Busulfan-fludarabine versus busulfan-cyclophosphamide for allogeneic transplant in acute myeloid leukemia: long term analysis of GITMO AML-R2 trial.

We report the long-term results of a randomized trial (GITMO, AML-R2), comparing 1:1 the combination of busulfan and cyclophosphamide (BuCy2, n = 125) and the combination of busulfan and fludarabine (BuFlu, n = 127) as conditioning regimen in acute myeloid leukemia patients (median age 51 years, range 40-65) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. With a median follow-up of 6 years, significantly better non-relapse mortality (NRM) was confirmed in BuFlu recipients, which is sustained up to 4 years after transplant (10% vs. 20%, p = 0.0388). This difference was higher in patients older than 51 years (11% in BuFlu vs. 27% in BuCy2, p = 0.0262). The cumulative incidence of relapse, which was the first cause of death in the entire study population, did not differ between the two randomized arms. Similarly, the leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were not different in the two cohorts, even when stratifying patients per median age. Graft-and relapse-free survival (GRFS) in BuFlu arm vs. the BuCy2 arm was 25% vs. 20% at 4 years and 20% vs. 17% at 10 years. Hence, the benefit gained by NRM reduction is not offsets by an increased relapse. Leukemia relapse remains a major concern, urging the development of new therapeutic approaches.

Optimizing maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: where do we stand in the year 2024?

INTRODUCTION: Despite the prognosis of patients affected by acute myeloid leukemia (AML) improved in the last decade, most patients relapse. Maintenance therapy after a chemotherapy approach with or without allogeneic stem cell transplantation could be a way to control the undetectable residual burden of leukemic cells. Several studies are being carried out as maintenance therapy in AML. Some critical points need to be defined, how the physician can choose among the various drugs available. AREAS COVERED: This review discusses the advances and controversies surrounding maintenance therapy for AML patients. EXPERT OPINION: Patients withFLT3-positive AML should receive midostaurin or quizartinib in the first-linesetting. For a patient initially receiving midostaurin, consider switching to sorafenib in the post-transplant setting. Because of the improved safety profile and potency, many experts will lean toward using a second-generation FLT3 inhibitor such as quizartinib or gilteritinib. Finally, no data indicate whether maintenance therapy should be prolonged until progression or for a defined period.

Molecular prognostication for transplant decision making of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: A retrospective single-center study.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative option for patients with Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). For many years, the selection of patients to allogeneic HSCT has been largely based on use of the International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised (IPSS-R). However, the recent broader application of next generation sequencing in clinical practice provided an abundance of molecular data and led to the introduction of molecular prognostic scores as IPSS-Molecular (IPSS-M). In this paper, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 57 consecutive MDS patients treated with allogeneic HSCT in our center. Re-stratification from IPSS-R to IPSS-M occurred in almost half of patients. The application of IPSS-M to our cohort demonstrated a stronger prognostic separation compared to IPSS-R and improved the C-index. Very high-risk IPSS-M patients showed worse outcomes following HSCT compared to high-risk patients. This study provides data supporting the need of integrating molecular information in the transplant decision making of patients with MDS. This allows an earlier and better identification of patients to whom the transplant should be advised.

Safety and efficacy of narsoplimab in pediatric and adult patients with transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy: a real-world experience.

Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is a severe complication following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). No approved treatments are currently available. This study presents real-world data obtained with narsoplimab, a human immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody that inhibits MASP-2, the effector enzyme of the lectin pathway of the complement system. Between January 2018 and August 2023, 20 (13 adult and 7 pediatric) patients diagnosed with TA-TMA received narsoplimab under an ongoing compassionate use program. The diagnosis was based on internationally defined criteria for pediatric and adult patients. Fifteen patients fulfilled the criteria recently established by an international consensus on TA-TMA. Nineteen patients exhibited high-risk characteristics. Thirteen patients (65%) responded to narsoplimab, achieving transfusion independence and significant clinical improvement. The one-hundred-day Overall Survival (OS) post-TA-TMA diagnosis was 70%, and 100% for responders. Narsoplimab proved to be effective and safe in the treatment of high-risk TA-TMA, with no increased infectious complications or other safety signals of concern across all age groups. The high response rates and the encouraging survival outcomes underscore the potential of narsoplimab as a valuable therapeutic option, particularly for high-risk cases.

Rituximab added to conditioning regimen significantly improves erythroid engraftment in major incompatible ABO-group hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

ABO-group major incompatibility hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) increases the risk of delayed red cell engraftment and other immunological complications. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of pre-transplant infusion of rituximab in patients with ABO-incompatibility in improving red blood cell engraftment after HSCT, measured by time to reach transfusion independence. We performed a retrospective, single-center study including 131 consecutive patients transplanted with major or bidirectional ABO-incompatible grafts between 1st January 2013 and 31st December 2019. Fifty-one patients received an infusion of rituximab during the conditioning regimen, while 80 patients did not receive any additional preventive treatment. Time to transfusion independence was significantly reduced for patients treated with rituximab (1 month, 95% CI, 0.5-2) compared with the control group (3.2 months, 95% CI 1.5-3.2, p = 0.02). By multivariable analysis, rituximab use was associated with a faster red blood cell (RBC) engraftment (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.17-3.03, p = 0.009), while a pre-transplant anti-donor isohemagglutinins titer >1:128 was associated with delayed transfusion independence (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-0.99, p = 0.05). Although limited by the retrospective nature of the study, the results of this analysis suggest that rituximab added to conditioning regimens is feasible, safe, and able to improve post-transplant red blood cell engraftment.

ECP versus ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory chronic GVHD - a retrospective study by the EBMT transplant complications working party.

Ruxolitinib has become the new standard of care for steroid-refractory and steroid-dependent chronic GVHD (SR-cGVHD). Our aim was to collect comparative data between ruxolitinib and extracorporeal photophoresis (ECP). We asked EBMT centers if they were willing to provide detailed information on GVHD grading, -therapy, -dosing, -response and complications for each included patient. 31 centers responded positively and we included all patients between 1/2017-7/2019 treated with ECP or ruxolitinib for moderate or severe SR-cGVHD. We identified 84 and 57 patients with ECP and ruxolitinib, respectively. We performed multivariate analyses adjusted on grading and type of SR-cGVHD (steroid dependent vs. refractory vs. intolerant to steroids). At day+180 after initiation of treatment for SR-cGVHD the odds ratio in the ruxolitinib group to achieve overall response vs. the ECP group was 1.35 (95% CI = [0.64; 2.91], p = 0.43). In line, we detected no statistically significant differences in overall survival, progression-free survival, non-relapse mortality and relapse incidence. The clinical significance is limited by the retrospective study design and the current data can't replace prospective studies on ECP in SR-cGVHD. However, the present results contribute to the accumulating evidence on ECP as an effective treatment option in SR-cGVHD.