Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Transl Med ; 8(24): 1707, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33490219

RESUMEN

High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is a leading cause of mortality among women worldwide. Currently, there is no clear consensus over the regime these patients should receive. The main two options are upfront debulking surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). The former approach is proposed to be accompanied by lower chemoresistance rates but could lead to severe surgical comorbidities and lower quality of life (QoL). Optimizing patient's selection for upfront debulking surgery might offer higher progression-free and overall survival rates. Further studies need to be conducted in order to elucidate the predictive factors, which are favorable for patients undergoing upfront debulking surgery in cases of high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

2.
Int J Artif Organs ; 36(12): 853-60, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24366836

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The dialysis delivered dose is limited by the rate at which urea can be transferred from the different body compartments. The time needed to clear the peripheral compartments of the body has been called the patient clearance time (tp). The aim of the study was to compare delivered dialysis dose using the tp index between patients dialyzed through a permanent central venous catheter (CVC) and patients with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). METHODS: The study included 48 stable hemodialyzed patients. Patients were classified into two groups according to their vascular access type. The first group included 24 patients dialyzed through a permanent CVC and the second group consisted of 24 patients with a mature AVF. The following parameters were calculated twice for each patient: tp, Kt/V adjusted for the tp. RESULTS: tp was lower in the AVF dialysis modality than in CVC (26 ± 7 vs. 42 ± 14 min, p<0.001) while the (eqKt/V)tp was higher in AVF than in CVC dialysis (1.36 ± 0.11 vs. 1.19 ± 0.13, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The patient clearance time is lower in AVF than in CVC dialysis, and this is accompanied by a higher delivered dialysis dose.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Diálisis Renal , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Biológicos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Urea/sangre
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...