RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infection due to multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae is a common cause of graft resection after small bowel transplantation. We report a failed case in which the intestinal graft was resected 18 days after the operation due to postoperative infection with multidrug-resistant K pneumoniae and a literature review of other common causes of small bowel transplantation failure have been reported. METHODS: A female, 29 years of age, underwent partial living small bowel transplantation for short bowel syndrome. After the operation, the patient was infected with multidrug-resistant K pneumoniae, even though various anti-infective regimens were employed. It further developed into sepsis and disseminated into intravascular coagulation, leading to exfoliation and necrosis of the intestinal mucosa. Finally, the intestinal graft had to be resected to save the patient's life. RESULTS: Multidrug-resistant K pneumoniae infection often affects the biological function of intestinal grafts and can even lead to necrosis. Other common causes of failure, including postoperative infection, rejection, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, graft-vs-host disease, surgical complications, and other related diseases, were also discussed throughout the literature review. CONCLUSIONS: Pathogenesis due to diverse and interrelated factors makes the survival of intestinal allografts a great challenge. Therefore, only by fully understanding and mastering the common causes of surgical failure can the success rate of small bowel transplantation be effectively improved.
Asunto(s)
Klebsiella pneumoniae , Síndrome del Intestino Corto , Humanos , Femenino , Receptores de Trasplantes , Intestinos/trasplante , Síndrome del Intestino Corto/cirugía , Necrosis , Rechazo de InjertoRESUMEN
Background: Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (Siewert II AEG) can be resected by the right thoracoabdominal surgical approach (RTA) or abdominal-transhiatal surgical approach (TH) under minimally invasive conditions. Although both surgical methods achieve complete tumor resection, there is a debate as to whether the former method is superior to or at least noninferior to the latter in terms of surgical safety. Currently, a small number of retrospective studies have compared the two surgical approaches, with inconclusive results. As such, a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial is necessary to validate the value of RTA (Ivor-Lewis) compared to TH. Methods: The planned study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Patients (n=212) with Siewert II AEG that could be resected by either of the above two surgical approaches will be included in this trial and randomized to the RTA group (n=106) or the TH group (n=106). The primary outcome will be 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary outcomes will include 5-year overall survival (OS), incidence of postoperative complications, postoperative mortality, local recurrence rate, number and location of removed lymph nodes, quality of life (QOL), surgical Apgar score, and duration of the operation. Follow-ups are scheduled every three months for the first 3 years after the surgery and every six months for the next 2 years. Discussion: Among Siewert II AEG patients with resectable tumors, this is the first prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing the surgical safety of minimally invasive RTA and TH. RTA is hypothesized to provide better digestive tract reconstruction and dissection of mediastinal lymph nodes while maintaining a high quality of life and good postoperative outcome. Moreover, this trial will provide a high level of evidence for the choice of surgical procedures for Siewert II AEG. Clinical trial registration: Chinese Ethics Committee of Registering Clinical Trials, identifier (ChiECRCT20210635); Clinical Trial.gov, identifier (NCT05356520).
RESUMEN
AIM: Gastric cancer (GC) has a high incidence and poor prognosis. Senescence genes are suggested to participate in immune cell infiltration, thus affecting the immunotherapy of GC. In this research, we established a senescence-related GC model to explore and verify the role of senescence genes in the prognosis, treatment, and tumor microenvironment (TME) of GC. METHODS: The TCGA GC (TCGA-STAD) dataset was used to screen key senescence genes from differentially expressed genes (DEGs). A prognostic risk model was trained utilizing the TCGA-STAD dataset and validated using an external GEO dataset. The CIBERSORT algorithm was run to explore the relationship between senescence genes and TME. The chemotherapy drug sensitivities in GC patients were calculated utilizing R package pRRophetic. RESULTS: A total of 37 senescence-related DEGs were obtained. Five key senescence-related genes were further screened to establish a senescence-related risk model based on Cox regression. The survival status of GC patients in the high-risk group was found to be worse than that in the low-risk group. According to the results of gene set enrichment analysis, the senescence-related risk was mainly associated with cytokine activity, immune mechanism, and related pathways. By analyzing the sensitivity of common chemotherapy drugs in GC patients, it was revealed that the sensitivities of high-risk patients to Dasatinib, Lapatinib, and Pazopanib were lower than those of low-risk patients. The CIBERSORT algorithm was executed to analyze the TME in the high-risk group, revealing elevated levels of CD8 T cells, Macrophages M2, and resting Mast cells. In addition, decreased levels of resting memory CD4 T cells , resting NK cells, activated Dendritic cells, and activated Mast cells were also observed. CONCLUSION: Senescence genes were related to the prognosis, response to chemotherapy drugs, and TME of GC. Our senescence-related risk model could forecast the survival of patients, their response to chemotherapy drugs, and the TME to a certain extent.
RESUMEN
Background: Total laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) for gastric cancer, especially with overlap esophagojejunostomy, has been verified that it has advantages of minimally invasion, less intraoperative bleeding, and faster recovery. Meanwhile, early oral feeding (EOF) after the operation has been demonstrated to significantly promote early rehabilitation in patients, particularly with distal gastrectomy. However, due to the limited application of TLTG, there is few related research proving whether it is credible or safe to adopt EOF after TLTG (overlap esophagojejunostomy). So, it is urgent to start a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trials to supply high level evidence. Methods/design: This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial with 200 patients (100 in each group). These eligible participants are randomly allocated into two different groups, including EOF group and delay oral feeding (DOF) group after TLTG (overlap esophagojejunostomy). Anastomotic leakage will be carefully observed and recorded as the primary endpoints; the period of the first defecation and exhaust, postoperative length of stay and hospitalization expenses will be recorded as secondary endpoints to ascertain the feasibility and safety of adopting EOF after TLTG (overlap esophagojejunostomy). Discussion: Recently, the adoption of TLTG was limited due to its difficult anastomotic procedure, especially in vivo esophagojejunostomy. With the innovation and improvement of operating techniques, overlap esophagojejunostomy with linear staplers simplified the anastomotic steps and reduced operational difficulties after TLTG. Meanwhile, EOF had received increasing attention from surgical clinicians as a nutrition part of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), which had shown better results in patients after distal gastrectomy. Considering the above factors, we implemented EOF protocol to evaluate the feasibility and safety of adopting EOF after TLTG (overlap esophagojejunostomy), which provided additional evidence for the development of clinical nutrition guidelines. Clinical trial registration: [www.chictr.org.cn], identifier [ChiECRCT20200440 and ChiCTR2000040692].
RESUMEN
Background: This research aimed to build an m6A-associated lncRNA prognostic model of esophageal cancer that can be used to predict outcome in esophageal cancer patients. Methods: RNA sequencing transcriptome data and clinical information about patients with esophageal cancer were obtained according to TCGA. Twenty-four m6A-associated genes were selected based on previous studies. m6A-associated lncRNAs were determined through Pearson correlation analysis. Three m6A-associated lncRNA prognostic signatures were built through analysis of the training set using univariate, LASSO, and multivariate Cox regression. To validate the stabilization of the risk signature, Kaplan-Meier and ROC curve analyses were performed on the testing and complete sets. The prognoses of EC patients were predicted quantitatively by building a nomogram. GSEA was conducted to analyze the underlying signaling pathways and biological processes. To identify the underlying mechanisms through which the lncRNAs act, we constructed a PPI network and a ceRNA network and conducted GO and KEGG pathway analyses. EC samples were evaluated using the ESTIMATE algorithm to compute stromal, immune, and estimate scores. The ssGSEA algorithm was used to quantitatively infer immune cell infiltration and immune functions. The TIDE algorithm was performed to simulate immune evasion and predict the response to immunotherapy. Results: We identified and validated an m6A-associated lncRNA risk model in EC that could correctly and reliably predict the OS of EC patients. The ceRNA network, PPI network, and GO and KEGG pathway analyses confirmed and the underlying mechanisms and functions provided enlightenment regarding therapeutic strategies for EC. Immunotherapy responses were better in the low-risk subgroup, and PD-1 and CTLA4 checkpoint immunotherapy benefited the patients in the low-risk subgroup. Conclusions: We constructed a new m6A-related lncRNA prognostic risk model of EC, based on three m6A-related lncRNAs: LINC01612, AC025166.1 and AC016876.2, that can predict the prognoses of EC patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , ARN Largo no Codificante , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Antígeno CTLA-4/genética , Antígeno CTLA-4/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Pronóstico , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/metabolismo , ARN Largo no Codificante/genética , Enfermedades Raras/genéticaRESUMEN
Background: Whether patients with advanced gastric cancer with unresectable synchronous liver metastases require surgical treatment remains a controversial topic among surgeons. Recently, an open-label multicenter, international RCT study show that compared with chemotherapy alone, gastric resection combined with chemotherapy had no survival advantage for advanced gastric cancer with unresectable synchronous liver metastases. A limitation of this study was that gastrectomy for gastric cancers was restricted to D1 lymphadenectomy and no metastatic lesions were removed. Whether D2 gastrectomy plus liver radiofrequency plus postoperative chemotherapy could provide benefits to these patients is worthy of further confirmation by high-level evidence-based medicine. Methods/Design: This study will investigate the efficacy of D2 gastrectomy plus liver radiofrequency plus postoperative chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone in a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that will enroll 200 patients who have advanced gastric cancer with unresectable synchronous liver metastases. The patients will be randomly divided into two groups: the test group (D2 gastrectomy plus liver radiofrequency plus postoperative chemotherapy, n=100) and the control group (chemotherapy alone, n=100). The patients' general information, past medical history, laboratory tests, imaging results, surgery details, and chemotherapy details will be recorded and analysed. The overall survival (OS) will be recorded as primary endpoints. Progression-free survival (PFS) and the total incidence of complications will be recorded as secondary endpoints. Discussion: This study is to establish a multicentre randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of D2 gastrectomy plus liver radiofrequency combined with postoperative chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, Approved No. of ethics committee:ChiECRCT20200331. Registered on 15 November 2020. Registration number:ChiCTR2000039964. The study has received full ethical and institutional approval. Advantages and Limitations of this Study: This is the first clinical trial that will provide evidence on the efficacy of D2 gastrectomy plus liver radiofrequency combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer with unresectable synchronous liver metastases. A prospective RCT with 200 patients who have advanced gastric cancer with unresectable synchronous liver metastases. Clinical Trial Registration: [https://www.chictr.org.cn/], identifier ChiCTR2000039964.