RESUMEN
Nanomedicine could improve the treatment of diabetes by exploiting various therapeutic mechanisms through the use of suitable nanoformulations. For example, glucose-sensitive nanoparticles can release insulin in response to high glucose levels, mimicking the physiological release of insulin. Oral nanoformulations for insulin uptake via the gut represent a long-sought alternative to subcutaneous injections, which cause pain, discomfort, and possible local infection. Nanoparticles containing oligonucleotides can be used in gene therapy and cell therapy to stimulate insulin production in ß-cells or ß-like cells and modulate the responses of T1DM-associated immune cells. In contrast, viral vectors do not induce immunogenicity. Finally, in diabetic wound healing, local delivery of nanoformulations containing regenerative molecules can stimulate tissue repair and thus provide a valuable tool to treat this diabetic complication. Here, we describe these different approaches to diabetes treatment with nanoformulations and their potential for clinical application.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Nanomedicina , Nanopartículas , Humanos , Nanomedicina/métodos , Animales , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Nanopartículas/química , Terapia Genética/métodos , Insulina/metabolismo , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/métodosRESUMEN
The aim of the current study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO), comparing subjects with and without peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The study is a prospective study including a population of patients affected by a DFO located in the forefoot. All patients were managed by a surgical conservative approach defined by the removal of the infected bone, in association with the antibiotic therapy. Patients were divided into two groups: those with PAD (neuro-ischaemic DFO) and those without (neuropathic DFO). After 1 year of follow-up, the following outcome were evaluated and compared between groups: healing, healing time, minor amputation, major amputation, hospitalization, need for surgical re-intervention. Overall, 166 patients were included, 87(52.4%) of them had neuro-ischaemic DFO and 79 (47.6%) neuropathic DFO. Patients with neuro-ischaemic DFO in comparison to neuropathic DFO were older (72.5 ± 9 vs 64.1 ± 15.5 years, P < .0001), had longer diabetes duration (21.8 ± 5.6 vs 16.4 ± 7.6 years, P < .0001), higher rate of dialysis (13.8 vs 1.3%, P = .001) and ischaemic heart disease (79.3 vs 12.7%, P < .0001). Outcomes for neuro-ischaemic DFO and neuropathic DFO were: healing (96.5 vs 97.5%, P = .7), healing time (7.8 ± 6.2 vs 5.7 ± 3.7 weeks, P = .01), minor amputation (16.1 vs 3.8%, P = .006), major amputation (0 vs 0%, ns), hospitalization (90.8 vs 51.9%, P < .0001), surgical re-intervention (14.9 vs 8.8%, P = .004) respectively. In addition, PAD resulted in an independent predictor of minor amputation, hospitalization, and surgical re-intervention. DFO in patients with PAD was characterized by longer healing time, more cases of minor amputation, hospitalization, and surgical re-intervention. PAD independently predicted the risk of minor amputation, hospitalization, and surgical re-intervention, while it was not associated with the healing rate.
RESUMEN
Objectives: Patients with ankle fractures associated with diabetes experience more complications following standard open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) than those without diabetes. Augmented fixation strategies, namely extended ORIF and hindfoot nails (HFNs), may offer better results and early weightbearing in this group. The aim of this study was to define the population of patients with diabetes undergoing primary fixation for ankle fractures. Secondarily, we aimed to assess the utilisation of standard and augmented strategies and the effect of these choices on surgical outcomes, including early post-operative weightbearing and surgical complications. Methods: A national multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted between January and June 2019 in 56 centres (10 major trauma centres and 46 trauma units) in the United Kingdom; 1360 patients with specifically defined complex ankle fractures were enrolled. The patients' demographics, fixation choices and surgical and functional outcomes were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed to compare high-risk patients with and without diabetes. Results: There were 316 patients in the diabetes cohort with a mean age of 63.9 yrs (vs. 49.3 yrs. in the non-diabetes cohort), and a greater frailty score > 4 (24% vs. 14% (non-diabetes cohort) (p < 0.03)); 7.5% had documented neuropathy. In the diabetes cohort, 79.7% underwent standard ORIF, 7.1% extended ORIF and 10.2% an HFN, compared to 87.7%, 3.0% and 10.3% in the non-diabetes cohort. Surgical wound complications after standard-ORIF were higher in the diabetes cohort (15.1% vs. 8.7%) (p < 0.02), but patients with diabetes who underwent augmented techniques showed little difference in surgical outcomes/complications compared to non-diabetes patients, even though early-weightbearing rates were greater than for standard-ORIF. Conclusions: Ankle fractures in diabetes occur in older, frailer patients, whilst lower-than-expected neuropathy rates suggest a need for improved assessment. Augmented surgical techniques may allow earlier weightbearing without increasing complications, in keeping with modern guidelines in ankle fracture management.
RESUMEN
Intra-articular fractures of the base of the first metacarpal (Bennet fractures) are prone to dislocation and require surgical reduction and fixation to prevent secondary degenerative joint disease and chronic dysfunction. Therefore, a prompt diagnosis is necessary, mostly achieved by conventional roentgenograms. We report the case of a 62-year-old man in whom a Bennet fracture was highly suspected on ultrasound (US) examination realized after a fall. Standard radiographs, obtained after US to confirm the diagnosis, were interpreted as normal. A computed tomography was then performed showing a typical Bennet fracture. This case report demonstrates that a careful assessment of bones must be an integral part of any routine musculo-skeletal US examination, particularly in post-traumatic patients. US can detect bone fractures where radiograph is not discriminating.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia is the end stage of peripheral arterial disease. The revascularization of patients suffering from diabetes mellitus who present chronic total occlusions of below-the-knee vessels can be technically very difficult and sometimes impossible to achieve by performing only an antegrade approach. As regards retrograde recanalization, several studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of this technique in the femoropopliteal axis or in the infrageniculate arterial vessels in patients with advanced atherosclerotic disease. Currently in the literature there are still few studies analyzing the effectiveness of the retrograde approach in the treatment of occlusions of below-the-knee vessels in patients suffering from diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to retrospectively evaluate safety, technical success, and clinical outcome of retrograde transpedal/transtibial recanalization in patients suffering from diabetes mellitus. RESEARCH DESIGN: This is a retrospective observational monocentric study. SUBJECTS: We retrospectively analyzed data over a three-year period (August 2019-September 2022) of patients that underwent revascularization of one or more below-the-knee vessels for chronic limb-threatening ischemia and had a retrograde transpedal/transtibial approach after a failed antegrade transfemoral revascularization. We identified and included in the study 28 out of 352 patients. MEASURES: We evaluated clinical comorbidities, Rutherford-Becker classification, Texas classification, and the occluded vessels (only below-the-knee or multi-level occlusions); we then analyzed technical, procedural and clinical success, survival rate, and procedural complications. All patients included in the study underwent a 6 months follow-up. RESULTS: Patients belonged to Rutherford-Becker stage V (18) or VI (10), Texas wound classification IIC: 7 IID: 8 IIIC: 4 IIID: 9, all suffering from diabetes, and five were on dialysis. Treatment of a femoropopliteal lesion was performed during the same procedure in 6 of 28 patients (28.6%). Technical success was obtained in 25 out of 28 patients (89.3%), and procedural success was achieved in 23 of 28 patients (82.1%). No complications occurred at the pedal/tibial access. One minor complication at the femoral access was observed. The cure rate 6 months after the procedure was 57.1% (16/28 patients), and the 6-month survival rate was 96.4%. Three major amputations (10.7%) and four minor amputations (14.2%) were performed after revascularization procedures. Two patients were readmitted for vascular causes (7.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Retrograde approach for revascularization of below-the-knee vessels in diabetic patients is safe and effective with high procedural and clinical success rates in the absence of significant complications. It should be considered when revascularization cannot be achieved with an antegrade transfemoral approach.
RESUMEN
Background: Adequate compliance with wearing therapeutic footwear (TF) to prevent diabetic foot ulcers is known to be low. The primary aim of this study was to identify population awareness about the ulceration and/or recurrence risk according to footwear choice. The secondary aim was to evaluate the compliance level in footwear choice based on a patient's own risk. Methods: Forty podiatrists participated from 1 September 2017 to 31 August 2018, providing six-section forms which included personal data, risk classification, footwear characteristics and a knowledge questionnaire. Results: This study included 1507 patients. Those with active ulcers were excluded. A total of 43% of patients belonged to risk class 0, 19% to risk class 1, 19% to risk class 2 and 19% to risk class 3. A total of 58% had foot deformities. Conclusions: Nearly half of patients with a high risk of ulceration had knowledge of their own risk but the majority of them did not follow the recommendations. Only a small percentage (36%) of risk class 3 patients wore footwear suitable for their risk class. There was poor consideration of footwear choice among patients. We highlight critical issues in patient education and compliance with wearing footwear appropriate to their risk class.
RESUMEN
The treatment of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is extremely complex, requiring a comprehensive approach that involves a variety of different healthcare professionals. Several studies have shown that a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is useful to achieve good clinical outcomes, reducing major and minor amputation and increasing the chance of healing. Despite this, the multidisciplinary approach is not always a recognized treatment strategy. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effects of an MDT approach on major adverse limb events, healing, time-to-heal, all-cause mortality, and other clinical outcomes in patients with active DFUs. The present meta-analysis was performed for the purpose of developing Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot with the support of the Italian Society of Diabetology (Società Italiana di Diabetologia, SID) and the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists (Associazione Medici Diabetologi, AMD). The study was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. All randomized clinical trials and observational studies, with a duration of at least 26 weeks, which compared the MDT approach with any other organizational strategy in the management of patients with DFUs were considered. Animal studies were excluded. A search of Medline and Embase databases was performed up until the May 1st, 2023. Patients managed by an MDT were reported to have better outcomes in terms of healing, minor and major amputation, and survival in comparison with those managed using other approaches. No data were found on quality of life, returning-to-walking, and emergency admission. Authors concluded that the MDT may be effective in improving outcomes in patients with DFUs.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Pie Diabético , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Humanos , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Pie Diabético/terapia , Italia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
Background: If unrecognized, Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy (CNO) can be a devastating complication of diabetes. Methods: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the outcomes in a cohort of diabetic patients diagnosed with active CNO managed in a tertiary level diabetic foot clinic (DFC). We included consecutive patients with active CNO, stage 0-1, according to the Eichenholtz-Shibata classification, who were referred from 1 January 2019 to 27 September 2022. Diagnosis of CNO was based on clinical signs and imaging (X-rays and magnetic resonance). All patients were completely offloaded by a total-contact cast (TCC) or removable knee-high device. Each patient was closely monitored monthly until CNO remission or another outcome. At 12 months of follow-up, the following outcomes were analyzed: remission, time to remission, major amputations (any above the ankle), and surgical indication. Results: Forty-three patients were included. The mean age was 57.6 ± 10.8 years; 65% were males and 88.4% had type 2 diabetes, with a mean duration of 20.6 ± 9.9 years. At baseline, 32.6% was affected by peripheral artery disease. Complete remission was recorded in 40/43 patients (93%), with a mean time to remission of 5.6 ± 1.5 months; major amputation and surgical indication occurred, respectively in 1/43 patients (2.3%) and 3/43 patients (7%). Conclusions: Early treatment of active Stage 0/1 CNO leads to high rates of remission and limb salvage.
RESUMEN
Despite many improvements have been achieved, diabetic foot disease (DFD) remains a clinical, social, and economic burden. In the last years, DFD showed an evolution of its characteristics with an increase of the ischaemic/neuro-ischaemic foot in comparison to the pure neuropathic foot. Simultaneously, there was and increased incidence of concomitant cardiovascular co-morbidities, which influences the higher fragility of patients with DFS. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in subjects with diabetic foot seems to show a more aggressive pattern, being more distal and difficult to treat. Untreatable PAD remains the unmet need for clinicians and the main risk factor of major amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Authors aimed to describe the evolution of diabetic foot patients in the last two decades, describing also the current and future treatment which may improve outcomes in the next generations.
RESUMEN
The 1989 Saint Vincent Declaration established a goal of halving global diabetes-related amputation rates. A generation later, this goal has been achieved for major but not minor amputations. However, diabetic foot disease (DFD) is not only a leading cause of global amputation but also of hospitalisation, poor quality of life (QoL) and disability burdens. In this paper, we review latest estimates on the global disease burden of DFD and the next generation care of DFD that could reduce this burden. We found DFD causes 2% of the global disease burden. This makes DFD the 13th largest of 350+ leading conditions causing the global disease burden, and much larger than dementia, breast cancer and type 1 diabetes. Neuropathy without ulcers and amputations makes up the largest portion of the global DFD burden yet receives the least DFD focus. Future care focussed on improving safe physical activity in people with DFD could considerably reduce the DFD burden, as this incorporates increasing physical fitness and QoL, while simultaneously decreasing ulceration and other risks. Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy is more prevalent than previously thought. Most cases respond well to non-removable offloading devices, but surgical intervention may further reduce the considerable burden of these neuropathic fracture dislocations. Ischaemia is becoming more common and complex. Most cases respond well to revascularisation interventions, but novel revascularisation techniques, medical management and autologous cell therapies may hold the key to more cases responding in the future. We conclude that DFD causes a global disease burden larger than most conditions and existing guideline-based care and next generation treatments can reduce this burden. We suggest the World Health Organization and International Diabetes Federation declare a new goal: halving the global DFD burden from 2% to 1% within the next generation.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Humanos , Pie Diabético/epidemiología , Pie Diabético/prevención & control , Calidad de Vida , Carga Global de Enfermedades , Amputación QuirúrgicaRESUMEN
The current study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PB-MNC) therapy as adjuvant treatment for patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and no-option critical limb ischaemia (NO-CLI). The study is a prospective, noncontrolled, observational study including patients with neuro-ischaemic DFUs and NO-CLI who had unsuccessful revascularization below the ankle (BTA) and persistence of foot ischaemia defined by TcPO2 values less than 30 mmHg. All patients received three cycles of PB-MNC therapy administered through a "below-the-ankle approach" in the affected foot along the wound-related artery according to the angiosome theory. The primary outcome measures were healing, major amputation, and survival after 1 year of follow-up. The secondary outcome measures were the evaluation of tissue perfusion by TcPO2 and foot pain defined by the numerical rating scale (NRS). Fifty-five patients were included. They were aged >70 years old and the majority were male and affected by type 2 diabetes with a long diabetes duration (>20 years); the majority of DFUs were infected and nearly 90% were assessed as gangrene. Overall, 69.1% of patients healed and survived, 3.6% healed and deceased, 10.9% did not heal and deceased, and 16.4% had a major amputation. At baseline and after PB-MNC therapy, the TcPO2 values were 17 ± 11 and 41 ± 12 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.0001), while the pain values (NRS) were 6.8 ± 1.7 vs. 2.8 ± 1.7, respectively (p < 0.0001). Any adverse event was recorded during the PB-MNC therapy. Adjuvant PB-MNC therapy seems to promote good outcomes in patients with NO-CLI and neuro-ischaemic DFUs.
RESUMEN
The aim of the current study was to evaluate the rate of readmission in patients affected by diabetes and foot ulcers (DFUs), and causes and outcomes of patients requiring a new hospitalization. The current study is a retrospective observational study including patients who have required hospitalization since January 2019 to September 2022 due to a DFU. Once patients were discharged, they were regularly followed as outpatients. Within 6 months of follow-up, the rate of hospital readmission for a diabetic foot problem was recorded. According to the readmission or not, patients were divided into 2 groups, readmitted and not readmitted patients, respectively. Hence, all patients were followed for 6 months more and outcomes of the 2 groups were analyzed and compared. Overall, 310 patients were included. The mean age was 68 ± 12 years, the majority of patients reported type 2 diabetes (>90%), and the mean diabetes duration was approximately 20 years. Sixty-eight (21.9%) patients were readmitted. The main reason for hospital readmission was the presence of critical limb ischemia (CLI) in the contralateral limb (6.1%), the recurrence of CLI in the previous treated limb (4.5%), and the onset of new infected DFU in the contralateral foot (4.5%). Readmitted patients reported lower rate of healing (51.5% vs 89.2%, P < .0001) and higher rate of major amputation (10.3% vs 4.5%, P = .2) in comparison to not readmitted patients. Critical limb ischemia resulted in the only independent predictor of hospital readmission. Hospital readmission is a frequent issue among patients with DFUs, and readmitted patients showed a lower chance of wound healing. Critical limb ischemia resulted in the main cause of new hospitalization.
RESUMEN
Aims: After the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the onset of glycemic impairment and diabetes have been reported. Nevertheless, the exact burden of glycemic impairment and diabetes after COVID-19 has not been clearly described. Materials and methods: Electronic search was run in Pubmed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrial.org for reports published from database inception to September 2022. We included observational studies reporting quantitative data on diabetes prevalence or its onset in subjects with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection from at least 60 days. Risk of bias was assessed by the JBI's critical appraisal checklist. Random effect model was used to calculate pooled data. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022310722). Results: Among 1,630 records screened, 20 studies were included in the analysis. The mean or median age of participants ranged from ~ 35 to 64 years, with a percentage of males ranging from 28% to 80%. Only two studies were considered at low risk of bias. The estimate of diabetes prevalence, calculated on a total of 320,948 participants pooled with 38,731 cases, was 16% (95%CI: 11-22%). The estimate of proportion of incident cases of diabetes was 1.6% (95%CI: 0.8-2.7%). Subgroup analysis showed that previous hospitalization increased the prevalence of diabetes and the proportion of incident cases. Conclusion: Diabetes is common in individuals who have experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially if they required hospitalization. This data may be helpful to screen for diabetes and manage its complications in individuals who experienced COVID-19. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022310722, identifier CRD42022310722.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Prevalencia , SARS-CoV-2 , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/etiología , Bases de Datos FactualesRESUMEN
The aim of our study was to identify risk factors for the recurrence of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in a selected population of patients in secondary prevention treated, according to International Guidelines, with an integrated foot care protocol by a referral diabetic foot clinic. A retrospective study was performed with the inclusion of selected outpatients with diabetes at higher risk for ulceration with a history of previous ulcer and/or amputation followed in our diabetic foot clinic between January 2015 and December 2021. According to the presence or absence of recurrence, patients were divided into 2 groups: ulcer recurrence and without ulcer recurrence. One hundred twenty-seven (127) patients were included, 47 patients (37%) developed an ulcer recurrence while 80 patients (63%) did not. The mean age was 71.7 years; 65% were male; 97% were affected by type 2 diabetes with a mean duration of 21.1 years, the mean HbA1c was 63 + 21â mmol/mol. Both groups of patients had foot deformities, such as claw and hammertoes; hallux valgus, and prominent metatarsal heads (MTHs). The presence of deformity was significantly associated with ulceration. The group with ulcer recurrence showed a higher rate of prominence MTHs in comparison to a group without ulcer recurrence. The MTHs resulted as the only independent predictor for recurrence. This study shows that the presence of the prominent MTH is a significant risk factor for ulcer recurrence in a selected population of diabetic foot patients treated in the best way with integrated foot care.
RESUMEN
AIMS: The current study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary diabetic foot team (MDFT) in the management of in-patients affected by diabetic foot problems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a retrospective observational study. Consecutive patients with a diabetic foot problem requiring hospitalisation were included. All patients were managed by a MDFT led by diabetologists according to the guidance. The rate of in-hospital complications (IHCs), major amputation, and survival were recorded at the end of patient's hospitalisation. IHC was defined as any new infection different from wound infection, cardiovascular events, acute renal injury, severe anaemia requiring blood transfusion, and any other clinical problem not present at the assessment. RESULTS: Overall, 350 patients were included. The mean age was 67.9 ± 12.6 years, 254 (72.6%) were males, 323 (92, 3%) showed Type 2 diabetes with a mean duration of 20.2 ± 9.6 years; 224 (64%) had ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and 299 (85.4%) had infected DFUs. IHCs were recorded in 30/350 (8.6%) patients. The main reasons for IHCs were anaemia requiring blood transfusion (2.8%), pneumonia (1.7%), acute kidney failure (1.1%). Patients with IHCs showed a higher rate of major amputation (13.3 vs. 3.1%, p = 0.02) and mortality (16.7 vs. 0.6%, p < 0.0001) in comparison to those without. Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and wound duration at the assessment (>1 month) were independent predictors of IHC, whereas IHCs, heart failure, and dialysis were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The multidisciplinary management of diabetic foot problems leads to an IHC rate of 8%. The risk of IHCs is higher in patients with IHD and long wound duration.
Asunto(s)
Anemia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Pie Diabético , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Pie Diabético/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitales , Grupo de Atención al PacienteRESUMEN
AIMS: Diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) and its complications are a growing public health concern. The Italian Society of Diabetology (SID) and the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists (AMD), in collaboration with other scientific societies, will develop the first Italian guidelines for the treatment of DFS. METHODS: The creation of SID/AMD Guidelines is based on an extended work made by 19 panelists and 12 members of the Evidence Review Team. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology has been used to decide aims, reference population, and target health professionals. Clinical questions have been created using PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) conceptual framework. The definition of questions has been performed using a two-step web-based Delphi methodology, a structured technique aimed at obtaining by repeated rounds of questionnaires a consensus opinion from a panel of experts in areas wherein evidence is scarce or conflicting, and opinion is important. RESULTS: The mean age of panelists (26.3% women) was 53.7 ± 10.6 years. The panel proposed 34 questions. A consensus was immediately reached for all the proposed questions, 32 were approved and 2 were rejected. CONCLUSIONS: The areas covered by clinical questions included diagnosis of ischemia and infection, treatment of ischemic, neuropathic, and infected ulcers, prevention of foot ulceration, organization and education issues, and surgical management. The PICO presented in this paper are designed to provide indications for healthcare professionals in charge of diabetic foot treatment and prevention, primarily based on clinical needs of people with diabetic foot syndrome and considering the existing organization of health care.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Consenso , Pie Diabético/etiología , Pie Diabético/terapia , Pie Diabético/diagnóstico , Italia/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
Hyperandrogenism during menopause is often underestimated by clinicians and attributed to the natural aging process. Hyperandrogenism can be associated with some metabolic abnormalities linked together in a vicious circle by insulin resistance. We present the case of an elderly woman affected with type 2 diabetes and obesity who reported the occurrence of clinical hirsutism after physiological menopause at the age of 47 years. At presentation, physical examination and Ferriman-Gallwey score revealed a condition of moderate hirsutism, with markedly increased levels of plasma testosterone and delta-4-androstenedione, obesity (body mass index 31.9), and inadequate glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin 65 mmol/mol). The patient underwent a thorough differential diagnosis by a multidisciplinary team approach, including the various causes of hyperandrogenism during menopause. After choosing surgical option as the appropriate treatment, clinical resolution of hirsutism was observed alongside patient satisfaction and marked improvement of the glucometabolic profile.
RESUMEN
The study aimed to evaluate the clinical and microbiological characteristics of diabetic foot infections (DFIs) in patients referring to a specialized diabetic foot service (DFS). The study is a retrospective observational study conducted in a single center, including patients who were referred for a new DFI. All patients were managed through a limb salvage protocol according to international guidelines. The following items were recorded: type of bacteria, presence of single or polymicrobial infection, and the antibiotic resistance. Overall, 268 patients were included. The mean age was 68.9 ± 10.9 years, 75% were male, and 97.2% had type 2 diabetes with a mean diabetes duration of 16 ± 9 years. One hundred thirty-nine (51.9%) DFU were ischemic, 120 (44.7%) patients had osteomyelitis, 107 (39.9%) had gangrene, 37 (13.9%) had phlegmon/abscess/cellulitis and 4 (1.5%) had necrotizing fasciitis. Among 370 bacteria isolated, gram positive were found in 207 (55.9%) cases, and gram negative in 163 (44.1%) cases. The higher rates of isolates were Staphylococcus aureus (32.9%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.8%), and Enterococcus faecalis (8.9%). Polymicrobial infection was reported in 33.6% of cases and antibiotic resistance was recorded in 16.5% of isolates. Among them, 10.3% were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Antibiotic resistance was detected in 40.9% of cases in association with gangrene and osteomyelitis. The current study shows as polymicrobial infections and antibiotic resistance is frequently reported in DFIs, and antibiotic resistance was more associated with gangrene and osteomyelitis. Among bacteria reporting antimicrobial resistance, the highest rate was found for MRSA.