Retrospective Data Analysis of Patients With Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma With or Without KRAS-Mutation or TTF1-Expression.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with lung adenocarcinoma not expressing TTF1 and those with a KRAS mutation have worse prognosis. However, available data are limited and sometimes contradictory. Therefore, this retrospective cohort analysis aimed to clarify whether there was a difference in overall survival and progression-free survival between these groups of patients. METHODS: In total, data derived from 181 patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated at the Martha-Maria Halle-Dölau Hospital from 2016 to 2019 were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated, and associated values, such as median survival and its confidence intervals, were determined using the log-rank test. RESULTS: A benefit in overall survival (OS) (8.4 vs 5.8 months; HR, .8; 95% CI, .53-1.19; P = .267) was associated with positive TTF1 expression, but this was not statistically significant. The same trend was shown with the progressive free survival (PFS) (6.5 vs 4.6 months; HR, .76; 95% CI, .51-1.20; P = .162). In patients with a KRAS mutation, there was no difference in OS compared to those with a wildtype KRAS. The median survival was almost identical at 7.5 months (KRAS mutation, 95% CI, 3.32-11.74) and 7.0 months (KRAS wildtype, 95% CI, 3.59-10.41). Additionally, in PFS, there was no difference between the 2 groups (5.8 vs 6.3 months). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis did not show a worse prognosis in patients with a KRAS mutation or in those with missing TTF1 expression, which is most likely related to the new therapeutic options. As a result of the administration of immunotherapy in patients with a KRAS mutation and the change from a regimen containing pemetrexed to a regimen containing no pemetrexed, the corresponding patients no longer seem to have a worse prognosis.

[30- and 90-day Lethality in Patients with Stage IV Lung Cancer Depending on the Primary Therapy]. / 30- und 90-Tage-Letalität bei Patienten mit Lungenkarzinom im Stadium IV in Abhängigkeit der Primärtherapie.

Early lethality after initiation of therapy in patients with stage IV lung cancer has rarely been the focus of scientific studies yet. The little time remaining between diagnosis, start of therapy and onset of death, as well as any influencing factors, are of special interest for both, patients and physician. Accordingly, the aim of this work was to analyze the 30- and 90-day morbidity after initiation of systemic therapy and to determine possible factors influencing early lethality. For this purpose, the data of 225 patients with stage IV lung cancer and treatment at the Martha-Maria Halle-Dölau Lung Cancer Center between 01/01/2017 and 05/18/2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Forms of therapy and patient characteristics were analyzed with a frequency distribution and the probability of survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The analysis of the early morbidity of all tumor-specifically treated patients showed a morbidity of 8.5 % at day 30 after the start of therapy and a rate of 23.5 % after 90 days. In a direct comparison of the different therapy groups, the patients receiving mono-checkpointinhibition had higher lethality (16.6 % after 30 days and 44.3 % after 90 days). In contrast, the morbidity of patients in the other therapy groups remained below 10 % after 30 days and below 23.3 % after 90 days. A poor general condition, an advanced tumor disease, polymetastasis and a positive history of smoking could be determined as predictors for higher early lethality. In contrast, there was no relevant difference in morbidity between the different tumor entities, gender, PD-L1 and mutation status. With this analysis, very high early lethality, comparable to other studies, could be detected in patients with lung cancer. Relevant differences between the forms of therapy illustrate the importance of individual patient selection for the respective therapy options and the rapid decision to initiate therapy.

Hepatic arterial vasodilation is independent of portal hypertension in early stages of cirrhosis.

INTRODUCTION: The compensatory increase in hepatic arterial flow with a decrease in portal venous flow is known as the hepatic arterial buffer response. In cirrhosis with elevated portal pressure, the vascular resistance of the hepatic artery is decreased. Whether this lower resistance of the hepatic artery is a consequence of portal hypertension or not remains unknown. STUDY AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate the hepatic arterial resistance and response to vasoconstriction in cirrhosis without portal hypertension (normal portal resistance). METHODS: Cirrhosis was induced by CCl4-inhalation for 8 weeks (8W, normal portal resistance) and for 12-14 weeks (12W, elevated portal resistance). Bivascular liver perfusion was performed at 8W or 12W and dose response curves of methoxamine were obtained in the presence or absence of LNMMA (nitric oxide synthase blocker). Vascular resistances of the hepatic artery (HAR), portal vein (PVR) and sinusoids (SVR) were measured. Western Blot (WB) and Immunohistochemistry (IHC) were done to measure eNOS and HIF 1a expression. RESULTS: HAR in both groups of cirrhotic animals (8W and 12W) were lower compared to controls. Dose response curves to methoxamine revealed lower HAR in both cirrhotic models (8W and 12W) regardless the magnitude of portal resistance. LNMMA corrected the dose response curves in cirrhosis (8W and 12W) to control. WB and IHC show increased protein expression of eNOS and HIF1a in 8W and 12W. CONCLUSION: Hepatic arterial resistance is decreased in cirrhosis independent of portal resistance. Vasodilation of the hepatic artery in cirrhosis seems to be influenced by hypoxia rather than increase in portal resistance. Nitric oxide is the main vasodilator.