Peripheral blood biomarkers associated with combination of immune checkpoint blockade plus chemotherapy in NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers predicting clinical outcomes of treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy would be valuable. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to seek predictors of combination of ICI/chemotherapy response in NSCLC patients using peripheral blood samples. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC between July 2019 and May 2021 receiving combination of ICI/chemotherapy were included and assessed for partial responses (PR), stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD). We measured circulating immune cells, plasma cytokines and chemokines. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled. The proportions of circulating natural killer (NK) cells within CD45 + cells, programmed death 1 (PD-1) + Tim-3 + T cells within CD4 + cells, and the amount of chemokine C-X-C ligand (CXCL10) in the plasma were significantly elevated in PR relative to SD/PD patients (median 8.1%-vs-2.1%, P= 0.0032; median 1.2%-vs-0.3%, P= 0.0050; and median 122.6 pg/ml-vs-76.0 pg/ml, P= 0.0125, respectively). Patients with 2 or 3 elevated factors had longer progression-free survival than patients with 0 or only one (not reached-vs-5.6 months, P= 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that NK cells, CD4 + PD-1 + Tim-3 + T cells, and CXCL10 levels in pre-treatment peripheral blood may predict the efficacy of combination of ICI/chemotherapy in NSCLC.

Immunotherapy or Chemoimmunotherapy in Older Adults With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Importance: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus chemotherapy combination treatment (ICI-chemotherapy) is now a standard treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable oncogene alterations, but there are few data on ICI-chemotherapy for patients 75 years and older. Objective: To inform the choice of first-line drugs in clinical practice and assess the safety and efficacy of ICI-chemotherapy combination treatment in older adult patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included 58 centers in Japan. The cohort consisted of patients 75 years and older with clinical stage IIIB, IIIC, IV, postoperative or radiotherapy recurrent NSCLC. Patients started first-line systemic therapy between December 2018 and March 2021. Those receiving first-line molecular targeted drugs were excluded. The data were analyzed from February 2022 to October 2022. Exposures: Systemic therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Results: A total of 1245 patients (median [range] age, 78 [75-95] years; 967 [78%] male) with NSCLC were included in the cohort. Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression of less than 1% occurred in 268 tumors (22%); 1% to 49% in 387 tumors (31%); 50% and higher in 410 tumors (33%), and unknown expression in 180 tumors (14%). Median OS was 20.0 (95% CI, 17.1-23.6) months for the 354 patients receiving ICI-chemotherapy (28%); 19.8 (95% CI, 16.5-23.8) months for the 425 patients receiving ICI alone (34%); 12.8 (95% CI, 10.7-15.6) months for the 311 patients receiving platinum-doublet chemotherapy (25%); and 9.5 (95% CI, 7.4-13.4) months for the 155 patients receiving single-agent chemotherapy (12%). After propensity score matching, no differences in OS and PFS were found between the patients receiving ICI-chemotherapy vs ICI alone. Each group consisted of 118 patients. For PD-L1 expression of 1% and higher the OS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.67-1.42; P = .90), and the PFS HR was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.67-1.25; P = .59). Significance was also not reached when separately analyzed for lower or higher PD-L1 expression (1%-49% or ≥50%). However, grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events occurred in 86 patients (24.3%) treated with ICI-chemotherapy and 76 (17.9%) with ICI alone (P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, ICI-chemotherapy combination treatment did not improve survival and increased the incidence of grade 3 and higher immune-related adverse events compared with ICI alone in patients 75 years and older. Based on these results, ICI alone may be recommended for older adult patients with PD-L1-positive NSCLC.

Multicenter, Retrospective Study to Evaluate Necitumumab Plus Cisplatin and Gemcitabine After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer in Japan: The NINJA Study.

Introduction: Necitumumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GCN) is a standard therapy for patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSqCC). However, the efficacy and tolerability of GCN in second-line or later treatment for patients previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remain unknown. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of GCN initiated between November 1, 2019 and March 31, 2022 as second-line to fourth-line treatment in patients with advanced LSqCC who had been pretreated with ICIs. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 93 patients from 35 institutions in Japan were enrolled. The median PFS, median overall survival (OS), and objective response rate were 4.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8-5.3), 13.3 months (95% CI: 9.6-16.5), and 27.3% (95% CI: 18.3-37.8), respectively. The median PFS, median OS, and objective response rate for second-line, third-line, and fourth-line treatment groups were 4.8 months, 3.8 months, and 4.3 months (p = 0.24); 15.7 months, 11.6 months, and 10.1 months (p = 0.06); and 31.0%, 13.6%, and 37.5% (p = 0.22), respectively. The severity of GCN-related skin disorders was associated with longer PFS (p < 0.05) and OS (p < 0.05). The frequencies of grade ≥3 skin disorders, hypomagnesemia, pneumonitis, and febrile neutropenia were 16.1%, 7.5%, 1.1%, and 4.3%, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: GCN for ICI-pretreated patients with LSqCC seems tolerable and offers promising efficacy regardless of treatment line, and ICI pretreatment might enhance GCN efficacy.

Monitoring of Plasma EGFR Mutations during Osimertinib Treatment for NSCLC Patients with Acquired T790M Mutation.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib was first approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients who have developed the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation after treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We routinely evaluated the plasma of NSCLC patients with the T790M mutation to more rapidly detect an increase in disease activity and resistance to treatment. METHODS: Eligible patients received osimertinib after resistance to the first- or second-generation of EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC harboring T790M mutation detectable in tumor tissue or plasma. Plasma samples were collected every 8 weeks during osimertinib treatment. The plasma analysis was performed using an improved PNA-LNA PCR clamp method. We tested samples for a resistance mechanism, including EGFR-activating, T790M, and C797S mutations, and assessed the association between the mutations and osimertinib treatment. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients enrolled in the study, 58 were eligible for this analysis. In plasma collected before osimertinib treatment, activating mutations were detected in 47 of 58 patients (81.0%) and T790M was detected in 44 patients (75.9%). Activating mutations were cleared in 60.9% (28/46) and T790M was cleared in 93.0% (40/43). Of these, 71.4% (20/28) of activating mutations and 87.5% (35/40) of T790M mutation were cleared within 8 weeks of treatment. The total response rate (RR) was 53.4% (31/58). The median duration of treatment was 259 days, with a trend toward longer treatment duration in patients who experienced the clearance of activating mutations with osimertinib. At the time of disease progression during osimertinib treatment, C797S was detected in 3 of 37 patients (8.1%). CONCLUSION: Plasma EGFR mutation analysis was effective in predicting the effect of osimertinib treatment.

Phase II trial of daily S-1 combined with weekly irinotecan in previously treated patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell lung cancer: North Japan lung cancer group 1101.

BACKGROUND: This phase II trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 combined with weekly irinotecan as a second- or third-line treatment for patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell lung cancer. METHODS: Patients with a body surface area <1.25, 1.25-1.50, and >1.50 m2 received oral S-1 on days 1-14 at 80, 100, and 120 mg/day, respectively, and irinotecan on days 1 and 8 at 70 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate, and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, and the incidence and severity of adverse effects. RESULTS: Between September 2011 and December 2014, 30 patients were enrolled in this study. The overall response rate was 6.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8%-22.1%), and the disease control rate was 73.3%. The median progression-free survival was 3.0 months (95% CI: 2.5-3.4 months), and the median overall survival was 10.5 months (95% CI: 5.6-13.7 months). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in ≥10% of the patients, including leukopenia (21%), neutropenia (21%), anemia (17%), anorexia (10%), and hypokalemia (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Although the treatment-related adverse events were manageable, the combination of weekly irinotecan and S-1 did not have the expected effect.

A retrospective study of the efficacy of combined EGFR­TKI plus VEGF inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy vs. EGFR­TKI monotherapy for PD­L1­positive EGFR­mutant non­small cell lung cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group 2202.

The present multicenter study was performed to compare the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy with that of combined EGFR-TKI plus vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF) inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data from patients with PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC were collected from 12 institutes. Survival in patients treated with first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs, osimertinib (third-generation EGFR-TKI), and combined EGFR-TKI plus VEGF inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy was analyzed by multiple regression analysis with adjustments for sex, performance status, EGFR mutation status, PD-L1 expression level, and the presence or absence of brain metastasis using a Cox proportional hazards model. Data from a total of 263 patients were analyzed, including 111 (42.2%) patients who had received monotherapy with a first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI, 132 (50.2%) patients who had received osimertinib monotherapy, and 20 (7.6%) patients who had received combined EGFR-TKI plus VEGF inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy (hereafter referred to as combined therapy). Multiple regression analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model showed that the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for progression-free survival was 0.73 (0.54-1.00) in the patients who had received osimertinib monotherapy and 0.47 (0.25-0.90) in patients who had received combined therapy. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.98 (0.65-1.48) in the patients who had received osimertinib monotherapy and 0.52 (0.21-1.31) in patients who had received combined therapy. In conclusion, combined therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of progression compared with first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI monotherapy, and therefore, may be promising for the treatment of patients of NSCLC.

Management of patients with presumed germline pathogenic variant from tumor-only genomic sequencing: A retrospective analysis at a single facility.

Cancer treatment is increasingly evolving toward personalized medicine, which sequences numerous cancer-related genes and identifies therapeutic targets. On the other hand, patients with germline pathogenic variants (GPV) have been identified as secondary findings (SF) and oncologists have been urged to handle them. All SF disclosure considerations for patients are addressed and decided at the molecular tumor boards (MTB) in the facility. In this study, we retrospectively summarized the results of all cases in which comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test was conducted at our hospital, and discussed the possibility of presumed germline pathogenic variants (PGPV) at MTB. MTB recommended confirmatory testing for 64 patients. Informed consent was obtained from attending physicians for 53 of them, 30 patients requested testing, and 17 patients tested positive for a confirmatory test. Together with already known variants, 4.5 % of the total confirmed in this cohort. Variants verified in this study were BRCA1 (n = 12), BRCA2 (n = 6), MSH2 (n = 2), MSH6 (n = 2), WT1 (n = 2), TP53, MEN1, CHEK2, MLH1, TSC2, PTEN, RB1, and SMARCB1. There was no difference in the tumor's VAF between confirmed positive and negative cases for variants determined as PGPV by MTB. Current results demonstrate the actual number of cases until confirmatory germline test for patients with PGPV from tumor-only CGP test through the discussion at the MTB. The practical results at this single facility will serve as a guide for the management of the selection and distribution of SF in the genome analysis.

Outcomes of Chemoimmunotherapy Among Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer According to Potential Clinical Trial Eligibility.

Importance: Chemoimmunotherapy is the standard first-line therapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, whether findings from pivotal trials can be extrapolated to the clinical practice setting remains unclear. Objective: To compare treatment outcome gaps following first-line chemoimmunotherapy for patients with ES-SCLC between those who met and did not meet the eligibility criteria used in previous clinical trials. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective cohort study was conducted from September 1, 2019, to September 30, 2020, at 32 hospitals in Japan, with at least 12 months of follow-up. Participants included consecutive patients with ES-SCLC who received carboplatin and etoposide with atezolizumab as first-line therapy. Exposures: Patients who met eligibility criteria for pivotal phase 3 clinical trials were considered trial-eligible. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 6-month progression-free survival. The secondary outcomes were differences in progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety according to whether key clinical trial eligibility criteria were met. Results: A total of 207 patients were analyzed (median age, 72 years; range, 46-87 years; 170 [82%] were male). Sixty-four patients (31%) were older adults (age ≥75 years), and most (184 [89%]) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. There were 132 (64%) trial-eligible patients. The 6-month progression-free survival rate for all patients was 38.8% (95% CI, 32.4%-45.7%). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months in trial-eligible patients and 4.7 months in trial-ineligible patients (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.97; P = .03). The proportion of patients who achieved disease control was 93% (118 of 127) in trial-eligible patients and 77% (55 of 71) in trial-ineligible patients (P = .002). The median overall survival was 15.8 months in trial-eligible patients and 13.1 months in trial-ineligible patients (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.51-1.07; P = .10). The rate of severe adverse events was numerically higher among trial-ineligible patients than among trial-eligible patients (39% vs 27%; P = .07). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the overall treatment outcome was comparable to that reported in pivotal clinical trials. However, treatment outcomes after chemoimmunotherapy might differ between trial-eligible and trial-ineligible patients. These findings suggest that trial-eligibility criteria may be useful in clinical practice, and further studies using data from clinical practice settings are required to inform regulatory approval and clinical decision-making.

Clinical decisions by the molecular tumor board on comprehensive genomic profiling tests in Japan: A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: A paradigm shift has occurred in cancer chemotherapy from tumor-specific treatment with cytotoxic agents to personalized medicine with molecular-targeted drugs. Thus, it is essential to identify genomic alterations and molecular features to recommend effective targeted molecular medicines regardless of the tumor site. Nevertheless, it takes considerable expertise to identify treatment targets from primary-sequencing data in order to provide drug recommendations. The Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) denotes a platform that integrates clinical and molecular features for clinical decisions. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyses all the cases of discussion and decision at the MTB in Tohoku University Hospital and summarizes genetic alterations and treatment recommendations. RESULTS: The MTB discussed 1003 comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests conducted in patients with solid cancer, and the resulting rate of assessing treatment recommendations was approximately 19%. Among hundreds of genes in the CGP test, only 30 genetic alterations or biomarkers were used to make treatment recommendations. The leading biomarkers that led to treatment recommendations were tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H) (n = 32), ERBB2 amplification (n = 24), BRAF V600E (n = 16), and BRCA1/2 alterations (n = 32). Thyroid cancer accounted for most cancer cases for which treatment recommendation was provided (81.3%), followed by non-small cell lung cancer (42.4%) and urologic cancer (31.3%). The number of tests performed for gastrointestinal cancers was high (n = 359); however, the treatment recommendations for the same were below average (13%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study may be used to simplify treatment recommendations from the CGP reports and help select patients for testing, thereby increasing the accuracy of personalized medicine.

Antibody responses to second doses of COVID-19 vaccination in lung cancer patients undergoing treatment.

BACKGROUND: Several reports have revealed that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection tends to have more severe outcomes in cancer patients. Although vaccination reduces the risk of severe disease, data on antibody titers achieved by vaccination is scarce in cancer patients. METHODS: We collected 79 blood samples (69 lung cancer patients and 10 control individuals) and conducted an anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody assay to compare the antibody titer achieved with current treatment. Sixty-eight patients (86%) received the BNT162 mRNA vaccine and 11 (14%) received the mRNA-1273 vaccine. They were categorized according to the current treatment: control individuals without cancer (cohort A), lung cancer patients who were treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy (cohort B), immunotherapy (cohort C), combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy and immunotherapy (cohort D), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (cohort E), and radiation therapy (cohort F). RESULTS: Among 69 lung cancer patients (cohort B-F), 57 (83%) had adenocarcinoma, and 66 (96%) had advanced-stage cancer. In the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody assay, the antibody titer was significantly lower in lung cancer patients than in control individuals (p = 0.01). The median antibody titers were 161 AU/ml in control individuals and 59.9 AU/ml in lung cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: Antibody titers after the second vaccination were lower in cancer patients than those in healthy individuals. Our findings provide essential information for understanding the benefits and necessity of additional vaccination to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in lung cancer patients.

Longitudinal analyses and predictive factors of radiation-induced lung toxicity-related parameters after stereotactic radiotherapy for lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate changes in longitudinal parameters after stereotactic radiotherapy for lung cancer and to identify possible pretreatment factors related to radiation-induced lung toxicity and the decline in pulmonary function after radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Protocol-specified examinations, including 4-D CT, laboratory tests, pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and body composition measurements, were performed before SRT and at 1 month, 4 months and 12 months after stereotactic radiotherapy. Longitudinal differences were tested by using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Correlations were examined by using the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (r). RESULTS: Sixteen patients were analyzed in this study. During a median follow-up period of 26.6 months, grade 1 and 2 lung toxicity occurred in 11 patients and 1 patient, respectively. The mean Hounsfield units (HU) and standard deviation (SD) of the whole lung, as well as sialylated carbohydrate antigen KL-6 (KL-6) and surfactant protein-D (SP-D), peaked at 4 months after radiotherapy (p = 0.11, p<0.01, p = 0.04 and p<0.01, respectively). At 4 months, lung V20 Gy (%) and V40 Gy (%) were correlated with changes in SP-D, whereas changes in the mean HU of the lung were related to body mass index and lean body mass index (r = 0.54, p = 0.02; r = 0.57, p = 0.01; r = 0.69, p<0.01; and r = 0.69, p<0.01, respectively). The parameters of PFTs gradually declined over time. When regarding the change in PFTs from pretreatment to 12 months, lung V5 Gy (cc) showed significant correlations with diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), DLCO/alveolar volume and the relative change in DLCO (r = -0.72, p<0.01; r = -0.73, p<0.01; and r = -0.63, p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that some parameters peaked at 4 months, but PFTs were the lowest at 12 months. Significant correlations between lung V5 Gy (cc) and changes in DLCO and DLCO/alveolar volume were observed.

The efficacy profiles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy followed by durvalumab in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Purpose: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is currently used more commonly than 3-dimensional conformal radiation for definitive thoracic radiation. We examined the efficacy profiles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with IMRT after durvalumab became clinically available. Methods: We reviewed the clinical records of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with CCRT and IMRT at seven centers in Japan and investigated relapse and survival from May 2018 to December 2019. The primary endpoint of this report was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Among 107 patients enrolled in the study, 87 were sequentially administered durvalumab. From CCRT commencement, patients were followed up for a median period of 29.7 months. The median PFS at the end of the CCRT was 20.7 months. Among the 87 patients, 58 experienced disease relapses, of whom 36 (62.1 %) had distant metastases. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that a favorable response to CCRT, a radiation dose ≥ 62 Gy, and stage IIIA NSCLC were associated with prolonged PFS (all P = 0.04). Multivariate logistic regression by landmark analysis revealed that mortality risk factors were durvalumab treatment duration ≤ 11.7 months, a lower maximum grade of immune-related adverse events, FEV1 < 2805 mL, and radiation dose < 62 Gy (P = 0.01, 0.01, 0.03, and 0.04, respectively). Conclusions: In patients with NSCLC receiving CCRT using IMRT, long PFS was associated with a better response to CCRT, stage IIIA NSCLC, and an increased radiation dose. The duration of durvalumab consolidation also played an essential role in the survival of patients receiving CCRT with IMRT. (250 words).

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Lung Cancer with a Risk-Adapted Strategy Using the Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique: A Single Arm Phase II Study.

PURPOSE: A phase II study carried out to assess the efficacy of a risk-adapted strategy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for lung cancer. The primary endpoint was 3-year local recurrence, and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), rate of start of systemic therapy or best supportive care (SST-BSC), and toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients fulfilled the following criteria: performance status of 2 or less, forced expiratory volume in 1 s of 700 mL or more, and tumor not located in central or attached to the chest wall. Twenty-eight Gy was prescribed for primary lung cancers with diameters of 3 cm or less and 30 Gy was prescribed for primary lung cancers with diameters of 3.1-5.0 cm or solitary metastatic lung cancer diameters of 5 cm or less. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were analyzed. The patients included 7 patients with adenocarcinoma, 2 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, 1 patient with metastasis, and 11 patients with clinical diagnosis. The median tumor diameter was 1.9 cm. SRS was prescribed at 28 Gy for 18 tumors and 30 Gy for 3 tumors. During the median follow-up period of 38.9 months for survivors, 1 patient had local recurrence, 7 patients had regional or distant metastasis, and 5 patients died. The 3-year local recurrence, SST-BSC, DFS, and OS rates were 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3-22.2%), 20.1% (95% CI: 6.0-40.2%), 59.2% (95% CI: 34.4-77.3%), and 78.2% (95% CI: 51.4-91.3%), respectively. The 95% CI upper value of local recurrence was lower than the null local recurrence probability. There was no severe toxicity, and grade 2 radiation pneumonitis occurred in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received SRS for lung cancer had a low rate of 3-year local recurrence and tolerable toxicity.

Updated Analysis of NEJ009: Gefitinib-Alone Versus Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Mutated EGFR.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned coprimary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.In a randomized, open-label, phase III NEJ009 study, gefitinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with gefitinib-alone in patients with untreated non-small-cell lung cancer harboring mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor. Herein, we report the updated survival outcome and long-term tolerability. Patients were randomly assigned to gefitinib (gefitinib 250 mg orally, once daily) and gefitinib combined with carboplatin plus pemetrexed (GCP in a 3-week cycle for six cycles followed by concurrent gefitinib and pemetrexed maintenance) groups. At the data cutoff (May 22, 2020), GCP demonstrated significantly better PFS2 (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97; P = .027) than gefitinib. However, the updated median OS was 38.5 months (95% CI, 31.1 to 47.1) and 49.0 months (95% CI, 41.8 to 56.7) in the gefitinib and GCP groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.06; P = .127). The OS in both groups was similar for the overall patient population. No severe adverse events occurred since the first report. This updated analysis revealed that the GCP regimen improved PFS and PFS2 with an acceptable safety profile compared with gefitinib-alone. GCP is more efficient than gefitinib monotherapy as a first-line treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.

Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor With or Without Chemotherapy for Nonsquamous NSCLC With Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

Introduction: Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is associated with poor treatment outcome in patients with NSCLC receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). ICIs and chemotherapy (ICI/Chemo) combination therapy is currently the standard therapy for NSCLC, and some ICI/Chemo regimens for nonsquamous (non-Sq) NSCLC contain bevacizumab (BEV), which is effective for controlling MPE and may enhance immune response. This study aimed to determine the optimal first-line treatment for this clinical population. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients with non-Sq NSCLC with MPE who received ICI/Chemo or pembrolizumab monotherapy. Treatment outcomes were analyzed in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score more than or equal to 50% who were administered ICI/Chemo or pembrolizumab monotherapy (PD-L1 high cohort) and in patients with any PD-L1 status, treated with ICI/Chemo with or without BEV (ICI/Chemo cohort). We used propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce bias. Results: PD-L1 high and ICI/Chemo cohorts included 143 and 139 patients, respectively. In PD-L1 high cohort, 37 patients received ICI/Chemo. With PSM, the median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ICI/Chemo group than in the pembrolizumab group (11.1 versus 3.9 mo, respectively, p = 0.0409). In the ICI/Chemo cohort, 23 patients received BEV. With PSM, no significant difference occurred in median progression-free survival between BEV and non-BEV groups (6.1 versus 7.4 mo, p = 0.9610). Conclusion: ICI/Chemo seemed more effective than pembrolizumab monotherapy for patients with non-Sq NSCLC with MPE. Nevertheless, the synergistic effect of BEV with ICI/Chemo may be limited. Further studies are needed to clarify the key factor in the tumor-induced immunosuppression environment in these patients.

Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer prolonged distant metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival and overall survival in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, the effect of durvalumab and radiation pneumonitis (RP) on survival after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is not fully understood. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate factors related to distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after IMRT for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). METHODS: All patients who were treated with conventional fractionated IMRT for LA-NSCLC between April 2016 and March 2021 were eligible. Time-to-event data were assessed by using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used for prognostic factor analyses. Factors that emerged after the start of IMRT, such as durvalumab administration or the development of RP, were analysed as time-dependent covariates. RESULTS: A total of 68 consecutive patients treated with conventional fractionated IMRT for LA-NSCLC were analysed. Sixty-six patients completed radiotherapy, 50 patients received concurrent chemotherapy, and 36 patients received adjuvant durvalumab. During the median follow-up period of 14.3 months, 23 patients died, and tumour progression occurred in 37 patients, including 28 patients with distant metastases. The 1-year DMFS rate, PFS rate and OS rate were 59.9%, 48.7% and 84.2%, respectively. Grade 2 RP occurred in 16 patients, grade 3 in 6 patients and grade 5 in 1 patient. The 1-year cumulative incidences of grade 2 or higher RP and grade 3 or higher RP were 33.8% and 10.3%, respectively. The results of multivariate analyses showed that durvalumab had a significantly lower hazard ratio (HR) for DMFS, PFS and OS (HR 0.31, p < 0.01; HR 0.33, p < 0.01 and HR 0.32, p = 0.02), respectively. Grade 2 or higher RP showed significance for DMFS and a nonsignificant trend for OS (HR 2.28, p = 0.04 and HR 2.12, p = 0.13), respectively, whereas a higher percentage of lung volume receiving 20 Gy or higher was significant for PFS (HR 2.25, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, durvalumab administration following IMRT with concomitant chemotherapy showed a significant survival benefit. Reducing the risk of grade 2 or higher RP would also be beneficial.

Clinical efficacy of dacomitinib in rechallenge setting for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutant non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective analysis (TOPGAN2020-02).

BACKGROUND: Dacomitinib is the second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EGFR-TKIs are often re-administered in Japan after the disease progression prior EGFR-TKI. There is little evidence of dacomitinib in rechallenge setting. This study evaluated clinical outcomes of dacomitinib in rechallenge setting. METHODS: Patients who received dacomitinib for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC who had progressed after EGFR-TKI in nine institutions in Japan were included in the analyses. RESULTS: In total, 43 patients were analyzed. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-5.6). The overall survival (OS) was 10.5 months (95% CI, 7.4-not reached). The overall response rate was 25.5% (95% CI, 13.1-33.7). Subset analysis indicated that patients with EGFR exon 21 L858R showed longer PFS than those with EGFR exon 19 deletion (5.8 vs. 4.1 months) (p = 0.018). The most common adverse events leading to dose modification were diarrhea, paronychia, rash, and oral mucositis. CONCLUSION: In the real practice in Japan, dacomitinib showed a worthwhile treatment option for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation after failure of previous EGFR-TKI. The benefit was especially pronounced in patients with the exon 21 mutation.

Histologic transformation of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the incidence and clinical course of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung cancer with histologic transformation (HT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated lung cancer who received EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) between 2012 and 2019. The primary outcome was the incidence of HT. The secondary outcome was treatment efficacy in patients with HT. RESULTS: In total, 6356 patients were enrolled. In 2624 patients, the histological type was proven by rebiopsy after acquiring resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Among them, 74 patients had HT (incidence rate: 2.8% [95% confidence interval: 2.3%-3.5%]). The median progression-free survival after EGFR-TKIs and first-line therapy after confirming HT was 10.4 and 4.4 months, respectively, which was not significantly different between patients with transformation to high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma and those with transformation to another subtype of non-small cell lung cancer. Overall survival after confirming HT was 12.2 months. Twenty-seven patients received immune checkpoint inhibitors: 6 and 21 received immune checkpoint inhibitors before and after confirming HT, respectively. No patients achieved 1-year progression-free survival. The median progression-free survival after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy after confirming HT was 1.6 months. CONCLUSION: HT occurred in approximately 3% of EGFR-mutated patients who developed resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Cytotoxic agents are likely to be effective in patients with HT. However, the therapeutic effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors was limited in these patients. Given the rarity of HT and absence of prospective trials, our findings are important to inform the treatment of these patients.

Urine autotaxin levels reflect the disease activity of sarcoidosis.

Since the clinical outcome of patients with sarcoidosis is still unpredictable, a good prognostic biomarker is necessary. Autotaxin (ATX) and phosphatidylserine-specific phospholipase A1 (PS-PLA1) function as main enzymes to produce lysophospholipids (LPLs), and these enzymes are attracting attention as useful biomarkers for several chronic inflammatory diseases. Here, we investigated the relationships between LPLs-producing enzymes and the disease activity of sarcoidosis. In total, 157 patients with sarcoidosis (active state, 51%) were consecutively enrolled. Using plasma or urine specimens, we measured the values of LPLs-producing enzymes. Urine ATX (U-ATX) levels were significantly lower in the active state compared to those in the inactive state, while the plasma ATX (P-ATX) and PS-PLA1 levels showed no significant difference between these two states. Concerning the comparison with existing clinical biomarkers for sarcoidosis, U-ATX showed a weak negative correlation to ACE, P-ATX a weak positive correlation to both ACE and sIL-2R, and PS-PLA1 a weak positive one to sIL-2R. Notably, only the U-ATX levels inversely fluctuated depending on the status of disease activity whether OCS had been used or not. These findings suggest that U-ATX is likely to be a novel and useful molecule for assessing the disease activity of sarcoidosis.

Clinical Significance of Tumor Markers for Advanced Thymic Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis from the NEJ023 Study.

The optimal tumor marker for predicting the prognosis of advanced thymic carcinoma (ATC) remains unclear. We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of patients with ATC. A total of 286 patients were treated with chemotherapy. Clinicopathological information, including serum tumor markers, was evaluated to determine the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The carcinoembryonic antigen, cytokeratin-19 fragment, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen, progastrin-releasing peptide, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and alpha-fetoprotein levels were evaluated. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the OS was significantly shorter in the patients with elevated NSE levels than in those with normal NSE levels (median, 20.3 vs. 36.8 months; log-rank test p = 0.029; hazard ratio (HR), 1.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-2.31 (Cox proportional hazard model)); a similar tendency regarding the PFS was observed (median, 6.4 vs. 11.0 months; log-rank test p = 0.001; HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.31-3.18). No significant differences in the OS and PFS were observed among the other tumor markers. In both univariate and multivariate analyses of the patients with SCC only, the NSE level was associated with the OS and PFS. Thus, the NSE level may be a prognostic tumor marker for thymic carcinoma, regardless of histology.