RESUMEN
AIM: The complete mesocolic excision competency assessment tool (CMECAT) is a novel tool designed to assess technical skills in minimally invasive complete mesocolic excision (CME) surgery. The aim of this study was to assess construct validity and reliability of CMECAT in a clinical context. METHOD: Colorectal surgeons were asked to submit video recorded laparoscopic CME resections for independent assessment of their technical abilities. The videos were grouped by surgeons' training level, and four established CME experts were recruited as CMECAT assessors. Extended reliability analysis (G-theory) was applied to describe assessor agreement. RESULTS: A total of 19 videos and 72 assessments were included in the analysis. Overall, technical skills assessed by CMECAT improved with increased training level: the experts scored significantly better than the untrained surgeons (3.3 vs. 2.5 points; p < 0.01). On right-sided resections, significantly higher scores were reported with increased training level for all categories and sections, while for left-sided resections, the variance across groups was smaller and significantly higher scores were only reported for oncological safety describing items. Overall, assessor agreement was high (G-coefficient: 0.81). CONCLUSION: This study confirms that CMECAT can be applied to video recorded CME cases for technical skill assessment. Further, it can reliably assess technical performance in right sided CME surgery, where construct validity has now been established. More videos are required to evaluate its validity on left colonic CME. In the future, we hope CMECAT can improve feedback during CME training, serve as a tool in certification processes and contribute to distinguishing CME from conventional surgery in future research.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Laparoscopía , Mesocolon , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Mesocolon/cirugía , Colectomía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The quality of care of patients receiving colorectal resections has conventionally relied on individual metrics. When discussing with patients what these outcomes mean, they often find them confusing or overwhelming. Textbook oncological outcome (TOO) is a composite measure that summarises all the 'desirable' or 'ideal' postoperative clinical and oncological outcomes from both a patient's and doctor's point of view. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of TOO in patients receiving robotic colorectal cancer surgery in five robotic colorectal units and understand the risk factors associated with failure to achieve a TOO in these patients. METHODS: We present a retrospective, multicentric study with data from a prospectively collected database. All consecutive patients receiving robotic colorectal cancer resections from five centres between 2013 and 2022 were included. Patient characteristics and short-term clinical and oncological data were collected. A TOO was achieved when all components were realized-no conversion to open, no complication with a Clavien-Dindo (CD) ≥ 3, length of hospital stay ≤ 14, no 30-day readmission, no 30-day mortality, and R0 resection. The main outcome measure was a composite measure of "ideal" practice called textbook oncological outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 501 patients submitted to robotic colorectal cancer resection were included. Of the 501 patients included, 388 (77.4%) achieved a TOO. Four patients were converted to open (0.8%); 55 (11%) had LOS > 14 days; 46 (9.2%) had a CD ≥ 3 complication; 30-day readmission rate was 6% (30); 30-day mortality was 0.2% (1); and 480 (95.8%) had an R0 resection. Abdominoperineal resection was a risk factor for not achieving a TOO. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic colorectal cancer surgery in robotic centres achieves a high TOO rate. Abdominoperineal resection is a risk factor for failure to achieve a TOO. This measure may be used in future audits and to inform patients clearly on success of treatment.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The novel CT-TDV scoring system, identifying T3c + disease; the presence/absence of tumour deposits and EMVI has been shown to be superior in predicting prognosis when compared to the CT-TNM staging system in the evaluation of colon cancer. Reproducibility of this scoring system between specialist GI radiologists has not been assessed previously. The aim of this study was to assess the inter-rater agreement of gastrointestinal radiologists in assessing the novel pre-operative CT-TDV scoring of patients with potentially curable right-sided colon cancer. METHODS: Ninety-three right colon cancer pre-operative CT scans were graded as CT TDV "good" versus TDV "poor" by four radiologists. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between all four readers and individual readers against the central radiologist using Cohen's κ statistic. RESULTS: The ICC comparing those graded as TDV "good" versus TDV "poor" for all 93 cases was 0.61 (0.51-0.70) indicating moderate reliability. Individual κ scores across the 93 cases were 0.76, 0.59 and 0.59 (p < 0.001) indicating moderate to substantial agreement. CONCLUSION: The CT TDV scoring system is reproducible amongst trained gastrointestinal radiologists in the assessment of newly diagnosed right colon cancer. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This further validates the clinical utility of the CT TDV scoring system as a prognostic tool to guide the management of patients with potentially curable right colon cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Extensión Extranodal , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Radiólogos , Neoplasias del Colon/diagnóstico por imagen , Variaciones Dependientes del ObservadorAsunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Neoplasias Testiculares , Masculino , Humanos , Dolor , Artralgia/diagnóstico , Artralgia/etiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/complicaciones , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/terapiaRESUMEN
AIM: A robotic approach to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery offers advantages over other approaches in terms of precision, improved access to the pelvis and less muscular fatigue for the surgeon. The integrity of the anastomosis is also fundamental to successful IPAA surgery. The robotic platform can permit intracorporeal suturing deep within the pelvis to create a single-stapled, double purse-string anastomosis, which may reduce the risk of anastomotic complications. This study describes the safety and early outcomes of robotic intracorporeal single-stapled anastomosis (RiSSA) amongst patients operated consecutively at a tertiary centre immediately before and following the pandemic. METHOD: A retrospective study of prospectively collected data analysing the outcome of patients undergoing robotic IPAA between 2019 and 2022 was conducted. All procedures were performed with the da Vinci Xi Surgical System (with a hand-assisted suprapubic incision to fashion the pouch). All pouch-anal anastomoses were performed using a double purse-string, single-stapled (RiSSA) method. Demographic, clinical and outcome data were collected. RESULTS: Twenty consecutive patients (nine with ulcerative colitis and 11 with familial adenomatous polyposis) were included with a median age of 25 years (range 16-52); 18 had American Society of Anesthesiologists classification II, and mean body mass index was 24 kg/m2 (range 18.1-34.3). Nine patients (eight ulcerative colitis and one familial adenomatous polyposis) had undergone prior subtotal colectomy and therefore underwent restorative proctectomy with IPAA. Eleven patients underwent restorative proctocolectomy. All procedures were completed robotically. The median length of stay was 9 days (5-49). There were no unplanned admissions to intensive care and no deaths. Three patients were readmitted following hospital discharge for (i) an ileus managed conservatively, (ii) small bowel obstruction managed conservatively and (iii) small bowel obstruction due to constriction at the stoma site necessitating surgery. There were two additional reoperations both for drain complications, one for drain removal and one for drain erosion. On mobilization of the pouch in the latter case, an anastomotic defect was observed. In total, 19/20 patients underwent RiSSA without postoperative anastomotic problems. DISCUSSION: RiSSA offers a safe and feasible alternative technique to other minimally invasive approaches with low rates of anastomosis-related complications.
Asunto(s)
Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon , Colitis Ulcerosa , Reservorios Cólicos , Obstrucción Intestinal , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Colitis Ulcerosa/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/cirugía , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical management of splenic flexure carcinoma remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to establish an expert international consensus on splenic flexure carcinoma management. DESIGN: A 3-round online-based Delphi study was conducted between September 2020 and April 2021. SETTING: The first round included 18 experts from 12 different countries. For the second and third rounds, each expert in the first round was asked to invite 2 more colorectal surgeons (n = 47). Out of 47 invited experts, 89% (n = 42) participated in the second and third rounds of the consensus. INTERVENTIONS: A total of 35 questions were created and sent via the online questionnaire tool. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Levels of recommendation based on voting concordance were graded as follows: more than 75% agreement was defined as strong, between 50% and 75% as moderate, and below 50% as weak. RESULTS: There was moderate consensus on the definition of splenic flexure (55%) as 10 cm from either side where the distal transverse colon turns into the proximal descending colon. Also, experts recommended an abdominopelvic CT scan plus intraoperative exploration (moderate consensus, 72%) for tumor localization and cancer registry. Segmental colectomy was the preferred technique for the management of splenic flexure carcinoma in the elective setting (72%). Moderate consensus was achieved on the technique of complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation principles for splenic flexure carcinoma (74%). Only strong consensus was achieved on the surgical approach for minimally invasive surgery (88%). LIMITATIONS: Subjective decisions are based on individual expert clinical experience and not evidence based. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first internationally conducted Delphi consensus study regarding splenic flexure carcinoma. The definition of splenic flexure remains ambiguous. To more effectively compare oncologic outcomes among different cancer registries, guidelines need to be developed to standardize each domain and avoid arbitrary definitions. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C143 . ESTANDARIZACIN DE LA DEFINICIN Y MANEJO QUIRRGICO DEL CARCINOMA DE NGULO ESPLNICO ESTABLECIDO POR UN CONSENSO INTERNACIONAL DE EXPERTOS UTILIZANDO LA TCNICA DELPHI ESPACIO PARA MEJORAR: ANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento quirúrgico del cáncer de ángulo esplénico sigue siendo controvertido.OBJETIVO:Establecer un consenso internacional de expertos sobre el manejo del cáncer del ángulo esplénico.DISEÑO:Se condujo un estudio Delphi en línea de 3 rondas entre septiembre de 2020 y febrero de 2021.ESCENARIO:La primera ronda incluyó a 18 expertos de 12 países distintos. Para la segunda y tercera rondas, a cada experto de la primera ronda se le pidió que invitara a 2 cirujanos colorrectales más de su región (n = 47). De los 47 expertos invitados, el 89% (n = 42) participó en la segunda y tercera ronda del consenso.INTERVENCIONES:Se crearon y enviaron un total de 35 preguntas a través de la herramienta de cuestionario en línea.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los niveles de recomendación basados en la concordancia de votos fueron jerarquizados de la siguiente manera: más del 75% de acuerdo se definió como fuerte, entre 50 y 75% como moderado y por debajo del 50% como débil.RESULTADOS:Hubo un consenso moderado sobre la definición de ángulo esplénico (55%) como 10 cm desde cualquier lado donde el colon transverso distal se convierte en el colon descendente proximal. Así también, los expertos recomendaron la tomografía computarizada abdominopélvica más la exploración intraoperatoria (consenso moderado, 72%) para la localización del tumor y el registro del ángulo esplénico. La colectomía segmentaria fue la técnica preferida para el tratamiento del cáncer de ángulo esplénico en el caso de ser electivo (72%). Se logró un consenso moderado sobre la técnica de escisión completa del mesocolon y los principios de ligadura vascular a nivel central para el cáncer de ángulo esplénico (74%). Solo se logró un fuerte consenso sobre el abordaje quirúrgico para la cirugía mínimamente invasiva (88%).LIMITACIONES:Decisiones subjetivas basadas en la experiencia clínica de expertos individuales y no basadas en evidencia.CONCLUSIONES:Este es el primer estudio internacional de consenso Delphi realizado sobre el cáncer de ángulo esplénico. Si bien encontramos un consenso moderado sobre las modalidades de diagnóstico preoperatorio y el manejo quirúrgico, la definición de ángulo esplénico sigue siendo ambigua. Para comparar de manera más efectiva los resultados oncológicos entre diferentes registros de cáncer, se deben desarrollar pautas para estandarizar cada dominio y evitar definiciones arbitrarias. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C143 . (Traducción-Dr. Osvaldo Gauto ).
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma , Colon Transverso , Neoplasias del Colon , Humanos , Colon , Colectomía , Estándares de Referencia , Técnica DelphiRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although the middle rectal artery is a relevant anatomical landmark for rectal resection and lateral lymph node dissection, descriptions of this entity are highly divergent. OBJECTIVE: Dissection, visualization, morphometry, and 3-dimensional reconstruction of the middle rectal artery to facilitate its management in surgery. DESIGN: Macroscopic dissection, histologic study, morphometric measurements, and virtual modeling. SETTING: University laboratory of applied surgical anatomy. PATIENTS: This study includes formalin-fixed hemipelvis specimens (n=37) obtained from body donors (age, 67-97 y). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures are photo documentation of origin, trajectory, diameter, and branching pattern; immunolabeling of lymphatics; and 3-dimensional reconstruction of the middle rectal artery. RESULTS: The middle rectal artery was present in 71.4% of body donors (21.4% bilateral, 50% unilateral), originated from the anterior division of the internal iliac artery, and branched either from the internal pudendal artery (45.5%), the inferior gluteal artery (22.7%), the gluteal-pudendal trunk (22.7%), or a trifurcation (9.1%). One to 3 branches of varying diameters (0.5-3.5 mm) entered the mesorectum from the ventrolateral (35.7%), lateral (42.9%), or dorsolateral (21.4%) aspect. The middle rectal artery was accompanied by podoplanin-immunoreactive lymphatic vessels and gave off additional branches (81.8%) to the urogenital pelvic organs. Three-dimensional reconstruction revealed the complex course of the middle rectal artery from the pelvic sidewall through the pelvic nerve plexus and parietal pelvic fascia into the mesorectum. LIMITATIONS: Findings retrieved from body donors may be prone to age- and fixation-related processes. CONCLUSIONS: The investigation disclosed the rather high prevalence of the middle rectal artery, its 3-dimensional topographic anatomy, and its proximity to the autonomic pelvic nerves. These features play a role in the surgical management of this blood vessel. The data provide the anatomical rationale for the lateral lymphatic spread of rectal cancer and an anatomical basis for nerve-preserving lateral lymph node dissection.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Laparoscopía/métodos , Pelvis/anatomía & histología , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Abdomen , Arterias/cirugíaRESUMEN
AIM: Right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) requires the removal of an intact mesocolic envelope. The study aimed to determine, on the basis of macroscopic and microscopic anatomical studies, the optimal surgical dissection planes for CME to preserve fascial integrity. Unequivocal anatomical nomenclature was applied to describe the retrocolic fascial system and compared to frequently used eponyms (Toldt, Gerota, Fredet, Treitz). METHOD: Stepwise macroscopic dissections, cross-section studies and histological analysis were performed on body donors to identify the components of the retrocolic fascial system. Based on these anatomical findings, the optimal surgical dissection planes for CME were validated in laparoscopic training courses on body donors and in robot-assisted surgical procedures in patients. RESULTS: The mesocolic tissue and lymphovascular pedicles were enveloped by the ventral and dorsal mesocolic leaf (mesocolic fascia). The mesocolic fascia was attached to the parietal peritoneal fascia ('fascia of Toldt') along the parieto-mesocolic interface, and further cranially to the pre-duodenopancreatic fascia along the mesocolic-duodenopancreatic interface ('space of Fredet'). Dorsally, the parietal peritoneal fascia was separated from the anterior renal fascia ('fascia of Gerota') by the parieto-renal interface. Dissection along this interface in front of the anterior renal fascia followed by incision of the parietal peritoneal fascia at the duodenal border and opening the mesocolic-duodenopancreatic interface yielded the best macroscopic appearance of specimens and was considered optimal for CME. CONCLUSION: The retrocolic fascial system as well as the surgical dissection planes for CME can be described by clearly defined anatomical terms rather than potentially confusing eponyms.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Laparoscopía , Mesocolon , Humanos , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Epónimos , Mesocolon/cirugía , Mesocolon/patología , Colectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodosRESUMEN
Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery (RACS) is steadily increasing in popularity with an annual growth in the number of colorectal procedures undertaken robotically. Further upscaling of RACS requires structured and standardised robotic training to safeguard high-quality clinical outcomes. The aims of this systematic review were to assess the structure and assessment metrics of currently established RACS training programmes. A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines was performed. Searches were performed of the Ovid Medline, Embase and Web of Science databases between 2000 and 27th November 2021 to identify studies reporting on training curricula in RACS. Core components of training programmes and their relevant outcome assessment metrics were extracted. Thirteen studies were identified, with all training programmes designed for the da Vinci platform (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Common elements of multimodal programmes included theoretical knowledge (76.9%), case observation (53.8%), simulation (100%) and proctored training (76.9%). Robotic skills acquisition was assessed primarily during the simulation phase (n = 4, 30.1%) and proctoring phase (n = 10, 76.9%). Performance metrics, consisting of time or assessment scores for VR simulation were only mandated in four (30.1%) studies. Objective assessment following proctored training was variably reported and employed a range of assessment metrics, including direct feedback (n = 3, 23.1%) or video feedback (n = 8, 61.5%). Five (38.4%) training programmes used the Global Assessment Score (GAS) forms. There is a broad consensus on the core multimodal components across current RACS training programmes; however, validated objective assessment is limited and needs to be appropriately standardised to ensure reproducible progression criteria and competency-based metrics are produced to robustly assess progression and competence.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Colorrectal , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Entrenamiento Simulado , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Cirugía Colorrectal/educación , Competencia Clínica , Robótica/educación , Curriculum , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodosRESUMEN
AIM: To (1) develop an assessment tool for laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (LCME) and (2) report evidence of its content validity. METHOD: Assessment statements were revealed through (1) semi-structured expert interviews and (2) consensus by the Delphi method, both involving an expert panel of five LCME surgeons. All experts were interviewed and then asked to rate LCME describing statements from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Responses were returned anonymously to the panel until consensus was reached. Statements were directly included as content in the assessment tool if ≥60% of the experts responded "agree" or "strongly agree" (ratings 4 and 5), with the remaining responses being "neither agree nor disagree" (rating 3). Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for expert agreement evaluation. All included statements were subsequently reformulated as tool items and approved by the experts. RESULTS: Four Delphi rounds were performed to reach consensus. Disagreement was reported for statements describing instrument handling around pancreas; visualisation of landmarks before inferior mesenteric artery ligation; lymphadenectomy around the inferior mesenteric artery, and division of the terminal ileum and transverse colon. ICC in the last Delphi-round was 0.84. The final tool content included 73 statements, converted to 48 right- and 40 left-sided items for LCME assessment. CONCLUSION: A procedure-specific, video-based tool, named complete mesocolic excision competency assessment tool (CMECAT), has been developed for LCME skill assessment. In the future, we hope it can facilitate assessment of LCME surgeons, resulting in improved patient outcome after colon cancer surgery.
Asunto(s)
Colon Transverso , Neoplasias del Colon , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Colon Transverso/cirugía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Ligadura , Técnica DelphiRESUMEN
The following article summarizes technical aspects of how to operate in the mesentery during complete mesocolic excision (CME). Increasingly, CME is being adopted and as such it is important to establish the anatomical basis of the techniques involved. This review thus serves to provide that foundation and explains the surgical techniques built on it.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Achieving proficiency in a surgical procedure is a milestone in the career of a trainee. We introduced a competency assessment tool for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our residency program. Our aim was to assess the inter-rater reliability of this tool. METHODS: We included all laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by residents under the supervision of board certified surgeons. All residents were assessed at the end of the procedure by the supervising surgeon (live reviewer) using our competency assessment tool. Video records of the same procedure were analyzed by two independent reviewers (reviewer A and B), who were blinded to the performing trainee's. The assessment had three parts: a laparoscopic cholecystectomy-specific assessment tool (LCAT), the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) and a 5-item visual analogue scale (VAS) to address the surgeon's autonomy in each part of the cholecystectomy. We compared the assessment scores of the live supervising surgeon and the video reviewers. RESULTS: We included 15 junior residents who performed 42 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Scoring results from live and video reviewer were comparable except for the OSATS and VAS part. The score for OSATS by the live reviewer and reviewer B were 3.68 vs. 4.26 respectively (p = 0.04) and for VAS (5.17 vs. 4.63 respectively (p = 0.03). The same difference was found between reviewers A and B with OSATS score (3.75 vs. 4.26 respectively (p = 0.001)) and VAS (5.56 vs. 4.63 respectively; p = 0.004)). CONCLUSION: Our competency assessment tool for the evaluation of surgical skills specific to laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been shown to be objective and comparable in-between raters during live procedure or on video material.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Competencia Clínica , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Preoperative planning is a crucial aspect of safe complete mesocolic excision (CME) surgery. 3D models derived from imaging may help improve anatomical understanding of the complex vascular anatomy. Here, we assessed the effect of 3D models on surgeons' anatomical understanding in comparison to a systematic approach for CT scan interpretation (AMIGO). METHOD: Fifteen cases were included in the study. Two GI radiology consultants reviewed each scan to ascertain the vascular anatomy. Virtual 3D models were produced and displayed on a web-based platform (https://skfb.ly/6OZUZ). A total of 13 surgical trainees were recruited. Candidates were assessed after baseline anatomical training and subsequently using the AMIGO method and 3D models. Five cases were randomly allocated in each round of testing for each participant. The primary outcome measure was an objective vascular anatomy knowledge score. The secondary outcome measure was subjective feedback from participants. RESULTS: Both 3D and AMIGO significantly improved anatomical understanding in comparison to baseline testing. However, 3D was superior to AMIGO (3D [n = 65; median score 8/14] vs. AMIGO [n = 65; median score 6/14; p < 0.0001]. For 13/15 patient cases examined, 3D was superior to the AMIGO method. Eleven participants demonstrated better anatomical understanding using 3D models versus AMIGO. Ten participants preferred 3D models in comparison to standard CT imaging. CONCLUSIONS: 3D models improve anatomical understanding of mesenteric vascular anatomy in a group of colorectal surgical trainees in comparison to a formal CT interpretation method. 3D models may be a useful planning adjunct to 2D imaging for CME surgery.
Asunto(s)
Imagenología Tridimensional , Mesocolon , Estudios Cruzados , Humanos , Mesenterio/cirugía , Mesocolon/diagnóstico por imagen , Mesocolon/cirugía , Modelos Anatómicos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic colorectal surgery, higher technical skills have been associated with improved patient outcome. With the growing interest in laparoscopic techniques, pressure on surgeons and certifying bodies is mounting to ensure that operative procedures are performed safely and efficiently. The aim of the present review was to comprehensively identify tools for skill assessment in laparoscopic colon surgery and to assess their validity as reported in the literature. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in EMBASE and PubMed/MEDLINE in May 2021 to identify studies examining technical skills assessment tools in laparoscopic colon surgery. Available information on validity evidence (content, response process, internal structure, relation to other variables, and consequences) was evaluated for all included tools. RESULTS: Fourteen assessment tools were identified, of which most were procedure-specific and video-based. Most tools reported moderate validity evidence. Commonly not reported were rater training, assessment correlation with variables other than training level, and validity reproducibility and reliability in external educational settings. CONCLUSION: The results of this review show that several tools are available for evaluation of laparoscopic colon cancer surgery, but few authors present substantial validity for tool development and use. As we move towards the implementation of new techniques in laparoscopic colon surgery, it is imperative to establish validity before surgical skill assessment tools can be applied to new procedures and settings. Therefore, future studies ought to examine different aspects of tool validity, especially correlation with other variables, such as patient morbidity and pathological reports, which impact patient survival.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Laparoscopía , Competencia Clínica , Colon/cirugía , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate 5-year overall survival (OS) in patients operated on for potentially curable right versus left-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer in England. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective propensity-score matched population-based cohort study was performed using data from English Hospital Episode Statistics, Office for National Statistics and National Bowel Cancer Audit dataset. Patients ≥18 who underwent elective resection for right-colon, left-colon, or rectal cancer between 2000 and 2015 were included. Patients were matched using propensity scores with the dependant variable being site of primary tumour (right-colon, left-colon, or rectum) and independent variables age, Charlson comorbidity index, operation year and Duke's stage. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 167,606 patients were included. Following propensity-score matching 26,662 patients remained in each group (right-colon, left-colon, and rectum). 5-year OS was significantly worse for patients with Duke's A-C right-sided primaries compared to left-sided and rectal cancers in the unmatched (58.8% vs 66.7% vs 70.0% p=<0.001) and matched cohorts (62.6%, 66.8%, 65.8% p=<0.001). Superior OS for patients with left-sided colon cancer was demonstrated across all stages (Duke's A HR 0.845, p = 0.003; Duke's B HR 0.947, p = 0.045; Duke's C HR 0.783, p < 0.0001). Secondary analysis demonstrated equivalent OS between study groups when ≥22 lymph nodes were harvested. CONCLUSION: There is a significant difference in survival between comparable patients with right and left sided colon cancers in England. The quality and/or extent of mesenteric resection may be of particular importance in right-sided colon cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias del Recto , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Puntaje de Propensión , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of The National Training Program for Lapco on the rate of laparoscopic surgery and clinical outcomes of cases performed by Lapco surgeons after completion of training. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lapco provided competency-based supervised clinical training for specialist colorectal surgeons in England. METHODS: We compared the rate of laparoscopic surgery, mortality, and morbidity for colorectal cancer resections by Lapco delegates and non-Lapco surgeons in 3-year periods preceding and following Lapco using difference in differences analysis. The changes in the rate of post-Lapco laparoscopic surgery with the Lapco sign-off competency assessment and in-training global assessment scores were examined using risk-adjusted cumulative sum to determine their predictive clinical validity with predefined competent scores of 3 and 5 respectively. RESULTS: One hundred eight Lapco delegates performed 4586 elective colo-rectal resections pre-Lapco and 5115 post-Lapco while non-Lapco surgeons performed 72,930 matched cases. Lapco delegates had a 37.8% increase in laparoscopic surgery which was greater than non-Lapco surgeons by 20.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 18.5-23.3, P < 0.001) with a relative decrease in 30-day mortality by -1.6% (95% CI, -3.4 to -0.2, P = 0.039) and 90-day mortality by -2.3% (95% CI, -4.3 to -0.4, P = 0.018). The change point of risk-adjusted cumulative sum was 3.12 for competency assessment tool and 4.74 for global assessment score whereas laparoscopic rate increased from 44% to 66% and 40% to 56%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lapco increased the rate of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery and reduced mortality and morbidity in England. In-training competency assessment tools predicted clinical performance after training.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Cirugía Colorrectal , Laparoscopía , Competencia Clínica , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Cirugía Colorrectal/educación , Inglaterra , Humanos , Laparoscopía/educaciónRESUMEN
Compared with other fields, adoption of robotics in colorectal surgery remains relatively slow. One of the reasons for this is that the expected benefits of robotics, such as greater accuracy, speed, and better patient outcomes, are not born out in evidence comparing use of robotics for colorectal procedures to conventional laparoscopy. But evidence also suggests that outcomes with colorectal robotic procedures depend on the experience of the surgeon, suggesting that a steep learning curve is acting as a barrier to the benefits of robotics being realized. In this paper, we analyze exactly why surgeon skill and proficiency is such a critical factor in colorectal surgery, especially around the most complex procedures associated with cancer. Shortening of the learning curve is crucial for both the adoption of the technique and the efficient use of expert trainers. Looking beyond the basics of training and embracing a new generation of digital learning technologies that facilitate peer-to-peer collaboration and development beyond the confines of individual institutions may be an important contributor to achieve these goals in the future.