Increasing Utilization of the Preparticipation Physical Evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: The American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics endorse the preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) to screen student athletes for the risk of sudden cardiac arrest. We sought to identify barriers precluding its use and improve utilization. METHODS: We analyzed documentation of PPE elements during well-care visits of patients aged 12 to 18 years from 5 primary care practices. Employing quality improvement (QI) methodology, we focused on improving PPE utilization in 1 practice by assessing the number of PPE elements addressed per chart. We expanded our QI project to 4 additional practices by using the same interventions but assessing the percentage of charts that had a complete PPE documented. RESULTS: A baseline analysis of 5 targeted practices revealed an average of 3.5 of 14 PPE elements documented. Using plan-do-study-act cycles, PPE elements addressed increased from 2.5 to 14 over an 18-month period in the initial practice. By spreading successful interventions to 4 other practices, complete PPE utilization increased from a median baseline of 10.0% to a median of 70.0% over a 12-month period. Postintervention, 12 of 16 patients (75%) required additional follow-up with pediatric cardiology beyond the initial consultation, as compared with 2 of 14 patients (14%) preintervention. CONCLUSION: The PPE is an underutilized but effective tool in screening student athletes for sudden cardiac arrest. QI methodology was helpful in increasing the use of PPE in the primary care setting.

Clinical confirmation to demonstrate similarity for a biosimilar pegfilgrastim: a 3-way randomized equivalence study for a proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim versus US-licensed and EU-approved reference products in breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is a common result of myelosuppressive chemotherapy treatment. Infections such as febrile neutropenia (FN) are sensitive to the duration of neutropenia as well as the depth of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) at nadir. Filgrastim, a granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), can stimulate the function of mature neutrophils. Pegfilgrastim, a long-acting form of filgrastim, has been shown to reduce FN to a greater extent compared to filgrastim. G-CSF agents have been recommended for prophylactic administration with chemotherapy. Apotex developed a proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar. This study was conducted to confirm that no clinically meaningful efficacy or safety differences exist between Apotex's proposed biosimilar and its reference product. METHODS: 589 breast cancer patients were randomized and dosed with the proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar, US-licensed pegfilgrastim reference product, or EU-approved pegfilgrastim reference product. The primary endpoint assessed was the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) and secondary endpoints included rate of FN and ANC nadir. RESULTS: Data showed that the mean DSN, the primary endpoint measured, was comparable across all three treatments. The As Treated arm had a 95% confidence interval within the equivalence range for the proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar with the US-licensed and EU-approved pegfilgrastim reference products. Secondary endpoints, which included depth and peak of ANC nadir, time to ANC recovery post-nadir and rates of FN, also showed similarity between the three different treatment groups. The adverse event incidence was similar across treatment arms and there were no unexpected safety events. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these results show that the proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar is similar to Amgen's US-licensed and EU-approved pegfilgrastim reference products with regard to the clinical efficacy and safety endpoints assessed.Trial registration EMA: European Union Clinical Trials Register: (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=eudract_number:2011-002678-21) Eudract # 2011-002678-21 Registered: 01/10/2012.

Single, very low rituximab doses in healthy volunteers - a pilot and a randomized trial: implications for dosing and biosimilarity testing.

There are no  dose-finding trials available for rituximab that could guide dosing in non-malignant diseases. We hypothesized that currently used doses (≥375 mg/m2) exceed several hundred-fold the half-maximal effective dose, which is most sensitive for detecting putative differences between biosimilars and important for dose finding. In an open label, exploratory trial healthy volunteers received single infusions of rituximab at doses of 0.1, 0.3 or 1.0 mg/m2. Subsequently, in a double-blind, randomized trial healthy volunteers received single infusions of two rituximab products at doses of 0.1 and 0.3 mg/m2. In the exploratory trial rituximab transiently depleted CD20+ cells by a mean 68% (range: 57-95%), 74% (55-82%) and 97% (94-100%) immediately after the infusion of 0.1 (n = 4), 0.3 (n = 4) and 1 mg/m2 (n = 8), respectively. In the randomized trial CD20+ cells decreased by a mean 48% (25-84%) - 55% (26-85%) and 81 (67-89%) - 87% (77-96%) after infusion of 0.1 mg/m2 (n = 12) or 0.3 mg/m2 (n = 8 proposed biosimilar, n = 4 reference product) of the proposed biosimilar or the reference product, respectively. It is important to understand that in healthy volunteers <1% of the authorized rituximab doses depletes almost all circulating B lymphocytes. Thus, for non-malignant diseases alternative, more cost-effective dosing regimens seem plausible, but require clinical testing. (EudraCT-No. 2010-023781-45; EudraCT-No. 2013-001077-24).

Confirmation of Biosimilarity in a Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Study in Healthy Volunteers for an Analytically Highly Similar Pegfilgrastim.

A phase 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) study was conducted to demonstrate similarity of a proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar to its reference product. In a single-dose, randomized, assessor-blinded, 2-way crossover, active-controlled PK/PD study, 66 healthy adults received the proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar and US-licensed pegfilgrastim reference product. Primary end points were pegfilgrastim AUCt and Cmax (PK), and absolute neutrophil count AUECt and Emax (PD). Safety and immunogenicity were also measured. Fifty-six subjects completed both arms of the study. Mean pegfilgrastim concentration-time profile for both products was similar, with the 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the relative mean ratio for the primary end points falling within the predefined acceptance criteria of 80%-125% (91.7%-116.1% and 86.7%-110.2% for AUCt and Cmax , respectively). PD similarity was also demonstrated by the 95%CI of the relative mean ratio of the primary end point parameters within the predefined acceptance margins of 80%-125% (96.0%-101.6% and 92.6%-100.1% for AUECt and Emax , respectively). No statistically meaningful PK/PD differences were observed. No clinically meaningful safety or immunological differences were observed with the proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar that were not previously identified with the reference product. The proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar product is highly similar to the reference product with regard to PK/PD.