Total valproate versus free valproate in therapeutic drug monitoring for bipolar disorder: A cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: The debate about observing total versus free serum valproate levels for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been unresolved for decades. This study was planned to assess the agreement between the total versus free valproate levels and the advantage of one method over the other in TDM. METHODS: The present cross-sectional study was done on 93 patients with bipolar disorder. The intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland Altman analysis, and Lin's concordance analysis were done to assess the agreement between the total and free valproate concentrations. Linear and polynomial models were constructed to evaluate the relation between the two measurements. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was done to compare the accuracy for differentiating remission from non-remission on Young's mania rating scale (YMRS). RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient were 0.491 (p = .002) and 0.055 (95% CI:0.037, 0.073), respectively. Bland Altman's analysis showed proportional bias. A polynomial model of second order was found to be the best fit for the prediction of free valproate from the data for total valproate, and 81.4% of the variability in free valproate could be explained when adjusted for albumin levels. The area under the curve for total valproate was 0.60 when compared to free valproate 0.56 for differentiating between remission and non-remission, but the comparison between the two ROC analyses was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Free valproate does not provide any added advantage over the total valproate levels; hence, total valproate levels may continue to be used as the marker for drug monitoring.

Augmentation Strategies for Partial or Non-responders to Clozapine in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Clozapine is the only approved drug for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but the response to the drug is often inadequate. Augmentation with other antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, and antidepressants is recommended for such patients, but there is a lack of evidence regarding the most effective therapy. This network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological agents used in the augmentation strategies in patients who were partial/ non-responders to clozapine. Relevant data were extracted from 30 randomized controlled trials through searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, clinical trial registries). PRISMA guidelines were followed for the extraction, management, analysis, and reporting of the data. The outcome measure in this study was a reduction in symptom severity according to total PANSS/BPRS and was reported as the standardized mean difference with a 95% credible interval. Bayesian network meta-analysis with random effects model and uninformative priors was conducted, and the ranking probability of each intervention was done. Meta-regression was done to assess the effect of duration on the reduction in symptom severity scores. Mirtazapine (-5.2 [95%CrI: -7.7, -2.7]) and memantine (-2.1 [95%CrI: -4.0, -0.19]] were more efficacious than placebo for augmentation of clozapine in partial/non-responders and were the most effective adjunctive agents as per SUCRA scores. Both drugs did not cause a significant increase in frequency of adverse events compared to placebo. There was a significant effect of duration on the reduction in symptom severity. There was no evident publication bias. Mirtazapine and memantine may prove beneficial for augmentation of clozapine in non/partial responders to monotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose amisulpride versus olanzapine-fluoxetine combination in post-schizophrenic depression: A randomized controlled trial.

Post-schizophrenic depression (PSD) increases the morbidity, mortality, and health burden in patients with schizophrenia. However, treatment of PSD is challenging due to the lack of substantial evidence of standard clinical practice. This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of low-dose amisulpride versus olanzapine-fluoxetine combination (OFC) in PSD. This was a randomized controlled trial conducted in sixty patients with PSD fulfilling the eligibility criteria. Recruited patients were randomized to receive either amisulpride at low dose (i.e., 100-300 mg/day) or OFC (5/10 mg + 20 mg) for eight weeks. The Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) and serum BDNF levels were assessed at baseline and after eight weeks of treatment. The change in the CDSS scores from baseline over eight weeks was significant in both the amisulpride and OFC groups. However, the changes were not significant when compared between the groups. Similarly, the changes in CGI-S scores and serum BDNF levels were significant in each group; but non-significant between the groups. A significant negative correlation was found between the changes in the CDSS scores and the serum BDNF levels in each group. No significant adverse events were noted in either group. Thus, to conclude, low-dose amisulpride can be a potential monotherapy in PSD with a favourable clinical outcome and safety profile (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04876521).

Efficacy of pharmacological agents for the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The present network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare and generate evidence for the most efficacious treatment among available pharmacological interventions for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). METHODS: Reviewers extracted data from 47 studies screened from PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane databases and clinical trial registries fulfilling the eligibility criteria. Random effects Bayesian NMA was done with non-informative priors. Network geometry was visualized, and node splitting was done for the closed triangles. Standardized mean difference and 95% credible interval(95%CrI) were reported for the reduction in symptom severity scores. The probability of each intervention for each rank was plotted. Meta-regression was done for the duration of the therapy. RESULTS: Augmentation of antipsychotics with escitalopram (SMD: -1.7[95%CrI: -2.8, -0.70]), glycine (SMD: -1.2 [95%CrI: -2.2, -0.28]) and Yokukansan (SMD: -1.3 [95%CrI: -2.4, -0.24]) shows a statistically significant reduction in symptom severity when compared to clozapine. As per surface under cumulative ranking curve analysis, escitalopram in combination with antipsychotics appeared to be the best intervention with moderate certainty of evidence. There was no significant effect of the duration of therapy on the treatment effects. CONCLUSION: Escitalopram augmentation of antipsychotics appears to be the most efficacious treatment with moderate certainty of evidence among the available pharmacological interventions. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42022380292.

Acute REM sleep behaviour disorder associated with alcohol withdrawal: A case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) is a parasomnia characterised by the loss of REM sleep muscle atonia and the enactment of dreams. Acute RBD associated with alcohol withdrawal syndrome is known, but the studies are limited, particularly on its neurobiological underpinnings and management alongside the withdrawal state. This work attempts to address this using a case study and relevant literature review. CASE PRESENTATION: A 40-year-old male with alcohol dependence (for 20 years) reported new-onset terrifying nightmares and violent behaviours in his sleep precipitated by alcohol withdrawal states for the last 18 months. The polysomnographic finding of REM-without-atonia supported the diagnosis of RBD. He was treated with chlordiazepoxide 100 mg/day (gradually tapered and stopped) and thiamine supplements. Post-discharge, he remained abstinent and symptom-free during the three months of follow-up. DISCUSSION: RBD related to alcohol withdrawal syndrome has been previously described in a few anecdotal reports. Sudden withdrawal from central nervous system suppressants like alcohol is hypothesised to cause a homeostatic imbalance in gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pathways and 'REM rebound', resulting in the clinical and polysomnographic picture of RBD. Benzodiazepines have been found to be useful in both RBD and alcohol withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol withdrawal syndrome may present with acute RBD, which can be treated with a short course of benzodiazepine. However, further studies are needed to explore the long-term course of RBD in these patients.

Efficacy and safety of V1a receptor antagonists in autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis has evaluated the efficacy and safety of V1a receptor antagonists in ASD compared to placebo. The reviewers extracted data from four relevant clinical trials after a literature search on databases and clinical trial registries. Quality assessment was done using the risk of bias assessment tool, and the random-effects model was used to estimate effect size. Subgroup analysis, meta-regression and sensitivity analysis were done. PRISMA guidelines were followed in the selection, analysis and reporting of findings. V1a receptor antagonists did not reduce Vineland II Adaptive behaviour composite score significantly (SMD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.06-0.35; p = 0.16; PI: -0.44-0.73), communication domain subscale score and socialization domain subscale score. The change in daily living skills domain subscale score was significant and favourable for V1a receptor antagonists (SMD: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.03-0.26; p = 0.01). The subgroup analysis revealed a significant improvement in Vineland II Adaptive behaviour composite score with doses <10 mg (SMD: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.11-0.78; p = 0.009). Meta-regression does not show a significant association between SMD of ASD symptom score reduction with the duration and dose of V1a receptor antagonist therapy. Treatment-emergent adverse effects were not serious and dose dependent. Low doses (<10 mg) of V1a receptor antagonist may be effective in reducing the core symptoms of ASD compared to placebo; however, future active-controlled clinical trials are necessary to generate conclusive evidence.

Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Add-on Alpha-Lipoic Acid on Migraine Prophylaxis in an Adolescent Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Nutraceuticals like alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) may have potential benefits as prophylactic agents for adolescent migraine, with fewer adverse events than existing medications. The present study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of add-on ALA for prophylaxis in adolescent migraine. A randomized, open-label, add-on clinical trial was conducted with 60 adolescent migraineurs, who were randomized to receive flunarizine or flunarizine with an add-on ALA. A clinical evaluation of the frequency and severity of migraine, responder rate, Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment (PedMIDAS) scoring, serum thiol, and serum calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) was performed both at baseline and following 12 weeks of treatment. The frequency of acute attacks of migraine decreased significantly (P = .001) in the test group compared with the control group. The responder rate was found to be significantly higher (80%) in the test group than in the control group (33.3%) (P = .001). The mean monthly migraine headache days in the test group showed a significant reduction (-7.7 days, 95%CI -9.1 to -6.3 days; P = .010). The severity of acute migraine attacks (mild, moderate, severe) also showed a significant reduction in the test group (P = .001). PedMIDAS scores showed significant improvement in the test group (P = .021), in comparison with the control group. Serum thiol levels were significantly increased in the test group (18 mmol/L, 95%CI 13.5 to 36.1 mmol/L; P = .001). Serum CGRP levels showed a significant reduction with adjunctive ALA therapy (-122.4 pg/mL, 95%CI -142.3 to -89.0 pg/mL; P = .006). Add-on ALA with flunarizine as a prophylactic agent for migraine in adolescents can improve clinical outcomes by improving clinical and biochemical parameters.

Efficacy and safety of tramadol in the treatment of opioid withdrawal: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacotherapeutic options for the treatment of opioid withdrawal are limited by abuse potential, adverse effects, and lack of availability of existing drugs. The results from previous clinical trials on tramadol are contradictory and non-conclusive; hence the present meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tramadol in the treatment of opioid withdrawal. METHODS: Reviewers extracted data from eight relevant clinical trials after a literature search on MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane databases, and clinical trial registries. Quality assessment was done using the risk-of-bias assessment tool, and the random-effects model was used to estimate effect size in frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and sensitivity analysis were done as applicable. PRISMA guidelines were followed in reporting findings. RESULTS: Tramadol significantly reduced opioid withdrawal scale score (SMD: -0.44; 95%CI: -0.76 to -0.13; PI: -1.54 to 0.71; p = 0.006) when all comparators were considered together in the frequentist approach but the reduction was non-significant in Bayesian approach. However, the subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference between tramadol and comparators like placebo (SMD: -1.12; 95%CI: -2.69 to 0.45) buprenorphine (SMD: -0.21; 95%CI: -0.43 to 0.01), clonidine (SMD: -0.26; 95%CI: -0.55 to 0.02) and methadone (SMD: -0.84; 95%CI: -1.78 to 0.10). Meta-regression showed non-significant associations between the SMD in opioid withdrawal score with the duration and dose of tramadol therapy. There were no significant differences in treatment retention at the end of studies between tramadol and comparators. Safety data in the individual studies were inadequate to analyze. CONCLUSION: Authors conclude that the efficacy of tramadol in reducing opioid withdrawal symptoms is not significantly different from comparators with low certainty of evidence against placebo, moderate against methadone, whereas with high certainty of evidence against buprenorphine and clonidine.

Paroxysmal dystonia and psychotic exacerbations in chronic psychosis: Diagnostic dilemmas and preliminary treatment approaches.

Patients with chronic psychosis on prolonged antipsychotic therapy may present with paroxysmal dystonia along with an exacerbation of their psychotic symptoms: paroxysmal dystonia and psychotic exacerbations (PDPE). The interindividual variability in the clinical presentations of PDPE can pose challenges in its diagnosis and treatment. The objectives of this work are to (i) discuss this rare phenomenon through a series of 10 patients and a relevant literature review, (ii) conceptualize its neurobiological underpinnings, and (iii) explore the preliminary treatment approaches for its management. Acute stress and/or a dysfunctional gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) ergic or dopaminergic system may be implicated in the pathogenesis of PDPE. The episodes respond acutely to parenteral benzodiazepines, while long-term management can be achieved by reducing antipsychotic doses, switching to clozapine or using central GABA enhancers. This article is the first attempt at conceptualizing and exploring treatment options for the rare condition PDPE and intends to guide future research in this regard.

Pharmacological augmentation of serotonin reuptake inhibitors in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: A network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The augmentation of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) can be achieved by add-on therapy with different pharmacological agents in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) for a better clinical outcome. This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to evaluate and compare the effects of available augmentation agents for SRIs in OCD. METHOD: The data was extracted from 59 relevant clinical trials after a literature search on MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane databases and clinical trial registries. PRISMA guidelines were followed in data extraction, analysis and reporting. Random effects Bayesian NMA was done to pool the effects across the interventions for the change in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) scoring from baseline to the end of the study. Network graph was built, consistency model was run, node splitting analysis was performed, treatments were ranked as per SUCRA score and meta-regression was done for refractoriness to SRIs and duration of augmentation therapy as the predictor variables. RESULTS: The drugs showing significant reduction in YBOCS scoring were pregabalin (MD:-8.1;95% CrI: -16, -0.43), memantine (MD:-6.2;95% CrI: -9.9, -2.3), lamotrigine (MD:-6;95% CrI: -12, -0.47), ondansetron (MD:-5.7;95% CrI: -11, -0.67), granisetron (MD:-5.6;95% CrI: -11, -0.44), aripiprazole (MD:-5.4;95% CrI:-9.1, -1.6), risperidone (MD:-3.3;95% CrI: -6.4, -0.20) and topiramate (MD:-5.3;95% CrI: -9.6, -0.97). The node-split analysis showed that direct and indirect pooled effect sizes for all comparisons were comparable. Meta-regression showed a statistically non-significant association between YBOCS score reduction with the duration of augmentation therapy, but significant with SRI-refractory status. Finally, the results were sorted based on certainty of evidence. CONCLUSION: Memantine was found to be most effective augmentation agent for SRIs in OCD, followed by lamotrigine, ondansetron and granisetron with moderate certainty of evidence. The augmentation agents showed better symptom reduction in patients with SRI-refractory OCD in comparison to non-refractory OCD. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42022360110.

Effect of regulated add-on sodium chloride intake on stabilization of serum lithium concentration in bipolar disorder: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Lithium-induced natriuresis may lead to lithium retention and fluctuation of lithium levels during maintenance therapy. Therefore, the present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of add-on sodium chloride on serum lithium levels in bipolar disorder. METHODS: This RCT was conducted in 60 patients with type I bipolar disorder who were randomized into the control group that received lithium carbonate with the advice not to take additional salt (at the table) and the test group that received sachets of sodium chloride (1 g/d) as an add-on to lithium carbonate and were advised to restrict their additional salt intake (at the table) to 1 g/d. After baseline assessments, all patients were followed up at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks when serum lithium, sodium, and potassium were estimated. Serum creatinine and aldosterone were repeated at 12 weeks. The percentage of patients showing fluctuations in serum lithium level (serum lithium <0.6 mEq/L or >0.8 mEq/L) was considered as the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: In the test group, the fluctuation rate in serum lithium (26.7%) was significantly (p = 0.01) lower than that in the control group (63.3%). Serum lithium values varied significantly across sampling times in the control group but not in the test group. There was a significant difference in serum lithium between the groups at 8 and 12 weeks of follow-up. There were no significant differences in the change in serum sodium, potassium, creatinine, aldosterone, creatinine clearance, and blood pressure within the group and between the groups. A significant positive correlation was found between serum lithium and aldosterone at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Intake of add-on sodium chloride (1 gm/day) may reduce the fluctuations in serum lithium during the maintenance phase of lithium therapy in type I bipolar disorder. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04222816.

Efficacy and Safety of Melatonin as Prophylaxis for Migraine in Adults: A Meta-analysis.

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of melatonin for migraine prophylaxis in adults. METHODS: After a comprehensive literature search in the MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, and International Clinical Trial Registry Platform databases, reviewers extracted data from three relevant articles. PRISMA guidelines were followed in the selection, analysis, and reporting of the findings. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. A random-effects model was used to estimate the effect size, and meta-regression was performed for variables with a likely influence on effect size. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the comparison used in the included studies. RESULTS: Melatonin therapy in migraine was associated with a significantly higher responder rate when compared to both placebo and standard therapy (OR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.08 to 3.14; P = .03). The results of the meta-analyses indicated that melatonin can achieve a significant reduction in frequency of migraine attacks (MD = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.02 to 1.98; P = .04), migraine attack duration (MD = 5.02; 95% CI: 0. 91 to 9.13; P = .02), use of analgesics (MD = 1.43; 95% CI: 0.38 to 2.48; P = .008), and migraine severity (MD = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.63; P < .0001) over placebo, but had no significant effects in comparison to amitriptyline or valproate. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of common adverse drug reactions, such as drowsiness and fatigue, between the melatonin group and the comparison groups. CONCLUSIONS: Melatonin showed a beneficial prophylactic role in migraine, with a better responder rate in comparison to placebo in reducing migraine severity, mean attack duration, mean attack frequency, and analgesic use, but did not show significant effects in comparison to amitriptyline or valproate.

Comparison of Acute Followed by Maintenance ECT vs Clozapine on Psychopathology and Regional Cerebral Blood Flow in Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: In treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), Clozapine is only approved treatment with undesirable side-effects, warranting better alternatives. Our hypothesis is acute followed by maintenance Electroconvulsive Therapy (M-ECT) will be comparable in efficacy and safety to Clozapine in TRS. STUDY DESIGN: In this open-label trial, 60 TRS patients were randomized equally to M-ECT (following an acute-course) or Clozapine. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression Schizophrenia Scale (CGI-SCH), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Global assessment of functioning (GAF) were measured and compared within and between the groups at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. SPECT-CT brain was done at baseline and 24 weeks to compare the changes in regional cerebral perfusion between the groups and correlate with the changes in the outcome-measures. STUDY RESULTS: The PANSS-T scores changes from baseline over the observation-points were significant in both M-ECT and clozapine groups (P < .001), with comparatively better reduction with M-ECT (P < .001). Similar trends were observed in PANSS subscales, CGI-SCH and GAF in both groups, with significantly better improvement with M-ECT over the study-period. After 24 weeks, there was significantly better perfusion with M-ECT in bilateral prefrontal and temporal cortices (P < .05). With M-ECT, a positive correlation was found between changes in PANSS-P scores and left-lateral Temporal cortical perfusion (r = .465, P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: Acute followed by M-ECT was more effective than clozapine over 6 months in reducing the positive and negative symptoms, general psychopathology, illness-severity, and improving the global functionality in TRS [clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03807882].