Single nucleotide polymorphisms in A4GALT spur extra products of the human Gb3/CD77 synthase and underlie the P1PK blood group system.

Contrary to the mainstream blood group systems, P1PK continues to puzzle and generate controversies over its molecular background. The P1PK system comprises three glycosphingolipid antigens: Pk, P1 and NOR, all synthesised by a glycosyltransferase called Gb3/CD77 synthase. The Pk antigen is present in most individuals, whereas P1 frequency is lesser and varies regionally, thus underlying two common phenotypes: P1, if the P1 antigen is present, and P2, when P1 is absent. Null and NOR phenotypes are extremely rare. To date, several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been proposed to predict the P1/P2 status, but it has not been clear how important they are in general and in relation to each other, nor has it been clear how synthesis of NOR affects the P1 phenotype. Here, we quantitatively analysed the phenotypes and A4GALT transcription in relation to the previously proposed SNPs in a sample of 109 individuals, and addressed potential P1 antigen level confounders, most notably the red cell membrane cholesterol content. While all the SNPs were associated with the P1/P2 blood type and rs5751348 was the most reliable, we found large differences in P1 level within groups defined by their genotype and substantial intercohort overlaps, which shows that the P1PK blood group system still eludes full understanding.

Compound heterozygosity of two novel RHAG alleles leads to a considerable disruption of the Rh complex.

BACKGROUND: The Rhesus (Rh) complex consists of a core comprising the Rh proteins (RhD/RhCE) and the Rh-associated glycoprotein (RhAG) with accessory chains (GPB, LW, CD47). Molecular defects of the RHAG gene may cause a regulator Rhnull phenotype without Rh antigen expression or a Rhmod phenotype with decreased Rh antigen expression. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood samples of a donor with strongly diminished Rh antigens and five family members were analyzed by serological phenotyping, flow cytometry, molecular testing, and gene expression analysis of Rh complex candidate genes. RESULTS: RHAG sequencing identified a missense mutation, c.241G>C (p.Gly81Arg) and a splice site mutation, c.640 + 3del14, among the cohort. Compound heterozygosity of these novel alleles identified in the propositus and two siblings gave rise to a strongly diminished expression of RhAG, Rh, and CD47 antigens on the RBC surface. CONCLUSION: The Rhmod phenotype was caused by a novel RHAG splice site mutation in association with a non-functional allele. The primary depression of RhAG is most likely due to posttranslational events that affect the interaction and processing of the RhAG glycoprotein and gave rise to a secondary depression of RhD, RhCE, and CD47, the major members of the Rh complex.

RHD variants in Polish blood donors routinely typed as D-.

BACKGROUND: Blood donors exhibiting a weak D or DEL phenotypical expression may be mistyped D- by standard serology hence permitting incompatible transfusion to D- recipients. Molecular methods may overcome these technical limits. Our aim was to estimate the frequency of RHD alleles among the apparently D- Polish donor population and to characterize its molecular background. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Plasma pools collected from 31,200 consecutive Polish donors typed as D- were tested by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the presence of RHD-specific markers located in Intron 4 and Exons 7 and 10. RHD+ individuals were characterized by PCR or cDNA sequencing and serology. RESULTS: Plasma cross-pool strategy revealed 63 RHD+ donors harboring RHD*01N.03 (n = 17), RHD*15 (n = 12), RHD*11 (n = 7), RHD*DEL8 (n = 3), RHD*01W.2 (n = 3), RHD-CE(10) (n = 3), RHD*01W.3, RHD*01W.9, RHD*01N.05, RHD*01N.07, RHD*01N.23, and RHD(IVS1-29G>C) and two novel alleles, RHD*(767C>G) (n = 3) and RHD*(1029C>A). Among 47 cases available for serology, 27 were shown to express the D antigen CONCLUSION: 1) Plasma cross-pool strategy is a reliable and cost-effective tool for RHD screening. 2) Only 0.2% of D- Polish donors carry some fragments of the RHD gene; all of them were C or E+. 3) Almost 60% of the detected RHD alleles may be potentially immunogenic when transfused to a D- recipient.

[Anti-K antibodies in pregnant women and genotyping of K antigen in foetuses]. / Przeciwciala anty-K u kobiet ciezarnych oraz badania genu kodujacego antygen K u plodów.

AIM: 1) We have presented our experiment conducted to detect anti-K antibodies from the Kell-system in pregnant women and their connection with potential destruction of foetal red cells, which may result in haemolytic disease of the foetus and the newborn (HDFN). 2) We have also indicated serological and molecular methods important for a proper diagnosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 27 women with anti-K. Serological diagnosis of K antigen in fathers and children. KEL1 gene examination in foetuses from DNA isolated from foetal cells contained in amniotic fluid, using discrimination of alleles--real-time PCR method. RESULTS: Anti-K were detected in most women after blood transfusion, the fathers were usually K negative. Foetomaternal incompatibility was found in 6 out of 27 women. Haemolytic disease was observed in 5 cases: 3-severe, 1-fatal, 1-mild. Foetal genotyping allowed us to avoid cordocentesis in two pregnant women, it appeared that both foetuses have not received KEL1 gene from heterozygous (Kk) fathers--in the previous pregnancies the children had died because of HDFN. CONCLUSIONS: 1) In every pregnant woman with anti-K, the K antigen should be examined in the father. 2) In every K+ father the phenotype should be evaluated and if he is heterozygote (Kk), the fetal KEL1 gene must be examined, to avoid unnecessary cordocentesis. 3) If KEL1 gene is not detected in the foetus, HDFN will not occur. 4/Foetal KEL1 genotyping may be performed in all mothers with anti-K and heterozygous father in our Department, after providing the material from the amniocethesis.

Multiple red cell alloantibodies, including anti-Dib, after allogeneic ABO-matched peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Data on red blood cell (RBC) alloantibody appearance after hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (HPCT) from an ABO-matched donor are limited. CASE REPORT: A 32-year-old Caucasian man with chronic myeloid leukemia, never transfused, conditioned with BuCy120, received granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells from his HLA-identical sister. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine A and methotrexate. The patient engrafted showing complete donor chimerism and developed Grade 3 acute GVHD and subsequently extensive chronic GVHD. He received 2 units of RBCs on Days 13 and 14 without clinical signs of hemolysis. RESULTS: Patient was 0 Rh-K-JK(a-) and donor was 0 Rh+K-JK(a-). Pretransplant alloantibody screening was negative in the patient. In the donor, anti-E was detected before donation, together with anti-Jka and anti-Dib 4, 9, and 12 months after donation, likely triggered by RBC transfusion 2 months before cell harvest. In the patient, anti-Jka was detected on Day +25 and later anti-E and anti-Dib as well. In both, a Dia/Dia genotype was identified. Both parents were Di(a+b+). CONCLUSIONS: Three kinds of non-ABO alloantibodies were detected, including anti-Dib described for the first time after HPCT. The rapid development of antibodies in the recipient despite intensive immunosuppression suggests their production by the donor cells primed by the RBC transfusion before HPC harvest. Their production by the residual host cells cannot be unequivocally excluded, however.