Results of a novel intervention to increase rates of diagnosis and treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND: Veterans with primary hyperparathyroidism are under diagnosed and undertreated. We report the results of a pilot study to address this problem. METHODS: We implemented a stakeholder-driven, multi-component intervention to increase rates of diagnosis and treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism at a single VA hospital. Intervention effects were evaluated using an interrupted time series analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of Veterans affected by the intervention was 67 years (SD 12.1) and 84 â€‹% were men. Compared to the pre-intervention period, the intervention doubled the proportion of Veterans who were appropriately evaluated for hyperparathyroidism (absolute difference 25 â€‹%, 95 â€‹% CI 11 â€‹%-38 â€‹%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001) and increased referrals for treatment by 27 â€‹% (95 â€‹% CI 7 â€‹%-47 â€‹%, p â€‹< â€‹0.012). CONCLUSION: Our pilot study suggests it is feasible to address the underdiagnosis and undertreatment of primary hyperparathyroidism among Veterans.

Efficacy and safety of inhaled insulin (exubera) compared with subcutaneous insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of a 6-month, randomized, comparative trial.

OBJECTIVE: Glycemic control using inhaled, dry-powder insulin plus a single injection of long-acting insulin was compared with a conventional regimen in patients with type 2 diabetes, which was previously managed with at least two daily insulin injections. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to 6 months' treatment with either premeal inhaled insulin plus a bedtime dose of Ultralente (n = 149) or at least two daily injections of subcutaneous insulin (mixed regular/NPH insulin; n = 150). The primary efficacy end point was the change in HbA1c from baseline to the end of study. RESULTS: HbA1c decreased similarly in the inhaled (-0.7%) and subcutaneous (-0.6%) insulin groups (adjusted treatment group difference: -0.07%, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.17). HbA1c < 7.0% was achieved in more patients receiving inhaled (46.9%) than subcutaneous (31.7%) insulin (odds ratio 2.27, 95% CI 1.24-4.14). Overall hypoglycemia (events per subject-month) was slightly lower in the inhaled (1.4 events) than in the subcutaneous (1.6 events) insulin group (risk ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.97), with no difference in severe events. Other adverse events, with the exception of increased cough in the inhaled insulin group, were similar. No difference in pulmonary function testing was seen. Further studies are underway to assess tolerability in the longer term. Insulin antibody binding increased more in the inhaled insulin group. Treatment satisfaction was greater in the inhaled insulin group. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled insulin appears to be effective, well tolerated, and well accepted in patients with type 2 diabetes and provides glycemic control comparable to a conventional subcutaneous regimen.