Hydrus microstent compared to selective laser trabeculoplasty in primary open angle glaucoma: one year results.

BACKGROUND: To compare the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma medications following selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) versus stand-alone placement of the Hydrus microstent, a microinvasive glaucoma surgery device. DESIGN: Prospective interventional case-series. University practice. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty six eyes (56 patients) with uncontrolled primary open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: Patients received either SLT (n = 25) or Hydrus implantation (n = 31) in two centres. Patients were evaluated at baseline and 1, 7 days, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraocular pressure and number of glaucoma medications variations inter-groups and intra-groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences at baseline between groups, but the mean deviation was worse in the Hydrus group (-8.43 ± 6.84 dB, confidence limits (CL)-2.8/-3.3 vs.-3.04 ± 0.65 dB, CL-6/-10.8; P < 0.001). After 12 months, there was a significant decrease in IOP and medications in the Hydrus group compared with baseline values. In the SLT group, only the decrease in IOP was significant. There was 3-fold greater reduction in medication use in the Hydrus group compared with SLT (-1.4 ± 0.97 vs.-0.5 ± 1.05, P = 0.001). 47% of patients were medication free at 12 months in the Hydrus group (4% in the SLT group). No complications were recorded in the SLT group. In the Hydrus group, three patients experienced a temporary reduction of visual acuity post-operatively, and two patients had post-operative IOP spikes that resolved within one week. CONCLUSIONS: Both SLT and Hydrus implantation reduced IOP without serious adverse events. Hydrus implantation led to a significant and further reduction in medication dependence at 12 months.

Blindness and Glaucoma: A Multicenter Data Review from 7 Academic Eye Clinics.

PURPOSE: To evaluate frequency, conversion rate, and risk factors for blindness in glaucoma patients treated in European Universities. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 2402 consecutive patients with glaucoma in at least one eye. Medical charts were inspected and patients were divided into those blind and the remainder ('controls'). Blindness was defined as visual acuity≤0.05 and/or visual field loss to less than 10°. RESULTS: Unilateral and bilateral blindness were respectively 11.0% and 1.6% at the beginning, and 15.5% and 3.6% at the end of the observation period (7.5±5.5 years, range:1-25 years); conversion to blindness (at least unilateral) was 1.1%/year. 134 eyes (97 patients) developed blindness by POAG during the study. At the first access to study centre, they had mean deviation (MD) of -17.1±8.3 dB and treated intraocular pressure (IOP) of 17.1±6.6 mmHg. During follow-up the IOP decreased by 14% in these eyes but MD deteriorated by 1.1±3.5 dB/year, which was 5-fold higher than controls (0.2±1.6 dB/year). In a multivariate model, the best predictors for blindness by glaucoma were initial MD (p<0.001), initial IOP (p<0.001), older age at the beginning of follow-up (p<0.001), whereas final IOP was found to be protective (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this series of patients, blindness occurred in about 20%. Blindness by glaucoma had 2 characteristics: late diagnosis and/or late referral, and progression of the disease despite in most cases IOP was within the range of normality and target IOP was achieved; it could be predicted by high initial MD, high initial IOP, and old age.

In vivo confocal microscopy of conjunctiva in preservative-free timolol 0.1% gel formulation therapy for glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects at 1 year of preservative-free timolol gel and preserved timolol eye drops on conjunctiva and tear parameters. METHODS: Forty patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were randomized to the two treatment groups and compared with 20 healthy age-matched controls. Clinical tests (IOP, Schirmer I test, and lacrimal film break-up time BUT) and in vivo conjunctival confocal microscopy (IVCM) were performed in all patients at baseline and after 12 months. IVCM (HRT II Rostock Cornea Module; Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) was performed after topical anaesthesia in the four cardinal locations and at the corresponding limbus to analyse conjunctiva cells. The main IVCM outcomes were goblet cell density and epithelial regularity. RESULTS: IVCM and clinical parameters were similar in the three groups at baseline. After 12 months, intra-epithelial goblet cell density was significantly lower in the preserved (48.25 ± 7.70) than in the preservative-free beta-blocker group (86.83 ± 22.17, p < 0.001) and controls (88.9 ± 18.33, p < 0.001). The epithelial layer was significantly more regular in the preserved beta-blocker medication group than in the preservative-free beta-blocker group (p < 0.001) and the control group (p < 0.001). A significant reduction in both Schirmer I and BUT was found in the group of preserved timolol (respectively, 11.3 ± 2.97 and 8.12 ± 0.99) compared with preservative-free timolol (16.8 ± 1.83 and 11.27 ± 1.27, p < 0.001) and controls (17.8 ± 1.87 and 12.10 ± 1.28, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our IVCM data, preservative-free beta-blocker gel induces less changes at ocular surface than preserved beta-blockers, a fact that should be considered to obtain less adverse effects and maximal adherence to treatment in a chronic condition such as glaucoma.

Association between primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and WDR36 sequence variance in Italian families affected by POAG.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To assess the involvement of WDR36 sequence variance in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in Italian patients. METHODS: A cohort of 34 Italian families affected by POAG was analysed by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography for mutation in the WDR36 gene. Among the 34 families enrolled, 25 were affected by high-tension glaucoma (HTG), four by juvenile open-angle glaucoma and one by normal tension glaucoma. In addition, four families presented both juvenile open-angle glaucoma and HTG-POAG patients within the same pedigree. RESULTS: Four previously identified intronic polymorphisms (IVS5+30C→T; IVS12+90 G→T; IVS13+89G→A; IVS16-30A→G) and a novel one (IVS21-75G→A) have been identified. In addition, one proband was found to carry the p.D658G mutation reported as the more recurrent disease-causing allele. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that WDR36 sequence variance is only a rare cause of glaucoma in Italian families. Clearly, investigation of additional families with extensive studies is needed to clarify the role of WDR36 in the pathophysiology of glaucoma.