Epidemiological analysis of 2106 geriatric trauma patients in a level I trauma center in Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China.

As the global population ages, geriatric trauma gains attention. Limited studies on geriatric trauma in developing countries necessitate comprehensive investigation. This study aims to delineate the epidemiological characteristics of geriatric trauma, providing insights for prevention and enhanced elderly trauma care. Clinical data of 2106 geriatric trauma patients (age ≥ 60) treated from November 1, 2020, to October 31, 2023, at the trauma center of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University were retrospectively analyzed. Descriptive statistics covered temporal and monthly distribution, trauma sites, causes, and length of stay. Inclusive were 2106 geriatric patients (941 males, 1165 females; male-to-female ratio 1:1.24). Trauma incidence was higher in summer and autumn (May-October) than winter (November-December). Peak incidents occurred between 14:00-16:00, with concentrations at 12:00-16:00 and 20:00-22:00. Falls (59.35%), road traffic accidents (16.62%), other traumas (14.10%), cutting/stabbing (4.56%), violence (3.42%), mechanical injuries (1.61%), winter sports injuries (0.14%), burns (0.14%), and animal bites (0.06%) were major causes. Extremity and skin injuries prevailed, with significant site distribution differences (P < .001). Average length of stay at the trauma center was 78.35 ±â€…48.32 minutes. The gender distribution, timing, causes, and sites of trauma in the elderly differ significantly from other age groups. Unlike the higher occurrence of trauma in young men compared to women, among the elderly, it is more prevalent in women than men, mainly attributed to falls. It is crucial to implement specific measures to prevent trauma in the elderly, and the advancement of information technology in the trauma care system could additionally improve the quality of care.

Serum metabolites and hypercholesterolemia: insights from a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Background: Hypercholesterolemia, a critical contributor to cardiovascular disease, is not fully understood in terms of its relationship with serum metabolites and their role in disease pathogenesis. Methods: This study leveraged GWAS data to explore the relationship between serum metabolites and hypercholesterolemia, pinpointing significant metabolites via Mendelian Randomization (MR) and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. Data on metabolites were sourced from a European population, with analysis focusing on individuals diagnosed with hypercholesterolemia. Results: Out of 486 metabolites analyzed, ten showed significant associations with hypercholesterolemia, categorized into those enhancing risk and those with protective effects. Specifically, 2-methoxyacetaminophen sulfate and 1-oleoylglycerol (1-monoolein) were identified as risk-enhancing, with odds ratios (OR) of 1.545 (95% CI: 1.230-1.939; P_FDR = 3E-04) and 1.462 (95% CI: 1.036-2.063; P_FDR = 0.037), respectively. On the protective side, 3-(cystein-S-yl)acetaminophen, hydroquinone sulfate, and 2-hydroxyacetaminophen sulfate demonstrated ORs of 0.793 (95% CI: 0.735-0.856; P_FDR = 6.18E-09), 0.641 (95% CI: 0.423-0.971; P_FDR = 0.042), and 0.607 (95% CI: 0.541-0.681; P_FDR = 5.39E-17), respectively. In addition, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis further revealed eight critical pathways, comprising "biosynthesis of valine, leucine, and isoleucine", "phenylalanine metabolism", and "pyruvate metabolism", emphasizing their significant role in the pathogenesis of hypercholesterolemia. Conclusion: This study underscores the potential causal links between particular serum metabolites and hypercholesterolemia, offering innovative viewpoints on the metabolic basis of the disease. The identified metabolites and pathways offer promising targets for therapeutic intervention and warrant further investigation.

The effect of telerehabilitation on balance in stroke patients: is it more effective than the traditional rehabilitation model? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials published during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective: Telerehabilitation and telemedicine have gradually gained popularity. In 2019, the outbreak of COVID-19 started in Wuhan and then spread across the world. To date, most countries have opted to coexist with the virus. However, patients, especially those who have suffered a stroke, should take measures to avoid being infected with any disease as much as possible since any infectious disease can lead to adverse events for them. Telerehabilitation can be beneficial to stroke patients as they are less likely to be infected by the virus. In recent years, several studies on telerehabilitation have been conducted globally. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of telerehabilitation on the balance ability of stroke patients, compare the efficacy of conventional rehabilitation with telerehabilitation, explore the characteristics of telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation, and provide recommendations for rehabilitation programs in the context of the global pandemic. Methods: We searched Pubmed, Embase, the Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library databases from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2022 for randomized controlled trials published in English that evaluated the improvement of balance function in stroke patients after telerehabilitation and compared the differences between telerehabilitation (TR) and conventional rehabilitation (CR). The random-effects model was utilized to calculate mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to estimate intervention effects. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed according to the I2 values. The risk of bias was measured using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool. Results: We included nine studies in the system evaluation, all of which were included in the pooled analysis. All outcomes in the experimental and control groups improved over time. The comparison between groups concluded that people who received the telerehabilitation intervention had a significant improvement in the Berg Balance Scale (MD = 2.80; 95% CI 0.61, 4.98, P < 0.05, I2 = 51.90%) and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (MD = 8.12; 95% CI 6.35, 9.88, P < 0.05, I2 = 0) compared to controls. The Timed Up and Go test (MD = -4.59; 95% CI -5.93, -.25, P < 0.05, I2 = 0) and Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment-Balance (MD = 2.50; 95% CI 0.39, 4.61, P < 0.05) scored better in the control group than in the experimental group. There were no significant differences in other outcomes between the two groups. Conclusion: Studies on changes in medical conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic also demonstrated that, for stroke patients, telerehabilitation achieves similar effects as the conventional rehabilitation model and can act as a continuation of the conventional rehabilitation model. Owing to the different equipment and intervention programs of telerehabilitation, its curative effect on the static balance and reactive balance of stroke patients may be different. Currently, telerehabilitation may be more conducive to the rehabilitation of patients' static balance abilities, while conventional rehabilitation is more effective for the rehabilitation of patients' reactive balance. Therefore, further studies are needed for investigating the difference in efficacy between varied devices and telerehabilitation programs. Further research is needed on static and reactive balance. In addition, such research should have a large body of literature and a large sample size to support more definitive findings based on the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Systematic review registration: CRD42023389456.