tipos de GPC. Aquellas basadas en la evidencia, halladas en una búsqueda sistemática y exhaustiva de la bibliografía, y las que muestran recomendaciones considerando distintas variables, como efectos, beneficios, costos, inconvenientes y preferencias de los pacientes. Todas las GPC tienen como objetivo ayudarnos a mejorar nuestra práctica clínica y el cuidado de nuestros paciente.