Daptomycin Exposure as a Risk Factor for Daptomycin-Induced Eosinophilic Pneumonia and Muscular Toxicity.

BACKGROUND: High-dose daptomycin is increasingly used in patients with bone and joint infection (BJI). This raises concerns about a higher risk of adverse events (AEs), including daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia (DIEP) and myotoxicity. We aimed to examine pharmacokinetic and other potential determinants of DIEP and myotoxicity in patients with BJI receiving daptomycin. METHODS: All patients receiving daptomycin for BJI were identified in a prospective cohort study. Cases were matched at a 1:3 ratio, with controls randomly selected from the same cohort. Bayesian estimation of the daptomycin daily area under the concentration-time curve over 24 hours (AUC24h) was performed with the Monolix software based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data. Demographic and biological data were also collected. Risk factors of AEs were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: From 1130 patients followed over 7 years, 9 with DIEP, 26 with myotoxicity, and 106 controls were included in the final analysis. Daptomycin AUC24h, C-reactive protein, and serum protein levels were associated with the risk of AEs. The adjusted hazard ratio of DIEP or myotoxicity was 3.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48-6.5; P < .001) for daptomycin AUC24h > 939 mg/h/L, 9.8 (95% CI, 3.94-24.5; P < .001) for C-reactive protein > 21.6 mg/L, and 2.4 (95% CI, 1.02-5.65; P = .04) for serum protein <72 g/L. CONCLUSIONS: We identified common determinants of DIEP and myotoxicity in patients with BJI. Because the risk of AEs was associated with daptomycin exposure, daptomycin TDM and model-informed precision dosing may help optimize the efficacy and safety of daptomycin treatment in this setting. A target AUC24h range of 666 to 939 mg/h/L is suggested.

Evaluation of Limited Sampling Strategies for Bayesian Estimation of Daptomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve: A Short Communication.

PURPOSE: Increasing evidence supports daptomycin therapeutic drug monitoring. The author's reference center used to perform therapeutic drug monitoring in patients who receive high-dose daptomycin for bone and joint infections, with a three-sample strategy to estimate the daptomycin daily area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). The objective of this study was to evaluate simpler strategies based on only 2 or 1 sample(s). METHODS: The authors used the BestDose software to estimate the daptomycin AUC after Bayesian posterior estimation of individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters at steady state. The reference AUC (AUC full ) was based on 3 samples obtained predose (T0) and approximately 1 hour (T1) and 6 hours (T6) after the start of a 30-minute infusion of IV daptomycin. It was compared with the AUC based on all possible 2-sample and 1-sample strategies. Bias, imprecision, regression, and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the performance of the alternative strategies. RESULTS: Data from 77 patients were analyzed. The mean AUC full value was 936 ± 373 mg·h/L. The best 2-sample strategy was T0 + T6, with a mean prediction bias of 0.13 mg·h/L and absolute imprecision of 3%. The T0 + T1 strategy also performed well with a mean bias of -10 mg·h/L and imprecision of 3%. The best 1-sample strategy was the T6 sample only with a bias of 2.19 mg·h/L and imprecision of 6%. CONCLUSIONS: Bayesian estimation of daptomycin AUC based on a two-sample strategy was associated with negligible bias and imprecision compared with the author's usual three-sample strategy. The trough and peak strategy may shorten and simplify patient visits and reduce assay labor and costs.

Pre-referral intranasal artesunate powder for cerebral malaria: a proof-of-concept study.

BACKGROUND: Malaria still kills young children in rural endemic areas because early treatment is not available. Thus, the World Health Organization recommends the administration of artesunate suppositories as pre-referral treatment before transportation to the hospital in case of severe symptoms with an unavailable parenteral and oral treatment. However, negative cultural perception of the rectal route, and limited access to artesunate suppositories, could limit the use of artesunate suppositories. There is, therefore, a need for an alternative route for malaria pre-referral treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the potential of intranasal route for malaria pre-referral treatment. METHODS: The permeability of artesunate through human nasal mucosa was tested in vitro. The Transepithelial Electrical Resistance (TEER) of the nasal mucosa was followed during the permeation tests. Beside, regional deposition of artesunate powder was assessed with an unidose drug delivery device in each nostril of a nasal cast. Artesunate quantification was performed using Liquid Chromatography coupled to tandem Mass Spectrometry. RESULTS: The experimental model of human nasal mucosa was successfully implemented. Using this model, artesunate powder showed a much better passage rate through human nasal mucosa than solution (26.8 ± 6.6% versus 2.1 ± 0.3%). More than half (62.3%) of the artesunate dose sprayed in the nostrils of the nasal cast was recovered in the olfactory areas (44.7 ± 8.6%) and turbinates (17.6 ± 3.3%) allowing nose-to-brain and systemic drug diffusion, respectively. CONCLUSION: Artesunate powder showed a good permeation efficiency on human nasal mucosa. Moreover it can be efficiently sprayed in the nostrils using unidose device to reach the olfactory area leading to a fast nose-to-brain delivery as well as a systemic effect. Taken together, those results are part of the proof-of-concept for the use of intranasal artesunate as a malaria pre-referral treatment.

Quantification of canakinumab in human plasma by liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry.

Canakinumab is a fully-human monoclonal immunoglobulin gamma 1 kappa. This interleukin-1ß blocker is used for the treatment of autoinflammatory diseases. Various studies have demonstrated the value of therapeutic drug monitoring of monoclonal antibodies in the management of inflammatory diseases. The purpose of this study was to develop a method to quantify canakinumab plasmatic concentration using liquid chromatography-high-resolution (Orbitrap®) mass spectrometry. The quantification was based on a bottom-up approach with the analysis of one surrogate peptide after an immunopurification of IgG followed by tryptic proteolysis. Rituximab and cetuximab, both IgG1, were tested as internal standards. Chromatographic separation was performed on a bioZenTM Peptide PS-C18 column. Mass detection was conducted in positive ionization mode with Parallel Reaction Monitoring at a resolution of 70,000. The method was fully validated in terms of linearity, sensitivity, selectivity, accuracy and matrix effect. Standards ranged from 2.5 to 75 µg/mL. Intra- and inter-day coefficients of variation ranged from 3.7 to 14.7 %, and accuracy from 97.4 to 104.1 %. This method allowed the determination of canakinumab plasmatic concentrations from eight treated patients. This method is efficient and suitable for routine use in therapeutic drug monitoring or pharmacokinetic studies.

Cross-Validation of a Multiplex LC-MS/MS Method for Assaying mAbs Plasma Levels in Patients with Cancer: A GPCO-UNICANCER Study.

BACKGROUND: Different liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods have been published for quantification of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in plasma but thus far none allowed the simultaneous quantification of several mAbs, including immune checkpoint inhibitors. We developed and validated an original multiplex LC-MS/MS method using a ready-to-use kit to simultaneously assay 7 mAbs (i.e., bevacizumab, cetuximab, ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, rituximab and trastuzumab) in plasma. This method was next cross-validated with respective reference methods (ELISA or LC-MS/MS). METHODS: The mAbXmise kit was used for mAb extraction and full-length stable-isotope-labeled antibodies as internal standards. The LC-MS/MS method was fully validated following current EMA guidelines. Each cross validation between reference methods and ours included 16-28 plasma samples from cancer patients. RESULTS: The method was linear from 2 to 100 µg/mL for all mAbs. Inter- and intra-assay precision was <14.6% and accuracy was 90.1-111.1%. The mean absolute bias of measured concentrations between multiplex and reference methods was 10.6% (range 3.0-19.9%). CONCLUSIONS: We developed and cross-validated a simple, accurate and precise method that allows the assay of up to 7 mAbs. Furthermore, the present method is the first to offer a simultaneous quantification of three immune checkpoint inhibitors likely to be associated in patients.

Analysis of Pembrolizumab in Human Plasma by LC-MS/HRMS. Method Validation and Comparison with Elisa.

Pembrolizumab is a humanized immunoglobulin G4-kappa anti-PD1 antibody used in the treatment of different solid tumors or haematological malignancies. A liquid chromatography coupled with a high resolution mass spectrometry (orbitrap technology) method was fully developed, optimized, and validated for quantitative analysis of pembrolizumab in human plasma. A mass spectrometry assay was used for the first time a full-length stable isotope-labelled pembrolizumab-like (Arginine 13C6-15N4 and Lysine 13C6-15N2) as an internal standard; the sample preparation was based on albumin depletion and trypsin digestion and, finally, one surrogate peptide was quantified in positive mode. The assay showed good linearity over the range of 1-100 µg/mL, a limit of quantification at 1 µg/mL, excellent accuracy from 4.4% to 5.1%, and also a between-day precision below 20% at the limit of quantification. In parallel, an in-house ELISA was developed with a linearity range from 2.5 to 50 µg/mL. Then, results were obtained from 70 plasma samples of cancer patients that were treated with pembrolizumab and quantified with both methods were compared using the Passing-Bablok regression analysis and Bland-Altman plotting. The LC-MS/HRMS method is easy to implement in the laboratory for use in the context of PK/PD studies, clinical trials, or therapeutic drug monitoring.

Development, Validation, and Comparison of Two Mass Spectrometry Methods (LC-MS/HRMS and LC-MS/MS) for the Quantification of Rituximab in Human Plasma.

Rituximab is a chimeric immunoglobulin G1-kappa (IgG1κ) antibody targeting the CD20 antigen on B-lymphocytes. Its applications are various, such as for the treatment of chronic lymphoid leukemia or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in oncology, and it can also be used in the treatment of certain autoimmune diseases. Several studies support the interest in therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize dosing regimens of rituximab. Thus, two different laboratories have developed accurate and reproductive methods to quantify rituximab in human plasma: one using liquid chromatography quadripolar tandem mass spectrometer (LC-MS/MS) and the other, liquid chromatography orbitrap tandem mass spectrometer (LC-MS/HRMS). For both assays, quantification was based on albumin depletion or IgG-immunocapture, surrogate peptide analysis, and full-length stable isotope-labeled rituximab. With LC-MS/MS, the concentration range was from 5 to 500 µg/mL, the within- and between-run precisions were <8.5%, and the limit of quantitation was 5 µg/mL. With LC-MS/HRMS, the concentration range was from 10 to 200 µg/mL, the within- and between-run accuracy were <11.5%, and the limit of quantitation was 2 µg/mL. Rituximab plasma concentrations from 63 patients treated for vasculitis were compared. Bland-Altman analysis and Passing-Bablok regression showed the interchangeability between these two methods. Overall, these methods were robust and reliable and could be applied to routine clinical samples.

Quantification of nivolumab in human plasma by LC-MS/HRMS and LC-MS/MS, comparison with ELISA.

Nivolumab is a fully human immunoglobulin G4 used for the treatment of several advanced solid cancers as immune checkpoint inhibitors. There are some challenges for the quantification of mAb in plasma because IgG are present intrinsically in complex biologic matrices and this determination must be based on reliable, selective, and accurate analytical methods. This study described two validated methods carried out in two separate laboratories, one developed with a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and the other with high resolution mass spectrometry with an orbitrap system (LC-MS/HRMS). Both methods used full-length stable isotope-labeled nivolumab-like (Arginine 13C6-15N4 and Lysine 13C6-15N2) as internal standard. The sample preparation was based on IgG immunocapture, then trypsin digestion was performed and one surrogate peptide was quantified in positive mode. Assays showed good linearity over the range of 5-100 µg/mL and 5-150 µg/mL for LC-MS/HRMS and LC-MS/MS, respectively. The limit of quantification was set at 2 and 5 µg/mL for LC-MS/HRMS and LC-MS/MS, respectively. Acceptable accuracy (from - 13.6% to 3.0%) and precision (within 20%) values were also obtained with both methods. The two LC-MS methods showed a very different matrix effect linked to the use of different analytical columns and elution gradients. Nivolumab plasma concentrations from 60 cancer outpatients were compared with the two mass spectrometry methods and also with a home-made ELISA method. The Bland-Altman analysis did not show any significant bias between the three methods. The Passing-Bablock linear regression analysis showed a good agreement between the three methods with a better correlation between the two mass spectrometry methods.

Determination of Cetuximab in Plasma by Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Orbitrap With a Stable Labeled 13C,15N-Cetuximab Internal Standard.

BACKGROUND: Cetuximab (CTX) is a chimeric IgG1 Kappa monoclonal antibody used to treat head and neck cancer and colorectal cancer. Previous clinical studies indicated that the pharmacokinetics of CTX influences patient survival. Thus, individualizing CTX treatment by measuring trough levels of the drug in plasma could have a major impact on clinical efficacy. METHODS: To measure these levels, a full-length stable isotope-labeled CTX standard was used in a generic, rapid, and high-throughput sample preparation protocol based on IgG capture followed by trypsin digestion, on-line solid-phase extraction cleanup, and liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). RESULTS: The optimized method displayed good analytical performance and was linear over a range from 5 to 150 mcg/mL. The within-run and between-run imprecision of the assay were equal to or less than 10%, for 6 replicates at 3 different concentrations and for runs performed on 5 separate days. The plasma CTX concentrations in 19 patients were also determined. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that quantification of mAb in clinical samples does not strictly require a tandem mass spectrometry system, and LC-HRMS is also relevant in this context. This first study implementing a quantitative LC-HRMS assay with a specific stable isotope-labeled mAb internal standard paves the way for more robust clinical monitoring of anticancer mAbs.