Does a delay to surgery for preoperative echocardiogram affect outcomes in patients with hip fracture?

Introduction: Delay to surgery >24 hours has been shown to correlate with mortality rates in patients with hip fracture when left untreated. Many of these patients have multiple comorbidities, including aortic stenosis (AS), and undergo workup for operative clearance, which may delay time to surgery. The purpose of this study was to examine whether preoperative echocardiogram workup affects time to surgery, complications, and mortality after operative fixation for hip fracture. Methods: Our institutional hip fracture registry was retrospectively reviewed for inclusion over a 3-year period. Patients who had a preoperative echocardiogram (yECHO) for operative clearance were compared with those who did not (nECHO). Demographic data, time to surgery, overall complication rate, and mortality at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year were collected. Results: Two cohorts consisted of 136 yECHO patients (45.8%) and 161 nECHO patients (54.2%). Thirty-two yECHO patients (23.5%) had AS. Patients in the yECHO cohort were more likely to have a complication for any cause compared with nECHO patients (25.7% vs. 10.6%, P = 0.01) and have a higher mortality rate at 1 year (38.9% vs. 17.4%, P = 0.001). There was no association found between AS and all-cause complication (P = 0.54) or 30-day (P = 0.13) or 90-day mortality rates (P = 0.79). However, patients with AS had a significantly higher mortality rate at 1 year (45.8% vs. 25.1%, P = 0.03). Conclusion: This study reinforces the benefits of ensuring less than a 24-hour time to surgery in the setting of a hip fracture and identifies an area of preoperative management that can be further optimized to prevent unnecessary prolongation in time to surgery. Patients with known aortic stenosis are not associated with increased 30-day or 90-day mortality or all-cause complications. Surgical delays in the yECHO cohort were attributed to preoperative medical assessments, including echocardiograms and the management of comorbidities. Therefore, the selective utilization of preoperative echocardiograms is needed and should be reserved to ensure they have a definitive role in guiding the perioperative care of patients with hip fracture. Level of Evidence: III.

Outcomes of Antibiotic-Impregnated Calcium Sulfate, Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator, and Locked Intramedullary Static Spacer in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in the Multiply Revised and Infected Knee: A Single-Center Case Series.

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty is commonly treated via 2-stage revision utilizing either articulating or static antibiotic cement spacers. While recent literature exhibits a slight functional advantage in favor of articulating spacers, those patients with a history of recurrent infection/multiple revision procedures are frequently excluded from these studies. The purpose of this study was to report infection eradication rates and efficacy of utilizing antibiotic-loaded locked intramedullary nail for infection for the multiply revised, infected total knee arthroplasty. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all consecutive patients receiving static spacers between 2017 and 2020 at an academic medical center. Surgical techniques for all patients included irrigation and debridement using a reamer-irrigator-aspirator, injection of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate into the intramedullary canal, and nail placement. Antibiotic-loaded cement is then used to create a spacer block in the joint space. A Cox proportional hazard regression was run to identify risk factors for reinfection. Results: Forty-two knees in 39 patients were identified meeting inclusion criteria. Overall, there was an 68.8% infection eradication rate at an average of 46.9 months following spacer placement. The only risk factors identified on cox regression were increasing number of previous spacers, a surrogate for previous infections (hazards ratio = 14.818, P value = .021), and increasing operative time during spacer placement (hazards ratio = 1.014, P value = .039). Conclusions: Use of static spacers, in conjunction with reamer-irrigator-aspirator and antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate, can be effective in treating chronic, complex periprosthetic joint infections in the setting of bone loss and or soft-tissue compromise and produced similar results to more simple infection scenarios.

Comparative outcomes after treatment of peri-implant, periprosthetic, and interprosthetic femur fractures: which factors increase mortality risk?

Objectives: To compare mortality rates between patients treated surgically for periprosthetic fractures (PPF) after total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), peri-implant (PI), and interprosthetic (IP) fractures while identifying risk factors associated with mortality following PPF. Design: Retrospective. Setting: Single, Level II Trauma Center. Patients/Participants: A retrospective review was conducted of 129 consecutive patients treated surgically for fractures around a pre-existing prosthesis or implant from 2013 to 2020. Patients were separated into 4 comparison groups: THA, TKA, PI, and IP fractures. Intervention: Revision implant or arthroplasty, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing (IMN), percutaneous screws, or a combination of techniques. Main Outcome Measurements: Primary outcome measures include mortality rates of different types of PPF, PI, and IP fractures at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative. We analyzed risk factors associated with mortality aimed to determine whether treatment type affects mortality. Results: One hundred twenty-nine patients were included for final analysis. Average follow-up was similar between all groups. The overall 1-year mortality rate was 1 month (5%), 3 months (12%), 6 months (13%), 1 year (15%), and 2 years (22%). There were no differences in mortality rates between each group at 30 days, 90 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years (P-value = 0.86). A Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated no difference in survivorship up to 2 years. Older than 65 years, history of hypothyroidism and dementia, and discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) led to increased mortality. There was no survival benefit in treating patients with PPFs with either revision, ORIF, IMN, or a combination of techniques. Conclusion: The overall mortality rates observed were 1 month (5%), 3 months (12%), 6 months (13%), 1 year (15%), and 2 years (22%), and no differences were found between each group at all follow-up time points. Patients aged 65 and older with a history of hypothyroidism and/or dementia discharged to an SNF are at increased risk for mortality. From a mortality perspective, surgeons should not hesitate to choose the surgical treatment they feel most comfortable performing. Level of Evidence: Level III.

No Difference in Acute Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Fix and Replace Versus Fixation Alone in the Treatment of Geriatric Acetabular Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To compare acute outcomes between patients undergoing fix and replace (FaR) versus open-reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) alone in the treatment of geriatric acetabular fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. SETTING: Single Level 2 Trauma Center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Consecutive acetabular fracture patients ≥ 55 years of age treated by two orthopaedic trauma surgeons at one tertiary care center from January 2017 to April 2022 with FaR versus ORIF were identified. Included were those with complete datasets within the 180-day global period. Excluded were patients with previous ORIF of the acetabulum or femur, or revision total hip arthroplasty. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: The primary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative weight-bearing status, postoperative disposition, time to postoperative mobilization, and 90-day readmission rates. Secondary outcomes compared included demographic information, injury mechanism, surgical time, complications, revisions, and preoperative and postoperative Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS Jr.) scores. These were compared between FaR and ORIF groups. RESULTS: Seventeen FaR patients (average age 74.5 ± 9.0 years) and 11 ORIF patients (average age 69.4 ± 9.6 years) met inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 26.4 months (range: 6-75.6 months). More FaR group patients were ordered immediate weight-bearing as tolerated or partial weight-bearing compared with ORIF alone (70% vs. 9.0%, P = 0.03). More patients in the FaR group had pre-existing hip osteoarthritis compared with ORIF alone (71% vs. 27%, P = 0.05). Fracture classification ( P = 0.03) and Charlson Comorbidity Index ( P = 0.02) differed between the 2 groups. There were no other differences in demographics, LOS ( P = 0.99), postoperative disposition ( P = 0.54), time to postoperative mobilization ( P = 0.38), 90-day readmission rates ( P = 0.51), operative time ( P = 0.06), radiographic union ( P = 0.35), time to union ( P = 0.63), pre- ( P = 0.32) or postoperative HOOS Jr. scores ( P = 0.80), delta HOOS Jr. scores ( P = 0.28), or reoperation rates between groups ( P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: FaR and ORIF seem to be sound treatment options in the management of geriatric acetabular fractures. Patients in the FaR group achieved immediate or partial weight-bearing earlier than the ORIF group; however, time to postoperative mobilization did not differ between the two groups. The remainder of acute postoperative outcomes (LOS, postoperative disposition, and 90-day readmission rates) did not differ between the two groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Early versus Standard Weight Bearing Following Operative Treatment of Tibial Plateau Fractures: Do We Really Have to Wait So Long?

Postoperative management of tibial plateau fractures classically involves a prolonged period between 10 and 12 weeks of nonweight bearing or partial weight bearing. In recent years, there has been some support for earlier weight-bearing protocols although this remains controversial. The goal of this study was to investigate the difference in outcomes between early weight-bearing (EWB) and traditional weight-bearing (TWB) protocols. This investigation is a retrospective review of 92 patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures at a single institution, from August 2018 to September 2020. Subjects were divided into EWB (< 10 weeks) and traditional nonweight bearing groups (≥ 10 weeks). Key outcome measures collected include injury classification, mechanism of injury, surgical fixation method, bone grafting, time to full weight bearing, radiographic time to union, range-of-motion, all-cause complications, and subsidence at an average follow-up time of 1 year. The EWB group had an earlier average time to weight bearing versus the TWB group (6.5 ± 1.4 vs. 11.8 ± 2.3 weeks, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in the classification of fractures treated between the two groups, with Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association B3 fractures the most common in the EWB group, and C3 fractures the most common in the TWB group. Radiographic time to union was no different between the two groups (93.5 ± 53.7 days for EWB vs. 103.7 ± 77.6 days for TWB, p = 0.49). There was no significant difference in complication rates or subsidence. Following operative treatment of tibial plateau fractures, patients who underwent a weight-bearing protocol earlier than 10 weeks were able to recover faster with similar outcomes and complications compared with patients who started weight bearing after 10 weeks or more. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Risk Factors for Revision Surgery Following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Hinged Knee Prosthesis for Septic and Aseptic Indications.

INTRODUCTION: The use of hinged knee replacements (HKRs) for limb salvage is a popular option for revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). Although recent literature focuses on the outcomes of HKR for septic and aseptic RTKAs, little is reported on the risk factors of returning to the operating room. The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors of revision surgery and revision after receiving HKR for septic versus aseptic etiology. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective review was conducted on consecutive patients who received HKR from January 2010 to February 2020 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were separated into two groups: septic and aseptic RTKAs. Demographic, comorbidity, perioperative, postoperative, and survivorship data were collected and compared between groups. Cox hazard regression was used to identify risk factors associated with revision surgery and revision. RESULTS: One-hundred fifty patients were included. Eighty-five patients received HKR because of prior infection, and 65 received HKR for aseptic revision. A larger proportion of septic RTKA returned to the OR versus aseptic RTKA (46% vs 25%, P = 0.01). Survival curves revealed superior revision surgery-free survival favoring the aseptic group ( P = 0.002). Regression analysis revealed that HKR with concomitant flap reconstruction was associated with a three-fold increased risk of revision surgery ( P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: HKR implantation for aseptic revision is more reliable with a lower revision surgery rate. Concomitant flap reconstruction increased the risk of revision surgery, regardless of indication for RTKA using HKR. Although surgeons must educate patients about these risk factors, HKR remains a successful treatment option for RTKA when indicated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: prognostic, level III evidence.

Extensor Mechanism Reconstruction After Total Knee Arthroplasty with Allograft Versus Synthetic Mesh: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Patellar and quadriceps tendon ruptures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have historically poor outcomes. To date, there is no consensus for optimal treatment. The purpose of this study is to directly compare clinical outcomes and survivorship between allograft versus synthetic mesh for reconstruction of native extensor mechanism (EM) rupture after TKA. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective review identifying consecutive TKA patients operated between December 2009 to November 2019 was conducted. Patients aged ≥ 45 years old with native EM disruption treated with either allograft or synthetic mesh with minimum 2 year follow-up were included. Demographic information, injury mechanism, range of motion, surgical time, revision surgeries, and postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS Jr.) were collected. Student t-tests and Fisher exact tests were used to compare the demographic data between groups. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve method was used to determine the survivorship as treatment failure was defined as postoperative EM lag >30° or revision surgery. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Univariate Cox proportional hazard regression identified risk factors associated with treatment failure. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent EM reconstruction using allograft versus 35 with synthetic mesh. Both groups had similar demographics and an average follow-up time of 3.5 years (P = 0.98). Patients treated with allograft had significantly greater postoperative flexion than patients treated with mesh (99.4 ± 9.5 allograft versus 92.6 ± 13.6 synthetic mesh, P = 0.04). Otherwise, there was no difference in postoperative outcomes between the two groups in average KOOS Jr. (P = 0.29), extensor lag (P = 0.15), graft failure (P = 0.71), revision surgery rates (P = 0.81), surgical time (P = 0.42), or ambulatory status (P = 0.34) at the most recent follow-up. Survival curve comparison also yielded no difference at up to 5-year follow-up (P = 0.48). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that reconstruction with allograft or synthetic mesh leads to similar clinical outcomes with good survivorship. Future studies, including larger randomized control trials, are required to determine the superior reconstruction method for this injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Direct versus indirect posterior malleolar fixation in the treatment of trimalleolar ankle fractures: Is there a difference in outcomes?

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in functional outcomes between direct and indirect surgical fixation methods of the posterior malleolus in the setting of trimalleolar fractures and identify any variables affecting patient outcomes. Methods: Primary outcomes were evaluated by PROMIS scores for short-term outcomes regarding total pain (TP) and total function (TF) comparing 40 patients with direct fixation with 77 with indirect fixation. Continuous variables were analyzed using t tests for parametric variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric variables. Categorical variables were analyzed using a χ2 test. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models were performed to analyze factors that affect outcomes of TP and TF. Results: There was no difference in TP or TF between groups (P = 0.65 vs. P = 0.19). On univariate linear regression for TP, BMI, incidence of complication, tobacco use, and open injury showed significance in increasing pain levels with open injuries providing the greatest effect (coef = 11.8). On multivariate analysis, BMI, incidence of complication, open injury, and tourniquet time all significantly increased pain. For TF, univariate analysis showed age, BMI, incidence of complication, and diabetes to decrease function, and use of external fixator and tourniquet time increased function. In the multivariate model, increased BMI, open injuries, and increasing tourniquet time all decreased TF while use of an external fixator increased TF. Conclusion: This study showed no difference in TP and TF using the PROMIS outcome scores when comparing direct fixation versus indirect fixation under univariate and multivariate models. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic III.

Cemented Femoral Fixation in a High-Risk Cohort Diminishes Risk of Early Postoperative Periprosthetic Fracture.

BACKGROUND: Early periprosthetic fractures (PPFx) following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) create significant morbidity. Established risk factors for early PPFx include age, gender, body mass index, surgical approach, and implant fixation. We investigated the role of femoral fixation on early PPFx (<90 days postoperatively) in a high-risk cohort undergoing direct anterior approach (DAA) THA. METHODS: The final cohort comprised 344 consecutive patients (390 hips) with risk factors for PPFx (age >68 years and body mass index <25 kg/m2) who underwent primary DAA THA between May 4, 2009 and December 31, 2019 and had 90-day follow-up. Noncemented fixation was used in 229-hips, while cemented fixation was used in 161 hips. The primary outcome was early PPFx. Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables, while t-tests were used to compare continuous variables. RESULTS: We observed 8 early PPFx (2.1%), all fractures occurring in the noncemented group. Baseline demographics were similar but not equal, with the cemented group being older (78.0 versus 76.3 years; P = .004) with a greater proportion of females (91.9% versus 69.4%; P < .001). The rate of early PPFx was significantly higher with noncemented fixation compared to cemented fixation (3.5% versus 0.0%; P = .023). A post hoc power analysis confirmed sufficient power (1-ß = 0.81). CONCLUSION: Although baseline risk factors for early PPFx are not easily modifiable, surgical factors can be modified. Cemented fixation has the potential to markedly reduce the risk of early PPFx in high-risk patients undergoing DAA THA.

Techniques for extensor mechanism reconstruction after total knee arthroplasty: Is there a clear winner?

Extensor mechanism (EM) disruption after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is rare, but can result in devastating outcomes for patients including inability to ambulate. Disruption can occur at the quadriceps tendon, patella, or patellar tendon. This complication can be traumatic, but is often atraumatic from an iatrogenic or degenerative etiology. Primary repair for treatment of EM disruption has led to poor results with high failure rates and has mostly been abandoned. Most commonly accepted techniques center around Achilles tendon allograft reconstruction, synthetic mesh reconstruction, or other smaller options. However, to date, there is still no consensus for the optimal EM reconstructive technique due to the heterogeneity and small sample sizes of published studies. The need to identify a consistent and effective surgical technique is paramount to restore quality of life to patients who suffer from EM disruption after TKA. The purpose of this review is to describe the osteology, vasculature, and EM of the knee, identify risk factors associated with EM disruption after TKA, outline the considerations for surgical management, as well as compare and analyze the latest contributions to the literature, in particular allograft versus synthetic mesh, in the reconstruction of the EM after TKA.

Survivorship Analysis in Asymptomatic COVID-19+ Hip Fracture Patients: Is There an Increase in Mortality?

Purpose: Mortality rates following hip fracture surgery have been well-studied. This study was conducted to examine mortality rates in asymptomatic patients presenting for treatment of acute hip fractures with concurrent positive COVID-19(+) tests compared to those with negative COVID-19(-) tests. Materials and Methods: A total of 149 consecutive patients undergoing hip fracture surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic at two academic medical centers were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups for comparative analysis: one group included asymptomatic patients with COVID-19+ tests versus COVID-19- tests. The primary outcome was mortality at 30-days and 90-days. Results: COVID-19+ patients had a higher mortality rate than COVID-19- patients at 30-days (26.7% vs 6.0%, P=0.005) and 90-days (41.7% vs 17.2%, P=0.046) and trended towards an increased length of hospital stay (10.1±6.2 vs 6.8±3.8 days, P=0.06). COVID-19+ patients had more pre-existing respiratory disease (46.7% vs 11.2%, P=0.0002). Results of a Cox regression analysis showed an increased risk of mortality at 30-days and 90-days from COVID-19+ status alone without an increased risk of death in patients with pre-existing chronic respiratory disease. Conclusion: Factors including time to surgery, age, preexisting comorbidities, and postoperative ambulatory status have been proven to affect mortality and complications in hip fracture patients; however, a positive COVID-19 test result adds another variable to this process. Implementation of protocols that will promote prompt orthogeriatric assessments, expedite patient transfer, limit operating room traffic, and optimize anesthesia time can preserve the standard of care in this unique patient population.

Risk of Instability After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a major source of morbidity after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The risk of recurrent infection has been more extensively studied than the risk of mechanical failure. We sought to define the incidence of instability after revision TKA for PJI and to compare this incidence with that for revision TKA for instability. We retrospectively reviewed patients treated by 4 arthroplasty surgeons at 1 institution. The primary outcome was a new diagnosis of clinical instability after index revision. We analyzed potential risk factors that may contribute to postoperative instability after PJI, including demographic characteristics, implant alignment, number of previous procedures, level of constraint during index revision, and type of spacer used. Patients were matched 1:1 with patients undergoing revision TKA for instability. Continuous variables were compared with Student's t test for normally distributed variables and Mann-Whitney U test for non-normal variables. Categorical variables were compared with Fisher's exact test. Thirty-seven patients who underwent revision TKA for PJI were identified. Twelve (32.4%) had clinical instability after revision, compared with only 3 (8.1%) in the matched cohort (P=.019). Use of a revision, midlevel constraint device in the PJI cohort did not correlate with a lower risk of instability (P=.445). A greater number of previous surgical procedures increased the likelihood of instability (P=.041). Revision TKA for PJI is associated with a high risk of subsequent instability. Midlevel constrained implants may not be sufficient to prevent instability. A focus on soft tissue tension and a lower threshold for increasing constraint may be prudent in this cohort. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(3):145-150.].

Identification of concomitant injuries associated with specific spine level fractures in polytrauma patients.

INTRODUCTION: Spine fractures are associated with high energy mechanisms and can lead to substantial morbidity and mortality in the trauma setting. Rapid identification and treatment of these fractures and their associated injuries are paramount in preventing adverse outcomes. The purpose of this study is to identify concomitant skeletal and non-skeletal injuries related to cervical, thoracic, and lumbar fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review of institutional American College of Surgeons (ACS) registry was conducted on 3,399 consecutive trauma patients identifying those with spine fractures from 1/2016-12/2019. Two-hundred ninety patients were included(8.5%) and separated into three groups based on fracture location: eighty-eight cervical(C)-spine, 129thoracic(T)-spine, and 143lumbar(L)-spine. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify associated injuries, presenting injury severity score(ISS) and Glasgow coma scale(GCS), mechanism of injury, demographic data, substance use, and paralysis for each group. Cox hazard regression was utilized to identify factors associated with inpatient mortality. RESULTS: C-spine fractures were associated with head trauma(OR2.18,p = 0.003),intracranial bleeding (OR2.64,p = 0.001),facial(OR2.25,p = 0.02) and skull fractures(OR3.92,p = 0.001),and cervical cord injuries(OR4.78,p = 0.012). T-spine fractures were associated with rib fractures(OR2.31,p = 0.003). L-spine fractures were associated with rib(OR1.77, p = 0.04), pelvic(OR5.11,p<0.001), tibia/fibula (OR2.31,p = 0.05), and foot/ankle fractures(OR3.32,p = 0.04), thoracic(OR2.43,p = 0.008) and retroperitoneal cavity visceral injuries(OR27.3,p = 0.001). Falls≤6meters were also significantly associated with C-spine fractures(OR1.70,p = 0.04) while falls>6meters were associated with L-spine fractures(OR4.30,p = 0.001). Inpatient mortality risk increased in patients with C-spine fractures(HR4.41,p = 0.002), higher ISS(HR1.05, p<0.001), and lower GCS(HR0.85,p<0.001). Last, patients≥65-years-old were more likely to experience C-spine fractures(OR1.88,p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Patients who experience fractures of the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine are at risk for additional fractures, visceral injury, and/or death. Awareness of the associations between spinal fractures and other injuries can increase diagnostic efficacy, improve patient care, and provide valuable prognostic information. These associations highlight the importance of effective and timely communication and multidisciplinary collaboration.

Tranexamic acid lowers transfusion requirements and hospital length of stay following revision total hip or knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUD: Intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to reduce blood loss in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty without systemic complications. There is limited evidence of its effectiveness in revision procedures. This study evaluated intravenous TXA effect on blood loss, transfusion rates, and length of hospital stay in revision joint replacement. METHODS: One-hundred revision total joint arthroplasty patients were retrospectively reviewed [44 revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 54 revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA)] who underwent surgery from 2013 to 2016. Fifty-four revision joint patients (23 THA and 31 TKA) received intravenous TXA intra-operatively, while 46 revision joint patients (23 THA/TKA) did not. Primary outcome measures were blood loss, transfusion rates, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The mean blood loss difference between revision THA patients who received TXA vs. not receiving TXA was 180ml in revision THA patients (p < .005). Mean length of hospital stay was 6 days in non-TXA vs. 3 days in TXA patients (p < .001). Eighteen patients received transfusions in the non-TXA revision TKA group compared to nine patients in the TXA revision TKA group (p < .001). Average length of hospital stay was 5 days in the non-TXA revision TKA group compared to 3 days in the TXA revision TKA group (p < .003). There was no increased risk of thromboembolic complications in TXA groups for either procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous TXA reduced length of hospital stay in both revision cohorts, decreased blood loss in revision THA and decreased the rate of transfusion in revision TKA without an increase in thromboembolic complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (Case-control study).

Aseptic Tibial Implant Loosening After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Preventable?

Aseptic loosening is a considerable complication that affects the longevity of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants. Surgeon technique may help minimize aseptic loosening after TKA. Meticulous cementation of the prosthesis and the bone surface during various stages of cement polymerization will maximize cement adherence to the prosthesis and the bone, respectively. Pressurization of the cement in the canal and at the cut surface to achieve at least 2 mm of cement depth penetration has been reported to increase TKA implant longevity.

Iliopsoas Impingement After Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Treatment Options.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence, natural history, response to treatment, and risk factors for anterior iliopsoas impingement (AIPI) after direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Between January 1, 2009 and January 4, 2014, 600 patients (655 hips) who underwent primary DAA THA were retrospectively reviewed. AIPI incidence was calculated. Natural history and response to a stepwise treatment approach was assessed. Radiographic anterior acetabular component overhang was measured. Asymptomatic controls were used to identify risk factors for the development of AIPI. RESULTS: In total, 518 patients (559 hips) met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of AIPI was 32/559 (5.7%). Symptom resolution occurred in 22/32 (68.8%) patients at final follow-up. Nonoperative management was successful in 15/32 (46.9%) patients. Operative intervention resulted in symptom resolution in 5/8 (62.5%) patients. On univariate analysis, female gender (odds ratio [OR] 2.79), acetabular component to native femoral head diameter ratio above 1.1 (OR 3.85), and any measurable overhang (OR 7.07) significantly raised the risk of AIPI, while increasing native femoral head diameter was protective for AIPI (OR 0.83). CONCLUSION: AIPI is a cause of groin pain after DAA THA, which often improves with conservative measures. Significant predisposing factors for AIPI include female gender, small native femoral head diameter, increased acetabular component to femoral head diameter ratio, and most notably, any measurable acetabular component overhang. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Improved Sexual Function After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis of the hip and knee is known to affect sexual activity. For patients with osteoarthritis, pain during sexual activity can lead to decreased quality of life and other associated health issues. The authors designed a prospective study to evaluate the effect of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty on the psychosocial and physical aspects of sexuality pre- and postoperatively. Between April 2009 and December 2011, patients received questionnaires in the mail preoperatively. They were asked to return the preoperative questionnaire before surgery and the postoperative questionnaire 6 months after surgery. Data were analyzed to evaluate the psychosocial and physical aspects of sexuality and participants' subjective assessment of their appearance. Preoperatively, 91% and 67% of patients reported psychosocial and physical issues, respectively. After the arthroplasty procedure, 84% (P<.001) and 47% (P<.001) of patients reported improvement psychosocially and physically, respectively. Of the patients, 16% reported that arthroplasty adversely affected sexual function, with their predominant fear being joint damage (63%). A greater number of women and patients undergoing hip procedures reported improvement in sexual activity after surgery compared with men (P=.02) and patients undergoing knee procedures (P=.002). Both hip and knee osteoarthritis and arthroplasty had a significant effect on overall sexual function-psychosocially, physically, and in terms of patients' assessment of their external appearance-with higher rates of improvement seen after hip arthroplasty. Because of the effect of osteoarthritis and arthroplasty on sexual function, this topic should be addressed both pre- and postoperatively. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(2):111-116.].

Femoral revision for periprosthetic fracture in total hip arthroplasty.

Periprosthetic fracture can create significant morbidity in the arthroplasty population. Patients with periprosthetic fracture have been shown to have worse outcomes and higher mortality than patients undergoing elective revision THA. In this review, we will focus on Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures. Both of these fracture types are associated with a loose primary prosthesis and warrant revision surgery. There are many different options for fixation choice of the femoral prosthesis, and preference has been evolving over the last 30 years. Currently, we use monoblock, tapered, fluted, titanium stems for all periprosthetic fracture revision surgeries.