Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta Cir Bras ; 30(2): 120-6, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25714691

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of copaiba oil on jaw defects repair in Wistar rats treated with bioglass or adipose tissue. METHODS: A jaw defect was randomly created in forty-two rats and filled with bioglass or adipose tissue. The two groups (Gbio and Gcell) were subdivided in three subgroups with seven animals each according to gavage administration: control (distillated water), oil (copaiba oil) and melox (meloxicam). Euthanasia was performed after forty post-operative days. The bone formation was analyzed regarding the histological aspects. RESULTS: The osteoclasts activity was observed only in four subgroups (p=0.78). Regarding the osteoblasts presence, it was very similar between the subgroups, the difference was due to Gcell-melox (p=0.009) that presented less osteoblastic activity. The inflammatory cells were more evident in Gcell-melox subgroup, however, there was no difference in comparison with the other subgroups (p=0.52). Bone formation was observed in all subgroups, just two animals showed no bone formation even after 40 days. More than 50% of bone matrix mineralization was observed in 56% (23 animals) of the analyzed areas. The bone matrix mineralization was not different between subgroups (p=0.60). CONCLUSIONS: The subgroups that received copaiba oil showed bone repair, although not statistically significant in comparison to subgroups treated with meloxicam or controls. Copaiba oil administered by gavage had no effect on bone repair in this experimental model.


Asunto(s)
Regeneración Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Fabaceae/química , Maxilares/efectos de los fármacos , Osteogénesis/efectos de los fármacos , Aceites de Plantas/farmacología , Tejido Adiposo/trasplante , Animales , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/farmacología , Sustitutos de Huesos/uso terapéutico , Cerámica/uso terapéutico , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Maxilares/fisiopatología , Anomalías Maxilomandibulares/tratamiento farmacológico , Anomalías Maxilomandibulares/fisiopatología , Masculino , Meloxicam , Osteoblastos/efectos de los fármacos , Osteoblastos/fisiología , Osteoclastos/efectos de los fármacos , Osteoclastos/fisiología , Ratas Wistar , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Tiazinas/farmacología , Tiazoles/farmacología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacos
2.
Acta cir. bras ; 30(2): 120-126, 02/2015. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-741028

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of copaiba oil on jaw defects repair in Wistar rats treated with bioglass or adipose tissue. METHODS: A jaw defect was randomly created in forty-two rats and filled with bioglass or adipose tissue. The two groups (Gbio and Gcell) were subdivided in three subgroups with seven animals each according to gavage administration: control (distillated water), oil (copaiba oil) and melox (meloxicam). Euthanasia was performed after forty post-operative days. The bone formation was analyzed regarding the histological aspects. RESULTS: The osteoclasts activity was observed only in four subgroups (p=0.78). Regarding the osteoblasts presence, it was very similar between the subgroups, the difference was due to Gcell-melox (p=0.009) that presented less osteoblastic activity. The inflammatory cells were more evident in Gcell-melox subgroup, however, there was no difference in comparison with the other subgroups (p=0.52). Bone formation was observed in all subgroups, just two animals showed no bone formation even after 40 days. More than 50% of bone matrix mineralization was observed in 56% (23 animals) of the analyzed areas. The bone matrix mineralization was not different between subgroups (p=0.60). CONCLUSIONS: The subgroups that received copaiba oil showed bone repair, although not statistically significant in comparison to subgroups treated whit meloxicam or controls. Copaiba oil administered by gavage had no effect on bone repair in this experimental model. .


Asunto(s)
Animales , Masculino , Regeneración Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Fabaceae/química , Maxilares/efectos de los fármacos , Osteogénesis/efectos de los fármacos , Aceites de Plantas/farmacología , Tejido Adiposo/trasplante , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/farmacología , Sustitutos de Huesos/uso terapéutico , Cerámica/uso terapéutico , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Anomalías Maxilomandibulares/tratamiento farmacológico , Anomalías Maxilomandibulares/fisiopatología , Maxilares/fisiopatología , Osteoblastos/efectos de los fármacos , Osteoblastos/fisiología , Osteoclastos/efectos de los fármacos , Osteoclastos/fisiología , Ratas Wistar , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tiazinas/farmacología , Tiazoles/farmacología , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...