Perioperative Management of a Patient With Multiple Comorbidities Undergoing Lung Resection for Bronchopulmonary Carcinoid Complicated by SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Case Report.

We report a case of a high-risk patient with multiple comorbidities who underwent right median lobectomy and lymph node resection due to a carcinoid tumor. The patient's course was complicated by a hospital-acquired severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and a postoperative chest hematoma requiring urgent thoracotomy. Multidisciplinary and timely management resulted in a favorable patient outcome.

Does preoperative administration of hypotensive agents affect the quality of the surgical field during endoscopic sinus surgery? A triple-blind randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is a surgical procedure widely used in the treatment of various sinonasal conditions. Excessive bleeding during ESS leads to potentially major complications. The primary aim of this trial was to explore any different effects of bisoprolol and nifedipine on the intraoperative surgical field. In addition, the correlations regarding surgical field state, total blood loss (TBL), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) were also examined. METHODS: A prospective, triple-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted, including 72 patients between 18 and 65 years of age who underwent ESS. As an indicator of the worst state of the intraoperative surgical field, the Boezaart scale score was used, as evaluated by two surgeons. Appropriate statistical analysis was conducted to explore score comparisons across groups and correlations between vital signs, bleeding, and the operative field state. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found among different intervention groups regarding the worst state of the surgical field (p = 0.367 > 0.05). The Boezaart scale score was positively correlated with TBL (rxy = 0.619, p = 0.000 < 0.001) and MAP (rxy = 0.259, p = 0.028 < 0.05). Furthermore, MAP was positively correlated with HR (rs = 0.254, p = 0.32 < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that preoperative administration of bisoprolol and nifedipine does not affect the worst state of the operative field. However, vital signs seem to either directly or indirectly affect bleeding and operative field state, and agents affecting them are worth exploring further.

The Effect of Laterality in Modified Radical Neck Dissection on the Risk of Intraoperative Bradycardia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background Intraoperative bradycardia is a hardly studied complication of modified radical neck dissection (MRND). Methods Using convenient sampling, we retrospectively studied a cohort (n = 159) of patients who underwent MRND at Papanikolaou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece between 2019 and 2020 to investigate whether MRND laterality (bilateral vs. unilateral) affects the occurrence of intraoperative bradycardia (a pulse rate lower than 50 bpm). Results Roughly two-thirds of the patients underwent unilateral MRND, and the rest underwent bilateral MRND. Bradycardia was observed in 25.8% of the cohort. We used logistic regression and investigated several potential confounding factors. Unilateral MRND was associated with a lower risk of intraoperative bradycardia compared to bilateral MRND in the simple regression model (relative risk (RR): 0.555, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.331-0.932, p = 0.027). MRND laterality was not significantly associated with intraoperative bradycardia (p = 0.082) in the multiple regression model, whereas an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) score of 3 vs. 4 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.125, 95% CI: 0.0340-0.457, p = 0.002), the presence of atrial fibrillation (aOR = 11.4, 95% CI: 4.10-31.8, p < 0.001) and induction of anesthesia with dexmedetomidine (aOR = 4.57, 95% CI: 1.34-15.6, p = 0.015) were significantly associated with intraoperative bradycardia. Conclusions MRND laterality was close to statistical significance. Bigger sample sizes may provide more definitive information since the effect of MRND laterality on intraoperative bradycardia remains unclear. Our findings can inform clinical practice so that clinicians know when to expect bradycardia and are better prepared to manage it.

A four-probiotic preparation for ventilator-associated pneumonia in multi-trauma patients: results of a randomized clinical trial.

The role of probiotics in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains inconclusive. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a probiotic regimen for VAP prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated multi-trauma patients, intubated immediately after the injurious insult. In a randomized, placebo-controlled study enrolling multi-trauma patients, patients expected to require mechanical ventilation for >10 days were assigned at random to receive prophylaxis with a probiotic formula (n=59) or placebo (n=53). The probiotic formula was a preparation of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 [1.75 × 109 colony-forming units (cfu)], Lactobacillus plantarum (0.5 × 109 cfu), Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12 (1.75 × 109 cfu) and Saccharomyces boulardii (1.5 × 109 cfu) in sachets. Each patient received two sachets twice daily for 15 days: one through the nasogastric tube and one spread on the oropharynx. The incidence of VAP was the primary endpoint. The incidence of other infections and sepsis, and the duration of hospital stay were the secondary endpoints. Administration of probiotics reduced the incidence of VAP [11.9% vs 28.3%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13-0.92; P=0.034] and sepsis [6.8% vs 24.5%, odds ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.74: P=0.016]. Furthermore, probiotic prophylaxis reduced the time of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the length of hospital stay. The prophylactic use of probiotics with a combination of enteral and topical application to the oropharynx had a positive effect on the incidence of VAP and sepsis, as well as on ICU and total hospital stay in patients receiving protracted mechanical ventilation.

Propofol/Fentanyl/Rocuronium or Sevoflurane Inhalational Induction for Intubation?

Introduction Anesthesia induction and airway instrumentation are critical parts of anesthesia administration. Intravenous induction is time convenient but necessitates immediate commencement of ventilation. Inhalational sevoflurane induction takes longer but preserves spontaneous respiration. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the intubation quality features achieved by sevoflurane as the sole induction agent compared with the standard intravenous induction, involving the use of muscle relaxants. Methods Sixty patients were randomly allocated into two groups: the Inhalational Vital Capacity Induction With Sevoflurane (IVCIS) group (n = 30) in which patients were intubated after sevoflurane inhalational anesthesia with the vital capacity technique and the Standard Intravenous Induction With Propofol, Fentanyl, and Rocuronium (SIPFR) group (n = 30) after propofol 1.5 mg/kg, fentanyl 2 µg/kg, and rocuronium 0.5 mg/kg administration intravenously. Group IVCIS patients were intubated when bispectral index (BIS) < 60 and end-expiratory sevoflurane ≥ 2 minimum alveolar concentration for > eight minutes. Scoring systems were used to evaluate induction and intubation conditions. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used for data analysis. Results Intubating and induction conditions were of equal quality in both groups. Sevoflurane induction duration was markedly prolonged. Heart rate was higher in IVCIS group patients throughout the induction, especially during laryngoscopy. Less blood pressure fluctuations were recorded in IVCIS group patients. Conclusions Inhalational vital capacity induction with sevoflurane provided acceptable intubating conditions and exhibited a safe hemodynamic profile, albeit the duration was more than 12 minutes.