Sources of hydroxyl radical in headwater streams from nitrogen-saturated forest.

Hydroxyl radical (HO) photoformation rate (RHO) was determined in headwater stream samples from nitrogen (N)-saturated forests, (1) to quantify the sources of HO in headwater streams and (2) to evaluate the nitrate NO3(-)-induced enhancement of HO formation in stream water caused by N saturation in forested watersheds. Stream water fulvic acid extracted from the forested watersheds was used to quantify the contribution of dissolved organic matter (DOM) to RHO. The results showed that almost all (97%; 81-109%) RHO sources in our headwater stream samples were quantitatively elucidated; the photolysis of NO3(-) (55%; 34-75%), nitrite [N(III)] (2%; 0.5-5.2%), and DOM-derived HO formation, from which photo-Fenton reactions (18%; 12-26%) and the direct photolysis of fluorescent dissolved organic matter (FDOM) (22%; 10-40%), was successfully separated. FDOM, which accounted for 53% (24-96%) of DOM in total organic carbon bases, was responsible for HO formation in our headwater streams. High NO3(-) leaching caused by N saturation in forested watersheds increased RHO in the headwaters, indicating that N-saturated forest could significantly change photoinduced and biogeochemical processes via enhanced HO formation in downstream water.

Adsorptive separation of arsenate and arsenite anions from aqueous medium by using orange waste.

Cellulose and orange waste were chemically modified by means of phosphorylation. The chemically modified gels were further loaded with iron(III) in order to create a suitable chelating environment for arsenate and arsenite removal. The loading capacity for iron(III) on the gel prepared from orange waste (POW) was 1.21 mmol g(-1) compared with 0.96 mmol g(-1) for the gel prepared from cellulose (PC). Removal tests of arsenic with the iron(III)-loaded gel were carried out batchwise and by using a column. Arsenite removal was favored under alkaline condition for both PC and POW gels, however, the POW gel showed some removal capability even at neutral pH. On contrary, arsenate removal took place under acidic conditions at pH=2-3 and 2-6 for the PC and POW gels, respectively. Since iron(III) loading is higher on the POW gel than on the PC gel greater arsenic removal has been achieved by the POW gel compared with the PC gel. It can be concluded that the POW gel can be used for the removal and recovery of both arsenite and arsenate from arsenic contaminated wastewater.