Influence of an adjacent zirconium implant, tube current, and metal artifact reduction algorithm on horizontal root fracture diagnosis in cone beam computed tomography.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the influence of an adjacent zirconium implant, tube current (mA), and a metal artifact reduction algorithm (MARA) on horizontal root fracture (HRF) diagnosis in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). STUDY DESIGN: Nineteen teeth (9 with HRF, 10 without) were individually placed in a human maxilla. Scan volumes were acquired without and with a zirconium implant adjacent to the tooth at settings of 4, 8, and 10 mA, with MARA disabled and enabled, using a 5×5 cm field of view, 0.085-mm voxel size, and 90 kV. Four maxillofacial radiologists individually assessed the scans. Diagnostic metrics were compared by multiway analysis of variance (α=5%). Inter- and intraexaminer agreements for HRF diagnosis were evaluated with the weighted kappa test. RESULTS: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were significantly lower in the presence of the implant (P≤.005). AUC values were higher in scans obtained with 8 and 10 mA compared with 4 mA (P=0.010), but 10 mA without MARA was better with the implant present. MARA did not significantly influence outcomes (P≥0.240). Inter- and intraexaminer agreements ranged from moderate to almost perfect. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of the zirconium implant impairs HRF detection. Settings of 8 or 10 mA improve HRF detection regardless MARA condition without the implant. With an adjacent implant, 10 mA without MARA is recommended to improve diagnostic performance.

DICOM file format has better radiographic image quality than other file formats: an objective study.

This study aimed to assess the influence of the file format on the image quality parameters (image noise, brightness, and uniformity) of periapical radiographs acquired with different digital systems. Radiographic images of an acrylic phantom were acquired with two digital systems - Digora Toto and Express, and exported into five different file formats - TIFF, BMP, DICOM, PNG, and JPEG. Image noise, image brightness (mean of gray values), and image uniformity (standard deviation of gray values) were evaluated in all images. A two-way analysis of variance with Tukey's test as a post-hoc test was used to compare the results, considering the file formats and radiographic systems as the studied factors. A significance level of 5% was adopted for all analyses. The DICOM image file format presented lower image noise, higher brightness (higher mean gray values), and greater image uniformity (p<0.001) than the other file formats, which did not differ from each other for both digital radiography systems (p>0.05). The Express system revealed lower image noise and greater image uniformity than the Digora Toto system regardless of the image file format (p<0.001). Moreover, the Express showed higher brightness than the Digora Toto for all image file formats (p<0.001), except for the DICOM image file format, which did not significantly differ between the digital radiography systems tested (p>0.05). The DICOM image file format showed lower image noise, higher brightness, and greater image uniformity than the other file formats (TIFF, BMP, PNG, and JPEG) in both digital radiography systems tested.

DICOM file format has better radiographic image quality than other file formats: an objective study

Abstract This study aimed to assess the influence of the file format on the image quality parameters (image noise, brightness, and uniformity) of periapical radiographs acquired with different digital systems. Radiographic images of an acrylic phantom were acquired with two digital systems - Digora Toto and Express, and exported into five different file formats - TIFF, BMP, DICOM, PNG, and JPEG. Image noise, image brightness (mean of gray values), and image uniformity (standard deviation of gray values) were evaluated in all images. A two-way analysis of variance with Tukey's test as a post-hoc test was used to compare the results, considering the file formats and radiographic systems as the studied factors. A significance level of 5% was adopted for all analyses. The DICOM image file format presented lower image noise, higher brightness (higher mean gray values), and greater image uniformity (p<0.001) than the other file formats, which did not differ from each other for both digital radiography systems (p>0.05). The Express system revealed lower image noise and greater image uniformity than the Digora Toto system regardless of the image file format (p<0.001). Moreover, the Express showed higher brightness than the Digora Toto for all image file formats (p<0.001), except for the DICOM image file format, which did not significantly differ between the digital radiography systems tested (p>0.05). The DICOM image file format showed lower image noise, higher brightness, and greater image uniformity than the other file formats (TIFF, BMP, PNG, and JPEG) in both digital radiography systems tested.

Resumo Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a influência do formato do arquivo nos parâmetros de qualidade de imagem (ruído de imagem, brilho e uniformidade) de radiografias periapicais adquiridas com diferentes sistemas digitais. As imagens radiográficas de um fantoma de acrílico foram adquiridas com dois sistemas digitais - Digora Toto e Express, e exportadas em cinco formatos de arquivo diferentes - TIFF, BMP, DICOM, PNG e JPEG. O ruído da imagem, o brilho da imagem (média dos valores de cinza) e a uniformidade da imagem (desvio padrão dos valores de cinza) foram avaliados em todas as imagens. A análise de variância (ANOVA) bidirecional com o teste post-hoc de Tukey foi aplicada para comparar os resultados, considerando os formatos de arquivo e os sistemas radiográficos como os fatores estudados. Um nível de significância de 5% foi adotado para todas as análises. O formato de arquivo de imagem DICOM apresentou menor ruído de imagem, maior brilho (maiores valores médios de cinza) e maior uniformidade de imagem (p<0,001) do que os outros formatos de arquivo, que não diferiram entre si para ambos os sistemas de radiografia digital (p>0,05). O sistema Express apresentou menor ruído de imagem e maior uniformidade de imagem que o sistema Digora Toto, independentemente do formato do arquivo de imagem (p<0,001). Além disso, o Express mostrou maior brilho do que o Digora Toto para todos os formatos de arquivo de imagem (p<0,001), exceto para o formato de arquivo de imagem DICOM, que não diferiu significativamente entre os sistemas de radiografia digital testados (p>0,05). O formato de arquivo de imagem DICOM mostrou menor ruído de imagem, maior brilho e maior uniformidade de imagem do que os outros formatos de arquivo (TIFF, BMP, PNG e JPEG) em ambos os sistemas de radiografia digital testados.

Tridimensional assessment of the mandibular angle in patients with different skeletal patterns by cone-beam computed tomography scans: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Since the muscles of chewing are involved in the region of the mandibular angle, important structures in surgical and orthodontic procedures, to study its morphological aspects and the possible influence of different patterns of skeletal development would be of interest. Thus, this study aimed to assess the influence of patient characteristics - such as sex, skeletal malocclusion (Class I, Class II, and Class III) and facial type (brachycephalic, mesocephalic, and dolichocephalic) - on the width, height, thickness, and volume of the mandibular angle, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. METHODS: CBCT scans were assessed - 144 men and 154 women, total of 298 - and classified according to skeletal patterns (skeletal malocclusions and facial types). Width, height, and thickness of the mandibular angle were measured using OnDemand 3D software. The volumetric measures of the mandibular angle were obtained using the ITK-SNAP software. Analysis of Variance (multiway ANOVA) with Tukey's post-hoc test compared the data, with a 5% significance level. RESULTS: Among the factors studied, sex significantly influenced all the analyzed variables (height, width, thickness, and volume of the mandibular angle) (p < 0.05); in general, male individuals presented higher values than females. In some cases, the skeletal malocclusion and facial type factors influenced only the width and height variables (p < 0.05); in general, the Class III and dolichocephalic individuals presented higher values in relation to the other types of skeletal malocclusions and facial types. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in the craniofacial growth pattern, considering the different skeletal malocclusions and facial types, had some influence in the width and height dimensions of the mandibular angle. Furthermore, sex influenced all the studied variables.

Digital file format does not influence the radiographic diagnosis of vertical root fracture.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of the file format of digital periapical radiographs on the diagnosis of vertical root fracture (VRF). STUDY DESIGN: Periapical radiographic images of 34 single-rooted teeth-19 with VRF, and 15 without VRF were acquired using two digital systems-Digora Toto, and Digora Optime, and exported into four different file formats-TIFF, BMP, PNG, and JPEG, totaling 272 radiographs. The radiographs were assessed by five examiners for the detection of VRF, using a 5-point scale (1-definitely absent; 2-probably absent; 3-uncertain; 4-probably present; 5-definitely present). Diagnostic values of area under the ROC curve, specificity, and sensitivity for the diagnosis of VRF were calculated. The results were compared by two-way Analysis of Variance with post hoc Tukey's test. The intra- and inter-examiner agreements were measured by the Kappa test. The significance level was set at 5% for all analyses. RESULTS: The values of intra-examiner agreement varied from moderate (0.56) to almost perfect (0.81), while the values of inter-examiner agreement varied from fair (0.29) to moderate (0.60). The image file format did not influence the diagnostic values for VRF for any of the radiographic systems tested (p > 0.05). Digora Toto had significantly greater values of area under the ROC curve than Digora Optime for all file formats (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The image file format of periapical radiographs does not influence the diagnosis of VRF, regardless of the digital radiography system.

Do the dimensions of the hard palate have a relationship with the volumes of the upper airways and maxillary sinuses? A CBCT study.

BACKGROUND: As the hard palate is a central structure of the skull, and its close relationship with the nasal cavity, oral cavity, and maxillary sinuses, it would be of interest to study if there is a relationship between this bone and other structures of the stomatognathic system. Thus, this study aimed to assess the dimensions of the hard palate and associate them with sex, and skeletal and breathing patterns. Also, to investigate if there is a relationship between these dimensions and the volumes of the upper airways and maxillary sinuses. METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-eight CBCT scans of patients were classified according to sex, and skeletal and breathing patterns. Then, the linear dimensions of width and height of the hard palate at the regions of the first premolars and first molars, and the volumes of the upper airways and maxillary sinuses were measured using the CS 3D Imaging and ITK-SNAP software, respectively. Data were submitted to multi-way analysis of variance and linear regression, with a significance level of 5% (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Sex and facial type influenced the hard palate dimensions (p < 0.05). Males had greater width and height of the hard palate than females (p < 0.0001). It was observed greater width for brachycephalics at the first premolars region (p = 0.0032), and greater height for dolichocephalics at the first premolars (p = 0.0154) and first molars (p = 0.0038) regions. Skeletal malocclusion and breathing pattern did not influence the measurements of the hard palate (p > 0.05). There was a significant relationship between the width and height of the hard palate at the premolar's region and the total volume of the upper airways (p = 0.018, and p = 0.038), and between both dimensions of the hard palate at the molar's region and the total volume of the maxillary sinuses (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The hard palate dimensions are influenced by sex and facial type, but not by skeletal malocclusion or breathing pattern. Also, there is an association between these dimensions and the volumes of the upper airways and maxillary sinuses.

Influence of the image file format of digital periapical radiographs on the diagnosis of external and internal root resorptions.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of different image file formats of digital radiographic images on the diagnosis of external (ERR) and internal root resorption (IRR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four human teeth were selected. For ERR, 20 teeth were used (10 control and 10 with simulated ERR), and for IRR, 14 teeth were used (before and after IRR simulation). Digital periapical radiographs were acquired using the Digora Toto system and exported in four different image file formats: TIFF, BMP, PNG, and JPEG, totaling 192 radiographs. Five examiners evaluated the images using the JPEGView software and scored the detection of ERR or IRR on a 5-point scale. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the area under the ROC curve were obtained for the diagnosis of ERR and IRR in the different image file formats. Two-way ANOVA compared the diagnostic values between the file formats and the Kappa test assessed intra- and inter-examiner agreement. The significance level was set at 5% (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The mean values of intra-examiner agreement were substantial (0.740) for ERR and almost perfect (0.836) for IRR and, inter-examiner was fair (0.263) and moderate (0.421), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found among the different file formats for the diagnostic values of ERR and IRR. CONCLUSION: The file format of digital radiographs does not influence the diagnosis of ERR and IRR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Digital radiographic images may be susceptible to computational factors; however, they can be stored in multiple file formats without affecting the diagnosis of dental root resorptions.

Classification and Morphological Analysis of the Hard Palate in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans: A Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: As the hard palate is a central structure of the skull and is involved in orthodontic and surgical procedures, it would be of interest to study the morphological aspects of this bone and its possible variations as per different patterns of skeletal development. Thus, this study aimed to develop a classification for the different morphological characteristics of the hard palate and to evaluate the relationship between these characteristics and the different skeletal patterns, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective and cross-sectional study used CBCT scans of patients seen from January 2014 to December 2016. Carestream Dental 3D Imaging software was applied to classify each patient according to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns, and to evaluate the 3 morphological characteristics of the hard palate: depth (flat, regular, or deep), inclination (superior, parallel, or inferior), and presence of a bony projection (S-shaped). χ2 and Fisher's exact tests evaluated the relationship between the hard palate characteristics and the different skeletal patterns. RESULTS: A total of 298 CBCT scans (144 males and 154 females) were evaluated. The depth of the hard palate was significantly related to both skeletal patterns in males (P < .05), with Class II and dolichocephalics presenting a greater amount of deep palates, while classes I and III and brachycephalics had a greater amount of regular palates. The inclination of the hard palate was significantly associated with the facial type in females (P < .05), with brachycephalics and mesocephalics presenting a greater amount of parallel palates, whereas dolichocephalics had a greater number of inferiorly inclined palates. Regarding the presence of the S-shape in the hard palate, there was a greater number of this projection in Class II males and brachycephalic females. CONCLUSIONS: A morphological classification for the hard palate was developed. The morphology of the hard palate varied among the different skeletal patterns.

Tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico como método de avaliação da pneumatização da articulação temporomandibular / Cone-beam computed tomography as a method of evaluating pneumatization of the temporomandibular joint

Introdução: A pneumatização, considerada um processo fisiológico, são cavidades cheias de ar no interior dos ossos do crânio resultante de áreas de células epiteliais. Objetivo: Determinar a prevalência de pneumatização na fossa articular (PFA) e da eminência articular (PEA) do osso temporal por meio de exames de tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico (TCFC). Material e métodos: Trezentas e noventa imagens de articulações temporomandibulares foram avaliadas por dois examinadores, devidamente calibrados, com experiência em imagens de TCFC. Nos casos em que foi detectada pneumatização, esta foi classificada de acordo com o tipo (unilocular e multilocular) e lateralidade (unilateral ou bilateral). Resultados: A PFA ou a PEA foi diagnosticada em 97 (49,74%) pacientes. Destes pacientes, 61 (31,3%) apresentaram PFA e 36 (18,5%) PEA. Em relação à lateralidade, na PFA, 36 (59%) apresentaram a condição unilateralmente e 25 (41%) bilateralmente. Dentre os pacientes com PEA, 24 (66,7%) apresentaram a condição unilateralmente e 12 (33,3%) bilateralmente. A pneumatização foi correlacionada entre os lados pelo coeficiente de correlação de Spearman e foi significativa para os casos multiloculares (fossa articular: rs=0,52 / p<0,0001 e eminência articular: rs=0,42 p<0,0001). Conclusão: A pneumatização da região temporomandibular é uma característica relativamente comum e, apesar de não necessitar de tratamento, a observação é fundamental para evitar complicações do tratamento ou diagnóstico errôneo na região.

Introduction: Pneumatization, considered a physiological process, are air-filled cavities within the skull bones resulting from areas of epithelial cells. Objective: To determine the prevalence and characteristics of pneumatization of the glenoid fossa and articular eminence on cone beam computed tomography. Material and methods: Images of 195 patients (195 temporomandibular joints) were evaluated and the age and gender of the individuals were collected. In cases where pneumatization was detected, this was classified according to type (unilocular and multilocular) and laterality (unilateral or bilateral). Results: The pneumatization of the glenoid fossa and articular eminence were diagnosed in 63 (32.3 %) patients. Of these patients, 61 (31.3%) had pneumatization of glenoid fossa and 36 (18.5%) had pneumatization of articular eminence. Regarding laterality, in PGF 36 (59%) presented the condition unilaterally and 25 (41%) bilaterally. The patients with PAE, 24 (66.7%) presented the condition unilaterally and 12 (33.3%) bilaterally. Pneumatization was correlated between the sides using the Spearman correlation coefficient and was significant for multilocular cases (glenoid fossa: rs= 0,52/p<0,0001 and articular eminence: rs=0,50 p<0,0001). Conclusion: The pneumatization of temporomandibular region is a relatively common feature, and even though it does not require treatment, observation is crucial to avoid complications of treatment or wrong diagnosis in the region.