Risk factors of AIS C incomplete cervical spinal cord injury for poor prognosis-The significance of anorectal evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Although the prognosis of incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) diagnosed as American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade C (AIS C) is generally favorable, some patients remain non-ambulatory. The present study explored the clinical factors associated with the non-ambulatory state of AIS C patients. METHODS: This study was a single-center retrospective observational study. Seventy-three participants with AIS C on admission were enrolled and divided into two groups according to ambulatory ability after one year. Prognostic factors of SCI were compared in ambulatory (A-group) and non-ambulatory participants (NA-group). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed on demographic information, medical history, mechanism of injury, presence of fracture, ASIA motor scores (MS) of the extremities, neurological findings, including an anorectal examination on admission, and imaging findings. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included in the A-group and 32 in the NA-group. Univariable analysis revealed that the following factors were related to poor outcomes (p < 0.05): older age, history of cerebrovascular disorder, impairment/absence of S4-5 sensory score, deep anal pressure (DAP) (-), voluntary anal contraction (VAC) (-), anorectal tone (-), anal wink reflex (-), and low MS of the upper and lower extremities. In the multivariable analysis using age, presence or absence of sacral abnormality, and history of cerebrovascular disorders (adjusted for these three factors), older age and presence of sacral abnormality on admission were independent risk factors for a non-ambulatory state at the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete AIS C SCI individuals with older age and/or impairment of anorectal examination could remain non-ambulatory at 1-year follow-up.

Exceptional Conditions for Favorable Neurological Recovery After Laminoplasty in Cases with Cervical Myelopathy Caused by K-line (-) Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational study. OBJECTIVE: To clarify the exceptional conditions for a favorable neurological recovery after laminoplasty (LMP) for cervical myelopathy caused by K-line (-) ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The K-line-based classification of cervical OPLL was developed to predict insufficient neurological recovery after LMP. For patients with K-line (-) OPLL, LMP generally yields the least improvement because of inadequate decompression of the spinal cord; however, there are some exceptional cases wherein LMP promotes favorable neurological recoveries. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 106 consecutive patients who underwent LMP for cervical OPLL to determine the demographic data, radiographic findings, and neurological recoveries of the patients as assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively by their Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores. The factors associated with favorable outcomes after LMP in patients with K-line (-) were then investigated. RESULTS: Of 106 total patients, 31 were classified as K-line (-), of whom 21 achieved the least neurological recovery after LMP (JOA recovery rate <50%), while the remaining 10 patients achieved favorable outcomes (JOA recovery rate ≥50%). Among the K-line (-) group patients, those with ext-K-line (+), which changed to K-line (+) in the neck-extended position, and the patients with up-K-line (-), in whom the lesion responsible for myelopathy in the upper cervical spine (C3 or above), showed favorable neurological recoveries after LMP. CONCLUSION: Our data shows that, even for patients with K-line (-) OPLL, a favorable neurological recovery can be expected after LMP in cases in which the OPLL is in the upper cervical spine or the K-line changes to (+) in the neck-extended position. This means that K-line-based predictions of surgical outcomes after LMP should be indicated for patients with OPLL in the middle and lower cervical spine with limited extension mobility.Level of Evidence: 4.

Coronal Hamate Fractures with Carpometacarpal Dislocation Treated Effectively Using Headless Compression Screws with Percutaneous Pinning Fixation by Using the 2-Directional Approach: A Report of 2 Cases.

CASE: Coronal shear fractures of the hamate are relatively rare injuries. Surgical intervention is recommended for displaced fractures. However, there is no established surgical procedure for the displaced coronal shear fractures of the hamate. Therefore, we present 2 cases of the displaced coronal hamate fracture with metacarpal dislocations, which were successfully managed with open reduction and internal fixation, using the headless compression screw by the 2-directional approach. CONCLUSION: Our procedure ensured that the screw's distal end captured the hamate hook, and the displaced bone fragments were reduced considerably in both cases.

Early surgical intervention may facilitate recovery of cervical spinal cord injury in DISH.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of consecutive surgically managed cases of cervical spinal fractures and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) at our hospital from October 2006 to April 2016. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prognostic factors have not been determined for cervical fractures in DISH. OBJECTIVES: To assess demographics, surgical techniques, and complications in cervical spinal cord injury with DISH and to evaluate factors affecting neurological prognosis. METHODS: Patients' medical records and radiographs were reviewed and analyzed for demographics, injury characteristics, surgical outcomes, perioperative complications, additional surgeries, and neurological prognosis. Neurological status was assessed by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade at admission and discharge. RESULTS: Of 38 patients (mean age 71.9 ± 8.8), 20 had type 1 fractures (through the disc space), 8 had type 2 (through the vertebral body), and 10 had type 3 (through disc and vertebral body). ASIA grades at admission included 14 ASIA-A, 4 ASIA-B, 7 ASIA-C, 8 ASIA-D, and 5 ASIA-E. All patients underwent posterior fusion with an average of 4.5 ± 2.5 instrumented vertebrae (range, 2-7) and six patients required secondary halo-vest fixation. Of 14 ASIA-A patients, 12 developed serious postsurgical pulmonary complications and 4 of these died within 6 months of surgery. Of the 38 patients, 13 improved more than one grade after treatment, 24 did not improve, and 1 deteriorated. In the 18 ASIA-A/B cases (complete motor paralysis), neither fracture type nor injury mechanism (e.g. a ground-level fall or high-energy trauma) correlated with neurological prognosis, but a time of 8 h or less from injury to surgery correlated significantly with an improvement from ASIA A/B to C/D ( p < 0.01, Pearson's χ2 test). CONCLUSION: Patients with complete motor paralysis after a cervical fracture with DISH may recover to partial paralysis if surgically treated within 8 h of injury.