Ultra-Sensitive Droplet Digital PCR for the Assessment of Microchimerism in Cellular Therapies.

Current techniques to assess chimerism after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are limited in both sensitivity and precision. These drawbacks are problematic in the context of cellular therapies that frequently result in microchimerism (donor chimerism <1%). We have developed a highly sensitive droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay using commercially available regents with good performance throughout the range of clinically relevant chimerism measurements, including microchimerism. We tested the assay using spiked samples of known donor-recipient ratios and in clinical samples from HSCT recipients and patients enrolled on clinical trials of microtransplantation and third-party virus-specific T cells (VSTs). The levels of detection and quantification of the assay were .008% and .023%, with high levels of precision with samples of DNA content ranging from 1 to 300 ng DNA. From the panel of 29 insertion-deletion probes multiple informative markers were found for each of 43 HSCT donor-recipient pairs. In the case of third-party cellular therapies in which there were 3 DNA contributors (recipient, HSCT donor, and T-cell donor), a marker to detect the cellular product in a background of recipient and donor cells was available for 11 of 12 cases (92%). Chimerism by ddPCR was able to quantify chimerism in HSCT recipients and comparison against standard STR analysis in 8 HSCT patients demonstrated similar results, with the advantage of fast turnaround time. Persistence of donor microchimerism in patients undergoing microtransplantation for acute myeloid leukemia was detectable for up to 57 days in peripheral blood and bone marrow. The presence of microtransplant product DNA in bone marrow T cells after cell sorting was seen in the 1 patient tested. In patients receiving third-party VSTs for treatment of refractory viral infections, VST donor DNA was detected at low levels in 7 of 9 cases. ddPCR offers advantages over currently available methods for assessment of chimerism in standard HSCT and cellular therapies.

Use of ubiquitous, highly heterozygous copy number variants and digital droplet polymerase chain reaction to monitor chimerism after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Chimerism analysis has an important role in the management of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. It informs response to disease relapse, graft rejection, and graft-versus-host disease. We have developed a method for chimerism analysis using ubiquitous copy number variation (CNV), which has the benefit of a "negative background" against which multiple independent informative markers are quantified using digital droplet polymerase chain reaction. A panel of up to 38 CNV markers with homozygous deletion frequencies of approximately 0.4-0.6 were used. Sensitivity, precision, reproducibility, and informativity were assessed. CNV chimerism results were compared against established fluorescence in situ hybridization, single nucleotide polymorphism, and short tandem repeat-based methods with excellent correlation. Using 30 ng of input DNA per well, the limit of detection was 0.05% chimerism and the limit of quantification was 0.5% chimerism. High informativity was seen with a median of four informative markers detectable per individual in 39 recipients and 43 donor genomes studied. The strength of this approach was exemplified in a multiple donor case involving four genomes (three related). The precision, sensitivity, and informativity of this approach recommend it for use in clinical practice.

A Paediatric Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia Patient Harbouring a Cryptic PML-RARA Insertion due to a Complex Structural Chromosome 17 Rearrangement.

Acute promyelocytic leukaemia with PML-RARA fusion is usually associated with the t(15;17)(q24.1;q21.1) translocation but may also arise from complex or cryptic rearrangements. The fusion usually resides on chromosome 15 but occasionally on others. We describe a cryptic PML-RARA fusion within a novel chromosome 17 rearrangement. We performed interphase fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) using a dual-fusion PML-RARA probe, followed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for PML-RARA, karyotyping, and metaphase FISH using RARA break-apart, locus-specific, and subtelomere probes for chromosome 17. An 850K SNP microarray was also employed. Interphase and metaphase FISH showed atypical results involving a single PML-RARA fusion, no second fusion, but instead separate diminished PML and RARA signals. RT-PCR confirmed PML-RARA fusion; however, karyotyping detected only an altered chromosome 17. Metaphase FISH showed the single fusion and diminished 5' RARA signals located unexpectedly in the subtelomeric short-arm and long-arm regions of the rearranged chromosome 17, respectively. SNP microarray revealed no copy number abnormality. This paediatric patient with PML-RARA fusion reflects a cryptic insertion that resides within a complex and novel chromosome 17 rearrangement. This rearrangement likely arose via 7 chromosome breaks with the insertion occurring first followed by sequential paracentric and then pericentric inversions.