Measuring music engagement in older adults: the UNE music in aging wellness scale (MAWS).

OBJECTIVES: Engagement with music (i.e. listening, moving to the beat, joining in, performance) is documented to enhance cognition, mood, socialization, and a host of other wellness indicators in advancing age. A number of comprehensive scales measure this engagement, but a brief, accessible scale designed for general use with older adults is lacking. This project was undertaken to create and offer preliminary validation of the 7-item Music in Aging Wellness Scale (MAWS). METHOD: Seven items reflecting aspects of music engagement (ME) were developed by expert opinion (e.g. 'I always tap my foot or sway my body to good music') for completion on a 1-7, strongly disagree to strongly agree, Likert scale. These were subject to exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (n = 349 cases) along with a set of six experimental items on ageism. It was hypothesized these items would cluster by content, thus showing separation into distinct factors. RESULTS: This was achieved and the resulting measure showed sound internal consistency (0.82), split-half reliability (0.71), and one-year test-retest (0.83). The MAWS total score was found to correlate significantly in expected directions with common gerontological measures. High scorers reported less depression, more mastery, less loneliness, and larger social networks. No association was found for worry-based anxiety and self-reported cognitive decline. CONCLUSION: This preliminary reliability and validity study suggests that the MAWS may be an appropriate outcome and tracking measure for older adults involved in music-wellness interventions. Future research will further validate MAWS characteristics and associations with other established measures in this important field.

Sleep movements and respiratory coupling as a biobehavioral metric for early Alzheimer's disease in independently dwelling adults.

INTRODUCTION: Sleep disorder is often the first symptom of age-related cognitive decline associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) observed in primary care. The relationship between sleep and early AD was examined using a patented sleep mattress designed to record respiration and high frequency movement arousals. A machine learning algorithm was developed to classify sleep features associated with early AD. METHOD: Community-dwelling older adults (N = 95; 62-90 years) were recruited in a 3-h catchment area. Study participants were tested on the mattress device in the home bed for 2 days, wore a wrist actigraph for 7 days, and provided sleep diary and sleep disorder self-reports during the 1-week study period. Neurocognitive testing was completed in the home within 30-days of the sleep study. Participant performance on executive and memory tasks, health history and demographics were reviewed by a geriatric clinical team yielding Normal Cognition (n = 45) and amnestic MCI-Consensus (n = 33) groups. A diagnosed MCI group (n = 17) was recruited from a hospital memory clinic following diagnostic series of neuroimaging biomarker assessment and cognitive criteria for AD. RESULTS: In cohort analyses, sleep fragmentation and wake after sleep onset duration predicted poorer executive function, particularly memory performance. Group analyses showed increased sleep fragmentation and total sleep time in the diagnosed MCI group compared to the Normal Cognition group. Machine learning algorithm showed that the time latency between movement arousals and coupled respiratory upregulation could be used as a classifier of diagnosed MCI vs. Normal Cognition cases. ROC diagnostics identified MCI with 87% sensitivity; 89% specificity; and 88% positive predictive value. DISCUSSION: AD sleep phenotype was detected with a novel sleep biometric, time latency, associated with the tight gap between sleep movements and respiratory coupling, which is proposed as a corollary of sleep quality/loss that affects the autonomic regulation of respiration during sleep. Diagnosed MCI was associated with sleep fragmentation and arousal intrusion.

Cross-Generational Understandings of Ageism and Its Perceived Impacts on Personal-Public Health.

In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched a global campaign to combat ageism, emphasizing its potential harm to personal and public health. This qualitative focus group study explored generational differences in understanding the WHO's definition and impact of ageism among baby boomers (ages 60-72; n = 17) and silent generation members (ages 78-85; n = 10). Verbatim transcripts were analyzed via a grounded theory approach, and representative themes and quotations were extracted by consensus. Members of both age groups initially downplayed personal impacts of ageism in favor of a broader discussion of age-related discrimination on a societal level. As each discussion progressed, however, participants acknowledged economic, social, and health impacts linked with ageism, but primarily for others. Both groups noted ageist actors in places of employment, healthcare settings, restaurants, retirement communities, and within family networks. Interestingly, each group rated risk of harm by ageism as greater for the other group. Our findings highlight challenges associated with the translation of a broad public health campaign to engage specific stakeholder subgroups. We discuss future research, education, and training initiatives across all ages to address the detrimental impacts of ageism.

Impairment for Medication Management in Older Adults: Validity of a Family Report Measure.

Objectives: Medication nonadherence can have significant consequences for the health of older adults. Difficulty managing medications is often a sign of cognitive impairment, and monitoring is an early caregiving task for family members. This study examined a screening tool for independence in medication management.Methods: Reliability and validity of the screening tool were assessed in a sample of 152 female care partners for a relative aged 65+years.Results: The tool showed sound test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and test utility, such that medication assistance was not better predicted by a global rating of cognitive impairment.Conclusions: In context of cognitive impairment, detection of medication mismanagement could be improved in both primary care and specialty health encounters through adoption of this single-item screening tool.Clinical Implications: This single-item report can be used to quickly facilitate discussions of medication management and cognitive impairment screening in office visits. The item also shows promise for efficient measurement of impairment in medication management than typical IADL assessment language.

Predictors of Readiness for Mobility Transition in Older Drivers.

We administered the Assessment of Readiness for Mobility Transition (ARMT) to 301 older drivers and compared total scores with participant characteristics. Overall, 18% of participants were not attitudinally ready for mobility transition, while 19% were very ready. Notably, participants with hospitalizations in the past year were either very ready for mobility transition (20% vs 14% without hospitalizations) or not ready at all (30% vs 17%). Significant health events may polarize reactions towards mobility transition. Individualizing communication about driving cessation readiness could help address such differing views. To further consider its effectiveness, ARMT could be utilized in mobility transition counseling interventions.

Dementia spousal caregivers and past transgressions: Measuring and understanding forgiveness experiences.

The transition from "wife" to "caregiver" for a cognitively impaired husband can be an overwhelming experience. Communication patterns change and small conflicts can grow, at times bringing angry feelings and new burdens. Engagement with forgiveness processes may benefit wives by lowering resentment over past tensions, restoring trust, and enhancing the overall caregiving experience. This study examined the utility of the Enright Forgiveness Inventory (EFI) within a sample of caregiving wives. Our intent was to better understand this population's experience with forgiveness when other contextual factors were likely to influence this process. Forgiveness scores on the EFI were positively related to the cognitive status of the care recipient, a particularly important finding for clinical intervention, and inversely related to marital distress and state anxiety.

Clinician Effectiveness in Assessing Fitness to Drive of Medically At-Risk Older Adults.

OBJECTIVES: To model the relative contributions of driver data and clinical judgments to clinical ratings of driver capability for a state licensing authority and to compare ratings with on-road test results. DESIGN: Retrospective, logistic regression. SETTING: Missouri Driver License Bureau. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 60 and older (N = 652; 52% male) evaluated by a physician of their choosing and a portion subsequently road tested (n = 286). MEASUREMENTS: Clinical data from an evidence-based physician statement (Form 1528). A three-level rating (likely capable, unclear, not capable) was collapsed into two outcomes (0 likely capable; 1 unclear, not capable) as the dependent variable. Independent variables (predictors) were age, sex, driving exposure, recent crash or police action, number of medical conditions, medication side effects, driver insight, and disease functional severity rating for driving. RESULTS: Three variables in the model (Nagelkerke coefficient of determination = 0.64; P < .001) were significant in the expected direction: disease functional severity for driving (odds ratio (OR = 6.65), insight (OR = 2.35), and age (OR = 1.06). Proportionately more drivers rated likely capable (73%) passed the road test than those rated unclear or not capable (62%). CONCLUSION: Judgments of disease severity, decrements in driver insight, and older age influenced clinician ratings of driving capability. Correspondence of physician ratings to on-road test outcomes was imperfect, highlighting the complexities in translation of clinical judgments to on-road performance. Both means of assessment have important and additive roles in driver licensing.

A randomized crash injury prevention trial of transitioning high-risk elders from driving.

UNLABELLED: Supplemental digital content is available in the text. BACKGROUND: Older adults with medical conditions that impair function are at risk for experiencing a motor vehicle crash. This randomized controlled trial tested an intervention to reduce crash-related risk among older patients. METHODS: A 2-to-1 allocation ratio resulted in comparisons between 26 intervention and 13 attention control (n = 39) group members who were recruited from inpatient and outpatient settings. The intervention consisted of two sessions of facilitated planning in which participants' health, transportation alternatives, attitudes/emotions regarding a change in mobility, and actions to ensure continued safe mobility were discussed. Moreover, all participants received supportive telephone calls during the 6-month intervention period. RESULTS: Results showed that when compared with the control group, the intervention group had significantly better subjective health, had fewer high-risk driving behaviors, and drove less distance on excursions from home at follow-up. Yet, simple repeated-measures analyses were not significant. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that facilitated planning may help ease the transition to driving retirement among some high-risk older patients. Larger samples and longer study duration are needed to confirm these effects and to measure direct crash and injury outcomes. A significant proportion of high-risk patients do not plan for driving retirement and remain a crash risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management study, level III.

Family reports of medically impaired drivers in Missouri: cognitive concerns and licensing outcomes.

This study investigated reasons why older adults (n=689) were reported to the Driver License Bureau, Missouri Department of Revenue, by family members as potentially unfit to drive with an emphasis on cognitive concerns and associated licensing outcomes. A total of 448 drivers were reported to have some cognitive issue; common symptoms included confusion, memory loss, and becoming lost while driving. Diagnostic labels (Alzheimer's disease (AD), cognitive impairment/dementia, brain injury/insult) were listed for 365 cases. A physician evaluation is required for license review. Of those with a diagnostic label, half (51%, n=187) failed to submit this evaluation and almost all were de-licensed immediately. Of those evaluated by a physician, diagnostic agreement between family members and physicians was high for specific conditions (100% for AD, 97% for acute brain injury), and less so for cognitive impairment/dementia (75%). This latter finding suggests that physicians and family members may understand cognitive symptoms differently. Whether cognitively impaired or not, few family reported drivers in this sample (∼2%) retained a valid license. Family members may be in the best position to recognize when medical-functional deficits impact on driving safety, and physicians and driver licensing authorities would do well to take their observations into account with respect to older driver fitness.

Content and face validity of the marwitmeuser caregiver grief inventory (short form) in African American caregivers.

There may be cultural differences in the experience of predeath grief in African American (AA)/Black caregivers for persons with Alzheimers disease (AD). The most commonly used screening tool, the Marwit and Meuser Caregiver Grief Inventory-Short Form (MMCGI-SF), was developed from focus groups with primarily Caucasian/White caregivers. Interviews were held with 19 AA spouse and adult child caregivers for persons with mild, moderate, and severe AD, and data were coded and compared with scale items on the MCMGI-SF to assess validity. Results from this study provide evidence for content and face validity of the MMCGI-SF for use in AA caregivers.

The instructional impact of the American Medical Association's Older Drivers Project online curriculum.

The Older Drivers Project (ODP) of the American Medical Association has provided evidence-based training for clinicians since 2003. More than 10,000 physicians and other professionals have been trained via an authoritative manual, the Physician's Guide to Assessing & Counseling Older Drivers, and an associated continuing medical education five-module curriculum offered formally by multidisciplinary teams from 12 U.S. States from 2003 to 2008. An hour-long, online version was piloted with medical residents and physicians (N = 259) from six academic and physician office sites from 2010 to 2011. Pre/postsurveys were completed. Most rated the curriculum of high quality and relevant to their practice. A majority (88%) reported learning a new technique or tool, and 89% stated an intention to incorporate new learning into their daily clinical practice. More than one half (62%) reported increased confidence in addressing driving. This transition from in-person to online instruction will allow the ODP to reach many more clinicians, at all levels of training, in the years to come.

Addressing individual differences in mobility transition counseling with older adults.

In the final phase of a 3-phase project, the Assessment of Readiness for Mobility Transition (ARMT) was clinically validated, emphasizing assessment/intervention. ARMT and coping, health/vision status, and social support measures were administered to 133 community-dwelling older adults. Concurrent validity is supported. Higher readiness to cope with mobility transition and self-confidence related to fall risk, higher self-rated health/vision, and fewer maladaptive behaviors, but not social support/adaptive coping, suggesting that those at risk can benefit from person-centered intervention to mobilize strengths for transportation/mobility planning. Older drivers may harbor unrealistic expectations regarding nonfamily mobility support. Implications for practice, education, research, and policy are presented.

Assessment of Readiness for Mobility Transition (ARMT): a tool for mobility transition counseling with older adults.

Individualized assessment is important when counseling older adults concerning the transition from driving to nondriving mobility. This study validated a measure of emotional and attitudinal readiness in support of mobility transition counseling (MTC). Items derived from a mixed-methods approach were administered by mailed questionnaire to community-dwelling adults (n = 297; ages 57-95). Factor analysis was employed to form the 24-item Assessment of Readiness for Mobility Transition (ARMT). The ARMT-Total Score (ARMT-TS) demonstrated sound internal consistency and split-half reliability (.88 each). The ARMT-TS correlated as hypothesized with validity measures, including self-reported physical functioning, mental health, and openness to experience. High scorers, who evidenced strong self-reliance and an unwillingness to be a burden on others, are considered to be at risk when faced with a significant mobility transition. An appreciation for such differences can allow for personalized, tailored discussion and planning for when it is time to "hang up the keys."

Physician input and licensing of at-risk drivers: a review of all-inclusive medical evaluation forms in the US and Canada.

This article details a systematic review of medical evaluation forms in support of licensing decisions for medically at-risk drivers. Comparisons were made between all-inclusive forms utilized by 52 State and Provincial Departments of Motor Vehicles (DMVs) in the US and Canada. Comparisons focused on length, format, content, instructional quality, medical coverage, ease of use, and other qualitative characteristics. Median page length was 2 (range 1-10), and mean word count was 1083 (494-3884). Common response options included open-ended (98%), forced choice (87%), and check box (81%). While the majority of forms (77%) required driver consent, only 24% requested information from the driver. Less than half (46%) included text on confidentiality protection. While all forms requested general medical information, just over half included specific sections for vision (54%) and cognitive/neurological conditions (56%). Most forms (81%) required that a judgment be made concerning driver safety, and half prompted for possible license restrictions. Criterion-based quality ratings were assigned on a five-point Likert scale by group consensus. One third of forms were rated as marginal or poor in comprehensiveness and utility, and just two garnered an excellent overall rating. Findings are discussed relative to current research on driver fitness and elements of a proposed model form. Best practice recommendations include a page length limitation, emphasis on in-person evaluation (i.e., as opposed to a records-only review), prompts to collect crash and other driving history information, clear instructions and stepwise format, content prompts across relevant medical categories, documentation of functional status and impairment levels, options for driving with restrictions in lieu of de-licensing, and emphasis on relative (vs. absolute) clinical judgments of overall driver safety.

Improving physician awareness of Alzheimer disease and enhancing recruitment: the Clinician Partners Program.

BACKGROUND: Primary care providers routinely evaluate older adults and are thus in a position to first detect symptoms and signs of Alzheimer disease. In urban areas, diagnostic or management difficulties may be referred to specialists; however, in rural areas, specialists may not be available. The Clinician Partners Program (CPP) was initiated to enhance rural health providers' ability in the diagnosis of dementia and care, and to increase research recruitment into dementia research studies of participants from rural communities. METHODS: The CPP is a 3-day "miniresidency" of didactic, observational, and skill-based teaching techniques. Participants completed pretests and posttests evaluating dementia knowledge, confidence in providing care, and practice behaviors. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2009, 146 health care professionals with a mean age of 45.7±10.8 years attended the CPP; 79.2% were white, 58.2% were women, and 58% of participants had been in practice for more than 10 years. Posttests showed an improvement in knowledge and confidence for diagnosis and treatment and increased the use of dementia screening tools. Rural research participation in an urban Alzheimer Disease Research Center increased 52% over the pre-CPP period. CONCLUSIONS: The following primary goals were accomplished: increased knowledge and confidence, changed practice habits, and enhanced research recruitment. Educational programs such as the CPP may be beneficial for increasing access to accurate diagnoses and appropriate treatment for Alzheimer disease while also enhancing research participation.

Internet-Based Dementia Resources: Physician Attitudes and Practices.

Despite the potential of the internet for informing clinical practice, little is know about physicians' use of and attitudes about internet use for dementia care. We surveyed 373 physicians to inform development of on-line dementia education resources. Two thirds reported using internet-based resources in their clinical practices at least three times per week; 61% participated in on-line continuing medical education. Three fourths agreed that internet-based resources are helpful in clinical care but most expressed mixed views about quality of available information. Respondents reported limited awareness and use of dementia-specific internet resources, but expressed an interest in such information regarding screening, treatment, community resources, and patient education. National Institute on Aging-funded Alzheimer's Disease Centers are in a unique position to disseminate on-line resources for physicians on dementia diagnosis, treatment, and care. Our study suggests that such a resource would be well received and utilized by physicians.

Identifying amnestic mild cognitive impairment in primary care: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), characterized by episodic memory impairment in the absence of clinical dementia, often represents a transitional stage between normal aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD). It is not known if non-expert primary-care physicians (PCPs) can differentiate individuals with no cognitive impairment (NCI), aMCI and mild AD in a primary-care practice setting. This study develops an approach to this question, which is necessary for aMCI to become a treatment target. METHODS: Fourteen experts assessed subjects with memory complaints in terms of their laboratory test results, magnetic resonance imaging findings and scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination, adapted Clinical Dementia Rating Scale and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale Delayed Word Recall before designating each subject as having NCI, aMCI or AD. Subjects agreed upon by a consensus committee were assigned to non-expert PCPs who, following brief training, assessed them using the same clinical information and utilizing the same assessment instruments. The chance-corrected inter-rater reliability (expert versus non-expert) measure κ, based on binary outcome (aMCI/not-aMCI), was estimated. RESULTS: The study recruited 119 evaluable subjects (50 aMCI, 27 mild AD and 42 NCI) and demonstrated fair to moderate agreement (κ = 0.423) between experts and non-experts in designation of aMCI. The percent agreement was 72.3%, sensitivity 62.0% and specificity 79.7%. Overall, non-experts under-rated the level of impairment compared with experts. CONCLUSION: This study established the feasibility of making the aMCI designation in the community and identified some likely sources of error. The results suggest that when drugs with clear benefit for aMCI patients are developed, community-based PCPs, with additional, more optimized training, will be able to accurately identify those patients who should receive treatment.