Orbital Teratoma: Case Report and Management Review.

Orbital teratoma is a rare, vision-threatening, congenital neoplasm derived from all germ cell layers. The management of orbital teratoma is uncertain because of its rarity and variable severity. We present a case with complete tumor excision with preservation of vision and cosmesis. A 4-day-old female presented with progressive proptosis of the OD. She was born term following an uneventful pregnancy and delivery. MRI of the orbits showed a large right-sided mass centered within the intraconal space with heterogeneous signal intensity characteristics consistent with a teratoma. She underwent a right posterior orbitotomy. The tumor was wrapped around the optic nerve but was gradually separated from it and all other normal structures and delivered intact. Histology was compatible with an immature teratoma without evidence of malignancy. The patient is now 6 months old, visually attentive with no evidence of optic neuropathy, and has essentially normal appearance.

Concomitant herpetic keratitis and acute retinal necrosis: clinical features and outcomes.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors, prognosis, and management in patients with concomitant herpetic keratitis and acute retinal necrosis (ARN). SUBJECTS/METHODS: In this retrospective observational series, ARN patients in the Greater Vancouver area from 2004 to 2018 were identified through key words, billing codes, and dispensing data from medical records of affiliate researchers and the pharmacy at Vancouver General Hospital. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed with ARN during this period. Five of those were also diagnosed with herpetic keratitis. Thus, the incidence of combined keratitis and ARN was 18% of patients with ARN. The two diseases occurred concomitantly in four out of five patients. Mean age at diagnosis was 55 ± 17 years. Of the five patients with both corneal and retinal involvement, three patients were immunocompromised and three had a history of herpetic diseases. Three developed disciform keratitis and two developed stromal immune keratitis. Clinical management and outcomes of these patients did not differ from patients with ARN alone, except for a lower rate of retinal detachment (p = 0.006) and a higher proportion with visual acuity ≥ 20/200 (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Keratitis may complicate the clinical picture of one out of five to six patients with ARN. Comprehensive ophthalmic examination, including careful anterior segment exams in patients with ARN and sequential dilated fundus exams in patients with herpetic keratitis, should always be conducted to identify cases of concomitant disease.

Oral Miltefosine as Adjunctive Treatment for Recalcitrant Acanthamoeba Keratitis.

PURPOSE: Acanthamoeba keratitis is a rare, vision-threatening disease. Commercially available antiamoebics are poorly cysticidal and highly toxic, and therapeutic keratoplasties can be complicated by recurrence or graft failure. We aimed to discuss the use of oral miltefosine for treatment of recalcitrant Acanthamoeba keratitis. METHODS: A 44-year-old contact lens wearer presented with a 2-week history of red painful eye and decreasing vision. After poorly responding to topical corticosteroid on the presumptive diagnosis of anterior uveitis, she developed radial keratoneuritis. Corneal scraping was positive for Acanthamoeba. No clinical response to treatment was observed with topical chlorhexidine 0.02%, polyhexamethylene biguanide 0.02%, and oral voriconazole. She then underwent 2 therapeutic keratoplasties with prompt recurrence of the disease in the keratoplasty graft. RESULTS: Oral miltefosine was added to the treatment. She underwent a third penetrating keratoplasty 8 months later. The excised button was negative for amoeba. She continued miltefosine for 3 more months. No recurrence was observed after 30 months. CONCLUSIONS: This case shows resolution of recalcitrant Acanthamoeba keratitis with oral miltefosine in an immunocompetent patient. Further clinical evidence would be needed to possibly incorporate this medication in the antiamoebic armamentarium.

Visual Contrast Sensitivity in Early-Stage Parkinson's Disease.

PURPOSE: Visual impairments are frequent in Parkinson's disease (PD) and impact normal functioning in daily activities. Visual contrast sensitivity is a powerful nonmotor sign for discriminating PD patients from controls. However, it is usually assessed with static visual stimuli. Here we examined the interaction between perception and eye movements in static and dynamic contrast sensitivity tasks in a cohort of mildly impaired, early-stage PD patients. METHODS: Patients (n = 13) and healthy age-matched controls (n = 12) viewed stimuli of various spatial frequencies (0-8 cyc/deg) and speeds (0°/s, 10°/s, 30°/s) on a computer monitor. Detection thresholds were determined by asking participants to adjust luminance contrast until they could just barely see the stimulus. Eye position was recorded with a video-based eye tracker. RESULTS: Patients' static contrast sensitivity was impaired in the intermediate spatial-frequency range and this impairment correlated with fixational instability. However, dynamic contrast sensitivity and patients' smooth pursuit were relatively normal. An independent component analysis revealed contrast sensitivity profiles differentiating patients and controls. CONCLUSIONS: Our study simultaneously assesses perceptual contrast sensitivity and eye movements in PD, revealing a possible link between fixational instability and perceptual deficits. Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity profiles may represent an easily measurable metric as a component of a broader combined biometric for nonmotor features observed in PD.