Validation of a new protocol for a zebrafish MEFL (malformation or embryo-fetal lethality) test method that conforms to the ICH S5 (R3) guideline.

Detecting the toxic effects of chemicals on reproduction and development without using mammalian animal models is crucial in the exploitation of pharmaceuticals for human use. Zebrafish are a promising animal model for investigating pharmacological effects and toxicity during vertebrate development. Several studies have suggested the use of zebrafish embryos for the assessment of malformations or embryo-fetal lethality (MEFL). However, a reproducible protocol as a standard for the zebrafish MEFL test method that fulfills global requests has not been established based on the International Council of Harmonisation (ICH) S5 (R3) guidelines. To establish such a toxicity test method, we developed a new and easy protocol to detect MEFL caused by chemicals, especially those with teratogenic potential, using fertilized zebrafish eggs (embryos) within 5 days of development. Our toxicity test trials using the same protocol in two to four different laboratories corroborated the high inter-laboratory reproducibility. Our test method enabled the detection of 18 out of 22 test compounds that induced rat MEFL. Thus, the prediction rate of our zebrafish test method for MEFL was almost 82% compared with that of rat MEFL. Collectively, our study proposes the establishment of an easy and reproducible protocol for the zebrafish MEFL test method for reproductive and developmental toxicity that meets ICH guideline S5 (R3), which can be further considered in combination with information from other sources for regulatory use.

Alternatives to Monkey Reproductive Toxicology Testing for Biotherapeutics.

Embryofetal toxicity studies are conducted to support inclusion of women of childbearing potential in clinical trials and to support labeling for the marketed pharmaceutical product. For biopharmaceuticals, which frequently lack activity in the rodent or rabbit, the nonhuman primate is the standard model to evaluate embryofetal toxicity. These studies have become increasingly challenging to conduct due to the small number of facilities capable of performing them and a shortage of sexually mature monkeys. The low number of animals per group and the high rate of spontaneous abortion in cynomolgus monkeys further complicate interpretation of the data. Recent FDA guidance has proposed a weight of evidence (WoE) approach to support product labeling for reproductive toxicity of products intended to be used for the treatment of cancer (Oncology Pharmaceuticals: Reproductive Toxicity Testing and Labeling Recommendations), an approach that has also supported the approval of biotherapeutics for non-cancer indications. Considerations to determine the appropriateness and content of a WoE approach to support product labeling for embryofetal risk include known class effects in humans; findings from genetically modified animals with or without drug administration; information from surrogate compounds; literature-based assessments about the developmental role of the pharmaceutical target; and the anticipated exposure during embryofetal development. This paper summarizes the content of a session presented at the 42nd annual meeting at the American College of Toxicology, which explored the conditions under which alternative approaches may be appropriate to support product labeling for reproductive risk, and how sponsors can best justify the use of this approach.