From Pleasure to Pathology: Understanding the Neural Basis of Food Addiction in the Context of Obesity.

As rates of severe obesity continue to rise globally, intense efforts are required both from the scientific community, physicians and health policy makers to better understand the mechanisms, prevent and treat obesity in order to stop the upcoming pandemic. Obesity is known to significantly reduce life expectancy and overall quality of life, thus becoming a leading cause of preventable deaths. This article focuses on the relationship between obesity and food addiction, the main neural mechanisms, brain regions, genes, hormones and neurotransmitters involved and on the similarities between food addiction and substance abuse. The definition of obesity is based on the body mass index (BMI). A BMI of 30 or higher is classified as obese. Obesity is not solely a result of overeating, but has multifactorial causes, thus, prevention being extremely difficult. The concept of food addiction implies extreme cravings, lack of self-control, and overeating, especially involving tasty foods. The addiction concept is supported both by clinicalbehavioural research and neurobiological research. These studies demonstrate similarities between binge eating and drug addiction, including cravings, loss of control, excessive intake, tolerance, withdrawal, and distress/dysfunction. Although generally food addiction is thought to be distinct from obesity, most studies identify that a significant percentage of individuals with food addiction are obese. Our aim was to emphasize the need to better understand the neurological basis of obesity and addiction, and its implications for research, treatment, and public health initiatives. Understanding the neural mechanisms underlying food addiction can inform future healthcare policies and interventions aimed at addressing the global obesity epidemic.

The Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Quality of Life in Patients with Obesity.

Obesity has become a widespread health problem influencing people's health, general well-being, and healthcare costs. It also represents an important risk factor for multiple comorbidities and malignancies. OBJECTIVES: the primary objective of this study was to provide notable insights to healthcare professionals regarding the management of patients with obesity, to highlight the effectiveness of bariatric surgical methods in losing excess weight, and to establish the relationship between weight loss and changes in quality of life (QoL). MATERIAL AND METHODS: our study evaluated the QoL of 76 patients following bariatric surgery at different postoperative stages using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) and The World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaires. RESULTS: regarding the type of bariatric procedure performed, out of the 76 respondents, 39.47% underwent gastric bypass surgery (RYGB), 56.57% underwent sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and only 3.94% underwent single anastomosis duodeno-ileal switch (SADI-S). Pertaining to the SF-36 questionnaire, the lowest average scores were found in the energy/fatigue subscales and in the limitations due to mental health, which remained consistent across surgery types with a significant decrease in the SADI-S group. Concerning the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire, the lowest mean scores were found in the environment (15.03 ± 2.37) and social relations (16.08 ± 2.22) subscales, whilst the highest average scores were in physical health (16.30 ± 2.03) and mental health (16.57 ± 2.16). CONCLUSIONS: the findings revealed that whilst bariatric surgery significantly improved physical health, it resulted in a decrease in mental health scores. Consequently, the study emphasizes the importance of adopting a holistic approach to managing obesity that considers improving both physical and mental health outcomes.