Safety and feasibility of percutaneous abdominal lavage cytology screening (PACS) prior to surgical resection for pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, diagnostic yield, and technical aspects of percutaneous abdominal lavage cytology screening (PACS) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study included patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who underwent PACS before pancreatectomy between May 2022 and October 2023. The technical success rate, position of the drainage tube, volume of fluid administered, volume of fluid retrieved, fluid retrieval rate, and adverse events were evaluated. The cytological results of PACS were compared with those of surgical peritoneal lavage performed during pancreatectomy. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled in this study. The technical success rate for PACS was 100%. Drainage tube placement was outside the pouch of Douglas in all patients in the right-sided abdominal approach group (n = 10), whereas the placement was in the pouch of Douglas in all patients in the suprapubic approach group (n = 34). The mean volume of fluid administered, mean volume of fluid retrieved, and fluid retrieval rate were 185.0 ± 22.9 ml vs. 97.1 ± 32.0 ml (p < 0.001), 36.8 ± 25.6 ml vs. 50.5 ± 21.6 ml (p = 0.059), and 19.0 ± 12.4% vs. 54.9 ± 21.9% (p < 0.001) in the right abdominal approach and suprapubic approach groups, respectively. No adverse events were reported. The cytological results were benign in 42 patients; no discrepancy was observed in the results of surgical peritoneal lavage (n = 36). CONCLUSION: PACS is a feasible and safe procedure that can be performed before pancreatectomy in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. the suprapubic approach may be ideal and PACS could be a screening method to detect carcinomatous peritonitis.

Diagnostic performance of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for solid pancreatic lesions ≤10 mm.

Background and Objectives: EUS tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is the standard diagnostic method for solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs); however, there are few reports on EUS-TA results for SPLs ≤10 mm. Furthermore, given the recent advent of fine-needle biopsy, the current diagnostic accuracy of EUS-TA for SPLs ≤10 mm is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and efficacy of EUS-TA for SPLs ≤10 mm. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 109 patients with SPLs ≤10 mm who underwent EUS-TA. All patients underwent rapid on-site specimen evaluation. Results: The median tumor diameter was 8 mm (range, 2.5-10 mm), and the technical success rate was 99.1% (108/109). Adverse events were observed in 3 patients (2.8%). The diagnostic performance was as follows: sensitivity, 90.1% (64/71); specificity, 97.3% (36/37); accuracy, 92.6% (100/108); positive predictive value, 98.5% (64/65); and negative predictive value, 83.7% (36/43). Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of punctures (odds ratio, 7.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-37.5; P = 0.023) and tumor type (odds ratio, 11.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-102.0; P = 0.024) were independent risk factors for inaccurate EUS-TA results. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-TA for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was 87.5% (14/16). No EUS-TA-related needle-tract seeding was observed in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma during the observation period. Conclusions: EUS-TA for SPLs ≤10 mm showed adequate diagnostic accuracy and was safe for use with rapid on-site specimen evaluation in all cases.

Oligo-like liver metastasis: A novel prognostic indicator to improve survival in pancreatic cancer.

Purpose: Whether surgical intervention for patients with oligometastatic recurrence can improve their post-recurrent prognosis is unclear. In this study, we introduce a novel concept of oligometastasis in post-surgical pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with hepatic recurrence, which we call "oligo-like liver metastasis (OLLM)." Patients with OLLM have better post-recurrence prognosis and could therefore be eligible for surgical intervention. Methods: A total of 121 PDAC patients who underwent radical resection, and who had an initial and single-organ metastasis to the liver, were analyzed. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival after recurrence (OSAR) were examined, and patients with all of these factors were defined as OLLM. The clinicopathological features and post-recurrent prognosis of OLLM patients were evaluated. In addition, a detailed analysis using the oligo-score, which was based on the prognostic factors, was performed. Results: The prognostic analysis revealed that short recurrence-free interval (RFI) (<6 months), short stable disease interval (SDI) (≤3 months), and four or more recurrent tumors were independent poor prognostic factors. OLLM patients were defined as those with all three conditions: long RFI (≥6 months), long SDI (>3 months), and three or less recurrent tumors. OLLM patients had a significantly better prognosis for OSAR than non-OLLM patients (HR = 0.272, p < 0.001). Further analysis demonstrated that the OSAR of patients could be stratified using the oligo-score, which was calculated based on the prognostic factors. Conclusion: We recommend that OLLM should be used to predict which patients are most likely to experience better post-recurrent prognosis after surgery with curative intent.

Comparative analysis of liver resection in Non-B Non-C and hepatitis virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of non-hepatitis B and non-hepatitis C hepatocellular carcinoma (NBNC-HCC) is increasing in our country. This study assesses the feasibility of employing an identical surgical treatment strategy for resectable NBNC-HCC as that for hepatitis virus-associated HCC (HV-HCC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis (1993-2023) of 1321 curative liver resections for HCC at a single institution was performed. Propensity score matching ensured a balanced comparison of preoperative clinical factors, including tumor status and background liver condition. RESULTS: The proportion of NBNC-HCC cases has gradually increased, reaching up to 70 %. After matching, 294 of 473 NBNC-HCC patients and 294 of 848 HV-HCC patients were compared. Operative outcomes, including operation time, blood loss, type of surgical procedure, and morbidity, were comparable. Long-term outcome analysis showed similar recurrence-free survival (HR: 0.86, 95 % CI: 0.70-1.06, P = 0.167) and overall survival (HR: 0.98, 95 % CI: 0.79-1.23, P = 0.865) for NBNC-HCC. Multivariable analysis identified ICGR15 ≥ 15 %, ALBI grade 2 or 3, aspartate aminotransferase ≥40, tumor size > 5 cm, multiple tumors, macrovascular invasion, and microvascular invasion as independent prognostic factors for overall survival, while hepatitis B or C virus status lost significance. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increasing incidence of NBNC-HCC, comparable outcomes were achieved between the two groups of matched cohort.

Impact of Surgical Margin Status on Survival and Recurrence After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: Is Microscopic Residual Tumor (R1) Associated with Higher Rates of Local Recurrence?

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing macroscopically curative resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) have high recurrence rates and poor prognoses. This study aimed to investigate the impact of surgical margin status on survival and recurrence after resection of DCC, specifically focusing on microscopic residual tumor (R1) and its relationship to local recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for DCC between 2005 and 2021. Surgical margin was classified as R0, R1cis (positive bile duct margin with carcinoma in situ), and R1inv (positive bile duct margin with an invasive subepithelial component and/or positive radial margin). RESULTS: In total, 29 of 133 patients (21.8%) had R1cis and 23 (17.3%) R1inv. The 5-year overall survival (OS) for R0 (55.7%) did not differ significantly from that for R1cis/R1inv (47.4%/33.6%, respectively). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) for R0 was significantly longer than that for R1inv (50.1% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.003), whereas RFS did not differ significantly between those with R0 and R1cis. R1cis/R1inv status was not an independent predictor of OS and RFS in multivariate analysis. Cumulative incidence of isolated distant recurrence was significantly higher for R1cis/R1inv than for R0 (p = 0.0343/p = 0.0226, respectively), whereas surgical margin status was not significantly associated with rates of local or local plus distant recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical margin status does not significantly impact OS and RFS in patients undergoing PD for DCC following precise preoperative imaging evaluation. Additionally, R1 status is significantly linked to higher isolated distant recurrence rather than local recurrence, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary therapy.

A Recombinant Peptide Device Combined with Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells Enhances Subcutaneous Islet Engraftment.

Subcutaneous space has been considered an attractive site for islet graft transplantation; however, the oxygen tension and vascularization are insufficient for islet graft survival. We investigated whether subcutaneous pre-implantation of a recombinant peptide (RCP) device with adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCs) enhanced subcutaneous islet engraftment. RCP devices with/without syngeneic ADSCs were pre-implanted into the subcutaneous space of C57BL/6 mice. Syngeneic islets (300 or 120 islet equivalents (IEQs)) were transplanted into the pre-treated space after diabetes induction using streptozotocin. The cure rates of groups in which RCP devices were implanted four weeks before transplantation were significantly better than the intraportal transplantation group when 300 IEQs of islets were transplanted (p < 0.01). The blood glucose changes in the RCP+ADSCs-4w group was significantly ameliorated in comparison to the RCP-4w group when 120 IEQs of islets were transplanted (p < 0.01). Immunohistochemical analyses showed the collagen III expression in the islet capsule of the RCP+ADSCs-4w group was significantly enhanced in comparison to the RCP-4w and RCP+ADSCs-d10 groups (p < 0.01, p < 0.01). In addition, the number of von Willebrand factor-positive vessels within islets in the RCP+ADSCs-4w group was significantly higher than the RCP-4w group. These results suggest that using ADSCs in combination with an RCP device could enhance the restoration of the extracellular matrices, induce more efficient prevascularization within islets, and improve the graft function.

Pathological complete response of initially unresectable multiple liver metastases achieved using combined peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and somatostatin analogs following pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor resection: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) serves as a novel and effective treatment option for somatostatin receptor-positive unresectable liver metastases of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). However, there are few reported cases of surgical resection for initially unresectable liver metastases of PNET that were converted to resectable after PRRT. Here we report a case where PRRT and somatostatin analogs (SSAs) led to a pathological complete response of initially unresectable multiple liver metastases following PNET resection. CASE PRESENTATION: A 52-year-old man underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for PNET at age 40 and subsequent hepatectomies for resectable liver metastases at 44 and 47 years of age. At age 48, a follow-up examination revealed unresectable multiple liver metastases, and PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy was initiated. After four cycles of PRRT, most liver metastases diminished according to imaging studies, and the remaining two hepatic lesions continued to shrink with additional lanreotide. Conversion surgery for liver metastases was successfully performed, revealing no viable tumor cells in tissue specimens. Seventeen months after surgery, imaging showed no detectable residual tumor or recurrence. We present a review of the relevant literature that highlights the significance of our findings. CONCLUSIONS: This rare case highlights the pathological complete response of initially unresectable multiple liver metastases achieved by PRRT and SSAs following PNET resection, suggesting their potential as a multimodality treatment option for unresectable PNET.