Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 209
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Oncol ; : JCO2400459, 2024 Oct 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39393041

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The Medicare part D Low-Income Subsidy (LIS) improves access to oral cancer drugs, but provides no assistance for clinician-administered/part B drugs. This analysis assessed the association between LIS participation and receipt of optimal cancer treatment. METHODS: We investigated initial systemic therapy using SEER-Medicare data (2015-2017) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Evidence Blocks (EB) as the standard for treatment recommendations. We included cancer clinical scenarios wherein (1) ≥one treatment was optimal (higher efficacy and safety scores) versus other treatments; (2) identifiable in SEER-Medicare (eg, not defined by clinical data unavailable in registry data or claims); and (3) both EB and ASCO Value Framework agreed regarding optimal treatment. We fit logistic regression models to assess the association between receipt of systemic therapy (v no therapy) and patient and provider characteristics. Contingent on receipt of treatment, we modeled the likelihood of receiving a treatment ranked (by EB scores) within the highest or lowest quartile for that cancer type. RESULTS: Nine thousand two hundred and ninety patients were included across 11 clinical scenarios. Fifty-seven percent (5,336) of patients received any systemic therapy and 43% (3,954) received no systemic therapy. Compared with non-LIS participants, LIS participants were less likely to receive any systemic therapy versus no systemic therapy (odds ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.72]). Contingent on receiving systemic therapy, LIS participants received treatment ranked within the worst quartile 24.8% of the time, compared with 21.9% of non-LIS patients (adjusted prevalence difference, 4.3% [95% CI, 0.5 to 8.2]). CONCLUSION: LIS participants were less likely to receive systemic therapy at all and were more likely to receive treatments that receive low NCCN EB scores.

2.
mSphere ; : e0057924, 2024 Oct 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39431903

RESUMEN

Central carbon metabolism is vital for the proliferation of Candida albicans, a fungus that is prominent as a commensal and pathogen. Glycolytic genes are activated by overlapping activities of the transcription factors Tye7 and Gal4, as shown by studies in the SC5314 genetic background. However, regulatory relationships can vary among C. albicans isolates. Here, we analyzed Tye7- and Gal4-related phenotypes in five diverse clinical isolates of C. albicans. We tested growth properties and gene expression impact through Nanostring profiling and, for the two strains SC5314 and P87, RNA sequencing. Our results lead to three main conclusions. First, the functional redundancy of Tye7 and Gal4 for glycolytic gene activation is preserved among all strains tested. Second, at the gene expression level, strain P87 is an outlier with regard to tye7Δ/Δ impact, and strain SC5314 is an outlier with regard to gal4Δ/Δ impact. Third, while Gal4 is well known to be dispensable for induction of the GAL1, GAL7, and GAL10 galactose-specific metabolic genes, we find that gal4Δ/Δ mutants of several strains have a mild galactose fermentation defect, as assayed by growth on galactose with the respiration inhibitor antimycin A. Our findings indicate that even a central metabolic regulatory network is subject to strain variation and illustrates an unexpected genotype-phenotype relationship.The fungal commensal and pathogen Candida albicans rely upon metabolic flexibility to colonize and infect host niches. Central carbon metabolism is governed by two regulators, Tye7 and Gal4, as defined in the reference strain SC5314. Here, we have explored the impact of Tye7 and Gal4 on carbon utilization and gene expression across five diverse C. albicans clinical isolates. Novel aspects of this study are the finding that even a central metabolic regulatory network is subject to strain variation and the observation of an unexpected mutant phenotype.

3.
J Am Chem Soc ; 146(38): 25912-25917, 2024 Sep 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39270209

RESUMEN

We report the first bottleable enantiopure P-chiral secondary phosphines from the rhodium-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation of phosphaalkenes. Catalytic asymmetric hydrogenation, a reaction of broad academic and industrial importance for C═C, N═C, and O═C bonds, has not previously been reported for the P═C bond. The hydrogenation of ArP═CR2 (Ar = Mes, m-Xyl and TMOP; R = Ph, 4-C6H4F) affords four unprecedented P-stereogenic secondary phosphines in 76%-90% isolated yields with 91%-97% enantiomeric excess (ee). These isolable P-chiral secondary phosphines are configurationally stable indefinitely in the solid state and show only modest loss in ee when kept in solution for over a month at room temperature.

4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(9): e2434707, 2024 Sep 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39302676

RESUMEN

Importance: Medicare Advantage (MA) has grown significantly over the last decade; however, MA's performance for patients with serious conditions, such as cancer, remains unclear. Objective: To compare resource use and care quality between MA and traditional Medicare (TM) beneficiaries undergoing cancer chemotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used TM claims and MA encounter records from January 2015 to December 2019. Participants were MA and TM beneficiaries who initiated cancer chemotherapy between January 2016 and December 2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting balanced characteristics between MA and TM beneficiaries, and regression estimation was used. The analysis was conducted between August 2023 and May 2024. Exposure: Chemotherapy initiation after a 1-year washout period. Main Outcomes and Measures: Resource use and care quality were measured during a 6-month period following chemotherapy initiation. Resource use was measured using standardized prices for services in both MA and TM, covering hospital inpatient services, outpatient care, Part D drugs, and hospice services. Chemotherapy utilization was examined for Part B chemotherapy, Part B supportive drugs, and Part D chemotherapy. Quality measures included chemotherapy-related emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations, avoidable ED visits, preventable hospitalizations during the 6-month episode, and survival days up to 18 months from chemotherapy initiation. Results: The study comprised 96 501 MA enrollees contributing to 98 872 episodes (mean [SD] age, 72.9 [7.6] years; 55 859 [56.5%] female; 7371 [7.5%] Hispanic, 14 778 [14.9%] non-Hispanic Black, and 75 130 [75.0%] non-Hispanic White participants) and 206 274 TM beneficiaries, contributing 212 969 episodes (mean [SD] age, 72.7 [8.3] years; 121 263 [56.9%] female; 8356 [3.9%] Hispanic, 16 693 [7.8%] non-Hispanic Black, and 182 228 [85.6%] non-Hispanic White participants). Adjusted total resource use per enrollee during the 6-month episode was $8718 (95% CI, $8343 to $9094) lower in MA than TM ($62 599 vs $71 317). Part B chemotherapy resource use accounted for most of the difference in total resource use, with MA enrollees having $5032 (95% CI, $4772 to $5293) lower use than TM beneficiaries. Lower resource use for Part B chemotherapy in MA was associated with both fewer chemotherapy visits (-1.06 visits; 95% CI, -1.10 to -1.02 visits) and less expensive chemotherapy per visit (-$277; 95% CI, -$275 to -$179). Findings on quality were mixed, but importantly, survival did not differ between MA and TM patients who initiated chemotherapy. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, MA enrollment was associated with lower resource use but not shorter survival.


Asunto(s)
Medicare Part C , Medicare , Neoplasias , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare Part C/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/economía
5.
mBio ; 15(9): e0187224, 2024 Sep 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39078139

RESUMEN

Major Candida albicans virulence traits include its ability to make hyphae, to produce a biofilm, and to damage host cells. These traits depend upon expression of hypha-associated genes. A gene expression comparison among clinical isolates suggested that transcription factor Rme1, established by previous studies to be a positive regulator of chlamydospore formation, may also be a negative regulator of hypha-associated genes. Engineered RME1 overexpression supported this hypothesis, but no relevant rme1Δ/Δ mutant phenotype was detected. We reasoned that Rme1 may function within a specific regulatory pathway. This idea was supported by our finding that an rme1Δ/Δ mutation relieves the need for biofilm regulator Brg1 in biofilm formation. The impact of the rme1Δ/Δ mutation is most prominent under static or "biofilm-like" growth conditions. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of cells grown under biofilm-like conditions indicates that Brg1 activates hypha-associated genes indirectly via repression of RME1: hypha-associated gene expression levels are substantially reduced in a brg1Δ/Δ mutant and partially restored in a brg1Δ/Δ rme1Δ/Δ double mutant. An rme1Δ/Δ mutation does not simply bypass Brg1, because iron homeostasis genes depend upon Brg1 regardless of Rme1. Rme1 thus connects Brg1 to the targets relevant to hypha and biofilm formation under biofilm growth conditions.IMPORTANCECandida albicans is a major fungal pathogen of humans, and its ability to grow as a surface-associated biofilm on implanted devices is a common cause of infection. Here, we describe a new regulator of biofilm formation, RME1, whose activity is most prominent under biofilm-like growth conditions.


Asunto(s)
Biopelículas , Candida albicans , Proteínas Fúngicas , Regulación Fúngica de la Expresión Génica , Hifa , Factores de Transcripción , Candida albicans/genética , Candida albicans/fisiología , Proteínas Fúngicas/genética , Proteínas Fúngicas/metabolismo , Hifa/genética , Hifa/crecimiento & desarrollo , Biopelículas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Factores de Transcripción/genética , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismo , ADN Helicasas/genética , ADN Helicasas/metabolismo , Virulencia/genética , Mutación
6.
mBio ; 15(8): e0124924, 2024 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38949302

RESUMEN

Protein kinases are critical regulatory proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Accordingly, protein kinases represent a common drug target for a wide range of human diseases. Therefore, understanding protein kinase function in human pathogens such as the fungus Candida albicans is likely to extend our knowledge of its pathobiology and identify new potential therapies. To facilitate the study of C. albicans protein kinases, we constructed a library of 99 non-essential protein kinase homozygous deletion mutants marked with barcodes in the widely used SN genetic background. Here, we describe the construction of this library and the characterization of the competitive fitness of the protein kinase mutants under 11 different growth and stress conditions. We also screened the library for protein kinase mutants with altered filamentation and biofilm formation, two critical virulence traits of C. albicans. An extensive network of protein kinases governs these virulence traits in a manner highly dependent on the specific environmental conditions. Studies on specific protein kinases revealed that (i) the cell wall integrity MAPK pathway plays a condition-dependent role in filament initiation and elongation; (ii) the hyper-osmolar glycerol MAPK pathway is required for both filamentation and biofilm formation, particularly in the setting of in vivo catheter infection; and (iii) Sok1 is dispensable for filamentation in hypoxic environments at the basal level of a biofilm but is required for filamentation in normoxia. In addition to providing a new genetic resource for the community, these observations emphasize the environmentally contingent function of C. albicans protein kinases.IMPORTANCECandida albicans is one of the most common causes of fungal disease in humans for which new therapies are needed. Protein kinases are key regulatory proteins and are increasingly targeted by drugs for the treatment of a wide range of diseases. Understanding protein kinase function in C. albicans pathogenesis may facilitate the development of new antifungal drugs. Here, we describe a new library of 99 protein kinase deletion mutants to facilitate the study of protein kinases. Furthermore, we show that the function of protein kinases in two virulence-related processes, filamentation and biofilm formation, is dependent on the specific environmental conditions.


Asunto(s)
Biopelículas , Candida albicans , Proteínas Quinasas , Candida albicans/genética , Candida albicans/enzimología , Candida albicans/patogenicidad , Candida albicans/fisiología , Biopelículas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Proteínas Quinasas/genética , Proteínas Quinasas/metabolismo , Virulencia , Animales , Proteínas Fúngicas/genética , Proteínas Fúngicas/metabolismo , Candidiasis/microbiología , Regulación Fúngica de la Expresión Génica , Ratones , Hifa/crecimiento & desarrollo , Hifa/genética
7.
mSphere ; 9(7): e0037224, 2024 Jul 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38980069

RESUMEN

Iron acquisition is critical for pathogens to proliferate during invasive infection, and the human fungal pathogen Candida albicans is no exception. The iron regulatory network, established in reference strain SC5314 and derivatives, includes the central player Sef1, a transcription factor that activates iron acquisition genes in response to iron limitation. Here, we explored potential variation in this network among five diverse C. albicans strains through mutant analysis, Nanostring gene expression profiling, and, for two strains, RNA-Seq. Our findings highlight four features that may inform future studies of natural variation and iron acquisition in this species. (i) Conformity: In all strains, major iron acquisition genes are upregulated during iron limitation, and a sef1Δ/Δ mutation impairs that response and growth during iron limitation. (ii) Response variation: Some aspects of the iron limitation response vary among strains, notably the activation of hypha-associated genes. As this gene set is tied to tissue damage and virulence, variation may impact the progression of infection. (iii) Genotype-phenotype variation: The impact of a sef1Δ/Δ mutation on cell wall integrity varies, and for the two strains examined the phenotype correlated with sef1Δ/Δ impact on several cell wall integrity genes. (iv) Phenotype discovery: DNA repair genes were induced modestly by iron limitation in sef1Δ/Δ mutants, with fold changes we would usually ignore. However, the response occurred in both strains tested and was reminiscent of a much stronger response described in Cryptococcus neoformans, a suggestion that it may have biological meaning. In fact, we observed that the iron limitation of a sef1Δ/Δ mutant caused recessive phenotypes to emerge at two heterozygous loci. Overall, our results show that a network that is critical for pathogen proliferation presents variation outside of its core functions.IMPORTANCEA key virulence factor of Candida albicans is the ability to maintain iron homeostasis in the host where iron is scarce. We focused on a central iron regulator, SEF1. We found that iron regulator Sef1 is required for growth, cell wall integrity, and genome integrity during iron limitation. The novel aspect of this work is the characterization of strain variation in a circuit that is required for survival in the host and the connection of iron acquisition to genome integrity in C. albicans.


Asunto(s)
Candida albicans , Proteínas Fúngicas , Regulación Fúngica de la Expresión Génica , Hierro , Candida albicans/genética , Candida albicans/patogenicidad , Candida albicans/metabolismo , Hierro/metabolismo , Proteínas Fúngicas/genética , Proteínas Fúngicas/metabolismo , Mutación , Virulencia , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Factores de Transcripción/genética , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismo , Fenotipo , Pared Celular/metabolismo , Pared Celular/genética , Variación Genética , Genotipo
8.
JNCI Cancer Spectr ; 8(3)2024 Apr 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38825338

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Industry payments to US cancer centers are poorly understood. METHODS: US National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated comprehensive cancer centers were identified (n = 51). Industry payments to NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers from 2014 to 2021 were obtained from Open Payments and National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant funding from NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT). Given our focus on cancer centers, we measured the subset of industry payments related to cancer drugs specifically and the subset of NIH funding from the NCI. RESULTS: Despite a pandemic-related decline in 2020-2021, cancer-related industry payments to NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers increased from $482 million in 2014 to $972 million in 2021. Over the same period, NCI research grant funding increased from $2 481  million to $2 724  million. The large majority of nonresearch payments were royalties and licensing payments. CONCLUSION: Industry payments to NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers increased substantially more than NCI funding in recent years but were also more variable. These trends raise concerns regarding the influence and instability of industry payments.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones Oncológicas , Industria Farmacéutica , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto , Estados Unidos , Humanos , National Cancer Institute (U.S.)/economía , Industria Farmacéutica/economía , Industria Farmacéutica/tendencias , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/tendencias , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/economía , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/economía , Instituciones Oncológicas/economía , Conflicto de Intereses/economía , Antineoplásicos/economía , Neoplasias/economía
10.
PLoS Pathog ; 20(5): e1012225, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38739655

RESUMEN

Biofilm formation by the fungal pathogen Candida albicans is the basis for its ability to infect medical devices. The metabolic gene ERG251 has been identified as a target of biofilm transcriptional regulator Efg1, and here we report that ERG251 is required for biofilm formation but not conventional free-living planktonic growth. An erg251Δ/Δ mutation impairs biofilm formation in vitro and in an in vivo catheter infection model. In both in vitro and in vivo biofilm contexts, cell number is reduced and hyphal length is limited. To determine whether the mutant defect is in growth or some other aspect of biofilm development, we examined planktonic cell features in a biofilm-like environment, which was approximated with sealed unshaken cultures. Under those conditions, the erg251Δ/Δ mutation causes defects in growth and hyphal extension. Overexpression in the erg251Δ/Δ mutant of the paralog ERG25, which is normally expressed more weakly than ERG251, partially improves biofilm formation and biofilm hyphal content, as well as growth and hyphal extension in a biofilm-like environment. GC-MS analysis shows that the erg251Δ/Δ mutation causes a defect in ergosterol accumulation when cells are cultivated under biofilm-like conditions, but not under conventional planktonic conditions. Overexpression of ERG25 in the erg251Δ/Δ mutant causes some increase in ergosterol levels. Finally, the hypersensitivity of efg1Δ/Δ mutants to the ergosterol inhibitor fluconazole is reversed by ERG251 overexpression, arguing that reduced ERG251 expression contributes to this efg1Δ/Δ phenotype. Our results indicate that ERG251 is required for biofilm formation because its high expression levels are necessary for ergosterol synthesis in a biofilm-like environment.


Asunto(s)
Biopelículas , Candida albicans , Candidiasis , Proteínas Fúngicas , Biopelículas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Candida albicans/metabolismo , Candida albicans/genética , Candida albicans/fisiología , Proteínas Fúngicas/metabolismo , Proteínas Fúngicas/genética , Animales , Candidiasis/microbiología , Candidiasis/metabolismo , Hifa/metabolismo , Ratones , Regulación Fúngica de la Expresión Génica , Ergosterol/metabolismo , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismo , Factores de Transcripción/genética , Mutación
12.
BMJ Med ; 3(1): e000802, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38596814

RESUMEN

Objectives: To evaluate National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline recommendations for oncology drug treatments that have been granted accelerated approval, and to determine whether recommendations are updated based on the results of confirmatory trials after approval and based on status updates from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Design: Cross sectional study. Setting: US FDA and NCCN guidelines. Population: Oncology therapeutic indications (ie, specific oncological conditions for which the drug is recommended) that have been granted accelerated approval in 2009-18. Main outcome measures: NCCN guideline reporting of accelerated approval status and postapproval confirmatory trials, and guideline recommendation alignment with postapproval confirmatory trial results and FDA status updates. Results: 39 oncology drug treatments were granted accelerated approval for 62 oncological indications. Although all indications were recommended in NCCN guidelines, accelerated approval status was reported for 10 (16%) indications. At least one postapproval confirmatory trial was identified for all 62 indications, 33 (53%) of which confirmed benefit; among these indications, NCCN guidelines maintained the previous recommendation or strengthened the category of evidence for 27 (82%). Postapproval confirmatory trials failed to confirm benefit for 12 (19%) indications; among these indications, NCCN guidelines removed the previous recommendation or weakened the category of evidence for five (42%). NCCN guidelines reflected the FDA's decision to convert 30 (83%) of 36 indications from accelerated to traditional approval, of which 20 (67%) had guideline updates before the FDA's conversion decision. NCCN guidelines reflected the FDA's decision to withdraw seven (58%) of 12 indications from the market, of which four (57%) had guidelines updates before the FDA's withdrawal decision. Conclusions: NCCN guidelines always recommend drug treatments that have been granted accelerated approval for oncological indications, but do not provide information about their accelerated approval status, including surrogate endpoint use and status of postapproval confirmatory trials. NCCN guidelines consistently provide information on postapproval trial results confirming clinical benefit, but not on postapproval trials failing to confirm clinical benefit. NCCN guidelines more frequently update recommendation for indications converted to traditional approval than for those approvals that were withdrawn.

13.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 22(4): 226-230, 2024 04 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648846

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The health care industry spends more on lobbying than any other industry, with more than $700 million spent in 2022. However, health care lobbying related to cancer has not been characterized. In this study, we sought to describe overall health sector lobbying spending and oncology-related lobbying spending across patient and clinician organizations. METHODS: We obtained lobbying data from OpenSecrets.org and the Federal Election Commission. Overall health sector lobbying spending was categorized by OpenSecrets into 4 groups: pharmaceuticals/health products, health services/health maintenance organizations (HMOs), hospitals/nursing homes, and health professionals. We then identified and categorized 4 oncology-related lobbying groups: oncology physician professional organizations (OPPOs), prospective payment system (PPS)-exempt cancer hospitals, patient advocacy organizations, and provider networks (eg, US Oncology Network). We described temporal trends in lobbying spending from 2014 to 2022, in both overall dollar value (inflation-adjusted 2023 dollars) and in per-physician spending (using American Association of Medical Colleges [AAMC] data for number of hematologists/oncologists) using a Mann-Kendall trend test. RESULTS: Among the overall health sector lobbying, pharmaceuticals/health products had the greatest increase in lobbying spending, with an increase from $294 million in 2014 to >$376 million in 2022 (P=.0006). In contrast, lobbying spending by health professionals did not change, remaining at $96 million (P=.35). Regarding oncology-related lobbying, OPPOs and PPS-exempt cancer hospitals had a significant increase of 170% (P=.016) and 62% (P=.009), respectively. Per-physician spending also demonstrated an increase from $60 to $134 for OPPOs and from $168 to $226 for PPS-exempt cancer hospitals. Overall, OPPO lobbying increased as a percentage of overall physician lobbying from 1.16% in 2014 to 3.76% in 2022. CONCLUSIONS: Although overall health sector lobbying has increased, physician/health professional lobbying has remained relatively stable in recent years, spending for lobbying by OPPOs has increased. Continued efforts to understand the utility and value of lobbying in health care and across oncology are needed as the costs of care continue to increase.


Asunto(s)
Maniobras Políticas , Oncología Médica , Humanos , Oncología Médica/economía , Oncología Médica/normas , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/terapia , Atención a la Salud/economía , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
Oncologist ; 29(6): 527-533, 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38484395

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Because the markups on cancer drugs vary by payor, providers' financial incentive to use high-price drugs is differential according to each patient's insurance type. We evaluated the association between patient insurer (commercial vs Medicaid) and the use of high-priced cancer treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We linked cancer registry, administrative claims, and demographic data for individuals diagnosed with cancer in North Carolina from 2004 to 2011, with either commercial or Medicaid insurance. We selected cancers with multiple FDA-approved, guideline-recommended chemotherapy options and large price differences between treatment options: advanced colorectal, lung, and head and neck cancer. The outcome was a receipt of a higher-priced option, and the exposure was insurer: commercial versus Medicaid. We estimated risk ratios (RRs) for the association between insurer and higher-priced treatment using log-binomial models with inverse probability of exposure weights. RESULTS: Of 812 patients, 209 (26%) had Medicaid. The unadjusted risk of receiving higher-priced treatment was 36% (215/603) for commercially insured and 27% (57/209) for Medicaid insured (RR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.02-1.67). After adjustment for confounders the association was attenuated (RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.81-1.65). Exploratory subgroup analysis suggested that commercial insurance was associated with increased receipt of higher-priced treatment among patients treated by non-NCI-designated providers (RR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.14-2.04). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with Medicaid and commercial insurance received high-priced treatments in similar proportion, after accounting for differences in case mix. However, modification by provider characteristics suggests that insurance type may influence treatment selection for some patient groups. Further work is needed to determine the relationship between insurance status and newer, high-price drugs such as immune-oncology agents.


Asunto(s)
Medicaid , Humanos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/economía , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , North Carolina , Anciano , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto
15.
G3 (Bethesda) ; 14(5)2024 05 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38470537

RESUMEN

Candida albicans is a prominent fungal pathogen that can infect the bloodstream and deep tissues. One key pathogenicity trait is the ability to transition between yeast and hyphal growth. Hyphae are critical for the formation of biofilms, which in turn enable device-associated infection. Among signals that drive hypha formation is the presence of hemin, an oxidized Fe(III)-containing heme derivative found in blood. In this study, we asked 4 questions. First, how uniform is the filamentation response to hemin among C. albicans strains? We tested 26 diverse isolates and found that the strength of a strain's filamentation response to hemin reflected its filamentation level in the absence of hemin. Second, does hemin induce biofilm formation? Hemin biofilm induction was evident in 5 out of 10 isolates tested, including most of the weaker biofilm formers tested. Third, what is the gene expression response to hemin? We compared RNA-seq data for type strain SC5314 grown in pH 5.5 minimal media with or without hemin. We also compared that response to SC5314 grown in pH 7.0 minimal media, where it undergoes well-studied pH-dependent filamentation. We found a common set of 72 genes with upregulated RNA levels in response to both signals, including many known hypha-associated genes. Surprisingly, overlap among those 72 genes with 2 recent consensus definitions of hypha-associated genes was limited to only 16 genes. Fourth, which regulators govern hemin-induced filamentation? A mutant survey indicated that the response depends upon filamentation regulators Efg1, Brg1, and Rim101, but not upon heme acquisition regulator Hap1 or its target genes HMX1, RBT5, PGA10, PGA7, and CSA2. These findings argue that hemin induces hypha formation independently of its utilization.


Asunto(s)
Biopelículas , Candida albicans , Proteínas Fúngicas , Regulación Fúngica de la Expresión Génica , Hemina , Hifa , Hemina/farmacología , Candida albicans/genética , Candida albicans/efectos de los fármacos , Biopelículas/efectos de los fármacos , Biopelículas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Hifa/efectos de los fármacos , Proteínas Fúngicas/genética , Proteínas Fúngicas/metabolismo , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismo , Factores de Transcripción/genética
16.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 20(3): 393-400, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38190588

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Bone-modifying agents (BMAs) do not prevent skeletal-related events among patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC), but many patients receive BMAs unnecessarily. The costs to Medicare from overuse have not been assessed. METHODS: We used linked SEER-Medicare data 2011-2015 to measure the frequency and number of doses of zoledronic acid (ZA) and denosumab received during CSPC (between diagnosis and initiation of metastatic, castration resistant prostate cancer therapy). We estimated excess BMA among patients who received BMA therapy for CSPC and did not have an indication for osteoporosis fracture prevention. We used the Medicare fee schedule for drug prices and peer-reviewed sources to estimate adverse event frequencies and costs. RESULTS: Median CSPC duration was 387 days (IQR, 253-573), during which time 42% of patients received ≥one dose of denosumab (mean doses, 7) and 18% received ≥one dose of ZA (mean doses, 7). Thirty-eight percent of those receiving denosumab and 47% of those receiving ZA had a history of osteoporosis, osteopenia, spine or hip fracture, or hypercalcemia. The estimated, annual excess BMA cost to Medicare was $44,105,041 in US dollars (USD), composed of $43,303,078 USD and $45,512 USD in drug costs for denosumab and ZA, respectively, and $682,865 USD and $75,585 USD in adverse event costs, respectively. In one-way sensitivity analysis, the estimate was most sensitive to denosumab dosing frequency (estimate range, $28,469,237 USD-$98,830,351 USD) and duration of CSPC (estimate range, $36,823,311 USD-$99,015,908 USD). CONCLUSION: BMA overuse in CSPC incurs substantial cost to Medicare, largely because of denosumab drug costs. Excess costs may be reduced by greater adherence to guideline-concordant BMA use.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Neoplasias Óseas , Osteoporosis , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Denosumab/efectos adversos , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/farmacología , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Óseas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Imidazoles/efectos adversos , Medicare , Ácido Zoledrónico/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/inducido químicamente , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Castración
17.
J Clin Oncol ; 42(1): 38-46, 2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37748124

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: External-beam radiation therapy (RT) is standard of care (SOC) for pain relief of symptomatic bone metastases. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of radiation to asymptomatic bone metastases in preventing skeletal-related events (SRE). METHODS: In a multicenter randomized controlled trial, adult patients with widely metastatic solid tumor malignancies were stratified by histology and planned SOC (systemic therapy or observation) and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive RT to asymptomatic high-risk bone metastases or SOC alone. The primary outcome of the trial was SRE. Secondary outcomes included hospitalizations for SRE and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 78 patients with 122 high-risk bone metastases were enrolled between May 8, 2018, and August 9, 2021, at three institutions across an affiliated cancer network in the United States. Seventy-three patients were evaluable for the primary end point. The most common primary cancer types were lung (27%), breast (24%), and prostate (22%). At 1 year, SRE occurred in one of 62 bone metastases (1.6%) in the RT arm and 14 of 49 bone metastases (29%) in the SOC arm (P < .001). There were significantly fewer patients hospitalized for SRE in the RT arm compared with the SOC arm (0 v 4, P = .045). At a median follow-up of 2.5 years, OS was significantly longer in the RT arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.89; P = .018), which persisted on multivariable Cox regression analysis (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.85; P = .01). CONCLUSION: Radiation delivered prophylactically to asymptomatic, high-risk bone metastases reduced SRE and hospitalizations. We also observed an improvement in OS with prophylactic radiation, although a confirmatory phase III trial is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Nivel de Atención , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Análisis de Regresión
18.
Prostate ; 84(2): 177-184, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37846041

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend bone-modifying agents (BMAs) for patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and bone metastasis, but not for castrate-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC). Physicians beliefs and practices regarding BMA therapy are poorly understood. METHODS: This was a qualitative interview study with embedded Likert-scale elements. Study participants were physicians who treat prostate cancer, located within an academic cancer center or an affiliated community-based network. Participants were asked about their experiences and practice patterns regarding BMA therapy. Participants used Likert-scale items to identify the most common barriers to guideline-concordant BMA use and the most effective potential interventions. Participants were subsequently asked to rank the three most common barriers and the three most effective interventions to reduce underuse (for CRPC) and overuse (for CSPC). RESULTS: Nineteen physicians were invited and 15 participated; one physician did not answer some questions as outside of their practice scope. All were aware of the recommendation for BMAs in CRPC. 14% (2/14) were unaware of the recommendation against BMA use for CSPC; an additional 29% (4/14) believed that BMA use could be appropriate for CSPC depending on the metastatic disease burden. 36% (5/14) were unaware of recommendations for screening and treatment of low bone mineral density. The most common barriers (occurring "often" or "sometimes") were obtaining dental clearance (11/15) and insufficient clinic time (6/15). The interventions identified as most effective to reduce underuse were dental navigation (11/15) and electronic medical record (EMR)-based guidance (9/15). The interventions identified as most effective to reduce overuse were peer-to-peer education (14/15) and EMR-based guidance (13/15). CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of guideline recommendations for screening and treatment of low bone mineral density and against BMA use for CSPC was good, but not complete. Dental navigation, peer-to-peer education, and EMR-based guidance were preferred intervention strategies to improve guideline-concordant use.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Óseas Metabólicas , Neoplasias Óseas , Médicos , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Masculino , Humanos , Investigación Cualitativa , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico
19.
BMJ ; 383: 2832, 2023 12 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38049172
20.
mSphere ; 8(6): e0048523, 2023 Dec 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37850790
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...