Obstetric Simulation Training and Teamwork: Immediate Impact on Knowledge, Teamwork, and Adherence to Hemorrhage Protocols.

INTRODUCTION: The Obstetric Simulation Training and Teamwork (OB-STaT) curriculum was an in situ interprofessional program to provide standardized postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) simulation training throughout a health system to decrease PPH morbidity. In this study portion, investigators hypothesized that OB-STaT would increase: (a) team member knowledge in diagnosis and management of PPH, (b) teamwork, (c) adherence to established PPH protocols, and (d) patient satisfaction. METHODS: The OB-STaT was implemented at 8 US Navy hospitals between February 2018 and November 2019. Participant PPH treatment and maternal/neonatal resuscitation pretraining/posttraining knowledge was assessed via an 11-item test, whereas teamwork and standardized patient assessment were rated using validated Likert-type scales: the 15-item Clinical Teamwork Scale and 3-item Patient Perception Score, with item ranges of 0 to 10 and 0 to 5, respectively. Local PPH protocol adherence was assessed using role-specific checklists, with a potential maximum of 14 points (anesthesia/nursing) or 22 points (obstetrics). RESULTS: Fifty-four interprofessional teams participated. Obstetricians (trainees and attendings) demonstrated significantly improved knowledge test scores (8.33 ± 1.6 vs. 8.66 ± 1.5, P < 0.01). Between the 2 scenarios, overall mean Clinical Teamwork Scale scores improved significantly for all interprofessional teams (5.82 ± 2.0 vs. 7.25 ± 1.9, P < 0.01). Anesthesia, nursing, and obstetric subteams demonstrated significant increases in protocol adherence as measured by critical action scores (12.28 ± 1.7 vs. 13.56 ± 1.0, 12.43 ± 1.6 vs. 13.14 ± 1.3, and 18.14 ± 2.7 vs. 19.56 ± 2.1 respectively, all P < 0.02). Although overall standardized patient satisfaction did not significantly improve, scores for feeling well informed did (3.36 ± 1.0 vs. 3.76 ± 0.8, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The OB-STaT curriculum modestly improved participants' teamwork, communication, and protocol adherence during simulated PPH scenarios; OB-STaT may decrease PPH morbidity.

Outcomes of Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in Patients With COVID-19: A Multinational Cohort Study.

Timing of tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 has attracted substantial attention. Initial guidelines recommended delaying or avoiding tracheostomy due to the potential for particle aerosolization and theoretical risk to providers. However, early tracheostomy could improve patient outcomes and alleviate resource shortages. This study compares outcomes in a diverse population of hospitalized COVID-19 patients who underwent tracheostomy either "early" (within 14 d of intubation) or "late" (more than 14 d after intubation). DESIGN: International multi-institute retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Thirteen hospitals in Bolivia, Brazil, Spain, and the United States. PATIENTS: Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 undergoing early or late tracheostomy between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 549 patients from 13 hospitals in four countries were included in the final analysis. Multivariable regression analysis showed that early tracheostomy was associated with a 12-day decrease in time on mechanical ventilation (95% CI, -16 to -8; p < 0.001). Further, ICU and hospital lengths of stay in patients undergoing early tracheostomy were 15 days (95% CI, -23 to -9 d; p < 0.001) and 22 days (95% CI, -31 to -12 d) shorter, respectively. In contrast, early tracheostomy patients experienced lower risk-adjusted survival at 30-day post-admission (hazard ratio, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.8-5.2). Differences in 90-day post-admission survival were not identified. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 patients undergoing tracheostomy within 14 days of intubation have reduced ventilator dependence as well as reduced lengths of stay. However, early tracheostomy patients experienced lower 30-day survival. Future efforts should identify patients most likely to benefit from early tracheostomy while accounting for location-specific capacity.