RESUMEN
Background: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, many birth hospitals separated SARS-CoV-2-positive mothers from their newborn infants and advised against breastfeeding to decrease postnatal SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Information on how these practices impacted breastfeeding postdischarge is limited. Objectives: In a statewide sample of SARS-CoV-2-positive mothers, we aimed to determine the extent to which (1) mother-infant separation and (2) a lack of breastfeeding initiation in-hospital were associated with breast milk feeding postdischarge. Design/Methods: From 11 birthing hospitals in Massachusetts, we identified 187 women who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 from 14 days before to 72 hours after delivery (March 1-July 31, 2020) and their newborn infants. We abstracted chart data from the delivery hospitalization on main exposure variables (mother-infant separation, in-hospital breast milk feeding [expressed milk feeding and/or direct breastfeeding]) and from outpatient visits until 30 days postdischarge. We evaluated associations of in-hospital practices with outcomes up to 30 days postdischarge, adjusting for confounders using multivariable logistic and linear regression. Results: Mother-infant separation in-hospital was associated with a shorter duration of any breast milk feeding (regression coefficient estimate -5.29 days, 95% confidence intervals [CI] [-8.89 to -1.69]). Direct breastfeeding in-hospital was associated with higher odds of any breast milk feeding (adjusted odds ratios [AOR] 5.68, 95% CI [1.65-23.63]) and direct breastfeeding (AOR 8.19, 95% CI [2.99-24.91]) postdischarge; results were similar for any breast milk feeding in-hospital. Conclusions: Perinatal hospital care practices implemented early in the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically mother-infant separation and prevention of breast milk feeding initiation, were associated with adverse effects on breast milk feeding outcomes assessed up to 1 month postdischarge.
Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , COVID-19 , Cuidados Posteriores , Lactancia Materna/métodos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Pandemias/prevención & control , Alta del Paciente , Embarazo , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To describe epidemiology, interventions, outcomes, and the health services experience for a cohort of children with pulmonary hypertension (PH) who underwent tracheostomy placement and to identify risk factors for inhospital mortality and 30-day readmissions. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of the Pediatric Health Information System database. SETTING: Thirty-seven freestanding U.S. children's hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients 31 days to 21 years old who were discharged from the hospital between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2017, with a diagnosis of primary or secondary PH, and who underwent tracheostomy placement. Outcomes were examined over a 2-year period from the time of discharge from the index encounter. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 793 patients with PH who underwent tracheostomy placement. The overall inhospital mortality rate was 23.7%. Secondary PH due to congenital heart disease (CHD) was significantly associated with overall inhospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.36; 95% CI, 1.38-4.04). The rate of 30-day readmissions for patients over the 2-year follow-up period was 33.3%. Tracheostomy during the index encounter and the diagnosis of secondary PH due to CHD were significantly associated with lower rates of 30-day readmissions (adjusted OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.19-0.61; and adjusted OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.77, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In the context of expanding utilization of tracheostomy and long-term ventilation, children with PH are among the highest risk cohorts for extended and repeated hospitalization and death. Tracheostomy placement during the index encounter was associated with fewer 30-day readmissions over the 2-year follow-up period. Further understanding of which subgroups may benefit from earlier intervention and which subgroups are at highest risk may offer important clinical insight when considering optimal timing of tracheostomy and may enhance informed decision-making for all stakeholders.
Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías Congénitas , Hipertensión Pulmonar , Niño , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/etiología , Hipertensión Pulmonar/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , TraqueostomíaRESUMEN
Importance: The incidence of mother-to-newborn SARS-CoV-2 transmission appears low and may be associated with biological and social factors. However, data are limited on the factors associated with neonatal clinical or viral testing outcomes. Objective: To ascertain the percentage of neonates who were born to mothers with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results during the birth hospitalization, the clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with neonatal test result positivity, and the clinical and virological outcomes for newborns during hospitalization and 30 days after discharge. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study included 11 academic or community hospitals in Massachusetts and mother-neonate dyads whose delivery and discharge occurred between March 1, 2020, and July 31, 2020. Eligible dyads were identified at each participating hospital through local COVID-19 surveillance and infection control systems. Neonates were born to mothers with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results within 14 days before to 72 hours after delivery, and neonates were followed up for 30 days after birth hospital discharge. Exposures: Hypothesized maternal risk factors in neonatal test result positivity included maternal COVID-19 symptoms, vaginal delivery, rooming-in practice, Black race or Hispanic ethnicity, and zip code-derived social vulnerability index. Delivery indicated by worsening maternal COVID-19 symptoms was hypothesized to increase the risk of adverse neonatal health outcomes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes for neonates were (1) positive SARS-CoV-2 test results, (2) indicators of adverse health, and (3) clinical signs and viral testing. Test result positivity was defined as at least 1 positive result on a specimen obtained by nasopharyngeal swab using a polymerase chain reaction-based method. Clinical and testing data were obtained from electronic medical records of nonroutine health care visits within 30 days after hospital discharge. Results: The cohort included 255 neonates (mean [SD] gestational age at birth, 37.9 [2.6] weeks; 62 [24.3%] with low birth weight or preterm delivery) with 250 mothers (mean [SD] age, 30.4 [6.3] years; 121 [48.4%] were of Hispanic ethnicity). Of the 255 neonates who were born to mothers with SARS-CoV-2 infection, 225 (88.2%) were tested for SARS-CoV-2 and 5 (2.2%) had positive results during the birth hospitalization. High maternal social vulnerability was associated with higher likelihood of neonatal test result positivity (adjusted odds ratio, 4.95; 95% CI, 1.53-16.01; P = .008), adjusted for maternal COVID-19 symptoms, delivery mode, and rooming-in practice. Adverse outcomes during hospitalization were associated with preterm delivery indicated by worsening maternal COVID-19 symptoms. Of the 151 newborns with follow-up data, 28 had nonroutine clinical visits, 7 underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing, and 1 had a positive result. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings emphasize the importance of both biological and social factors in perinatal SARS-CoV-2 infection outcomes. Newborns exposed to SARS-CoV-2 were at risk for both direct and indirect adverse health outcomes, supporting efforts of ongoing surveillance of the virus and long-term follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Parto Obstétrico , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Adulto , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , Prueba de COVID-19/métodos , Prueba de COVID-19/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/virología , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the timing of pediatric asthma rehospitalization, variation in rate of rehospitalization across hospitals, and factors associated with rehospitalization at different intervals. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of 44,204 hospitalizations for children with asthma within 42 children's hospitals between July 2008 and June 2011. The main outcome measures were rehospitalization for asthma within 7, 15, 30, 60, 180, and 365 days of an index asthma admission. RESULTS: The rate of asthma rehospitalization ranged from 0.5% (n = 208) at 7 days to 17.2% (n = 7603) at 365 days. Black patients and patients with public insurance had higher odds of rehospitalization at 60 days and beyond (P ≤ .01 for both). Adolescents (12- to 18-year-old), patients with a diagnosis of a complex chronic condition, and patients with a prior year asthma admission had higher odds of rehospitalization at every time interval (P ≤ .001 for all). Significant hospital variation in case-mix adjusted rates of rehospitalization existed at each time interval (P ≤ .01 for all). Rates at 365 days were ≤ 10.9% for the top 10% of hospitals; if all hospitals achieved this rate, 36.6% of rehospitalizations might have been avoided. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation in asthma rehospitalization rates exists across children's hospitals from 7 to 365 days after an index admission. Racial/ethnic and economic disparities emerge at 60 days. By 1 year, rehospitalizations account for 1 in 6 hospitalizations. Assessing asthma rehospitalizations at longer intervals may augment our current understanding of and approach to post-hospitalization care improvement.
Asunto(s)
Asma/terapia , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/tendencias , Adolescente , Asma/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Morbilidad/tendencias , Pronóstico , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Use of medical imaging is under scrutiny because of rising costs and radiation exposure. We compare imaging utilization and costs across pediatric hospitals to determine their variability and potential determinants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were extracted from the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database for all inpatient encounters from 40 U.S. children's hospitals. Imaging utilization and costs were compared by insurance type, geographical region, hospital size, severity of illness, length of stay and type of imaging, all among specific diagnoses. RESULTS: The hospital with the highest utilization performed more than twice as many imaging studies per patient as the hospital with the lowest utilization. Similarly, imaging costs ranged from $154 to $671/patient. Median imaging-utilization rate was 1.7 exams/patient on the ward and increased significantly in the PICU (11.8 exams/patient) and in the NICU (17.7 exams per patient, (P < 0.001). Considerable variability in imaging utilization persisted despite adjustment for case mix index (CMI, range in variation 16.6-25%). We found a significant correlation between imaging utilization and both CMI and length of stay, P < 0.0001). However, only 36% of the variation in imaging utilization could be explained by CMI. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic imaging utilization and costs vary widely in pediatric hospitals.
Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Diagnóstico por Imagen/economía , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Lineales , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little information is known about the frequency, types and causes of diagnostic errors in imaging children. OBJECTIVE: Our goals were to describe the patterns and potential etiologies of diagnostic error in our subspecialty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 265 cases with clinically significant diagnostic errors identified during a 10-year period. Errors were defined as a diagnosis that was delayed, wrong or missed; they were classified as perceptual, cognitive, system-related or unavoidable; and they were evaluated by imaging modality and level of training of the physician involved. RESULTS: We identified 484 specific errors in the 265 cases reviewed (mean:1.8 errors/case). Most discrepancies involved staff (45.5%). Two hundred fifty-eight individual cognitive errors were identified in 151 cases (mean = 1.7 errors/case). Of these, 83 cases (55%) had additional perceptual or system-related errors. One hundred sixty-five perceptual errors were identified in 165 cases. Of these, 68 cases (41%) also had cognitive or system-related errors. Fifty-four system-related errors were identified in 46 cases (mean = 1.2 errors/case) of which all were multi-factorial. Seven cases were unavoidable. CONCLUSION: Our study defines a taxonomy of diagnostic errors in a large academic pediatric radiology practice and suggests that most are multi-factorial in etiology. Further study is needed to define effective strategies for improvement.